Sex and age differences and outcomes in acute coronary syndromes.

BACKGROUND: There is conflicting information about sex differences in presentation, treatment, and outcome after acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in the era of reperfusion therapy and percutaneous coronary intervention. The aim of this study was to examine presentation, acute therapy, and outcomes of men and women with ACS with special emphasis on their relationship with younger age (≤65years). METHODS: From January 2010 to June 2015, we enrolled 5140 patients from 3 primary PCI capable hospitals. Patients were registered according to the International Survey of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Transitional Countries (ISACS-TC) registry protocol (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01218776). The primary outcome was the incidence of in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: The study population was constituted by 2876 patients younger than 65years and 2294 patients older. Women were older than men in both the young (56.2±6.6 vs. 54.1±7.4) and old (74.9±6.4 vs. 73.6±6.0) age groups. There were 3421 (66.2%) patients with ST elevation ACS (STE-ACS) and 1719 (33.8%) patients without ST elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS). In STE-ACS, the percentage of patients who failed to receive reperfusion was higher in women than in men either in the young (21.7% vs. 15.8%) than in the elderly (35.2% vs. 29.6%). There was a significant higher mortality in women in the younger age group (age-adjusted OR 1.52, 95% CI: 1.01-2.29), but there was no sex difference in the older group (age-adjusted OR 1.10, 95% CI: 0.87-1.41). Significantly sex differences in mortality were not seen in NSTE-ACS patients. CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital mortality from ACS is not different between older men and women. A higher short-term mortality can be seen only in women with STEMI and age of 65 or less.

Predictive value of biphasic response during dipyridamole echocardiography test in the low-risk group of patients after acute myocardial infarction.

To investigate whether biphasic response during dipyridamole echocardiography test (DET), which represents viable but potentially ischemic myocardium in the infarcted region, affects prognosis of patients after uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction, we performed high-dose DET in 80 consecutive patients younger than 65 years with first acute myocardial infarction and preserved left ventricular function. Patients were followed up for 27 +/- 12 months for new coronary events. According to DET results all patients were classified into 4 groups: group 1 consisted of 20 patients with biphasic response; group 2 included 14 patients with sustained improvement in regional contractility; group 3 consisted of 24 patients showing no change in contractility; and group 4 included 22 patients with worsening response. Cumulative survival free of total coronary events was significantly lower in group 1 patients compared with all other groups (P < .05). By multivariate Cox analysis biphasic response was the strongest independent predictor of stable angina pectoris (odds ratio = 12.1, P = .0002), followed by hyperlipoproteinemia (odds ratio = 5.9, P = .006). On the other hand, development of acute coronary syndromes could not have been predicted by actual clinical or DET parameters.

Effects of glucose-insulin-potassium infusion on ST-elevation myocardial infarction in patients treated with thrombolytic therapy.

The role of glucose-insulin-potassium (GIK) infusion in the management of acute myocardial infarction is not well established. This prospective, randomized study comprised 120 patients who had ST-elevation myocardial infarction that was treated within 12 hours from symptom onset with a high dose of GIK (25% glucose, 50 IU of soluble insulin per liter, and 80 mmol of potassium chloride per liter at 1 ml/kg/hour over 24 hours) as adjunct to thrombolytic therapy (1.5 MU of streptokinase/30 to 60 minutes; GIK group) or thrombolytic therapy alone (control group). The primary end point of the study was the rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) at 1 month, defined as a composite of cardiac death, reinfarction, serious arrhythmias (ventricular fibrillation and/or tachycardia), and severe heart failure. The secondary end points were the rate of MACEs at 1 year and improvement in left ventricular systolic function. The incidence of MACEs at 1 month was significantly lower in the GIK group (10% vs 32.5%, relative risk 0.24, 95% confidence interval 0.09 to 0.63, p = 0.0043). Patients in the GIK group had significant decreases in ventricular tachycardia and/or fibrillation (1.3% vs 15.0%, p = 0.003) and severe heart failure (3% vs 12.5%, p = 0.031). The rate of MACEs at 1 year was also significantly lower in the GIK group (13% vs 40.0%, relative risk 0.22, 95% confidence interval 0.09 to 0.55, p = 0.0012). After 1 year, there was a significant improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction in the GIK group (from 48 +/- 8% to 51 +/- 10%, p <0.01), which was not observed in the control group. In conclusion, high-dose GIK, used as an adjunct to thrombolytic therapy, was safe and improved clinical outcome at 1 month. The beneficial effect of GIK infusion was maintained up to 1 year.