Use of Radiofrequency Ablation for the Management of Headache: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Headache is a very common condition that affects 5-9% of men and 12-25% of women in North America and Europe. Globally, the prevalence of active headaches among adults is 47%. The most common type of headache is tension headaches (38% of adults), followed by migraines (10%), and chronic headaches (3%). While the majority of headaches are benign, the disorder can severely negatively influence a patients' quality of life, which is directly reflected in societal costs. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review was to summarize available evidence behind radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for headache, including pain outcome measures, secondary outcomes, and complications. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. SETTING: This systematic review examined studies that applied the use of RFA for management of headache. METHODS: This systematic review was reported following the guidelines outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA). Two reviewers independently scored the methodological quality of the selected studies. Due to heterogeneity of studies, a best-evidence synthesis of the available prognostic factors was provided. RESULTS: In the present investigation, we evaluated 18 studies composed of 6 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 6 prospective studies, and 6 retrospective studies. All the studies assessed pain improvement with RFA in patients with headache. Most studies targeted the occipital nerve for treatment. Complications were mostly mild and self-limiting, including eyelid swelling, rash, superficial infection of the procedural site, and worsening of headache. LIMITATIONS: A large variability in definitions of trigeminal neuralgia, radiofrequency technique, and patient selection bias was observed in our selected cohort of studies. In addition, there is a paucity of strong longitudinal RCTs and prospective studies. CONCLUSION: Our review discusses several studies that suggest the efficacy of RFA in the treatment of headaches. Outcomes varied based on the difference in approaches regarding continuous radiofrequency versus pulsed radiofrequency, temperature, and duration of administration. The majority of the studies discussed in this review indicate a therapeutic benefit of RFA for headaches over a short-term period. Pain outcomes beyond one year are understudied and further studies are needed to determine the long-term effects of RFA for headaches.

Interventional Approaches to Pain and Spasticity Related to Cerebral Palsy.

Purpose of Review: This review will cover seminal and emerging evidence on interventional therapy chronic pain in cerebral palsy (CP). It will cover the background and burden of disease, present the current options, and then weigh the evidence that is available to support interventional therapy and the current indications. Recent Findings: CP is a permanent posture and movement disorder from in-utero brain development defects with a 3-4/1,000 incidence in the US. The cost of care for each child is estimated at $921,000. Pain in CP is attributed to musculoskeletal deformities, spasticity, increased muscle tone, dislocations, and GI dysfunction. First-line treatments include physical and occupational therapy and oral pharmacological agents; however, a significant amount of patients remain refractory to these and require further therapy. Injection therapy includes botulinum toxin A (BTA) injections and intrathecal baclofen. BTA injections were shown to control chronic pain effectively and are FDA approved for spastic pain; intra-thecal baclofen, in contrast, was only shown to improve comfort and quality of life with a focus on the pain. Surgical intervention includes selection dorsal rhizotomy (SDR). It may increase range of motion and quality of life and reduce spasticity and pain; however, most evidence is anecdotal, and more research is required. Summary: Interventional therapy, including injection and surgical, is the last line of therapy for chronic pain in CP. It extends the possibility of therapy in hard-to-treat individuals; however, more data is required to provide strong evidence to the efficacy of these treatments and guide proper patient selection.

Long-term neuropsychological effects of opioid use in children: a descriptive literature review.

BACKGROUND: Use of opioids in the management of pain and its consequences in children presents a substantial challenge. A significant concern in pediatric pain management is the long-term neuropsychological consequences of opioids. OBJECTIVES: The authors aim to provide a descriptive review of the current literature surrounding the neuropsychological impact of opioid use in children, along with possible extrapolations from their use in adults and animal models. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review of published literature. SETTING: Various universities in the United States. METHODS: The electronic review for papers published between January 1992 and December 2012 was conducted using Medline/Pubmed, PsychInfo, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library database, and Google Scholar. RESULTS: Findings assessing pediatric pain patients treated with opioids demonstrated no significant differences in intelligence, behavior, vocabulary, or motor skills. One study reported a decrease in a visuo-constructional ability, which measured higher order executive function. Studies from prenatal illicit opioid exposure found poorer performance on measures of language, verbal ability, mathematics, reading, impulse control, and school readiness skills. The literature from adult prescribed opioid users has mixed results. Some showed impairment in the neuropsychological domains of memory, decision-making, attention, concentration, information processing, psychomotor speed, visual special skills, and hand-eye coordination, while others found no differences or revealed improved perceptual-cognitive status, possibly due to the removal of pain as a stressor. LIMITATIONS: Very few studies looked into the long term neuropsychological and cognitive effects of the opioids in pediatric population. In an attempt to extrapolate from other groups, this review also included literature from adult patients, prenatal opioid exposure, and animal studies. CONCLUSION: Opioid medications have the potential to produce long-lasting neuropsychological side effects. However, given the negative consequences of untreated pain, the potential benefit may offset their risk. More studies are needed to clarify this complex interaction.