Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Type of study
Language
Publication year range
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37226436

ABSTRACT

Current forms of payment of independent physicians in U.S. health care may incentivize more care (fee-for-service) or less care (capitation), be inequitable across specialties (resource-based relative value scale [RBRVS]), and distract from clinical care (value-based payments [VBP]). Alternative systems should be considered as part of health care financing reform. We propose a "Fee-for-Time" approach that would pay independent physicians using an hourly rate based on years of necessary training applied to time for service delivery and documentation. RBRVS overvalues procedures and undervalues cognitive services. VBP shifts insurance risk onto physicians, introducing incentives to game performance metrics and to avoid potentially expensive patients. The administrative requirements of current payment methods introduce large administrative costs and undermine physician motivation and morale. We describe a Fee-for-Time payment scenario. A combination of single-payer financing and payment of independent physicians using the Fee-for-Time proposal would be simpler, more objective, incentive-neutral, fairer, less easily gamed, and less expensive to administer than any system with physician payment based on fee-for-service using RBRVS and VBP.


Subject(s)
Physicians , Relative Value Scales , Humans , Fee-for-Service Plans , Health Care Reform , Costs and Cost Analysis
3.
Hawaii Med J ; 69(12): 294-7, 2010 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21225582

ABSTRACT

This article introduces a promising new health care financing proposal for physician payment called Balanced Choice. It summarizes the implications of health care economics and current well-publicized health care reform proposals, each of which is problematic for physicians and their patients. The Balanced Choice proposal is for an integrated two-tier national system, which has an economically efficient universal plan similar to single-payer, but with an option for enhanced services using market forces at the doctor-patient level to manage care. The two tiers are linked together and balanced so that each complements and enhances the other. Balanced Choice solves the problems of other proposals in a way that would work well for doctors and for patients, and represents a fresh and uniquely American solution to the problem of health care financing.


Subject(s)
Health Care Reform/organization & administration , Insurance, Health, Reimbursement/economics , National Health Programs/organization & administration , Health Care Reform/economics , Health Expenditures , Humans , National Health Programs/economics , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...