Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Am J Cardiol ; 103(12): 1657-62, 2009 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19539072

ABSTRACT

Several definitions have been used to assess rates of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Whether the definition influences observed rates of CIN is unclear. The Oxilan Registry was the first-ever prospective analysis of the efficacy and safety of ioxilan (low-osmolar and low-viscosity contrast medium), including rates of CIN assessed by multiple definitions, in PCI. From July 2006 to June 2007, consecutive patients undergoing PCI using ioxilan were enrolled. Serum creatinine (SCr) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were assessed at baseline and 3 to 5 days after PCI. CIN was defined as SCr increase >or=0.5 mg/dl, eGFR decrease >or=25%, SCr increase >or=25%, or the composite. Of 400 patients (age 62 +/- 11 years), 19% were women, 37% were diabetic, 22% were anemic, and 8% had a history of congestive heart failure. Baseline SCr was 1.12 +/- 0.3 mg/dl and 24% had an eGFR <60 ml/min. CIN rates were 3.3% (SCr increase >or=0.5 mg/dl), 7.6% (eGFR decrease >or=25%), 10.2% (SCr increase >or=25%), and 10.5% (composite). Hospitalization was prolonged in 3.4% of patients with CIN and none required dialysis. There were no deaths or severe allergic reactions. Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization each occurred in 0.8%. In conclusion, in this unselected population undergoing PCI, CIN ranged in frequency from 3.3% to 10.5% depending on the definition used and was not associated with in-hospital mortality or substantial morbidity, such as dialysis. The wide variation in CIN and its lack of association with adverse outcomes underscore the need for a standardized, clinically relevant definition.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/methods , Contrast Media/adverse effects , Coronary Angiography/methods , Coronary Disease/diagnostic imaging , Iohexol/analogs & derivatives , Kidney Diseases/epidemiology , Coronary Angiography/adverse effects , Coronary Disease/mortality , Coronary Disease/therapy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Iohexol/adverse effects , Kidney Diseases/chemically induced , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Rate , United States/epidemiology
3.
Am J Cardiol ; 96(5): 659-63, 2005 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16125490

ABSTRACT

Sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) reduce restenosis compared with bare metal stents. Safety issues with drug-eluting stents are particularly important given concerns of possible increased thrombogenicity. Compared with heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, the direct thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin has been shown to reduce the risk of hemorrhagic complications in patients receiving bare metal stents, with similar efficacy in preventing ischemic complications. The safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with SESs and bivalirudin anticoagulation have not been prospectively studied. This prospective study performed at 9 United States hospitals evaluated 1,182 patients referred for PCI with SESs in whom the procedural anticoagulant was bivalirudin. Clopidogrel was administered before PCI in 79% of patients, and only 5.3% received procedural glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. At 30 days, major adverse cardiac events occurred in 7.1% of patients, including 0.3% mortality, 4.4% myocardial infarction (defined as creatine kinase-MB >3x normal), 1.7% target vessel revascularization, and 0.6% stent thrombosis. Major bleeding occurred in only 0.8% of patients. Thus, use of bivalirudin as the procedural anticoagulant to support SES implantation in a "real world" population of patients undergoing PCI results in low rates of major adverse cardiac events, stent thrombosis, and major bleeding.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/instrumentation , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Coated Materials, Biocompatible , Coronary Disease/therapy , Peptide Fragments/therapeutic use , Stents , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/mortality , Coronary Restenosis/mortality , Coronary Restenosis/prevention & control , Follow-Up Studies , Hirudins , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Recombinant Proteins/therapeutic use , Risk Factors , Safety , Sirolimus/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology
4.
Circulation ; 109(16): 1948-54, 2004 Apr 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15078794

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel, a microtubule-stabilizing compound with potent antitumor activity, has been shown to inhibit smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration. The DELIVER trial was a prospective, randomized, blinded, multicenter clinical evaluation of the non-polymer-based paclitaxel-coated ACHIEVE stent compared with the stainless steel Multi-Link (ML) PENTA stent. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 1043 patients with focal de novo coronary lesions, <25 mm in length, in 2.5- to 4.0-mm vessels were randomized (ACHIEVE n=524; ML PENTA n=519). Angiographic follow-up was performed in a subset of 442 patients (ACHIEVE n=228; ML PENTA n=214). Prespecified end points were a 40% reduction in target-vessel failure at 9 months (primary clinical end point) and a 50% reduction in binary restenosis at 8 months (major secondary end point). Baseline clinical characteristics were comparable between the groups. Patients in ACHIEVE had more type C lesions and a larger reference diameter. At follow-up, stent late loss was 0.81 versus 0.98 mm (P=0.003), stent binary restenosis was 14.9% versus 20.6% (P=0.076), and target-vessel failure was 11.9% versus 14.5% (P=0.12) for ACHIEVE and ML PENTA, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The ACHIEVE paclitaxel-coated stent decreased neointimal proliferation compared with the bare-metal PENTA stent; however, this reduction was insufficient to meet the prespecified primary end point of target-vessel failure and the secondary end point of binary restenosis.


Subject(s)
Coronary Restenosis/prevention & control , Coronary Stenosis/therapy , Paclitaxel/administration & dosage , Stents , Combined Modality Therapy , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Restenosis/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Restenosis/epidemiology , Coronary Stenosis/diagnosis , Drug Delivery Systems , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Paclitaxel/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL