Effect of polypharmacy on the outcomes of older patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors: A retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: The effect of polypharmacy on older patients with cancer is unclear. This study aimed to explore the effect of polypharmacy on the outcomes of treatment in older patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of older patients (aged ≥65 years) with advanced NSCLC who received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with or without platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment from March 2016 to December 2020. Patients with driver oncogenes or Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) ≥2 were excluded. Polypharmacy was defined as receiving five or more oral or inhaled medications at baseline. We compared the progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and mean cumulative length of hospital stays between the polypharmacy and non-polypharmacy groups. RESULTS: A total of 122 patients, with a median age of 72 years (range, 65-89 years), were included in the analysis. Of the patients, 34 (27.8%) had a PS of 0 and 68 (55.7%) had a PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) of ≥50%. The median number of oral or inhaled medications was 4 (range, 0-12), and 60 (49.1%) patients were taking ≥5 medications (polypharmacy). Age and Charlson Comorbidity Index score were significantly higher in the polypharmacy group (P = 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively). Compared with the non-polypharmacy group, the polypharmacy group had a similar median PFS (6.7 vs. 8.5 months, P = 0.94) and a shorter median OS (17.3 vs. 26.0 months, P = 0.04). In the polypharmacy group, the adjusted hazard ratio for OS (adjusted for age, PS, and PD-L1 TPS) was 1.65 (95% confidence interval, 1.04-2.86, P = 0.03). Patients in the polypharmacy group had longer hospital stays (46.3 ± 7.5 vs. 27.7 ± 4.1 days/person, P < 0.05) and more emergency hospitalizations (1.6 ± 0.3 vs. 0.8 ± 0.1 times/person, P < 0.05) during the first year. DISCUSSION: Polypharmacy was associated with shorter survival time and longer hospitalization in older patients with advanced NSCLC receiving first-line immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy.

Exploring the relationship between anorexia and therapeutic efficacy in advanced lung cancer treatment: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced anorexia is a common occurrence in patients undergoing treatment for advanced lung cancer. However, the relationship between chemotherapy-induced anorexia and weight loss during platinum-based chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors is unclear. This study explored the relationship between chemotherapy-induced anorexia and therapeutic outcomes in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer undergoing platinum-based chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors. METHODS: The study retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 106 patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors between January 2019 and October 2022. The incidence of weight loss and its association with treatment efficacy was assessed in the chemotherapy-induced anorexia group. Chemotherapy-induced anorexia, nausea, and vomiting were evaluated using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 5.0. Progression-free and overall survival were used to measure treatment efficacy. RESULTS: Chemotherapy-induced anorexia was observed in 13.2% of patients. These patients exhibited significant weight loss at 6 and 9 weeks after treatment initiation compared to those in the non-chemotherapy-induced anorexia group. Progression-free and overall survival were shorter in the chemotherapy-induced anorexia group than in the non-chemotherapy-induced anorexia group, but the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Chemotherapy-induced anorexia was associated with significant weight loss and reduced treatment efficacy in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer. These results highlight the importance of implementing robust supportive care for chemotherapy-induced anorexia to mitigate weight loss and uphold treatment effectiveness during platinum-based chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Suitability of frozen cell pellets from cytology specimens for the Amoy 9-in-1 assay in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The AmoyDx Pan lung cancer PCR panel (AmoyDx PLC panel) has been approved as a companion diagnostic tool for multiple anticancer agents in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the suitability of cytology specimens as samples for the AmoyDx PLC panel remains unclear. We evaluated the performance of frozen cell pellets from cytology specimens (FCPs) in the Amoy 9-in-1 assay, a preapproval assay of the AmoyDx PLC panel. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data of NSCLC patients enrolled in LC-SCRUM-Asia from the Shizuoka Cancer Center between September 2019 and May 2021. RESULTS: A total of 49 cases submitted FCPs for evaluation of oncogenic driver alterations and were assessed using Amoy 9-in-1 and next-generation sequencing (NGS) assays. The success rates of DNA and RNA analyses using the Amoy 9-in-1 were both 100%, compared with 86% and 45%, respectively, using NGS assays. Oncogenic driver alterations were detected in 27 (55%) and 23 (47%) patients using Amoy 9-in-1 and NGS, respectively. No inconsistent results were observed among 19 cases in which both assays showed successful detection. In the remaining 30 cases, 10 had inconsistent results: nine oncogenic driver alterations (3 MET, 2 ALK, 2 ROS1, and 2 KRAS) were detectable only in Amoy 9-in-1, and one epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation was detectable only in NGS. CONCLUSION: FCPs can be successfully used in the AmoyDx PLC panel, with higher success rate compared with the NGS assay. The AmoyDx PLC panel may be an option in cases when insufficient tissue sample is available for the NGS assay.

Efficacy of second-line chemotherapy in patients with pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma.

The efficacy of second-line chemotherapy in patients with pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of second-line chemotherapy in patients with pulmonary LCNEC. We retrospectively reviewed patients with pulmonary LCNEC or possible LCNEC (pLCNEC) who received platinum-based chemotherapy as the first-line treatment. Among these patients, we evaluated the efficacy of second-line treatment by comparing patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC group). Of the 61 patients with LCNEC or pLCNEC (LCNEC group) who received first-line chemotherapy, 39 patients were treated with second-line chemotherapy. Among the 39 patients, 61.5% received amrubicin monotherapy. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the LCNEC groups were 3.3 and 8.3 months, respectively. No significant differences in the PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.924, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.647-1.320; P = 0.664) and OS (HR: 0.926; 95% CI 0.648-1.321; P = 0.670) were observed between the LCNEC and SCLC groups. In patients treated with amrubicin, the PFS (P = 0.964) and OS (P = 0.544) were not different between both the groups. Second-line chemotherapy, including amrubicin, may be considered as a treatment option for patients with pulmonary LCNEC.

Relationship between patterns of immunohistochemical conventional neuroendocrine markers and efficacy of immune check point inhibitors in patients with extensive disease small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Which patients benefit from the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains unclear. There have been few reports on the efficacy of ICIs based on conventional immunohistochemical neuroendocrine (NE) markers (synaptophysin, chromogranin A, and neural cell adhesion molecule [NCAM]). In the present study, we aimed to analyze the relationship between the expression of immunohistochemical NE markers and the efficacy of ICIs in patients with extensive disease (ED)-SCLC, to assess whether conventional NE markers are predictive of ICIs. METHODS: Patients with untreated ED-SCLC who received first-line therapy at the Shizuoka Cancer Center between November 2002 and July 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. We evaluated the efficacy of first-line chemotherapy according to the expression status of each immunohistochemical NE marker in patients treated with ICI plus chemotherapy (ICI-chemo group) and with chemotherapy alone (chemo group). RESULTS: A total of 227 patients were included in the ICI-chemo and chemo groups, respectively. The progression-free survival (PFS) tended to be better in patients in the ICI-chemo group than those treated with chemotherapy alone in patients with NE marker-positive SCLC. In particular, it was statistically significant in patients with chromogranin A-positive SCLC (p = 0.036). In patients with NE marker-negative SCLC, no significant differences were observed in PFS between the two groups. There were no significant differences in overall survival (OS), regardless of the expression of any conventional NE marker. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that the efficacy of ICIs in addition to chemotherapy may be poor in patients with NE marker-negative SCLC.

Concordance of ALK fusion gene-rearrangement between immunohistochemistry and next-generation sequencing.

BACKGROUND: Although various companion diagnostic tests of ALK fusion gene-rearrangement are approved, few reports have assessed the concordance of ALK fusion gene-rearrangement in two companion diagnostic tests: next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing and immunohistochemistry (IHC). METHODS: The samples evaluated for gene alterations using NGS testing between May 2019 and November 2021 were included in this study. The inclusion criteria were as follows: samples were diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer; the results of the NGS analysis were informative; and samples had residual specimens for IHC. We performed IHC on the residual specimens and retrospectively collected sample characteristics from medical records. RESULTS: A total of 185 samples were analyzed using NGS. Twenty-six samples were excluded because of failure to analyze gene alterations using NGS, no residual samples, and inadequate IHC. We analyzed 159 samples. The major histological type was adenocarcinoma (115 samples). The number of surgical and transbronchial lung biopsy specimens was 59 and 56, respectively. ALK fusion gene-rearrangement was detected in four samples using NGS, and five were detected using IHC. The sensitivity and specificity of IHC referred to by NGS were 75.0% and 98.7%, respectively. The concordance rate between IHC and NGS was 98.1%. ALK rearrangement was detected in two patients using IHC but not using NGS. In addition, ALK rearrangement was detected in one patient using NGS but not using IHC. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that IHC and NGS might be complementary tests. In patients suspected of harboring ALK fusion gene-rearrangement, it should be analyzed using another diagnostic method.

Safety and efficacy of amrubicin with primary prophylactic pegfilgrastim as second-line chemotherapy in patients with small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Amrubicin (AMR) regimens have shown efficacy as second-line treatment in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC); however, adverse events such as febrile neutropenia (FN) sometimes preclude their use. Further, the safety and efficacy of AMR with primary prophylactic pegfilgrastim (P-PEG) have not been sufficiently evaluated. In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of AMR with or without P-PEG as second-line chemotherapy for SCLC. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with SCLC who received AMR as second-line chemotherapy at Shizuoka Cancer Center, between December 2014 and November 2021. Based on presence/absence of P-PEG in their regimen, patients (n = 60) were divided into P-PEG (n = 21) and non-P-PEG groups, and their clinical outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Median of AMR treatment cycles was five (range: 1-39 cycles) in P-PEG group and four (range: 1-15 cycles) in non-P-PEG group. The incidence of FN (4.8% vs. 30.8%; p = 0.02) and AMR dose reduction because of adverse events (4.8% vs. 25.6%; p = 0.08) were lower in the P-PEG group than in the non-P-PEG group. The objective response rates were 52.4% and 30.8%, and median progression-free and overall survival were 4.7 and 3.0 months, and 9.6 and 6.8 months, in the P-PEG and non-P-PEG groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: AMR with P-PEG as second-line chemotherapy for SCLC reduced the incidence of FN at a maintained AMR dose intensity and was associated with favorable tumor responses and survival outcomes. P-PEG should be considered for patients treated with AMR for SCLC including refractory relapsed SCLC.

Continuous vs. Fixed 2-year Duration Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment of Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Single Institution Database Analysis.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: The proper duration of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear. Previously, sponsor-initiated clinical trials have more often used either a maximum 2-year fixed duration of ICI treatment or continuous treatment until documented disease progression. The study aimed to evaluate the association between ICI treatment duration (2-year fixed or continuous) and prognosis in patients with advanced NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The medical records of 425 patients with NSCLC who received ICI before August 31, 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: No differences in time to treatment failure > 24 months (TTF-24) were detected between patients who underwent ICI treatment for > 2 years and patients who stopped ICI treatment at 2 years. Treatment-related adverse events tended to be higher in the patients with ICI treatment > 2 years. CONCLUSION: ICI treatment > 2 years did not significantly prolong the TTF compared with ICI treatment = 2 years, but it did increase the incidence of treatment-related adverse events.

Study Design and Rationale for Marble Study: A Phase II Trial of Atezolizumab (MPDL3280A) Plus Carboplatin and Paclitaxel in Patients With Advanced or Recurrent Thymic Carcinoma (JTD2101).

BACKGROUND: Thymic carcinoma (TC) is a rare thymic epithelial tumor, and advanced or recurrent TC has limited prognosis. Treatment for chemotherapy-naïve, advanced, or recurrent TC remains unchanged with the combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel; therefore, a new treatment strategy is warranted. Immune checkpoint blockades inhibiting the programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) pathway (PD-1 and its ligand, PD-L1) have shown potential as a monotherapy for TC, although the efficacy of monotherapy was moderate for previously treated TC. We hypothesized that the combination of an anti-PD-L1 antibody, atezolizumab, with carboplatin and paclitaxel, would be effective in inducing immunogenic cell death in patients with advanced or recurrent TC. METHODS: We initiated a multicenter, single-arm, open-label phase II study of atezolizumab combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel for metastatic or recurrent TC. Eligible patients will receive atezolizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel every 3 weeks for up to 6 cycles, followed by atezolizumab every 3 weeks for up to 2 years until progression or unacceptable toxicity. A total of 47 patients will be enrolled in this study, with a 24-month enrollment period and 12-month follow-up. The primary endpoint is the objective response rate (ORR), based on an independent central review. The secondary endpoints are the investigator-assessed ORR, disease control rate, progression-free survival, duration of response, overall survival, and safety. RESULTS: This study aims to establish the safety and efficacy of atezolizumab combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced or recurrent TC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT), jRCT2031220144. Registered on June 18, 2022, https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCT2031220144.

CALML5 is a novel diagnostic marker for differentiating thymic squamous cell carcinoma from type B3 thymoma.

BACKGROUND: Thymic squamous cell carcinoma and type B3 thymoma are primary neoplasms of the anterior mediastinum that are sometimes difficult to differentiate from one another histologically. However, only a few immunohistochemical markers are available for the differential diagnosis. The purpose of this study was to discover a novel marker for differentiating between thymic squamous cell carcinoma and type B3 thymoma. METHODS: We used histological samples of thymic carcinomas (n = 26) and type B3 thymomas (n = 38) which were resected between 1986 and 2017. To search for candidates of differential markers, gene expression levels were evaluated in samples using promoter analysis by cap analysis of gene expression (CAGE) sequencing. RESULTS: Promoter level expression of CALML5 genes was significantly higher in thymic carcinomas than in type B3 thymomas. We further validated the results of the CAGE analysis in all 26 thymic carcinomas and 38 type B3 thymomas by immunohistochemistry (IHC). CALML5 was strongly expressed in the cytoplasm in 19 of 26 cases with thymic carcinoma, whereas positivity at the protein level was shown in two of 38 type B3 thymomas. Thus, the sensitivity (73.1%) and specificity (94.7%) of CALML5 as markers for immunohistochemical diagnosis of thymic carcinoma were extremely high. CONCLUSION: We identified CALML5 as a potential marker for differentiating thymic squamous cell carcinoma from type B3 thymoma. It is assumed that future clinical use of CALML5 may improve the diagnostic accuracy of differentiating between these two diseases.

Validation of the initial brain metastasis velocity in non-small cell lung cancer at a single cancer center.

PURPOSE: The initial brain metastasis velocity (iBMV) was recently reported as a survival predictor after brain metastases (BM) in patients treated by stereotactic radiosurgery. In this study, we validated whether iBMV is a prognostic tool, regardless of treatment modality, in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with metachronous BM. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive 3,792 new lung cancer cases in which no BM was found on magnetic resonance (MR) screening between February 2014 and December 2019, and enrolled 176 NSCLC patients with subsequent BM. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of MR to identify the time from BM to death. RESULTS: The median iBMV score was 1.9. We used an iBMV score of 2.0 as the cutoff level, as previously reported. An iBMV score ≥ 2.0 was significantly associated with older age, high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and Stage IV (P = 0.04, 0.02, and 0.02, respectively). The median OS was 0.92 years. The median OS for patients with iBMV score ≥ 2.0 and < 2.0 were 0.59 years and 1.33 years, respectively (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that an iBMV score ≥ 2.0, ECOG performance status score of 1-3, Stage IV, and non-adenocarcinoma histology were independent poor prognostic factors (hazard ratio (HR), 1.94; P = 0.0001; HR, 1.53; P = 0.04; HR, 1.45; P = 0.04; and HR, 1.14; P = 0.03, respectively). Patients with iBMV scores of < 2.0 were more likely to undergo craniotomy or stereotactic irradiation. CONCLUSIONS: An iBMV score ≥ 2.0 is an independent predictor of survival in NSCLC patients with metachronous BM, regardless of the treatment modality.

Phase 2 study of osimertinib in combination with platinum and pemetrexed in patients with previously untreated EGFR-mutated advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: The OPAL Study.

BACKGROUND: This multicenter phase 2 trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of osimertinib and platinum-based chemotherapy (OPP) in patients with previously untreated EGFR-mutated advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received osimertinib 80 mg once daily (QD), with either cisplatin 75 mg/m2 (arm A) or carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC] = 5; arm B), plus pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 for four cycles and maintenance therapy of osimertinib 80 mg QD with pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. The primary end-points were safety and objective response rate (ORR), and the secondary end-points were complete response rate (CRR), disease control rate (DCR), and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: In total, 67 patients (34 in arm A and 33 in arm B) were enrolled between July 2019 and February 2020. At the data cutoff (28th February 2022), 35 (52.2%) patients had discontinued the protocol treatment, including 10 (14.9%) due to adverse events. No treatment-related deaths occurred. In the full analysis set, the ORR, CRR, and DCR were 90.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 84.0-97.8), 3.0% (0.0-7.2), and 97.0% (92.8-100.0), respectively. Based on updated survival data (data cutoff on August 31, 2022, median follow-up time: 33.4 months), the median PFS was 31.0 months (95% CI, 26.8 months-not reached) and median overall survival was not reached. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to show that OPP has excellent efficacy with acceptable toxicity in previously untreated EGFR-mutated advanced non-squamous NSCLC patients.

Incidence and Treatment Outcome of Radiation Pneumonitis in Patients With Limited-stage Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Concurrent Accelerated Hyperfractionated Radiation Therapy and Chemotherapy.

Purpose: This study aimed to clarify the characteristics of and evaluate the risk factors for radiation pneumonitis (RP) induced by chemoradiation therapy (CRT) using accelerated hyperfractionated (AHF) radiation therapy (RT) in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC). Methods and Materials: Between September 2002 and February 2018, 125 patients with LS-SCLC were treated with early concurrent CRT using AHF-RT. Chemotherapy was comprised of carboplatin/cisplatin with etoposide. RT was administered twice daily (45 Gy/30 fractions). We collected data regarding onset and treatment outcomes for RP, and analyzed the relationship between RP and total lung dose-volume histogram findings. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed to assess patient- and treatment-related factors for grade ≥2 RP. Results: The median age of patients was 65 years, and 73.6% of participants were men. In addition, 20% and 80.0% of participants presented with disease stage II and III, respectively. The median follow-up time was 73.1 months. Grades 1, 2, and 3 RP were observed in 69, 17, and 12 patients, respectively. Grades 4 to 5 RP were not observed. RP was treated with corticosteroids in patients with grade ≥2 RP, without recurrence. The median time from initiation of RT to onset of RP was 147 days. Three patients developed RP within 59 days, 6 within 60 to 89 days, 16 within 90 to 119 days, 29 within 120 to 149 days, 24 within 150 to 179 days, and 20 within ≥180 days. Among the dose-volume histogram parameters, the percentage of lung volume receiving >30 Gy (V30) was most strongly related to the incidence of grade ≥2 RP, and the optimal threshold to predict RP incidence was V30 ≥20%. On multivariate analysis, V30 ≥20% was an independent risk factor for grade ≥2 RP. Conclusions: The incidence of grade ≥2 RP correlated strongly with a V30 of ≥20%. Contrarily, the onset of RP induced by concurrent CRT using AHF-RT may occur later. RP is manageable in patients with LS-SCLC.

Efficacy and safety of carboplatin and etoposide in older extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer patients with a poor performance status.

Carboplatin plus etoposide is a standard treatment for older extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) patients with performance status (PS) 2. However, older patients often exhibit poor PS (3, 4), and the treatment effect in them is poorly understood. To determine the therapeutic efficacy and safety of carboplatin plus etoposide therapy for this population, we retrospectively analyzed 63 patients with ES-SCLC with PS ≥2, aged ≥71 years, who had received first-line carboplatin plus etoposide therapy. We compared the treatment efficacy and safety in patients with baseline PS 2 versus those with PS 3-4. In the PS 2 (38 patients) and PS ≥3 (25 patients) groups, the overall response rate was 71.1% and 72.0%, median progression-free survival was 4.6 and 3.1 months, and overall survival was 7.7 and 5.1 months, respectively. PS improved to 0-1 post-treatment in 65.8% and 48.0% of the patients in the PS 2 and PS ≥3 groups, respectively. Patients with PS ≥3 showing improved PS had a progression-free survival of 6.1 months. A higher incidence of grade ≥3 decreased neutrophil counts, febrile neutropenia, and treatment-related death was observed in the PS ≥3 group. The progression-free survival of patients administered prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was 5.2 and 6.1 months in the PS2 and PS ≥3 groups. Overall, carboplatin plus etoposide therapy provided comparable tumor shrinkage, but shorter progression-free and overall survival in older ES-SCLC patients with PS ≥3 than in those with PS 2. Thus, supportive care, such as prophylactic G-CSF administration, may be necessary to ensure safety and survival.

Clinical impact of tumour burden on the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand (PD-L1) inhibitors plus chemotherapy (ICI + Chemo) is the standard treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the impact of tumour burden on the efficacy of ICI + Chemo remains unknown. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 92 patients with advanced NSCLC treated with ICI + Chemo. Tumour burden was assessed as the sum of the longest diameter of the target lesion (BSLD) and number of metastatic lesions (BNMLs). We categorised the patients into three groups based on the combined BSLD and BNML values. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients (74%) had progressive disease or died. Forty-four patients (48%) in the low-BSLD group had a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 9.5 months, whereas patients in the high-BSLD group had a median PFS of 4.6 months (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.54, p = 0012). Twenty-five patients (27%) in the low-BNML group had a median PFS of 9.6 months, whereas patients in the high-BNML group had a median PFS of 6.5 months (HR = 0.51, p = 0.029). Low-BSLD and low-BNML were associated independently with improved PFS in multivariate analysis. Analysis of the tumour burden combined with BSLD and BNML revealed a trend towards improved PFS as the tumour burden decreased, with median PFS of 22.3, 8.7, and 3.9 months in the low- (N = 13), medium- (N = 42) and high-burden (N = 37) groups respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrated that a high tumour burden negatively impacts the efficacy of ICI + Chemo in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Clinical characteristics of adrenal insufficiency induced by pembrolizumab in non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have significantly improved the clinical outcomes of many cancer types, but they induce a range of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Although adrenal insufficiency (AI) is a rare irAE, it can lead to serious consequences. This study aimed to determine the clinical features of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who developed AI following pembrolizumab treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed and analyzed the clinical data of all patients with NSCLC treated with pembrolizumab at Juntendo University Hospital from February 2017 to December 2020. The diagnosis of AI was established based on the Endocrine Emergency Guidance for the acute management of endocrine complications of checkpoint inhibitor therapy in the UK and the clinical practice guidelines of the Japan Endocrine Society. RESULT: AI was clinically suspected in 59 out of 186 patients treated with pembrolizumab, and 10 (5.4%) cases were confirmed. The symptoms included hyponatremia (n = 9), fatigue (n = 8), and loss of appetite (n = 6). All patients had low adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) levels, and five patients were diagnosed with isolated ACTH deficiency. All patients completely recovered with corticosteroid replacement. The median time to onset of AI was 8.0 (range 3.8-15.2) months. The median progression-free survival in these patients was 22.4 (95% confidence interval 11.2-not reached) months. CONCLUSION: The incidence of AI among patients treated with pembrolizumab is more frequent than previously reported. In addition, secondary AI, especially isolated ACTH deficiency, is a major form of AI induced by pembrolizumab.

Association between the efficacy and immune-related adverse events of pembrolizumab and chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The combination of immune-checkpoint inhibitors with chemotherapy has become the standard of treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, the association between therapeutic efficacy and the development of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) remains unclear in patients treated with combination therapy. We aimed to investigate the frequency of irAEs, and the association between therapeutic efficacy and the development of irAEs in patients with NSCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively surveyed patients with chemo-naïve advanced NSCLC who received pembrolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy or pembrolizumab monotherapy at Juntendo University Hospital, Japan, between February 2017 and May 2021. RESULTS: Among 148 patients (median [range] age, 68 (33-85) years; 107 men [72.3%] and 41 women [27.7%]), 74 each received pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy and pembrolizumab monotherapy. IrAEs were observed in 46 (62.2%) and 41 patients (55.4%) in the combination therapy and monotherapy group, respectively. Patients with irAEs showed significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) than those without irAEs in the combination therapy group (8.9 vs. 5.7 months; Hazard Ratio [HR], 0.53; 95% CI, 0.29-0.98; P = 0.041) and monotherapy group (11.7 vs. 5.0 months; HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.22-0.70; P = 0.001). In the multivariable analysis, development of irAEs was positively associated with PFS in both the groups (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.26-0.89; P = 0.019 and HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.21-0.68; P < 0.01). In the inverse probability of treatment weighting adjusted analysis, development of irAEs was significantly associated with combination therapy (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.34-0.91; P = 0.019). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that the incidence of irAEs was associated with favorable efficacy in patients treated with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy, as well as pembrolizumab monotherapy. Also, the addition of chemotherapy to pembrolizumab significantly increased the incidence of irAEs.

Updated Analysis of NEJ009: Gefitinib-Alone Versus Gefitinib Plus Chemotherapy for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Mutated EGFR.

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned coprimary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.In a randomized, open-label, phase III NEJ009 study, gefitinib plus chemotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with gefitinib-alone in patients with untreated non-small-cell lung cancer harboring mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor. Herein, we report the updated survival outcome and long-term tolerability. Patients were randomly assigned to gefitinib (gefitinib 250 mg orally, once daily) and gefitinib combined with carboplatin plus pemetrexed (GCP in a 3-week cycle for six cycles followed by concurrent gefitinib and pemetrexed maintenance) groups. At the data cutoff (May 22, 2020), GCP demonstrated significantly better PFS2 (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.97; P = .027) than gefitinib. However, the updated median OS was 38.5 months (95% CI, 31.1 to 47.1) and 49.0 months (95% CI, 41.8 to 56.7) in the gefitinib and GCP groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.06; P = .127). The OS in both groups was similar for the overall patient population. No severe adverse events occurred since the first report. This updated analysis revealed that the GCP regimen improved PFS and PFS2 with an acceptable safety profile compared with gefitinib-alone. GCP is more efficient than gefitinib monotherapy as a first-line treatment for non-small-cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor mutations.

Predicting the efficacy of first-line immunotherapy by combining cancer cachexia and tumor burden in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Cancer cachexia and tumor burden predict efficacies of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors and chemotherapy or pembrolizumab in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). There are no predictive models that simultaneously assess cancer cachexia and tumor burden. METHODS: In the present retrospective study, we reviewed the medical records of patients with advanced NSCLC who received cancer immunotherapy as first-line systemic therapy. Clinical immune predictive scores were defined according to multivariate analysis of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 157 patients were included in the present study (75 treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors + chemotherapy; 82, pembrolizumab monotherapy). Multivariate analysis for PFS revealed that PD-L1 tumor proportion scores <50%, a total target lesion diameter ≥76 mm, and cancer cachexia were independently associated with poor PFS. Multivariate analysis for OS revealed that ≥4 metastases and cancer cachexia were significantly associated with poor OS. In the immune predictive model, the median PFS was 21.7 months in the low-risk group (N = 41); 7.6 in the medium-risk group (N = 64); and 3.0 in the high-risk group (N = 47). The median OS were not reached, 22.4 and 9.1 months respectively. Our immune predictive model was significantly associated with PFS (p < 0.001) and OS (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: We proposed the immune predictive model, including tumor burden and cancer cachexia, which may predict the efficacy and survival outcome of first-line immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC.

Impact of losing adipose tissue on outcomes from PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Adipose tissue induces inflammation, which desensitizes the efficacy of immunotherapy. However, several reports show that the therapeutic effect of programed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor(s) monotherapy is significantly better in obese patients. Therefore, the effect of adipose tissue on immunotherapy is unclear. METHODS: In this study, we retrospectively reviewed patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy between May 2016 and December 2018. We classified patients into total adipose tissue maintenance or loss groups according to adipose tissue change during the 6 months before treatment and compared the therapeutic effect of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors between these groups along with the presence or absence of cachexia, a poor prognostic factor. RESULTS: Of the 74 patients, 40 (54.1%) were cachexic. Among cachexic patients, we found no clear difference in the overall response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) between the total adipose tissue maintenance and loss group. However, among noncachexic patients, the total adipose tissue loss group had a higher ORR (64.7% vs. 23.5%, p < 0.05) and longer PFS (18.5 months vs. 2.86 months, p = 0.037) than the maintenance group. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that decreasing adipose tissue without cachexia might favor the therapeutic effects of immunotherapy.