ABSTRACT
The global pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is having a tremendous impact on the global economy, health care systems and the lives of almost all people in the world. The Central European country of Slovakia reached one of the highest daily mortality rates per 100,000 inhabitants in the first 3 months of 2021, despite implementing strong prophylactic measures, lockdowns and repeated nationwide antigen testing. The present study reports a comparison of the performance of the Standard Q COVID-19 antigen test (SD Biosensor) with three commercial RT-qPCR kits (vDetect COVID-19-MultiplexDX, gb SARS-CoV-2 Multiplex-GENERI BIOTECH Ltd. and Genvinset COVID-19 [E]-BDR Diagnostics) in the detection of infected individuals among employees of the Martin University Hospital in Slovakia. Health care providers, such as doctors and nurses, are classified as "critical infrastructure", and there is no doubt about the huge impact that incorrect results could have on patients. Out of 1231 samples, 14 were evaluated as positive for SARS-CoV-2 antigen presence, and all of them were confirmed by RT-qPCR kit 1 and kit 2. As another 26 samples had a signal in the E gene, these 40 samples were re-isolated and subsequently re-analysed using the three kits, which detected the virus in 22, 23 and 12 cases, respectively. The results point to a divergence not only between antigen and RT-qPCR tests, but also within the "gold standard" RT-qPCR testing. Performance analysis of the diagnostic antigen test showed the positive predictive value (PPV) to be 100% and negative predictive value (NPV) to be 98.10%, indicating that 1.90% of individuals with a negative result were, in fact, positive. If these data are extrapolated to the national level, where the mean daily number of antigen tests was 250,000 in April 2021, it points to over 4700 people per day being misinterpreted and posing a risk of virus shedding. While mean Ct values of the samples that were both antigen and RT-qPCR positive were about 20 (kit 1: 20.47 and 20.16 for Sarbeco E and RdRP, kit 2: 19.37 and 19.99 for Sarbeco E and RdRP and kit 3: 17.47 for ORF1b/RdRP), mean Ct values of the samples that were antigen-negative but RT-qPCR-positive were about 30 (kit 1: 30.67 and 30.00 for Sarbeco E and RdRP, kit 2: 29.86 and 31.01 for Sarbeco E and RdRP and kit 3: 27.47 for ORF1b/RdRP). It confirms the advantage of antigen test in detecting the most infectious individuals with a higher viral load. However, the reporting of Ct values is still a matter of ongoing debates and should not be conducted without normalisation to standardised controls of known concentration.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Communicable Disease Control , Europe , Hospitals , Humans , Sensitivity and Specificity , Slovakia/epidemiologyABSTRACT
We aimed to characterize Clostridioides difficile isolates cultured during a six-month single-center study from stool samples of patients with C. difficile infection (CDI) genotyped by the Xpert®C. difficile/Epi assay by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) ribotyping, toxin genes' detection and multi-locus variable number tandem repeats analysis (MLVA). The susceptibility to metronidazole, vancomycin and moxifloxacin was determined by agar dilution. In addition, the presence of Thr82Ile in the GyrA and a single nucleotide deletion at position (Δ117) in the tcdC gene were investigated. Between January 1 and June 30, 2016, of 114 CDIs, 75 cases were genotyped as presumptive PCR ribotype (RT) 027 infections using a commercial assay. C. difficile isolates cultured from presumptive RT027 stool samples belonged to RT176. These isolates carried genes for toxin A (tcdA), B (tcdB), binary (cdtA/B) and had Δ117 in the tcdC gene. Using MLVA, the 71/75 isolates clustered into two clonal complexes (CCs). Of these, 39 isolates (54.9%) were from patients hospitalized in acute care and 32 isolates (45.1%) were isolated from patients hospitalized in the long-term care department. All isolates were susceptible to metronidazole and vancomycin, and 105 isolates were resistant to moxifloxacin (92%) carrying Thr83Ile in the GyrA. An outbreak of RT176 CDIs, suspected as RT027, was recognized in a Slovakian hospital. In order to monitor the emergence and spread of RT027-variants, the identification of a presumptive RT027 CDI should be confirmed at a strain level by PCR ribotyping.
ABSTRACT
AIM: To obtain standardized epidemiological data for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in Slovakia. METHODS: Between October and December 2016, 36 hospitals in Slovakia used the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) surveillance protocol. RESULTS: The overall mean CDI incidence density was 2.8 (95% confidence interval 1.9-3.9) cases per 10 000 patient-days. Of 332 CDI cases, 273 (84.9%) were healthcare-associated, 45 (15.1%) were community-associated, and 14 (4.2%) were cases of recurrent CDI. A complicated course of CDI was reported in 14.8% of cases (n=51). CDI outcome data were available for 95.5% of cases (n=317). Of the 35 patients (11.1%) who died, 34 did so within 30 days after their CDI diagnosis. Of the 78 isolates obtained from 12 hospitals, 46 belonged to PCR ribotype 001 (59.0%; 11 hospitals) and 23 belonged to ribotype 176 (29.5%; six hospitals). A total of 73 isolates (93.6%) showed reduced susceptibility to moxifloxacin (ribotypes 001 and 176; p< 0.01). A reduced susceptibility to metronidazole was observed in 13 isolates that subsequently proved to be metronidazole-susceptible when, after thawing, they were retested using the agar dilution method. No reduced susceptibility to vancomycin was found. CONCLUSIONS: These results show the emergence of C. difficile ribotypes 027 and 176 with a predominance of ribotype 001 in Slovakia in 2016. Given that an almost homogeneous reduced susceptibility to moxifloxacin was detected in C. difficile isolates, this stresses the importance of reducing fluoroquinolone prescriptions in Slovak healthcare settings.
