Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 11: 1419058, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39086938

ABSTRACT

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the use of radiomics features and clinical information by four machine learning algorithms for predicting the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who have been treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). Methods: A total of 105 patients with HCC treated with TACE from 2002 to 2012 were enrolled retrospectively and randomly divided into two cohorts for training (n = 74) and validation (n = 31) according to a ratio of 7:3. The Spearman rank, random forest, and univariate Cox regression were used to select the optimal radiomics features. Univariate Cox regression was used to select clinical features. Four machine learning algorithms were used to develop the models: random survival forest, eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), gradient boosting, and the Cox proportional hazard regression model. The area under the curve (AUC) and C-index were devoted to assessing the performance of the models in predicting HCC prognosis. Results: A total of 1,834 radiomics features were extracted from the computed tomography images of each patient. The clinical risk factors for HCC prognosis were age at diagnosis, TNM stage, and metastasis, which were analyzed using univariate Cox regression. In various models, the efficacy of the combined models generally surpassed that of the radiomics and clinical models. Among four machine learning algorithms, XGBoost exhibited the best performance in combined models, achieving an AUC of 0.979 in the training set and 0.750 in the testing set, demonstrating its strong prognostic prediction capability. Conclusion: The superior performance of the XGBoost-based combined model underscores its potential as a powerful tool for enhancing the precision of prognostic assessments for patients with HCC.

2.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 11: 1413990, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38841579

ABSTRACT

Objective: This research aims to develop and assess the performance of interpretable machine learning models for diagnosing three histological subtypes of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) utilizing CT imaging data. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 317 patients diagnosed with NSCLC was included in the study. These individuals were randomly segregated into two groups: a training set comprising 222 patients and a validation set with 95 patients, adhering to a 7:3 ratio. A comprehensive extraction yielded 1,834 radiomic features. For feature selection, statistical methodologies such as the Mann-Whitney U test, Spearman's rank correlation, and one-way logistic regression were employed. To address data imbalance, the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) was utilized. The study designed three distinct models to predict adenocarcinoma (ADC), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and large cell carcinoma (LCC). Six different classifiers, namely Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, Decision Tree, Random Forest, eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), and LightGBM, were deployed for model training. Model performance was gauged through accuracy metrics and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC). To interpret the diagnostic process, the Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) approach was applied. Results: For the ADC, SCC, and LCC groups, 9, 12, and 8 key radiomic features were selected, respectively. In terms of model performance, the XGB model demonstrated superior performance in predicting SCC and LCC, with AUC values of 0.789 and 0.848, respectively. For ADC prediction, the Random Forest model excelled, showcasing an AUC of 0.748. Conclusion: The constructed machine learning models, leveraging CT imaging, exhibited robust predictive capabilities for SCC, LCC, and ADC subtypes of NSCLC. These interpretable models serve as substantial support for clinical decision-making processes.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL