Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 300: 196-201, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39025040

ABSTRACT

The mechanisms underlying pain in cases of endometriosis or chronic pelvic pain are complex, often involving various types of pain; mainly nociceptive pain, central sensitization, and neuropathic pain. Our main objective was to examine the prevalence of neuropathic pain in women with symptomatic endometriosis, and secondary, to explore the factors associated with this type of pain and to assess the prevalence of a positive PPSC score and a history of sexual violence within this population. This study is a retrospective, comparative, single-center cohort study conducted from September 2019 to January 2023. The presence of neuropathic pain was confirmed by a positive DN4 score, defined as greater than or equal to 4. The association with the following variables was studied: age, BMI, marital status, smoking, alcohol and drugs consumption, age at menarche, gestity, parity, duration of exposure to endometriosis, MRI locations, laparoscopy for endometriosis and post-laparoscopy r-ASRM classification, hormone treatment, associated symptoms, VAS, associated pathologies, infertility consultation, Pain Center consultation, EPH-5 score, positive PPSC score (≥5), and history of sexual violence. The prevalence of neuropathic pain was 44.1%. Younger age, being in a relationship, having a high EPH-5 score and undergoing laparoscopy for endometriosis are associated with neuropathic pain independently of other variables. Our study underscores the persistent high prevalence of neuropathic pain in endometriosis cases, emphasizing the importance of actively screening for it. Identifying neuropathic pain could prompt referrals to pain specialists, integrating it into a comprehensive multidisciplinary approach.


Subject(s)
Endometriosis , Neuralgia , Humans , Female , Endometriosis/complications , Endometriosis/epidemiology , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Prevalence , Neuralgia/epidemiology , Neuralgia/etiology , Pain Measurement , Pelvic Pain/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Sex Offenses/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
2.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod ; 52(7): 102621, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37301478

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Safety of the uterine manipulator (UM) within endometrial cancer (EC) surgery is being questioned. Its use might be one of the issues for potential tumor dissemination during the procedure, especially in the case of uterine perforation (UP). No prospective data on this surgical complication, nor on the oncological consequences exist. The aim of this study was to assess the rate of UP while using UM when performing surgery for EC and the impact of UP on the choice of adjuvant treatment. METHODS: We conducted a prospective single-center cohort study from November 2018 to February 2022, considering all EC cases surgically treated by a minimally invasive approach with the help of a UM. Demographic, preoperative, postoperative and adjuvant treatment corresponding to the included patients were collected and comparatively analyzed according to the absence or presence of a UP. RESULTS: Of the 82 patients included in the study, 9 UPs (11%) occurred during surgery. There was no significant difference in demographics and disease characteristics at diagnosis that may have induced UP. The type of UM used or the approach (laparoscopic vs. robotic) did not influence the occurrence of UP (p = 0.44). No positive peritoneal cytology was found post hysterectomy. There was a statistically significantly higher rate of lymph-vascular space invasion within the perforation group, 67% vs. 25% in the no perforation group, p = 0.02. Two out of nine (22%) adjuvant therapies were changed because of UP. The median follow-up time for patients was 7.6 months (range 0.5-33.1 months). No recurrence was found in the UP group. CONCLUSION: Our study found a uterine perforation rate of 11%. This information needs to be further integrated to consider the usefulness of MU for EC surgery.


Subject(s)
Endometrial Neoplasms , Uterine Perforation , Female , Humans , Uterine Perforation/epidemiology , Uterine Perforation/etiology , Cohort Studies , Endometrial Neoplasms/surgery , Endometrial Neoplasms/pathology , Hysterectomy/adverse effects , Hysterectomy/methods , Peritoneum/pathology
3.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod ; 51(1): 102234, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34571197

ABSTRACT

Native tissue cystocele repair has been the cornerstone of prolapse surgery, especially since the learned societies warned clinicians and patients about serious mesh related complications and recommend a vaginal route without prosthesis in first intention. Surgical techniques mainly consist in anterior colporraphy, vaginal patch plastron and para vaginal repair. However, in case of vaginal patch plastron, the vagina left in contact with the bladder is a material of much better quality than colporraphy alone. The multiplication of native tissues, generating post-operative fibrosis, associated with anchorage on a strong ligamentous structure, allows to expect better outcomes compared to anterior colporraphy. Indeed, vaginal plastron corrects median cystoceles with a vaginal strip as well as lateral cystoceles thanks to bilateral paravaginal suspension. Thereby, vaginal patch plastron appears to be a good compromise between the 3 autologous techniques with median and paralateral repair We aimed to describe the surgical technique of the vaginal patch plastron for vaginal native tissue repair for cystocele.


Subject(s)
Cystocele/surgery , Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Surgical Mesh/standards , Adult , Cystocele/complications , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/surgery , Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Prosthesis Implantation/trends
4.
Prog Urol ; 31(7): 439-443, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33867213

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: In a menopausal woman scheduled for curative surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) by sacral colpopexy (SC), the question of concomitant hysterectomy is frequently considered by the surgeon. The risk of endometrial cancer (EC) exists in this population, and increases with age and body mass index. The French college of gynecologists and obstetricians (CNGOF) decided to issue good practice guidelines on subtotal hysterectomy (SH) for postmenopausal women scheduled for SC for POP. METHODS: The CNGOF has decided to adopt the AGREE II and GRADE systems for grading scientific evidence. Each recommendation for practice was allocated a grade, which depends on the quality of evidence (QE) (clinical practice guidelines). RESULTS: The prevalence of occult endometrial cancer (EC) found on pathological analysis after SH in this context (concomitant SH associated with SC) is low (<1%) (QE: high). Few studies have assessed the value of preoperative uterine exploration. Performing SH during SC is associated with its own risks, which may diminish the potential "carcinological prevention benefit". Uterine morcellation, performed by laparoscopy or a robot-assisted procedure, is associated with a low risk (<0.6%) of dissemination of an unknown sarcoma/EC (QE: moderate) A risk of dissemination of parasitic myomas (<0.5%) is also possible (QE: moderate). CONCLUSION: It is not recommended to perform a subtotal hysterectomy associated with sacral colpopexy for the sole purpose of reducing the occurrence of endometrial cancer (Recommendation: STRONG [GRADE 1-]; the level of evidence was considered to be low and the risk-benefit balance was considered not to be favorable).


Subject(s)
Endometrial Neoplasms/prevention & control , Hysterectomy/methods , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/surgery , Prophylactic Surgical Procedures/methods , Endometrial Neoplasms/etiology , Female , Humans , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/complications , Risk Factors , Sacrum , Vagina
5.
Trials ; 21(1): 624, 2020 Jul 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32641096

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Native tissue cystocele repair has been the cornerstone of prolapse surgery, especially since the learned societies warned clinicians and patients about serious mesh-related complications. Surgical techniques mainly consist in anterior colporraphy and vaginal patch plastron. However, success rates of native tissue cystocele repair are heterogeneous, depending on the design of studies and definition of outcomes. To date, high-quality data comparing vaginal native tissue procedures are still lacking. METHODS: Herein we aimed to describe the design of the first randomized controlled trial (TAPP) comparing anterior colporraphy (plication of the muscularis and adventitial layers of the vaginal wall) and vaginal patch plastron (bladder support anchored on the tendinous arch of the pelvic fascia by lateral sutures) techniques. Our aim is to assess the effectiveness of vaginal native tissue repair at 1 year for cystocele with a combined definition of success-anatomic and functional. The primary endpoint will be the success rate 1 year after surgery with a composite of objective and subjective measures (Aa and Ba points < 0 from POP-Q (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System) and a negative answer to question 3 of Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory and no need for additional treatment). DISCUSSION: A prospective study has found a success rate at 35% for anterior colporraphy based on a combined definition, both anatomic and functional, as recently recommended. However, the definition of anatomic was strict (POP-Q< 2), while it seems that the best definition of anatomic success is "no prolapse among the hymen", that is to say Aa and Ba points from the POP-Q classification < 0. We hypothesize that vaginal patch plastron will have a better anatomic and functional success comparatively to anterior colporraphy because native tissue is added, as it corrects both median and lateral cystoceles thanks to bilateral paravaginal suspension. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CHU LIMOGES is the sponsor of this research (n°87RI18_0013). This research is supported by the French Department of Health (PHRC 2018-A03476-49) and will be conducted with the support of DGOS (PHRC interregional - GIRCI SOHO). The study protocol was approved by the Human Subjects Protection Review Board (Comité de Protection des Personnes) on May 16, 2019. The trial is registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov registry ( NCT03875989 ).


Subject(s)
Pelvic Floor/surgery , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Vagina/surgery , Female , France , Humans , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Patient Satisfaction , Prospective Studies , Prosthesis Design , Quality of Life , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome
6.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol ; 48(3): 314-321, 2020 03.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32004781

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To provide recommendations for the diagnosis and management of the recurrence of Borderline Ovarian Tumour (BOT). METHODS: Literature review by consulting Pubmed, Medline and Cochrane databases. RESULTS: In the case of BOT, most of recurrences are a new BOT without invasive contingent (LE2). In the case of bilateral BOT, bilateral cystectomy is associated with a shorter recurrence time compared to unilateral oophorectomy and contralateral cystectomy (LE2). In recurrent serous BOT, cysts are usually fluid thin-walled with vegetation, corresponding in the IOTA classification to a solid unilocular cyst (LE2). A size of the cyst less than 20mm is not a sufficient to eliminate the diagnosis of recurrent serous BOT (LE2). Recurrence of mucinous BOT predominantly appears as multilocular or as solid multilocular cysts (LE4). In the case of ovarian preservation, recurrences are most often observed on the preserved ovary(s) (LE2). Non-invasive peritoneal recurrence after initial radical treatment including bilateral hysterectomy and adnexectomy is possible, mainly in patients initially diagnosed with stage II or III BOT with non-invasive peritoneal implant (LE3). Most BOT recurrences are asymptomatic, but clinical examination may allow diagnosis of recurrence (LE2). The normality of the CA 125 dosage does not rule out the diagnosis of recurrent BOT (LE2). A second conservative treatment in the event of recurrence of BOT entails the risk of new recurrence (LE2) with no impact on survival (LE4). Totalization of the adnexectomy in case of recurrence of BOT reduces the risk of new recurrence (LE2). Conservative treatment does not increase the risk of recurrence with non-invasive peritoneal implants (LE4). Conservative treatment may be offered after a first non-invasive recurrence in young women who wish to preserve their fertility (gradeC). In the absence of infiltrating tumor, chemotherapy is not indicated. The only cases for which chemotherapy can be considered are those for which there is an infiltrative component in addition to TFO.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/pathology , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Ovarian Neoplasms/therapy , Conservative Treatment , Drug Therapy , Female , France , Humans , Neoplasm Invasiveness/pathology , Ovariectomy/methods , Peritoneal Neoplasms/pathology , Peritoneal Neoplasms/secondary , Peritoneal Neoplasms/therapy
7.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol ; 48(3): 248-259, 2020 03.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32004784

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To provide clinical practice guidelines from the French college of obstetrics and gynecology (CNGOF) based on the best evidence available, concerning epidemiology of recurrence, the risk or relapse and the follow-up in case of borderline ovarian tumor after primary management, and evaluation of completion surgery after fertility sparing surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: English and French review of literature from 2000 to 2019 based on publications from PubMed, Medline, Cochrane, with keywords borderline ovarian tumor, low malignant potential, recurrence, relapse, follow-up, completion surgery. From 2000 up to this day, 448 references have been found, from which only 175 were screened for this work. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Overall risk of recurrence with Borderline Ovarian Tumour (BOT) may vary from 2 to 24% with a 10-years overall survival>94% and risk of invasive recurrence between 0.5 to 3.8%. Age<40 years (level of evidence 3), advanced initial FIGO stage (LE3), fertility sparing surgery (LE2), residual disease after initial surgery for serous BOT (LE2), implants (invasive or not) (LE2) are risk factors of recurrence. In case of conservative treatment, serous BOT had a higher risk of relapse than mucinous BOT (LE2). Lymphatic involvement (LE3) and use of mini invasive surgery (LE2) are not associated with a higher risk of recurrence. Scores or Nomograms could be useful to assess the risk of recurrence and then to inform patients about this risk (gradeC). In case of serous BOT, completion surgery is not recommended, after conservative treatment and fulfillment of parental project (grade B). It isn't possible to suggest a recommendation about completion surgery for mucinous BOT. There is not any data to advise a frequency of follow-up and use of paraclinic tools in general case of BOT. Follow-up of treated BOT must be achieved beyond 5 years (grade B). A systematic clinical examination is recommended during follow-up (grade B), after treatment of BOT. In case of elevation of CA-125 at diagnosis use of CA-125 serum level is recommended during follow-up of treated BOT (grade B). When a conservative treatment (preservation of ovarian pieces and uterus) of BOT is performed, endovaginal and transabdominal ultrasonography is recommended during follow-up (grade B). There isn't any sufficient data to advise a frequency of these examinations (clinical examination, ultrasound and CA-125) in case of treated BOT. CONCLUSION: Risk of relapse after surgical treatment of BOT depends on patients' characteristics, type of BOT (histological features) and modalities of initial treatment. Scores and nomogram are useful tools to assess risk of relapse. Follow-up must be performed beyond 5 years and in case of peculiar situations, use of paraclinic evaluations is recommended.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/surgery , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Ovarian Neoplasms/epidemiology , Ovarian Neoplasms/surgery , CA-125 Antigen/blood , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/pathology , Female , Fertility Preservation/methods , Follow-Up Studies , France/epidemiology , Humans , Neoplasm Invasiveness/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Risk Factors , Survival Rate
8.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol ; 46(6): 509-513, 2018 06.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29776842

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: In case of large breast cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) can be performed to reduce the size of the tumor and thus perform a conservative surgery. The place of the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in case of NAC is still debated. The main aim of this study is to assess the risk of axillary recurrence after negative SLNB before NAC. METHODS: It is a retrospective, observational and uni-centric study. We included 18 to 80-year-old patients with unilateral breast cancer requiring a NAC and with a negative SLNB before NAC. Our primary endpoint was axillary recurrence. RESULTS: Between August 2006 and October 2016, 64 patients had a negative GS performing before a NAC and did not benefit from axillary dissection after NAC. The average duration of follow-up was 37 months. During our follow-up, we did not find any cases of axillary recurrence. CONCLUSION: This study supports the reliability of lymph node status assessment using the SLNB before CNA.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/methods , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Axilla , Female , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
9.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 42(3): 376-82, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26725307

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Two options are possible for the management of early stage cervical cancer, without lymph node involvement: radical surgery or brachytherapy followed by surgery. The aim of this study was to compare overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of early stage cervical cancers managed by uterovaginale brachytherapy followed by extrafasciale hysterectomy (group 1) or by radical hysterectomy alone (group 2). The secondary objectives were to compare the morbidity of these two different approaches and to evaluate the parametrial involvement rate in patients managed by radical hysterectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It is a retrospective and collaborative study between the Paoli Calmettes Institute (Marseille) and the Oscar Lambret Center (Lille) from 2001 to 2013, in patients with tumors FIGO stages IA1, IA2, IB1 and IIA less than 2 cm of diameter, without pelvic lymph node involvement. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-one patients were included (74 in group 1 and 77 in group 2). The demographic characteristics of the two groups were comparable. OS and DFS were respectively 92.3% versus 100% (p = 0.046) and 92.3% and 98.7% (p = 0.18). Complication rates were 12.2% and 44.2%, respectively (p < 0.0001). In group 2, the parametrial invasion rate in this study was 1.30%. CONCLUSION: In our study, the two strategies are comparable in terms of DFS. Complications seem more frequent in the group 2, but more severe in the group 1. Finally, the low rate of parametrial invasion in group 2 confirms the interest of a less radical surgical treatment in these stages with good prognosis.


Subject(s)
Brachytherapy/methods , Hysterectomy/methods , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/mortality , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/therapy , Age Factors , Aged , Brachytherapy/mortality , Cohort Studies , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Hysterectomy/mortality , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Invasiveness/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Statistics, Nonparametric , Survival Analysis , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology
10.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil ; 42(4): 265-8, 2014 Apr.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24411338

ABSTRACT

Aim of no residual macroscopic disease has to be the objective of the gynecologist oncologist surgeon. It can require extensive surgical procedures in all the abdomen area. We report 2 rare cases of cytoreductive surgery with iliac vessels resection and use of vascular prosthesis. We discuss the opportunity of this surgery with high morbidity.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Carcinoma, Endometrioid/surgery , Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures , Fallopian Tube Neoplasms/surgery , Iliac Vein/surgery , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Aged , Blood Vessel Prosthesis , Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures/methods , Fallopian Tube Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Humans , Iliac Vein/pathology , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Neoplasm Staging , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Ovarian Neoplasms/surgery , Venous Thrombosis/pathology , Venous Thrombosis/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL