Assessment of the potential vaping-related exposure to carbonyls and epoxides using stable isotope-labeled precursors in the e-liquid.

The formation of carbonyls and epoxides in e-cigarette (EC) aerosol is possible due to heating of the liquid constituents. However, high background levels of these compounds have inhibited a clear assessment of exposure during use of ECs. An EC containing an e-liquid replaced with 10% of 13C-labeled propylene glycol and glycerol was used in a controlled use clinical study with 20 EC users. In addition, five smokers smoked cigarettes spiked with the described e-liquid. Seven carbonyls (formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, acrolein, acetone, crotonaldehyde, methacrolein, propionaldehyde) were measured in the aerosol and the mainstream smoke. Corresponding biomarkers of exposure were determined in the user's urine samples. 13C-labeled formaldehyde, acetaldehyde and acrolein were found in EC aerosol, while all seven labeled carbonyls were detected in smoke. The labeled biomarkers of exposure to formaldehyde (13C-thiazolidine carboxylic acid and 13C-N-(1,3-thiazolidine-4-carbonyl)glycine), acrolein (13C3-3-hydroxypropylmercapturic acid) and glycidol (13C3-dihydroxypropylmercapturic acid) were present in the urine of vapers indicating an EC use-specific exposure to these toxicants. However, other sources than vaping contribute to a much higher extent by several orders of magnitude to the overall exposure of these toxicants. Comparing data for the native (unlabeled) and the labeled (exposure-specific) biomarkers revealed vaping as a minor source of user's exposure to these toxicants while other carbonyls and epoxides were not detectable in the EC aerosol.

A novel quantification method for sulfur-containing biomarkers of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde exposure in human urine and plasma samples.

A novel method for the quantification of the sulfur-containing metabolites of formaldehyde (thiazolidine carboxylic acid (TCA) and thiazolidine carbonyl glycine (TCG)) and acetaldehyde (methyl thiazolidine carboxylic acid (MTCA) and methyl thiazolidine carbonyl glycine (MTCG)) was developed and validated for human urine and plasma samples. Targeting the sulfur-containing metabolites of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde in contrast to the commonly used biomarkers formate and acetate overcomes the high intra- and inter-individual variance. Due to their involvement in various endogenous processes, formate and acetate lack the required specificity for assessing the exposure to formaldehyde and acetaldehyde, respectively. Validation was successfully performed according to FDA's Guideline for Bioanalytical Method Validation (2018), showing excellent performance with regard to accuracy, precision, and limits of quantification (LLOQ). TCA, TCG, and MTCG proved to be stable under all investigated conditions, whereas MTCA showed a depletion after 21 months. The method was applied to a set of pilot samples derived from smokers who consumed unfiltered cigarettes spiked with 13C-labeled propylene glycol and 13C-labeled glycerol. These compounds were used as potential precursors for the formation of 13C-formaldehyde and 13C-acetaldehyde during combustion. Plasma concentrations were significantly lower as compared to urine, suggesting urine as suitable matrix for a biomonitoring. A smoking-related increase of unlabeled biomarker concentrations could not be shown due to the ubiquitous distribution in the environment. While the metabolites of 13C-acetaldehyde were not detected, the described method allowed for the quantification of 13C-formaldehyde uptake from cigarette smoking by targeting the biomarkers 13C-TCA and 13C-TCG in urine.Graphical abstract.

Biomarkers of Exposure Specific to E-vapor Products Based on Stable-Isotope Labeled Ingredients.

INTRODUCTION: An important basis for risk estimation for e-cigarette (e-cig) users is a well-founded dosimetry. The objective of this study was to assess the applicability of stable-isotope e-liquid ingredients for exposure studies in vapers. METHODS: E-cigs with 10% of labeled propylene glycol (PG), glycerol (G), and nicotine was used by 20 experienced vapers under controlled (Part A) and free (Part B) conditions. In Part A, 10 subjects vaped at 10 W and another 10 subjects at 18 W power setting of the e-cig. In Part B, the same subjects used the same product ad libitum in their usual environment. Five smokers, smoking 10 non-filter cigarettes, spiked with labeled PG, G, and nicotine, served as positive control during Part A. PG, G, nicotine and its metabolites were measured in plasma, urine, and saliva. RESULTS: Peak nicotine levels (sum of measured labeled and unlabeled) in plasma were lower in vapers (15.8 to 19.6 ng/mL) than in smokers (36 ng/mL). The labeled plasma nicotine levels were ten times lower than the unlabeled, reflecting the ratio in the e-liquid. PG levels in plasma and urine also reflected the vaping activities in Part A, while G in these body fluids showed no association with vaping. CONCLUSIONS: This proof of concept study shows that the application of labeled e-liquid ingredients allows the accurate quantification of the dose of nicotine and PG when other nicotine and tobacco products were used simultaneously. Unchanged G was not assessable by this approach. IMPLICATIONS: This approach allows the investigations of the absorption of potential PG-, G-, and nicotine-derived vapor constituents (eg, aldehydes and epoxides) by vaping. Appropriate studies are in progress in our laboratory.