Unraveling the potential clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA detection in colorectal cancer-evaluation in a nationwide Danish cohort.

BACKGROUND: Increasingly, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is proposed as a tool for minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment. Digital PCR (dPCR) offers low analysis costs and turnaround times of less than a day, making it ripe for clinical implementation. Here, we used tumor-informed dPCR for ctDNA detection in a large colorectal cancer (CRC) cohort to evaluate the potential for post-operative risk assessment and serial monitoring, and how the metastatic site may impact ctDNA detection. Additionally, we assessed how altering the ctDNA-calling algorithm could customize performance for different clinical settings. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Stage II-III CRC patients (N = 851) treated with a curative intent were recruited. Based on whole-exome sequencing on matched tumor and germline DNA, a mutational target was selected for dPCR analysis. Plasma samples (8 ml) were collected within 60 days after operation and-for a patient subset (n = 246)-every 3-4 months for up to 36 months. Single-target dPCR was used for ctDNA detection. RESULTS: Both post-operative and serial ctDNA detection were prognostic of recurrence [hazard ratio (HR) = 11.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.8-16.4, P < 0.001; HR = 30.7, 95% CI 20.2-46.7, P < 0.001], with a cumulative ctDNA detection rate of 87% at the end of sample collection in recurrence patients. The ctDNA growth rate was prognostic of survival (HR = 2.6, 95% CI 1.5-4.4, P = 0.001). In recurrence patients, post-operative ctDNA detection was challenging for lung metastases (4/21 detected) and peritoneal metastases (2/10 detected). By modifying the cut-off for calling a sample ctDNA positive, we were able to adjust the sensitivity and specificity of our test for different clinical contexts. CONCLUSIONS: The presented results from 851 stage II-III CRC patients demonstrate that our personalized dPCR approach effectively detects MRD after operation and shows promise for serial ctDNA detection for recurrence surveillance. The ability to adjust sensitivity and specificity shows exciting potential to customize the ctDNA caller for specific clinical settings.

Fibrinogen supplementation ex vivo increasesclot firmness comparable to platelet transfusion in thrombocytopenia.

BACKGROUND: Fibrinogen concentrate can improve clot firmness and offers a better safety profile than platelet concentrates. Reduction or avoidance of blood transfusions represents a strategy to reduce associated risks. We investigated whether supplementation of fibrinogen concentrate ex vivo can compensate for clot strength as compared with platelet transfusion in vivo METHODS: One hundred patients in need of platelet transfusion (PT) were enrolled. Blood samples were collected immediately before PT and at 1 h and 24 h after PT. Fibrinogen concentrate was added to these citrated whole blood samples at concentrations of 50, 100, 200 and 400 mg kg-1 and the maximum clot firmness (MCF) was analysed using ROTEM thromboelastometry. RESULTS: Fibrinogen supplementation increased MCF significantly and dose-dependently before and after PT. The effect of fibrinogen concentrate (equivalent to doses of 100 and 200 mg kg-1) ex vivo was comparable to that of PT in vivo, whereas 400 mg kg-1 fibrinogen significantly improved MCF compared with PT (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Fibrinogen concentrate can match the effect of PT on MCF in thrombocytopenia. This potential alternative haemostatic intervention should be evaluated in clinical trials.

Fibrinogen concentrate improves clot strength in patients with haematological malignancies requiring platelet transfusion.

BACKGROUND: Patients with bone marrow failure secondary to chemotherapy often develop thrombocytopenia and require platelet transfusion. Fibrinogen plays an important role in platelet aggregation and the establishment of the primary haemostatic plug. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of in vivo platelet transfusion on clot firmness in thrombocytopenic patients with in vitro-performed fibrinogen concentrate substitution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with haematological malignancy admitted for platelet transfusion were included. Haemostatic effects from platelet transfusion and ex vivo addition of fibrinogen concentrate at three different doses were evaluated by thromboelastometry, with clot firmness as the primary endpoint (A30 ExTEM assay). Secondary endpoints were other thromboelastometry parameters, thrombin generation parameters, activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), prothrombin time PT, fibrinogen and factor XIII levels and a clinical bleeding score. RESULTS: Twenty patients (66%) had clinical bleeding signs by prior to transfusion. Platelets increased from 17 (range, 1-109) to 40 (range 2-139) × 10(9) L(-1) following transfusion, with a median corrected count increment of 16·7 (range, 0·8-43·5). The A30 value increased significantly by platelet transfusion from 35 ± 11 to 47 ± 10 mm, with no changes in thrombin generation. Fibrinogen concentrate dose-dependently increased A 30 (to 43 ± 10, 49 ± 9 and 50 ± 9 mm, respectively) and reduced parameters of thrombin generation at high doses. Platelet transfusion, together with fibrinogen concentrate, further increased clot firmness. APTT and PT were within normal range, whereas fibrinogen levels were slightly elevated. CONCLUSION: Fibrinogen concentrate increased clot firmness to the same degree as platelet transfusion in patients with low platelet count requiring platelet transfusion.

Platelet activation and aggregation: the importance of thrombin activity--a laboratory model.

This study introduces a new laboratory model of whole blood platelet aggregation stimulated by endogenously generated thrombin, and explores this aspect in haemophilia A in which impaired thrombin generation is a major hallmark. The method was established to measure platelet aggregation initiated by tissue factor evaluated by means of impedance aggregometry. Citrated whole blood from healthy volunteers and haemophilia A patients with the addition of inhibitors of the contact pathway and fibrin polymerization was evaluated. In healthy persons, a second wave of platelet aggregation was found to coincide with the thrombin burst and to be abolished by thrombin inhibitors. In this system, platelet aggregation in severe haemophilia A (n = 10) was found to be significantly decreased as compared with healthy individuals (912 ± 294 vs. 1917 ± 793 AU × min, P = 0.003), most probably due to the weak level of thrombin generation. For the first time, analysis of platelet aggregation as induced by endogenously generated thrombin was demonstrated. The new method makes it possible to explore the influence of the coagulation system on platelet function. In contrast to the general understanding, the data suggest that the impaired thrombin generation in haemophilia may affect platelet activation. Future studies will address whether our results may contribute to understanding differences in bleeding phenotypes and response to haemostatic substitution observed among patients.