Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
3.
J Small Anim Pract ; 60(6): 329-339, 2019 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31025713

ABSTRACT

There is a recent trend to feed pet dogs and cats in Britain and other developed countries on raw meat and animal by-products using either commercial preparations or home recipes. This shift from heat-treated processed food has been driven by perceived health benefits to pets and a suspicion of industrially produced pet food. The diets of wild-living related species have been used as a rationale for raw feeding, but differences in biology and lifestyle impose limitations on such comparisons. Formal evidence does exist for claims by raw-feeding proponents of an altered intestinal microbiome and (subjectively) improved stool quality. However, there is currently neither robust evidence nor identified plausible mechanisms for many of the wide range of other claimed benefits. There are documented risks associated with raw feeding, principally malnutrition (inexpert formulation and testing of diets) and infection affecting pets and/or household members. Surveys in Europe and North America have consistently found Salmonella species in a proportion of samples, typically of fresh-frozen commercial diets. Another emerging issue concerns the risk of introducing antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. Raw pet food commonly exceeds hygiene thresholds for counts of Enterobacteriaceae. These bacteria often encode resistance to critically important antibiotics such as extended-spectrum cephalosporins, and raw-fed pets create an elevated risk of shedding such resistant bacteria. Other infectious organisms that may be of concern include Listeria, shiga toxigenic E scherichia coli , parasites such as Toxoplasma gondii and exotic agents such as the zoonotic livestock pathogen Brucella suis, recently identified in European Union and UK raw pet meat imported from Argentina.


Subject(s)
Cat Diseases , Dog Diseases , Animals , Cats , Diet , Dogs , Europe , Zoonoses
5.
Vet Rec ; 178(13): 310-5, 2016 Mar 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27013568

ABSTRACT

This report, provided by the APHA, summarises the key descriptive epidemiological parameters of bovine TB in cattle in Great Britain from January 1 to December 31, 2014. It summarises some of the temporal trends observed over a longer period and highlights some differences and similarities between Scotland, Wales and the three bovine TB risk areas of England. It updates the previous annual summaries for 2012 and 2013, also published inVeterinary Record(VR, June 14, 2014, vol 174, pp 600-604; March 28, 2015, vol 176, pp 326-330).


Subject(s)
Sentinel Surveillance/veterinary , Tuberculosis, Bovine/epidemiology , Abattoirs , Animals , Autopsy/veterinary , Cattle , Genotyping Techniques/veterinary , Government Agencies , Incidence , Prevalence , Recurrence , Time Factors , Tuberculosis, Bovine/microbiology , United Kingdom/epidemiology
6.
Epidemiol Infect ; 143(2): 298-307, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24650797

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of a culture method and a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method for detection of two Campylobacter species: C. jejuni and C. coli. Data were collected during a 3-year survey of UK broiler flocks, and consisted of parallel sampling of caeca from 436 batches of birds by both PCR and culture. Batches were stratified by season (summer/non-summer) and whether they were the first depopulation of the flock, resulting in four sub-populations. A Bayesian approach in the absence of a gold standard was adopted, and the sensitivity and specificity of the PCR and culture for each Campylobacter subtype was estimated, along with the true C. jejuni and C. coli prevalence in each sub-population. Results indicated that the sensitivity of the culture method was higher than that of PCR in detecting both species when the samples were derived from populations infected with at most one species of Campylobacter. However, from a mixed population, the sensitivity of culture for detecting both C. jejuni or C. coli is reduced while PCR is potentially able to detect both species, although the total probability of correctly identifying at least one species by PCR is similar to that of the culture method.


Subject(s)
Campylobacter Infections/microbiology , Campylobacter , Chickens/microbiology , Feces/microbiology , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Poultry Diseases/microbiology , Animals , Bayes Theorem , Campylobacter/genetics , Campylobacter/isolation & purification , Campylobacter Infections/veterinary , DNA, Bacterial/analysis , DNA, Bacterial/genetics
7.
Vet Microbiol ; 159(3-4): 390-6, 2012 Oct 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22565009

ABSTRACT

Detection and enumeration of Campylobacter spp. in broiler chicken flocks are key components of research and surveillance studies aimed at reducing Campylobacter infections in people. Direct culture of caecal contents onto selective agar is the typical method used to confirm flock colonisation. Modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar (mCCDA) is commonly used for this method, although alternative selective media have been used. Additionally, PCR methods to detect Campylobacter DNA from caecal contents may provide a rapid alternative. However comparative performance data for these methods is limited and therefore required to ensure optimal detection methods for this sample type. In this study, 306 broiler caeca were tested for Campylobacter using direct culture on mCCDA, Skirrows and Preston agars and two real-time PCR methods, one specific for mapA/ceuE regions and another for the flaA gene region. Additionally, the suitability of spread plating and spiral plating methods for enumeration of Campylobacter and the impact of sample storage were assessed. This study confirmed modified CCDA as an optimal media for detection of Campylobacter in broiler caeca. It was significantly more sensitive than Skirrows or Preston agars. This study also demonstrated that the mapA/ceuE PCR had excellent agreement with culture on mCCDA and is a genuine alternative method. Spread plating and spiral plating methods were suitable for enumeration although spiral plating appeared more sensitive for stored samples (72 h). A 1 log reduction in viable Campylobacters was observed in stored samples, therefore storage effects should be considered for quantitative studies with broiler caeca.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Load/methods , Campylobacter Infections/veterinary , Campylobacter/isolation & purification , Chickens , Agar , Animals , Campylobacter/growth & development , Campylobacter/physiology , Cecum/microbiology , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
8.
Epidemiol Infect ; 140(10): 1725-37, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22631874

ABSTRACT

During 2007-2009 a UK-wide, 3-year stratified randomized survey of UK chicken broiler flocks was conducted to estimate the prevalence of Campylobacter-infected batches of birds at slaughter. Thirty-seven abattoirs, processing 88·3% of the total UK slaughter throughput, were recruited at the beginning of the survey. Of the 1174 slaughter batches sampled, 79·2% were found to be colonized with Campylobacter, the majority of isolates being C. jejuni. Previous partial depopulation of the flock [odds ratio (OR) 5·21], slaughter in the summer months (categorized as June, July and August; OR 14·27) or autumn months (categorized as September, October and November; OR 1·70) increasing bird age (40-41 days, OR 3·18; 42-45 days, OR 3·56; ⩾46 days, OR 13·43) and higher recent mortality level in the flock (1·00-1·49% mortality, OR 1·57; ⩾1·49% mortality, OR 2·74) were all identified as significant risk factors for Campylobacter colonization of the birds at slaughter. Time in transit to the slaughterhouse of more than 2·5 h was identified as a protective factor (OR 0·52).


Subject(s)
Campylobacter Infections/epidemiology , Campylobacter Infections/microbiology , Campylobacter jejuni/isolation & purification , Chickens , Poultry Diseases/epidemiology , Poultry Diseases/microbiology , Abattoirs , Animals , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Seasons , Survival Analysis , United Kingdom/epidemiology
9.
Epidemiol Infect ; 140(12): 2233-46, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22336562

ABSTRACT

A baseline survey on the prevalence of Campylobacter spp. in broiler flocks and Campylobacter spp. on broiler carcases in the UK was performed in 2008 in accordance with Commission Decision 2007/516/EC. Pooled caecal contents from each randomly selected slaughter batch, and neck and breast skin from a single carcase were examined for Campylobacter spp. The prevalence of Campylobacter in the caeca of broiler batches was 75·8% (303/400) compared to 87·3% (349/400) on broiler carcases. Overall, 27·3% of the carcases were found to be highly contaminated with Campylobacter (≥1000 c.f.u./g). Slaughter in the summer months (June, July, August) [odds ratio (OR) 3·50], previous partial depopulation of the flock (OR 3·37), and an increased mortality at 14 days (≥1·25% to <1·75%) (OR 2·54) were identified as significant risk factors for the most heavily Campylobacter-contaminated carcases. Four poultry companies and farm location were also found to be significantly associated with highly contaminated carcases.


Subject(s)
Campylobacter Infections/epidemiology , Campylobacter coli/isolation & purification , Campylobacter jejuni/isolation & purification , Chickens/microbiology , Food Microbiology , Abattoirs , Animals , Campylobacter Infections/mortality , Cecum/microbiology , Odds Ratio , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Seasons , Skin/microbiology , United Kingdom/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...