Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Dev Cell ; 57(11): 1316-1330.e7, 2022 06 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35597240

ABSTRACT

The changes that drive differentiation facilitate the emergence of abnormal cells that need to be removed before they contribute to further development or the germline. Consequently, in mice in the lead-up to gastrulation, ∼35% of embryonic cells are eliminated. This elimination is caused by hypersensitivity to apoptosis, but how it is regulated is poorly understood. Here, we show that upon exit of naive pluripotency, mouse embryonic stem cells lower their mitochondrial apoptotic threshold, and this increases their sensitivity to cell death. We demonstrate that this enhanced apoptotic response is induced by a decrease in mitochondrial fission due to a reduction in the activity of dynamin-related protein 1 (DRP1). Furthermore, we show that in naive pluripotent cells, DRP1 prevents apoptosis by promoting mitophagy. In contrast, during differentiation, reduced mitophagy levels facilitate apoptosis. Together, these results indicate that during early mammalian development, DRP1 regulation of mitophagy determines the apoptotic response.


Subject(s)
Dynamins/metabolism , Mitophagy , Animals , Apoptosis/physiology , Mammals/metabolism , Mice , Mitochondria/metabolism , Mitochondrial Dynamics/physiology , Mitophagy/physiology
2.
Genes Dev ; 34(23-24): 1599-1604, 2020 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33184225

ABSTRACT

There is increasing evidence demonstrating that adult neural stem cells (NSCs) are a cell of origin of glioblastoma. Here we analyzed the interaction between transformed and wild-type NSCs isolated from the adult mouse subventricular zone niche. We found that transformed NSCs are refractory to quiescence-inducing signals. Unexpectedly, we also demonstrated that these cells induce quiescence in surrounding wild-type NSCs in a cell-cell contact and Notch signaling-dependent manner. Our findings therefore suggest that oncogenic mutations are propagated in the stem cell niche not just through cell-intrinsic advantages, but also by outcompeting neighboring stem cells through repression of their proliferation.


Subject(s)
Glioblastoma/physiopathology , Neoplastic Stem Cells/physiology , Neural Stem Cells/cytology , Receptors, Notch/genetics , Signal Transduction/physiology , Animals , Cell Communication/physiology , Cell Proliferation/physiology , Cells, Cultured , Gene Expression Profiling , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Glioblastoma/genetics , Lateral Ventricles/cytology , Mice , Neoplastic Stem Cells/cytology , Neural Stem Cells/physiology
3.
Semin Cancer Biol ; 63: 36-43, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31102668

ABSTRACT

The maintenance of tissue homeostasis and health relies on the efficient removal of damaged or otherwise suboptimal cells. One way this is achieved is through cell competition, a fitness quality control mechanism that eliminates cells that are less fit than their neighbours. Through this process, cell competition has been shown to play diverse roles in development and in the adult, including in homeostasis and tumour suppression. However, over the last few years it has also become apparent that certain oncogenic mutations can provide cells with a competitive advantage that promotes their expansion via the elimination of surrounding wild-type cells. Thus, understanding how this process is initiated and regulated will provide important insights with relevance to a number of different research areas. A key question in cell competition is what determines the competitive fitness of a cell. Here, we will review what is known about this question by focussing on two non-mutually exclusive possibilities; first, that the activity of a subset of transcription factors determines competitive fitness, and second, that the outcome of cell competition is determined by the relative cellular metabolic status.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/genetics , Neoplasms/pathology , Animals , Cell Communication/physiology , Genetic Fitness , Humans , Mutation , Neoplasms/metabolism , Oncogenes , Selection, Genetic , Transcription, Genetic
4.
Development ; 146(13)2019 07 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31278123

ABSTRACT

The process of cell competition results in the 'elimination of cells that are viable but less fit than surrounding cells'. Given the highly heterogeneous nature of our tissues, it seems increasingly likely that cells are engaged in a 'survival of the fittest' battle throughout life. The process has a myriad of positive roles in the organism: it selects against mutant cells in developing tissues, prevents the propagation of oncogenic cells and eliminates damaged cells during ageing. However, 'super-fit' cancer cells can exploit cell competition mechanisms to expand and spread. Here, we review the regulation, roles and risks of cell competition in organism development, ageing and disease.


Subject(s)
Cell Communication/physiology , Cell Physiological Phenomena , Competitive Behavior/physiology , Genetic Fitness/physiology , Selection, Genetic/physiology , Aging/physiology , Animals , Cell Physiological Phenomena/genetics , Cellular Microenvironment/physiology , Humans , Reproduction/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...