Does class attendance matter? Results from a second-year medical school dermatology cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the impacts of class attendance and learning preferences on academic performance in dermatology. OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to examine the effects of medical student class attendance and learning preferences on students' academic performance in an introductory dermatology course. METHODS: A total of 101 second-year medical students enrolled in a required introductory dermatology course were surveyed regarding their learning preferences. Records of class attendance and scores on the final examination were reviewed. RESULTS: The most frequently cited reason for attending classes was social expectation (96%), whereas the least cited was learning well in a classroom-type setting (65%). The top reasons cited by students for not attending classes were availability of lectures online (35%), preference for individual study outside the classroom setting (26%), and the inconvenience of traveling to class (24%). Multivariate analysis found no statistically significant relationship between class attendance and performance on the final examination (estimate -0.074, standard error 0.12; P = 0.54) after adjusting for sex, age, Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) score, having children at home, and reason for attending class. Those who prefer to learn by watching online videos scored significantly higher on the final examination (prefer online videos: 87 ± 5.5; neutral: 86 ± 5.9; do not prefer online videos: 82 ± 2.6 [P = 0.049]). CONCLUSIONS: Class attendance was not associated with improved academic performance in a dermatology course. Those who preferred to learn by watching online videos demonstrated a higher level of performance than those who did not prefer to learn this way.

Public perception of dermatologists and comparison with other medical specialties: results from a national survey.

BACKGROUND: The public's perception of dermatologists in the United States is unknown. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the US public's perception of how dermatologists spend time professionally and to compare the public's perception of dermatologists with physicians from other medical specialties. METHODS: We administered a telephone survey to the US public using the validated random digit dialing method. RESULTS: We made 2353 telephone calls to randomly selected active numbers from 10 US area codes. A total of 800 adults (34%) completed the telephone survey. Overall, 46% of participants perceived that dermatologists spend a majority of their time managing skin cancer. Of respondents, 27% perceived that dermatologists spend a majority of their time performing cosmetic procedures. Compared with dermatologists, primary care physicians were perceived to have a more critical profession by 63% of participants, a more difficult job by 54% of respondents, and work longer hours by 92% of those surveyed. Similar findings were observed when dermatologists were compared with cardiologists. The public perceived dermatologists to earn more than primary care physicians but less than cardiologists or plastic surgeons. LIMITATIONS: Potential differences may exist between responders and nonresponders. CONCLUSIONS: Educational efforts are necessary to better inform public understanding and perception of dermatologists' expertise.

Teledermatology operational considerations, challenges, and benefits: the referring providers' perspective.

BACKGROUND: Teledermatology has been used to provide increased specialty access for medically underserved communities. In California, policies enable the California Medicaid (Medi-Cal) program to provide reimbursement for both store-and-forward (S&F) and live-interactive teledermatology consultations. To assess the effectiveness of teledermatology operations for this population, understanding the referring providers' perspective is crucial. The primary objective of this study was to explore the perspective of referring primary care providers (PCPs) on teledermatology by focusing on the operational considerations, challenges, and benefits to participating in teledermatology referral in the context of the Medi-Cal population. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We conducted hour-long one-on-one interviews with 10 PCPs who refer patients to teledermatology regularly and who together serve an average aggregate referral base of 2,760 teledermatology cases yearly. RESULTS: Of the 2,760 aggregate annual teledermatology referrals, PCPs reported that they serve predominantly uninsured or underinsured populations and participate in S&F consultations. The majority of surveyed PCPs treat common skin conditions themselves. However, these PCPs refer more patients to teledermatology consultations than in-person dermatology encounters. Several factors influence PCPs' decision to refer to teledermatology, which include complexity of the skin problem, distance to accessible dermatologist, patient's insurance, and patient's preferences. PCPs identified improved workflow, enhanced communication with dermatologists, and faster turnaround for recommendations as three areas that referring physicians would like improved in their experience with teledermatology. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the referring provider's perspective and subsequently adopting policy and practice solutions to address their challenges are vital to prompting further teledermatology participation for underserved communities.

Coronary artery disease in patients with psoriasis referred for coronary angiography.

Patients with psoriasis may have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease and myocardial infarction. The aim of this study was to investigate whether psoriasis is associated with an increased prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) independent of established cardiovascular risk factors in patients undergoing coronary angiography. A retrospective cohort analysis was performed by linking records of all patients undergoing coronary angiography from 2004 through 2009 with dermatology medical records. From an overall cohort of 9,473 patients, we identified 204 patients (2.2%) with psoriasis before coronary angiography. Patients with psoriasis had higher body mass index (31.3 ± 8.1 vs 29.3 ± 7.1 kg/m(2), p <0.001) but the prevalence of other risk factors was similar. Median duration of psoriasis before cardiac catheterization was 8 years (interquartile range 2 to 24). Patients with psoriasis were more likely to have CAD (84.3% vs 75.7%, p = 0.005) at coronary angiography. After adjusting for established cardiovascular risk factors, psoriasis was independently associated with presence of angiographically confirmed CAD (adjusted odds ratio 1.8, 95% confidence interval 1.2 to 2.8, p = 0.006). In patients with psoriasis, duration of psoriasis >8 years was also independently associated with angiographically confirmed CAD after adjusting for established cardiovascular risk factors (adjusted odds ratio 3.5, 95% confidence interval 1.3 to 9.6, p = 0.02). In conclusion, patients with psoriasis and especially those with psoriasis for >8 years have a higher prevalence of CAD than patients without psoriasis undergoing coronary angiography.

Practice models and challenges in teledermatology: a study of collective experiences from teledermatologists.

BACKGROUND: Despite increasing practice of teledermatology in the U.S., teledermatology practice models and real-world challenges are rarely studied. METHODS: The primary objective was to examine teledermatology practice models and shared challenges among teledermatologists in California, focusing on practice operations, reimbursement considerations, barriers to sustainability, and incentives. We conducted in-depth interviews with teledermatologists that practiced store-and-forward or live-interactive teledermatology from January 1, 2007 through March 30, 2011 in California. RESULTS: Seventeen teledermatologists from academia, private practice, health maintenance organizations, and county settings participated in the study. Among them, 76% practiced store-and-forward only, 6% practiced live-interactive only, and 18% practiced both modalities. Only 29% received structured training in teledermatology. The average number of years practicing teledermatology was 4.29 years (SD±2.81). Approximately 47% of teledermatologists served at least one Federally Qualified Health Center. Over 75% of patients seen via teledermatology were at or below 200% federal poverty level and usually lived in rural regions without dermatologist access. Practice challenges were identified in the following areas. Teledermatologists faced delays in reimbursements and non-reimbursement of teledermatology services. The primary reason for operational inefficiency was poor image quality and/or inadequate history. Costly and inefficient software platforms and lack of communication with referring providers also presented barriers. CONCLUSION: Teledermatology enables underserved populations to access specialty care. Improvements in reimbursement mechanisms, efficient technology platforms, communication with referring providers, and teledermatology training are necessary to support sustainable practices.