ABSTRACT
Paraproteins are a potential source of error for electrolyte analyses. The exclusion effect itself causes a discrepancy between direct and indirect ion selective electrode assays (dISE and iISE, respectively). We tested the applicability of different pretreatment methods and the difference of dISE and iISE with paraprotein-rich samples. We analysed chloride (Cl-), potassium (K+), and sodium (Na+) on 46 samples with paraproteins up to 73 g/L. We compared pretreatment methods of preheating, precipitation, and filtration to the native sample. All induced a statistically significant difference (p-value <0.05). Clinically significant difference was induced by precipitation for all analytes, and filtration for Cl- and Na+, but for none by preheating. The difference in electrolyte measurements with either dISE or iISE on native samples was explained by total protein concentration (TP). There was a statistically significant difference in all electrolyte measurements. On average, there was a clinically significant difference in Na + but not in Cl- and K + measurements. Paraprotein concentration (PP) or heavy chain class did not induce a statistically significant effect. The regression analysis and comparison to the theoretical exclusion effect supported the conclusion that TP is the only explanatory factor in the difference between dISE and iISE. We conclude that preheating is a suitable pretreatment method for all the studied analytes. Precipitation is not valid for any of them, and filtration can be considered only for K+. Because the difference between dISE and iISE was explained by the exclusion effect caused by TP, dISE is the more suitable method to analyse paraprotein-rich samples.