The role of secondary full lymphadenectomy for patients with early-stage endometrial cancer and isolated tumor cells detected on sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping is a surgical technique with high accuracy in detecting metastases while limiting morbidity associated with full lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer. Recent retrospective data suggests that recurrence risk is low for patients with isolated tumor cells (ITCs). The objective of this study was to describe the pathologic findings, postoperative complications, and outcomes of endometrial cancer patients with ITCs who subsequently underwent a second surgical procedure, full lymph node dissection (LND) following initial staging surgery. All patients with clinically early stage endometrial cancer who underwent planned minimally invasive surgical staging with SLN biopsy demonstrating ITCs at a single institution from 1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020 were identified retrospectively. Six patients with endometrial cancer with ITC who subsequently underwent secondary full LND were identified. Half of patients experienced postoperative complications within 30 days after LND, including persistent thigh numbness, a urinary tract infection, and a presyncopal episode. No patients had a change in stage as a result of subsequent full LND. One patient received no adjuvant therapy, while 83.3 % (5/6) received vaginal brachytherapy. One patient experienced distal recurrence six months after completing brachytherapy, while five remain without evidence of disease on most recent follow-up. In patients who underwent completion lymphadenectomy for ITCs identified during initial surgical staging for endometrial cancer, no additional lymph node metastatic disease was identified. This study supports current data there is a limited role for additional lymph node assessment in patients with early stage endometrial cancer with ITCs identified on SLN biopsy.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of tumor molecular classification in high-risk early-stage endometrial cancer.

PURPOSE: Tumor molecular analyses in endometrial cancer (EC) includes 4 distinct subtypes: (1) POLE-mutated, (2) mismatch repair protein (MMR) deficient, (3) p53 mutant, and (4) no specific molecular profile. Recently, a sub-analysis of PORTEC-3 demonstrated notable differences in treatment response between molecular classification (MC) groups. Cost of testing is one barrier to widespread adoption of MC. Therefore, we sought to determine the cost-effectiveness of MC in patients with stage I and II high-risk EC. METHODS: A Markov decision model was developed to compare tumor molecular classification (TMC) vs. no testing (NT). A healthcare payor's perspective and 5-year time horizon were used. Base case data were abstracted from PORTEC-3 and the molecular sub-analysis. Cost and utility data were derived from public databases, peer-reviewed literature, and expert input. Strategies were compared using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) with effectiveness in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and evaluated with a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per QALY gained. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test model robustness. RESULTS: When compared to NT, TMC was cost effective with an ICER of $25,578 per QALY gained; incremental cost was $1780 and incremental effectiveness was 0.070 QALYs. In one-way sensitivity analyses, results were most sensitive to the cost of POLE testing, but TMC remained cost-effective over all parameter ranges. CONCLUSIONS: TMC in early-stage high-risk EC is cost-effective, and the model results were robust over a range of parameters. Given that MC can be used to guide adjuvant treatment decisions, these findings support adoption of TMC into routine practice.

Is the risk of substantial LVSI in stage I endometrial cancer similar to PORTEC in the North American population? - A single-institution study.

OBJECTIVES: A pooled analysis of PORTEC-1 & 2 identified substantial lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) in 4.8% of patients, which predicted for pelvic recurrence, distant metastasis, and overall survival. Our institution implemented the PORTEC three-tier system of LVSI reporting (absent, focal, or substantial). We aimed to quantify the incidence of substantial LVSI in a North American population and to correlate extent of LVSI with lymph node (LN) involvement. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on patients with clinically uterine-confined, endometrioid type endometrial cancer who underwent surgical staging and were found to have pT1a-b disease. Binary logistic regression was used to assess predictors of LN involvement (defined as ITC, micrometastases, or macrometastases). RESULTS: In total, 438 patients with pT1a-b disease were identified. In the overall cohort and in the subset meeting PORTEC-1 inclusion criteria (n = 195), no LVSI was present in 67.4% and 50.8%; focal LVSI was present in 16.7% and 24.1%; and substantial LVSI was present in 16.0% and 25.1%, respectively. Among patients who underwent surgical LN assessment (79.2%, n = 347), LNs were involved in 3.3% without LVSI, 7.5% with focal LVSI (OR 2.4), and 15.2% with substantial LVSI (OR 5.3) (p = .005), with a similar trend in the PORTEC-1 cohort. Extent of LVSI correlated with disease burden in LN metastases. CONCLUSION: Our incidence of substantial LVSI was three to five times higher than reported by PORTEC and correlated with LN involvement. This questions the reproducibility of the three-tier LVSI reporting system and emphasizes the need for multi-institutional data outside PORTEC for confirmation of our findings.

Palliative care education in gynecologic oncology: a survey of the fellows.

INTRODUCTION: Gynecologic oncologists regularly care for patients at the end of life, yet little is known about their training or preparedness to deal with issues of palliative care. We sought to examine the training provided to gynecologic oncology fellows as well as their perceived preparedness to provide palliative care. METHODS: A self-administered survey was distributed to all fellows enrolled in all gynecologic oncology fellowships during the 2009 academic year. The instrument assessed attitudes, training, experience, and preparedness regarding caring for patients at the end of life. Descriptive, bivariate and multivariable analyses were performed. RESULTS: Sixty-one percent (103/168) of fellows completed the survey. Most (89%) feel that palliative care is integral to their training, but few (11%) have had any palliative care training, including either a rotation or fellowship. Using a scale of 1-10, fellows rated teaching quality on two common training opportunities, specifically managing postoperative complications (7.8) and endometrial cancer patients (8.7), as significantly higher than teaching on managing patients at the end of life (5.5; p<0.001). Fellows rated the quality of end of life teaching as significantly lower than overall teaching (55% vs. 92%; p=0.001). Their self-assessment regarding overall preparedness to deal with end of life issues was associated with higher end of life teaching quality and experience caring for more than 10 dying patients. CONCLUSIONS: The quantity and quality of training in palliative care are lower compared to other common procedural and oncological issues. Gynecologic oncology fellowship programs need to incorporate a palliative care training curriculum.

BRCA1 expression and improved survival in ovarian cancer patients treated with intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer 1, early onset (BRCA1) is a tumour-suppressor gene associated with familial epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Reduced BRCA1 expression is associated with enhanced sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy. We sought to examine the prognostic relevance of BRCA1 expression in EOC patients treated with intraperitoneal platinum/taxane. METHODS: The GOG-172 was a phase III, multi-institutional randomised trial of intravenous paclitaxel and cisplatin (IV therapy) vs intravenous paclitaxel, intraperitoneal cisplatin plus paclitaxel (IP therapy) in patients with optimally resected stage III EOC. The BRCA1 expression was assessed with immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining blinded to clinical outcome in archival tumour specimens. Slides with 10% staining were defined as aberrant and >10% as normal. Correlations between BRCA1 expression and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analysed using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: Of the 393 patients, 189 tumours had aberrant expression, and 204 had normal BRCA1 expression. There was an interaction between BRCA1 expression and route of administration on OS (P=0.014) but not PFS (P=0.054). In tumours with normal BRCA1 expression, the median OS was 58 months for IP group vs 50 months for IV group (P=0.818). In tumours with aberrant BRCA1 expression, the median OS was 84 vs 47 months in the IP vs IV group, respectively (P=0.0002). Aberrant BRCA1 expression was an independent prognostic factor for better survival in women randomised to IP therapy (hazard ratio (HR)=0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.47-0.97, P=0.032). Similar survival was observed in the IV and IP patients with normal BRCA1 expression. Multivariate but not univariate modelling demonstrated that IV patients with aberrant vs normal BRCA1 expression had worse survival. CONCLUSION: Decreased BRCA1 expression is associated with a 36-month survival improvement in patients with EOC treated with IP chemotherapy. Although these results merit validation in future studies, the results suggest that decreased BRCA1 expression predicts for improved response to cisplatin-based IP chemotherapy with cisplatin and paclitaxel.