Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 13 de 13
Filter
1.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol ; 49(5): 358-372, 2021 05.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33757922

ABSTRACT

Menopause Hormonal Treatment (MHT) was initially developed to correct the climacteric symptoms induced by postmenopausal estrogen deficiency. In non-hysterectomized women, MHT combines estrogens and a progestogen, the latter opposing the negative impact of estrogen on endometrial proliferation. In France, and contrary to the USA and Northern European countries, MHT mainly combines 17ß-estradiol, which is the physiological estrogen produced by the ovary, and progesterone or its derivative, dihydrogesterone. France has been a pioneer in the development of cutaneous administration routes (gel or transdermal patch) for estradiol, allowing better metabolic tolerance and a reduction of the risk of venous thromboembolism compared to the oral route. The choice of the doses as well as the treatment regimen is underpinned by tolerance as well as acceptance and compliance. The risk of breast cancer, which is one of the main risks of MHT, is higher with estro-progestogen combinations than with estrogens alone ; the preferential use of progesterone or dihydrogesterone being likely to limit the excess risk of breast cancer associated with MHT at least for duration of treatment of less than 5 to 7 years. The question of the optimal duration of MHT remains an issue and must take into account the initial indication of treatment as well as the benefit-risk balance, which is specific to each woman. Continuation of MHT is conditioned by the benefit-risk balance, which must be evaluated regularly, but also by the evolution of symptoms when MHT is stopped as well as menopause-related health risks or induced by MHT. After stopping MHT, it is necessary to maintain a medical follow-up to be adapted to the clinical situation of each woman and in particular, her cardiovascular and gynecological risk factors.


Subject(s)
Estrogen Replacement Therapy , Postmenopause , Female , Humans , Menopause , Progesterone , Risk Factors
4.
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) ; 45(10): 1596-1603, 2016 Dec.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27818117

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Develop recommendations for the practice of induced abortion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Pubmed database, the Cochrane Library and the recommendations from the French and foreign Gyn-Obs societies or colleges have been consulted. RESULTS: The number of induced abortions (IA) has been stable for several decades. There are a lot of factors explaining the choice of abortion when there is an unplanned pregnancy (UPP). Early initiation and choice of contraception in connection to the woman's life are associated with lower NSP. Reversible contraceptives of long duration of action should be positioned fist in line for the teenager because of its efficiency (grade C). Ultrasound before induced abortion must be encouraged but should not be obligatory before performing IA (Professional consensus). As soon as the sonographic apparition of the embryo, the estimated date of pregnancy is done by measuring the crown-rump length (CRL) or by measuring the biparietal diameter (BIP) from 11 weeks on (grade B). Reliability of these parameters being±5 days, IA could be done if measurements are respectively less than 90mm for CRL and less than 30mm for BIP (Professional consensus). A medical IA performed with a dose of 200mg mifepristone combined with misoprostol is effective at any gestational age (EL1). Before 7 weeks, mifepristone followed between 24 and 48hours by taking misoprostol orally, buccally sublingually or eventually vaginally at a dose of 400 ug possibly renewed after 3hours (EL1, grade A). Beyond 7 weeks, misoprostol given vaginally, sublingually or buccally are better tolerated with fewer side effects than oral route (EL1). It is recommended to always use a cervical preparation during an instrumental abortion (Professional consensus). Misoprostol is a first-line agent for cervical preparation at a dose of 400 mcg (grade A). Aspiration evacuation is preferable to curettage (grade B). A perforated uterus during an instrumental suction should not be considered as a scarred uterus (Professional consensus). IA is not associated with increased subsequent risk of infertility or ectopic pregnancy (EL2). The pre-abortion medical consultations does not affect, most of the time, the decision to request an IA. Indeed, a majority of women is quite sure of her choice during these consultations. Acceptability of the method of IA and satisfaction appears to be larger when they are able to choose the abortion method (grade B). There is no relationship between an increase in psychiatric disorders and IA (EL2). Women with psychiatric histories are at increased risk of mental disorders after the occurrence of an UPP (EL2). In case of instrumental abortion, oral estrogen-progestogen contraceptives and the patch should be started from the day of the abortion, the vaginal ring inserted within 5 days of IA (grade B). In case of medical abortion, the vaginal ring should be inserted within a week of taking mifepristone, oral estrogen-progestogen contraceptives and the patch should be initiated on the same day or the day after taking prostaglandins (grade C). In case of instrumental abortion, the contraceptive implant may be inserted on the day of the abortion (grade B). In case of medical abortion, the implant can be inserted on the day of mifepristone (grade C). The copper Intrauterine Device (IUD) and levonorgestrel should be inserted preferably on the day of instrumental abortion (grade A). In case of medical abortion, an IUD can be inserted within 10 days following mifepristone after ensuring by ultrasound of the absence of intrauterine pregnancy (grade C). CONCLUSION: The implementation of these guidelines may promote a better and more homogenous care for women requesting IA in our country.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Induced/methods , Abortion, Induced/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Female , Humans , Pregnancy
6.
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris) ; 64(3): 199-204, 2015 Jun.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26044304

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular diseases remain the first cause of death in women. To improve women's health cardiologists and gynaecologists should work together on women's specific cardiovascular risk factor. METHOD: Our study evaluated a care pathway named "heart, arteries and women". One hundred and ninety-one women were included for vascular (n=55) or hypertensive (n=136) explorations from January the first to December the 31st of 2013. We studied their clinical presentation and medical management. RESULTS: All women were at high cardiovascular risk (38% of them at very high risk). The average age was 52 years old. A woman on three had experienced high blood pressure or diabetes during pregnancy. One on two was postmenopausal woman. We stopped twelve estrogen-progesterone contraceptions; 60% didn't have gynaecological follow-up; 146 had high blood pressures (73% at night, 50% had no dipping blood pressure profile and 15 were newly diagnosed for hypertension). Sleep apnoea syndrome was suspected in half women. Medical therapies were optimized especially for women with atheroma in which 30 to 46% were properly treated (P=0.0005). Only 18% of the gynecologists received conclusive reports. CONCLUSION: At one year, our care pathway "heart, arteries and women" allowed to optimize medical therapy and clinical management. Everyone should be aware of this program.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Cardiovascular Diseases/therapy , Adult , Arteries , Critical Pathways , Female , Humans , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/therapy , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Women's Health
7.
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris) ; 63(3): 192-6, 2014 Jun.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24972987

ABSTRACT

Cardiovascular (CV) diseases are the primary cause of death of women. Since they kill 10 times more than breast cancer, preventive measures should be implemented. According to U.S. recommendations, a woman is either at "CV risk" or at "optimal health status" if she has no risk factors and a perfectly healthy lifestyle. Some risk factors are more deleterious to women (smoking, diabetes, stress, depression, atrial fibrillation); or specific to women (preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, contraception, menopause, headaches). The lifestyle plays a key role for them. The blood pressure measurement is the most frequent opportunity to detect women at risk. CV tests should be performed to all symptomatic women and for those over the age of 45 who want to start practicing sport. The cardiologist can play a key role to improve women's CV health by integrating their hormonal risks. Women themselves can also make a powerful contribution to prevention by adopting a healthy lifestyle. From those recommendations concerning women's CV health, there is a great opportunity to initiate a health path for women at high cardiovascular risk. The objectives of the specific path "heart, arteries and women" of University hospital of Lille will be to improve professional practice, awareness of women, educate public authorities and within a few years reduce the epidemic of CVD of French women.


Subject(s)
Arteries , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Heart Ventricles , Life Style , Women's Health , Adult , Arteries/pathology , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal/adverse effects , Depression/complications , Diabetes Complications/prevention & control , Diabetes, Gestational/prevention & control , Female , France/epidemiology , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Heart Ventricles/pathology , Humans , Menopause , Pre-Eclampsia/prevention & control , Pregnancy , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Smoking/adverse effects , Stress, Psychological/complications
8.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil ; 40(1): 37-42, 2012 Jan.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22030287

ABSTRACT

In recent years, intrauterine contraception has experienced a revival, explainable as much by the broadening of its indications as by the ever increasing demand, expressed by women, for a contraceptive method that is both reliable and not binding. In this review, we establish an up-to-date and comprehensive state of intrauterine contraception in 2010, by responding to key-questions, which arise from everyday practice in gynaecology.


Subject(s)
Contraception , Contraceptive Agents, Female/administration & dosage , Intrauterine Devices, Copper , Levonorgestrel/administration & dosage , Contraception Behavior , Evidence-Based Medicine , Family Planning Services , Female , Health Education , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Meta-Analysis as Topic
9.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil ; 39(11): 644-55, 2011 Nov.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22000833

ABSTRACT

Many guidelines regarding the daily management of regular oral hormonal contraceptive methods have been proposed worldwide. Some of them may even appear to be conflicting. The search for the maximal contraceptive protection leads to a low acceptance of these guidelines, probably because of their complexity and their apparent discrepancy. We are deeply convinced that simplicity and pragmatism of guidelines should pave the way to both their better acceptance and compliance and, consequently, to their improved real-life effectiveness. We have considered physiology and pharmacodynamics before proposing the following rules for an effective management of hormonal contraceptive failures. We conclude that the risk of unwanted pregnancy is higher in case of a unique contraception misuse/a delayed start during the first week of the contraceptive cycle (or in case of multiple days of contraceptive misuses during the following weeks) for a combined contraception or at every cycle day for a non anti-ovulatory progestin only contraception. In such risky situations, we firmly recommend the restart of the regular contraceptive method and the use of condoms for the following 72 hours, provided no sexual intercourse has occurred during the past 5 days before the contraceptive failure. If sexual intercourse has occurred during the past 5 days before the contraceptive failure, we firmly recommend the intake of an emergency contraception, ulipristal acetate, the restart the regular contraceptive method and in this case, the use of condoms for, at least, the following 7 days.


Subject(s)
Contraception/methods , Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal/administration & dosage , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Coitus , Condoms , Contraceptive Agents, Female/administration & dosage , Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal/pharmacokinetics , Expert Testimony , Female , Humans , Norpregnadienes/administration & dosage , Norpregnadienes/pharmacology , Patient Compliance , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Risk
10.
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) ; 39(2): 102-15, 2010 Apr.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20106606

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Analysis of the trials which compare the virologic testing (HPV testing) and the cytology in the cervical screening. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The MedLine database was consulted using the Keywords: "cervical screening", "pap smear", "liquid based cytology", "HPV testing", "adults", "adolescents", "cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)", "uterine cervix cancer". Articles were selected according their concern about the debate of the uterine cervix cancer screening in France. RESULTS: The HPV testing seems interesting allowing a decreasing delay in the diagnosis of CIN (more diagnosis of CIN2+ in the first round and less during the second one). But, when the two rounds are added, the number of CIN2+ are identical in the two arms (cytology and HPV testing) in all the trials (except the Italian NTCC trial). A negative HPV testing protects the women much longer than cytology can do: a delay of five years between two rounds seems ideal. The HPV testing alone increases the detection rate of cervical lesions, which could regress spontaneously and may induce an overtreatment, especially in the youngest population: a triage is necessary and the cytology appears to be the best way to select the candidates for colposcopy in case of positive HPV testing and cytology. The HPV infection presents some particularities in adolescent females: for this reason, the HPV testing should not be used in this special population. In vaccinated women, a consensus for the screening is necessary. CONCLUSION: The health care providers in France have to understand the characteristics of the HPV testing: its advantages compared to the cytologic screening are only evident in case of an organization of the screening in France and even in Europe.


Subject(s)
Mass Screening/methods , Papanicolaou Test , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Vaginal Smears , Adolescent , Adult , Europe , Female , France , Humans , Mass Screening/economics , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Papillomavirus Vaccines , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Time Factors , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/virology
11.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil ; 35(10): 951-67, 2007 Oct.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17855146

ABSTRACT

The two main objectives of adolescence contraception are the eviction of involuntary pregnancies and the prevention of sexually transmitted infections. In France, in spite of our rich contraceptive arsenal and a widely spread information, the rate of voluntary termination of pregnancy keeps growing among the teenagers population--and this, probably because the gap between theoretical effectiveness and practice of contraception is particularly wide among the young people. Every contraceptive means can be used by teenagers; the best option being, it seems, the "double DUTCH", which consists of concomitant use of condoms and hormonal contraception. Most often, the consultation for contraception is the first gynaecological consultation. That is the reason why it is usually stressful for teenagers who dread undergoing a gynaecological examination. If this examination is not necessary for most of young patients, it is essential to create a trustful relationship and to make explicit the several contraceptive methods. During this consultation it is interesting to look for common teenage troubles like addiction to smoking and eating disorders. For any prescription of hormonal contraception, it is important to explain the benefits and the possible side effects, to stress the observance and to tell the teenager about the recommendations in case of forgetting. Concerning condom - the only efficient way of preventing sexually transmitted infections--, it is useful to talk about it in concrete and straightforward terms, to show its handling and to inform about risks of tearing. With this state of mind, an emergency contraception can be prescribed straightaway in order to make its use easier. Also, without any moralizing speech, the need for maturity must be emphasized as well as taking care of one's body with the aim of avoiding a premature pregnancy or any sexually transmitted infection. This consultation must be coupled with a close follow-up, availability and mutual confidence which are the main elements vouching for a good observance and consequently an efficient contraception.


Subject(s)
Contraception/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Female , France , Humans , Psychology, Adolescent , Sexual Behavior/statistics & numerical data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...