Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Sex Med Rev ; 8(1): 48-58, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31416758

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Prior epidemiology studies on erectile dysfunction (ED) have varied in geography/place, time period, and methodology. Due to this variability, comparisons of data across studies are greatly limited. Additionally, little is known about the rates of comorbid ED and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). AIM: To update the prevalence of ED and patient characteristics using a single methodology in 8 countries: Brazil, China, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States. METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study included men (≥18 years) who self-reported experiencing difficulty in achieving or maintaing an erection in the past 6 months in the 2015 and 2016 National Health and Wellness Surveys (N = 97,159). Pairwise comparisons between the United States and each of the other countries were performed among respondents with ED and no BPH, aged ≥18 years, and within the subset of men aged 40-70 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: ED prevalence (with BPH, with no BPH, and overall), health characteristics, and ED risk factors were assessed. RESULTS: ED with BPH was found to be < 6.0% in all countries. ED prevalence overall varied from 37.2% (Brazil) to 48.6% (Italy). Similar patterns were observed for the subset of men aged 40-70 years. Patients in Brazil were younger (aged ≥18: 43.85 vs. 52.35; aged 40-70: 52.94 vs. 56.76 years; for both, P < .05) than those in the United States. ED-related comorbidities were more common in European countries, comparatively. CONCLUSION: This study provides an important update and outlook to ED epidemiology in Brazil, China, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Overall, ED prevalence is high, relative to some previous estimates. Findings from this study highlight the continued burden ED plays in the lives of men in these countries. Goldstein I, Goren A, Li VW, et al. Epidemiology Update of Erectile Dysfunction in Eight Countries with High Burden. Sex Med Rev 2020;8:48-58.


Subject(s)
Erectile Dysfunction/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Brazil/epidemiology , China/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Erectile Dysfunction/etiology , France/epidemiology , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Prostatic Hyperplasia/complications , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Spain/epidemiology , United Kingdom/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology
2.
Int J Clin Pract ; 73(11): e13384, 2019 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31389146

ABSTRACT

AIM: To evaluate the association of erectile dysfunction (ED) with work productivity loss, activity impairment and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) across Brazil, China, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the UK and the US. METHODS: This cross-sectional observational study used data from adult men (40-70 years old; N = 52 697) from the 2015 and 2016 National Health and Wellness Surveys. ED assessment was based on self-reported difficulty in achieving or maintaining an erection in the past 6 months. Impairment to work and non-work activities and HRQoL were assessed for each country and compared against the US. Multivariable models tested interactions between ED status and country for each outcome. RESULTS: Overall ED prevalence was reported as 49.7%, with Italy reporting the highest rate (54.7%). Men with ED reported significantly higher absenteeism (7.1% vs 3.2%), presenteeism (22.5% vs 10.1%), overall work productivity impairment (24.8% vs 11.2%), activity impairment (28.6% vs 14.5%) and significantly lower Mental Component Summary scores (MCS; 46.7 vs 51.2), Physical Component Summary scores (PCS; 48.3 vs 53.0), and health state utilities (SF-6D: 0.693 vs 0.778; all, P < 0.001) than men with no ED. After adjusting for covariates, compared with the US, the association of ED status with overall work productivity impairment was greatest in the UK (26% higher; P < 0.05), and with MCS, PCS and SF-6D scores was greatest in China (-2.67, -1.58, and -0.043 points, respectively; all, P < 0.001). Greater ED severity was significantly associated with higher impairment to work and non-work activities and lower HRQoL, with China reporting the highest burden, compared with the US (most P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: ED poses a significant burden with respect to work productivity and HRQoL, with greater severity associated with worse outcomes. Better management and earlier detection may help reduce this burden, especially in countries reporting a strong association between ED and poor economic and health outcomes.


Subject(s)
Absenteeism , Erectile Dysfunction/epidemiology , Quality of Life/psychology , Adult , Aged , Brazil/epidemiology , China/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , France/epidemiology , Germany/epidemiology , Health Surveys , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Presenteeism , Self Report , Spain/epidemiology
3.
J Asthma ; 56(3): 244-251, 2019 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29595345

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association of asthma on health-related quality of life (QoL), productivity, and use of healthcare resources among adults in Brazil. METHODS: Data were analyzed from the 2015 Brazil National Health and Wellness Survey, a cross-sectional survey with 12,000 adult respondents. Asthma and control groups were compared with respect to health-related QoL, asthma control, work productivity, and adherence. Generalized linear models were developed to compare asthma-related associations controlling for potential confounding factors. RESULTS: Among respondents, 4.1% (n = 494) reported an asthma diagnosis; those without asthma symptoms were used as the control group (n = 11,487). Regarding asthma control, 51.2% of patients had uncontrolled asthma, 36.4% partially controlled asthma, and 12.3% were fully controlled. Short-acting ß2 agonists were the most commonly used class of drugs (38.5%). Approximately 32.4% of asthma patients were considered fully adherent to their treatment. In multivariable analyses, asthma patients presented lower health-related QoL and had more frequent visits with medical healthcare providers (6.1 versus 4.2) emergency room visits (1.0 versus 0.5), and more hospitalizations (0.4 versus 0.2), than control respondents six months prior to the study (p < 0.05). Rates of absenteeism and presenteeism varied between 11.5% and 7.4% (p < 0.05) and 30.4% and 20.9% (p < 0.001) between asthma patients and controls, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Asthma had a negative association on health-related QoL, work productivity, and use of healthcare resources. Excessive use of short-acting ß2 agonists and poor treatment adherence reflect poor asthma control and suggest the need to implement new strategies for asthma treatment in Brazil.


Subject(s)
Asthma/economics , Asthma/epidemiology , Cost of Illness , Health Resources/economics , Health Services/economics , Quality of Life , Absenteeism , Adult , Age Factors , Asthma/psychology , Brazil/epidemiology , Bronchodilator Agents , Cross-Sectional Studies , Efficiency , Female , Health Expenditures , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Models, Economic , Severity of Illness Index , Sex Factors , Socioeconomic Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL