Early rehabilitation vs. conventional immobilization in nonoperative treatment of proximal humeral fracture: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Fractures of the proximal humerus (PHF) are commonly treated conservatively. Evidence suggests that a period of immobilization of one week or less may lead to some advantages compared to a traditional 3-4 weeks of immobilization. The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the clinical and radiological results in the case of early rehabilitation vs. delayed rehabilitation after PHF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In July 2023, a literature search was carried out on the PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase databases to identify all the randomized trials comparing early rehabilitation vs. delayed rehabilitation after PHF. The following data were extracted from each included study: patients' demographics, study design and level of evidence, follow-up times, treatment groups, evaluation scores adopted, and overall clinical and radiological findings. The quality of the trials was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment. RESULTS: A total of 5 studies, including 378 patients and dealing with early vs. delayed rehabilitation in case of conservative treatment of PHF, were included in this study. Early rehabilitation was started within 1 week and consisted mainly of pendulum exercise and progressive passive mobilization. Early rehabilitation was associated with better pain and functional scores within the first 3 months in 3 studies. No difference in pain or function was reported at 6 months or longer follow-up, and no differences in complications rate were observed between early vs. delayed rehabilitation groups. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review suggests that early mobilization within one week in case of conservative treatment of PHF leads to improved function recovery and reduced pain, especially in the first months of rehabilitation, without differences at longer follow-up and without increasing complications rate. Reducing immobilization time could accelerate function recovery and regaining independence in daily life activities.

Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for the treatment of osteonecrosis and bone vascular diseases: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to review the available literature on the use of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT) for the treatment of osteonecrosis (ON) and bone vascular disease (BVD), to understand its therapeutic potential and compare it with other therapies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review was performed on the PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, and Research Gate databases with the following inclusion criteria: 1) randomized controlled trials (RCTs); 2) written in English; 3) published in indexed journals within the last 25 years (1995-2020); and 4) dealing with the use of ESWT for the treatment of BVD or ON. The risk of bias was assessed by the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for RCTs. RESULTS: Five studies involving 199 patients in total (68 female and 131 male) were included. Patients in the control groups received different treatments, like surgery, bisphosphonates in combination with prostacyclin or ESWT, and hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Looking at the quality of the available literature, none of the studies included could be considered a "good quality" study; only one was ranked as "fair" and the remaining were marked "poor" quality studies. No major complications or serious adverse events were reported in any of the included studies. Based on the available data, ESWT can produce rapid pain relief and functional improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, a substandard quality of method emerged from the analysis of the literature, with most studies flawed by relevant bias. Ultimately, ESWT has the potential to be a useful conservative treatment in bone degeneration due to vascular and tissue turnover impairment.

Evidence-based treatment choices for acute lateral ankle sprain: a comprehensive systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Lateral ankle sprains are very common injuries that can be treated with different strategies. The aim of the present systematic review was to provide a comprehensive analysis on the treatment of acute lateral ankle sprains to clarify the possible differences in outcome between surgical and conservative management, different external supports, and different rehabilitation protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search on three different topics was carried out on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases on June 25th, 2021. The main objective of the literature search was to identify the randomized trials comparing: (1) surgery to conservative management, (2) different external supports, and (3) different rehabilitation protocols for the treatment of acute lateral ankle sprains. Two investigators extracted independently relevant data from each paper and assessed the quality of the trials using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment. RESULTS: A total of 12 studies for the first topic, 8 for the second one and 4 for the last one were included in this review. 8 out of 12 RCTs demonstrated a superior outcome and better socio-economic impact of conservative treatment compared to surgical management. In the other two comparisons, due to the wide variety of braces used and the different rehabilitation protocols, inconclusive results were obtained. CONCLUSIONS: Conservative treatment should be the first choice for severe acute lateral ankle sprains, as it provides satisfactory functional outcomes without the risks and costs of surgery. It was not possible to identify the best external support, but a preference toward flexible braces emerged since they allow an earlier return to daily activities. The paucity of studies comparing different rehabilitation protocols precluded the possibility of defining the ideal one.

Intraosseous injections of platelet rich plasma for knee bone marrow lesions treatment: one year follow-up.

PURPOSE: Cartilage lesions are usually accompanied by subchondral bone alterations or bone marrow lesions (BMLs). BML associated with joint degeneration and cartilage lesions are considered to be predictors of rapidly progressing OA. Currently no existing treatment can fully halt OA progression. One of the approaches is an autologous, biological treatment based on the use of platelet rich plasma (PRP) injections. The purpose of this study is to assess the short-term effectiveness of intraosseous PRP injections, within the BML of individuals affected by OA, in ameliorating pain and improving knee functionality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study involved 17 patients with an average age of 41.7 ± 14.3 years old. OA stage was determined using the Kellgren-Lawrence grading system by performing radiographic scanning of the knee joint before surgical intervention. Patients with K-L grade 3 knee joint OA prevailed. Patient OA history varied between one and nine years (average 5.2 ± 4.5 years). Clinical and functional state of the knee were assessed by pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Score (WOMAC), and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) which were filled out by patients previous to the surgical procedure at one, three, six and 12 months post-operatively. Before surgery, in addition to standard blood tests, serum cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) levels were tested for all patients. RESULTS: Evaluation of preliminary results revealed a statistically significant reduction of pain based on the VAS score. A significant improvement was also observed in the patients' WOMAC score and in the overall KOOS score. Serum marker levels were initially elevated in our experimental patient group compared to the same marker in healthy control respondents, and continued to rise one month and three months following surgery, at six and 12 month the level was similar as at three months. CONCLUSIONS: In our opinion, first COMP increasing can be caused by injection of platelet rich plasma. It is not adequate to interpret this growth in COMP levels as increased osteochondral degeneration. One year follow-up period showed good quality of life improvement, significant pain reduction, and essential MRI changes. The long-term observation of these cohort of patients combined with an analysis of MRI images is still ongoing.