[Liposome co-delivery of quercetin and doxorubicin in inhibiting retinoblastoma by regulating epithelial-mesenchymal transition process].

Regulating the process of epithelial-mesenchymal transition(EMT) is an essential strategy to inhibit tumor growth and metastasis. This study is based on the EMT process of retinoblastoma and constructs quercetin(QUE) and doxorubicin(DOX) co-loaded liposome(QD Lipo) to investigate the therapeutic effect and mechanisms of combined QUE and DOX treatment on retinoblastoma. Single-factor experiments were conducted to optimize the prescription process of QD Lipo. Eventually, spherical particles with a diameter of(108.87±1.93) nm, a PDI of 0.13±0.02, and a Zeta potential of(-34.83±1.92) mV were obtained. The encapsulation rates of QUE and DOX were 96.20%±4.40% and 91.17%±4.41%, respectively. Y79 human retinoblastoma cells were used as an in vitro cellular model, and confocal microscopy demonstrated that QD Lipo could enhance Y79 uptake efficiency. The CCK-8 assay confirmed that the optimal combination therapy effect of QUE and DOX occurred at a mass ratio of 1∶1 to 1∶2. Flow cytometry showed that QD Lipo enhanced the induction of apoptosis in Y79 cells. Western blot analysis revealed that QD Lipo significantly reduced the expression of EMT pathway-related proteins vimentin and α-SMA. Fluorescence assays detected a significant decrease in ROS levels in Y79 cells after treatment with QD. These results indicated that liposomal co-delivery of QUE and DOX can enhance drug delivery efficiency to retinoblastoma cells, inhibit the EMT process in retinoblastoma by downregulating ROS levels, and enhance the cytotoxicity of DOX against retinoblastoma.

The Content of Statistical Requirements for Authors in Biomedical Research Journals.

BACKGROUND: Robust statistical designing, sound statistical analysis, and standardized presentation are important to enhance the quality and transparency of biomedical research. This systematic review was conducted to summarize the statistical reporting requirements introduced by biomedical research journals with an impact factor of 10 or above so that researchers are able to give statistical issues' serious considerations not only at the stage of data analysis but also at the stage of methodological design. METHODS: Detailed statistical instructions for authors were downloaded from the homepage of each of the included journals or obtained from the editors directly via email. Then, we described the types and numbers of statistical guidelines introduced by different press groups. Items of statistical reporting guideline as well as particular requirements were summarized in frequency, which were grouped into design, method of analysis, and presentation, respectively. Finally, updated statistical guidelines and particular requirements for improvement were summed up. RESULTS: Totally, 21 of 23 press groups introduced at least one statistical guideline. More than half of press groups can update their statistical instruction for authors gradually relative to issues of new statistical reporting guidelines. In addition, 16 press groups, covering 44 journals, address particular statistical requirements. The most of the particular requirements focused on the performance of statistical analysis and transparency in statistical reporting, including "address issues relevant to research design, including participant flow diagram, eligibility criteria, and sample size estimation," and "statistical methods and the reasons." CONCLUSIONS: Statistical requirements for authors are becoming increasingly perfected. Statistical requirements for authors remind researchers that they should make sufficient consideration not only in regards to statistical methods during the research design, but also standardized statistical reporting, which would be beneficial in providing stronger evidence and making a greater critical appraisal of evidence more accessible.