Effectiveness of test-and-treat model with direct-acting antiviral for hepatitis C virus infection in migrants: a prospective interventional study in Italy.

BACKGROUND: Migrants, mainly undocumented and low-income refugees, are at high risk of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, but are a difficult-to-reach and to-treat population. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a test and treat model with direct-acting antiviral for HCV infection in these migrants coming from low-income and living in southern Italy. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, collaborative study based on a four-phase-program (educational counseling, screening, linkage-to-care and treatment) was designed in southern Italy; the study started in June 2018, was stopped in February 2020 because of the outbreak of SARS-CoV2 infection in Italy and was resumed in February 2021 until November 2021. After educational counseling on infectious diseases that are transmitted through blood or sexually pseudonymized HCV screening was offered to all undocumented migrants and low-income refugees observed at one of the 1st level clinical centers. The HCV-RNA-positive subjects were referred to one of the 3rd level units of Infectious Diseases (ID) and treated with a 12-week course of sofosbuvir-velpatasvir and observed for 12 weeks after the end of direct antiviral agents (DAA) treatment. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: For the descriptive analysis, the categorical variables were reported as absolute numbers and relative frequencies. Continuous variables were summarized as mean and standard deviation (SD) if normally distributed, or as a median and interquartile range (IQR) if not normally distributed. We used Pearson chi-square or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and Student's t test or Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables. A P value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Analyses were performed with SPSS 21.0. RESULTS: Of the 3501migrants observed in the study period, 3417 (97.6%) agreed to be screened; 185 (4.7%) were anti-HCV-positive and, of these, 53 (28.6%) were HCV-RNA-positive. Of these 53 subjects, 48 (90.5%) were referred to an ID unit and started DAA treatment. The HCV-RNA-positive-subjects were older [median 36 years (IQR: 32-21) vs 27.19 (IQR: 30.5-19.25); P = 0.001], and less frequently males [35 (66.03 %) vs 119 (90.1%), P < 0 .0001] than seronegative participants. They more frequently came from Eastern Europe (70.8%) stayed longer in Italy [months of stay in Italy, mean ± SD: 51.02 ± 52.84 vs 25.7 ± 42.65, P = 0.001], and had more years of schooling [years of schooling, mean ± SD: 9.61±2.81 vs 7.10 ± 4, P = 0.0001]. HCV-RNA-positive-subjects less frequently reported piercing, tattoos and tribal scars as risk factors (23.6%). Of these 48 HCV RNA positive subjects who started DAA, 47 (97.9%) showed a sustained virological response and one dropped-out in follow-up after DAA treatment. No subject had any adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: This model of HCV screening and linkage to care seems effective to eliminate HCV infectionin a difficult-to-reach and to-treat population, such as undocumented migrants and low-income refugees. The participation of cultural mediators in the study made possible a better interaction between migrants and physicians, as is evident from the large number of subjects enrolled. Eliminating HCV among migrants will have a long-term positive impact from a public health and healthcare perspective by reducing the number of individuals who potentially develop HCV-related complications such as liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma and reducing the circulation of HCV in the regions that host them which often, as in the case of Italy, are low endemic for HCV infection.

Systematic application of SICA-PED protocol for central venous catheterization in neonates: A prospective clinical study on 104 cases.

BACKGROUND: Catheterization of central vessels can be associated with early and late, potentially fatal complications. A proactive approach is imperative to reduce the frequency and magnitude of adverse events. Recently, the GAVeCeLT has proposed a protocol called SICA-PED (i.e. Safe Insertion of Central Access in Pediatric patients) and includes seven evidence-based strategies. METHODS: Through a single-center prospective observational study, the authors wanted to consolidate the efficacy and safety of these protocol in newborns. In a series of 104 newborns, the seven steps of the protocol were applied (1) pre-procedural ultrasound study of the RaCeVA veins, (2) correct aseptic technique, (3) ultrasound-guided venipuncture, (4) intraprocedural localization of the tip of the catheter with TTE (ECHO TIP) and (iECG) intracavitary electrocardiogram, (5) reasoned choice of the implant exit site with the RAVESTO Tunneling technique, (6) anchoring without stitches, and (7) exit point protection with the use of glue and transparent semipermeable membrane. The authors have included a further precaution in point (6) the subcutaneous anchoring system has added the counter-fixation of the catheter wings that we will call 6Plus Point. RESULTS: All infants requiring implantation of elective us-guided central venous access were enrolled in the study. None of the 104 implanted central venous catheters experienced early complications (accidental arterial puncture, PNX, primary malposition); rare late complications such as ecchymosis, CRBSI, exit site infection or dislodgement were observed, No catheter-related thrombotic phenomena were observed. The CRBSI catheter-related infection rate was 2.47 × 1000 days catheter cases. CONCLUSION: The results of this prospective study strengthen the feasibility and efficacy of the SICA-Ped Protocol. Demonstrating that the systematic application of the evidence-based seven-step implantation strategy increases the success rate, minimizes early and late complications, which result in increased patient safety.

The impact of a non-restrictive Antimicrobial Stewardship Program in the emergency department of a secondary-level Italian hospital.

Evidence supporting the effectiveness of Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS) Programs in the emergency department (ED) setting is limited. We conducted a prospective cohort study to assess the efficacy of an AMS program in an ED and a short-stay observation unit. The intervention included periodic prospective audits (twice a week), conducted by four infectious disease consultants. Primary outcomes included the difference in the hospital mortality rate, antibiotic consumption, and the incidence of bloodstream infections (BSI) caused by multidrug resistant (MDR) bacteria, before March 2020-February 2021 and after March 2021-February 2022 when the program was implemented. Interrupted time-series analysis was performed to assess the effect of our program. During the 12-month program, we performed 152 audits and evaluated 366 antibiotic therapies out of a total of 853 patients admitted. In the intervention period, we observed a non-statistically significant decrease in total antibiotic consumption, with a change in level of - 31.2 defined daily dose/100 patient-days (PD) (p = 0.71). Likewise, we found no significant variations in the rate of BSI due to MDR Gram-positive (CT - 0.02 events/PD, p = 0.84), MDR Gram-negative bacteria (CT 0.08, p = 0.71), or Candida spp. (CT 0.008, p = 0.86). Conversely, we found a significant decrease in the mortality rate between the pre- and post-intervention periods (- 1.98 deaths/100 PD, CI - 3.9 to - 0.007, p = 0.049). The Antibiotic Stewardship Program in the ED was associated with a significant decrease in the mortality rate. More high-quality studies are needed to determine the most effective ASP strategies in this unique setting.

Outcome of patients with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections treated with cefiderocol: A multicenter observational study.

BACKGROUND: No clear evidence supports the use of cefiderocol as first line treatment in A. baumannii infections. METHODS: We conducted an observational retrospective/prospective multicenter study including all patients> 18 years with carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAB) infections treated with cefiderocol, from June 12021 to October 30 2022. Primary endpoint was 30-day mortality, secondary end-points the clinical and microbiological response at 7 days and at the end of treatment. Furthermore, we compared the clinical and microbiological outcomes among patients who received cefiderocol in monotherapy or in combination. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients with forty episodes of infection were included [mean age 65 years (SD+16.3), 75% males, 90% with hospital-acquired infections and 70% showing sepsis or septic shock]. The most common infections included unknown source or catheter-related bacteremia (45%) and pneumonia (40%). We observed at 7 days and at the end of therapy a rate of microbiological failure of 20% and 10%, respectively, and of clinical failure of 47.5% and 32.5%, respectively; the 30-day mortality rate was 47.5%. At multivariate analysis clinical failure at 7 days of treatment was the only independent predictor of 30-day mortality. Comparing monotherapy (used in 72.5%) vs. combination therapy (used in 27.5%), no differences were observed in mortality (51.7 vs 45.5%) and clinical (41.4 vs 63.7%) or microbiological failure (24.1 vs 9.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study reinforce the effectiveness of cefiderocol in CRAB infections, also as monotherapy. However, prospective multicenter studies with larger sample sizes and a control group treated with standard of care are needed to identify the best treatment for CRAB infections.

Characterization of hepatitis virus co-infections in a cohort of immigrants living in southern Italy.

To characterize viral hepatitis co-infections in a cohort of immigrants living in southern Italy. In a prospective multicenter study, all undocumented immigrants and low-income refugees consecutively evaluated for a clinical consultation at one of the five first-level clinical centers in southern Italy from January 2012 to February 2020 were enrolled. All subjects included in the study were screened for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) and anti-HIV; the HBsAg-positive were screened also for anti-delta. Of the 2923 subjects enrolled, 257 (8%) were HBsAg-positive alone (Control group B), 85 (2.9%) only anti-HCV-positive (Control group C), 16 (0.5%) HBsAg/anti-HCV-positive (Case group BC), and 8 (0.2%) HBsAg/anti-HDV-positive (Case group BD). Moreover, 57 (1.9%) subjects were anti-HIV-positive. HBV-DNA positivity was found less frequently in the 16 subjects in Case group BC (43%) and in the 8 in Case group BD (12.5%) than in the 257 in Control group B (76%; p = 0.03 and 0.0000, respectively). Similarly, HCV-RNA positivity was more frequent in Case group BC than in Control group C (75% vs. 44.7% p = 0.02). The subjects in Group BC had a lower prevalence of asymptomatic liver disease (12.5%) than Control group B (62.2%, p = 0.0001) and Control group C (62.3%, p = 0.0002). Conversely, liver cirrhosis was more frequently identified in Case group BC (25%) than in Control groups B and C (3.11% and 2.35%, p = 0.0000 and 0.0004, respectively). The present study contributes to the characterization of hepatitis virus co-infections in the immigrant population.

Mortality Attributable to Bloodstream Infections Caused by Different Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli: Results From a Nationwide Study in Italy (ALARICO Network).

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to analyze mortality attributable to carbapenem-resistant (CR) gram-negative bacilli (GNB) in patients with bloodstream infections (BSIs). METHODS: Prospective multicentric study including patients with GNB-BSI from 19 Italian hospitals (June 2018-January 2020). Patients were followed-up to 30 days. Primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and attributable mortality. Attributable mortality was calculated in the following groups: Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Enterobacterales, metallo-ß-lactamases (MBL)-producing Enterobacterales, CR-Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA), CR-Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB). A multivariable analysis with hospital fixed-effect was built to identify factors associated with 30-day mortality. Adjusted OR (aORs) were reported. Attributable mortality was calculated according to the DRIVE-AB Consortium. RESULTS: Overall, 1276 patients with monomicrobial GNB BSI were included: 723/1276 (56.7%) carbapenem-susceptible (CS)-GNB, 304/1276 (23.8%) KPC-, 77/1276 (6%) MBL-producing CRE, 61/1276 (4.8%) CRPA, and 111/1276 (8.7%) CRAB BSI. Thirty-day mortality in patients with CS-GNB BSI was 13.7% compared to 26.6%, 36.4%, 32.8% and 43.2% in patients with BSI by KPC-CRE, MBL-CRE, CRPA and CRAB, respectively (P < .001). On multivariable analysis, age, ward of hospitalization, SOFA score, and Charlson Index were factors associated with 30-day mortality, while urinary source of infection and early appropriate therapy resulted protective factors. Compared to CS-GNB, MBL-producing CRE (aOR 5.86, 95% CI 2.72-12.76), CRPA (aOR 1.99, 95% CI 1.48-5.95) and CRAB (aOR 2.65, 95% CI 1.52-4.61) were significantly associated with 30-day mortality. Attributable mortality rates were 5% for KPC-, 35% for MBL, 19% for CRPA, and 16% for CRAB. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with BSIs, carbapenem-resistance is associated with an excess of mortality, with MBL-producing CRE carrying the highest risk of death.

Biochemical predictors of diabetic foot osteomyelitis: A potential diagnostic role for parathormone.

AIMS: The aims of this study were to evaluate parathormone (PTH) levels in people with diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) and investigate the relationship between PTH levels and osteomyelitis (OM) in this population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-eight patients were admitted for DFU in a tertiary-care centre from October 2021 to May 2022. OM was diagnosed by clinical, laboratory, and radiological evaluations. Laboratory measurements and clinical parameters were collected from medical records. Participants in the study were divided into two groups according to the diagnosis of OM (patients with OM, group 1 [n = 54] and patients without OM, group 2 [n = 34]). RESULTS: Compared with group 2, patients in group 1 were younger and had a longer duration of diabetes. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate and fibrinogen were significantly higher in group 1 compared with group 2. PTH levels were significantly lower (group 1 vs. group 2, median [interquartile range] 16.2 (11.6, 31.0) vs. 23.7 (17.0, 38.1), p = 0.008) and alkaline phosphatase was significantly higher (97.0 (79.0, 112.0) vs. 88.0 (63.0, 107.0), p = 0.031) in group 1. In multiple linear regression analysis, the only independent predictors of PTH concentrations were alkaline phosphatase levels (ß-coefficient 0.441, p < 0.001) and the presence of OM (ß-coefficient -0.290, p = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: In a population of patients with diabetes and OM admitted to a tertiary university centre, PTH levels were lower as compared with diabetic individuals without OM. The OM and alkaline phosphatase levels were independent predictors of PTH levels in this selected population.

Hepatitis D virus infection in a large cohort of immigrants in southern Italy: a multicenter, prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Since few data are available in the literature on the prevalence of anti-Delta-positive subjects in immigrant populations, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the demographic and virological characteristics of HDV infection in a large cohort of immigrants living in southern Italy. METHODS: Between January 2012 and February 2020 all immigrants attending one of the 5 first- level centers were enrolled and screened for HBsAg, the HBsAg-positive for anti-Delta and if positive, for HDV-RNA and HDV genotype. RESULTS: Of the 3521 immigrants observed in the study period, 3417 (97.0%) agreed to be screened; they were mainly males (61%), with a median age of 27 years (IQR 8-74) and came prevalently (58%) from sub-Saharan Africa. Of the 3417 patients enrolled, 319 (9%) subjects were HBsAg-positive, and of those, 8 (2.5%) were anti-Delta-positive. No difference in the demographic and epidemiological characteristics was observed between the anti-Delta-negative vs -positive. Of the 8 anti-Delta-positive subjects, only one was HDV-RNA-positive (viral load: 7050 IU/mL), genotype 1, with clinical signs of cirrhosis. CONCLUSIONS: the present study showed a prevalence of HDV of 2.5% in a large cohort of asymptomatic immigrants, suggesting the need for screening campaigns for viral infections including delta hepatitis in this population.

Early predictors of clinical deterioration in a cohort of outpatients with COVID-19 in southern Italy: A multicenter observational study.

Data regarding early predictors of clinical deterioration in patients with infection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) is still scarce. The aim of the study is to identify early symptoms or signs that may be associated with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We conducted a multicentre prospective cohort study on a cohort of patients with COVID-19 in home isolation from March 2020 to April 2021. We assessed longitudinal clinical data (fever, dyspnea, need for hospitalization) through video calls at three specific time points: the beginning of symptoms or the day of the first positivity of the nasopharyngeal swab for SARS-CoV-2-RNA (t0 ), and 3 (t3 ) and 7 (t7 ) days after the onset of symptoms. We included 329 patients with COVID-19: 182 (55.3%) males, mean age 53.4 ± 17.4 years, median Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) of 1 (0-3). Of the 329 patients enrolled, 171 (51.98%) had a mild, 81 (24.6%) a moderate, and 77 (23.4%) a severe illness; 151 (45.9%) were hospitalized. Compared to patients with mild COVID-19, moderate and severe patients were older (p < 0.001) and had more comorbidities, especially hypertension (p < 0.001) and cardiovascular diseases (p = 0.01). At t3 and t7 , we found a significant higher rate of persisting fever (≥37°C) among patients with moderate (91.4% and 58.0% at t3 and t7 , respectively; p < 0.001) and severe outcome (75.3% and 63.6%, respectively; p < 0.001) compared to mild COVID-19 outcome (27.5% and 11.7%, respectively; p < 0.001). Factors independently associated with a more severe outcome were persisting fever at t3 and t7 , increasing age, and CCI above 2 points. Persisting fever at t3 and t7 seems to be related to a more severe COVID-19. This data may be useful to assess hospitalization criteria and optimize the use of resources in the outpatient setting.

SARS-CoV-2 infection: a hurricane that does not ignore chronic hepatitis.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly compromised screening, laboratory controls, clinical surveillance and treatment of chronic hepatitis patients and worsened their outcome, as evidenced by its significant correlation with advanced cirrhosis, liver decompensation and mortality. RESULTS: This pandemic significantly impaired also the sector of liver transplantation, whose wards, operating rooms, outpatients' facilities, and healthcare personnel have been dedicated to patients with COVID-19. In addition, screening and treatment for HBV infection have been delayed or suspended in in most countries, with an increased risk of viral reactivation. Similar delay or suspension have also occurred for universal hepatitis B vaccination programs in many countries. Likewise, COVID-19 pandemic has made unreachable the goal of elimination of HCV infection as a worldwide public-health issue predicted for 2030 by the WHO. CONCLUSION: This review article demonstrates how COVID-19 pandemic is causing serious damage to the sector of liver disease, which has quickly lost the beneficial effects of years of study, research, and clinical and technological application, as well as considerable financial investments.

Cardiovascular disease risk in liver transplant recipients transplanted due to chronic viral hepatitis.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after liver transplantation, mostly in patients transplanted for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, obesity and diabetes. Few data exist on cardiovascular diseases among patients transplanted for viral hepatitis. OBJECTIVE: Our aim is to clarify the cardiovascular risk and subclinical vascular damage among liver transplant recipients for chronic viral hepatitis (i.e. hepatits C virus, hepatis B virus and hepatitis D virus infection). METHODS: Adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with orthotopic liver transplants (OLT) due to viral hepatitis who signed informed consent, and were admitted for a routine follow-up between June 2019 and September 2020 at the Infectious Disease outpatient clinic of the University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy, were prospectively enrolled. An estimation of cardiovascular risk was assessed using three main risk charts, echocolor-Doppler of epiaortic vessels was performed to assess subclinical Intima-Media changes. RESULTS: A total of 161 patients were evaluated; of these 15 were excluded because not affected by viral hepatitis. 146 patients were considered. 83 patients (56.8%) were considered at high cardiovascular risk according to Framingham, 54 patients (36.9%) to American Heart Association Arteriosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) score and 19 (13.0%) to Heart Score. Only 8 patients (5.4%) showed a normal carotid ultrasound, while 52 patients (35.6%) had a carotid artery Intima-Media Thickness (IMT) and 86 (58.9%) an atherosclerotic plaque. CONCLUSIONS: Liver transplant recipients for virus-related associated liver disease are, in light of the high percentage of carotid lesions, at high risk of CVD. Risk charts compared to subclinical carotid lesions which represent damage already established and a real localization of the disease, seem to underestimate the cardiovascular risk. A chronic inflammatory status, could play a key role. It's important to raise the awareness of cardiovascular risk in liver transplant patients to prevent cardiovascular diseases and improve the timing of early diagnosis of premature vascular lesions.

Beta-lactam monotherapy or combination therapy for bloodstream infections or pneumonia due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical and microbiological outcomes of patients treated with beta-lactam monotherapy or combination therapy for Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Google Scholar and the Cochrane Library. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA AND INTERVENTIONS: Experimental and observational studies published as full papers up to December 2020 that compared the efficacy of beta-lactams used as monotherapy or in combination with other active agents as empirical or targeted therapy for bloodstream infections or hospital-acquired pneumonia/ventilator-associated pneumonia due to P. aeruginosa were included in this meta-analysis. The outcomes evaluated were in-hospital mortality rate, 14-day- or 30-day-mortality rate, microbiological cure rate and clinical cure rate. RESULTS: Of 8363 citations screened, six randomized controlled trials, six prospective cohort studies and 21 retrospective cohort studies were included in the analysis, accounting for a total of 3861 subjects. Considering the 14 studies evaluating empirical therapy, no significant difference in mortality rate was observed between the two groups [relative risk (RR) 1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86-1.30; P=0.6]. Similar findings were obtained among the 18 studies analysing targeted therapy (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.83-1.31; P=0.708); however, grouping the studies by design, higher mortality was observed among patients receiving monotherapy in five prospective studies (RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.06-1.79; P=0.018). Finally, no difference was observed between groups in terms of microbiological cure and clinical cure. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrated no difference in mortality rate, clinical cure rate and microbiological cure rate in patients treated with beta-lactam monotherapy or combination therapy for P. aeruginosa infections.

The Impact of the SARS-Cov2 Pandemic on a Persuasive Educational Antimicrobial Stewardship Program in a University Hospital in Southern Italy: A Pre-Post Study.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the effect of the pandemic on the disruption of a persuasive educational antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) conducted in a university hospital in southern Italy. METHODS: In March 2020, the ASP, which began in January 2017 and was carried out at different times in 10 wards, was stopped due to the COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted an observational study with interrupted time series analysis to compare the antibiotic consumption and costs, average length of hospital stay and in-hospital mortality between 12 months before and 9 months after the interruption. RESULTS: Four medical, four surgical wards and two ICUs were included in the study, for a total of 35,921 patient days. Among the medical wards we observed after the interruption a significant increase in fluoroquinolone use, with a change in trend (CT) of 0.996, p = 0.027. In the surgical wards, we observed a significant increase in the overall consumption, with a change in level (CL) of 24.4, p = 0.005, and in the use of third and fourth generation cephalosporins (CL 4.7, p = 0.003). In two ICUs, we observed a significant increase in piperacillin/tazobactam and fluoroquinolone consumption (CT 9.28, p = 0.019, and 2.4, p = 0.047). In the wards with a duration of ASP less than 30 months, we observed a significant increase in antibiotic consumption in the use of piperacillin/tazobactam and fluoroquinolones (CT 12.9, p = 0.022: 4.12, p = 0.029; 1.004, p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: The interruption of ASP during COVID-19 led to an increase in the consumption of broad-spectrum antibiotics, particularly in surgical wards and in those with a duration of ASP less than 30 months.

Inappropriateness of Antibiotic Prescribing in Medical, Surgical and Intensive Care Units: Results of a Multicentre Observational Study.

The objectives of the present study were to provide a snapshot analysis of antibiotic appropriateness in two hospitals in Southern Italy in three specific areas, surgical, medical and intensive care, and to evaluate the risk factors associated with inappropriateness in antimicrobial prescriptions. We conducted a multicentre observational study in two hospitals in the Campania region. We collected data of all patients admitted on the day of evaluation to antibiotic therapy or prophylaxis through a case report form. The primary outcome was to assess the inappropriateness of antibiotic prescribing, related to the spectrum, dose, route of administration and duration of treatment-in particular, to assess whether there was a difference in the adequacy of the prescriptive practice in the medical, surgical and intensive sectors. Prescriptive inappropriateness was more frequently observed in surgical units (79.8% of the 104 antimicrobial prescriptions) than in medical units (53.8% of the 65 prescriptions, p = 0.0003) or in intensive care units (64.1% of the 39 prescriptions, p = 0.052). The reasons for the inappropriate antimicrobial prescriptions were similar in the three areas evaluated: antimicrobial unnecessary and antimicrobial not recommended were the most frequent reasons for inappropriateness. Not participating in an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) was identified as a factor associated with inappropriate antimicrobial prescriptions in medical and surgical units, but not in Intensive Care Units (ICUs). ASPs may enhance the appropriateness of antimicrobial prescriptions especially in medical and surgical units. In ICUs, specific programs able to limit empirical therapies and encourage the collection of microbiological samples may be useful to set up targeted therapies and to design antimicrobial protocols.

Impact of an Education-Based Antimicrobial Stewardship Program on the Appropriateness of Antibiotic Prescribing: Results of a Multicenter Observational Study.

To evaluate the effect that an education-based Antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) implemented in two hospitals in southern Italy had on the quality and appropriateness of antibiotic prescription. We conducted a multicenter observational study in two hospitals in the Campania region. Only some departments of both hospitals were already participating in the ASP. We collected data on all patients admitted on the day of evaluation in antibiotic therapy or prophylaxis through a case report form. The primary outcome was to investigate the difference in the appropriateness of the antibiotic prescriptive practice in the departments that had joined the ASP and in those that had not participated in the project (non-ASP). The total number of patients assessed was 486. Of these, 78 (16.05%) were in antibiotic prophylaxis and 130 (26.7%) in antibiotic therapy. The prescriptive appropriateness was better in the units that had joined ASP than in those that had not, with respectively 65.8% versus 22.7% (p < 0.01). Patients in the non-ASP units more frequently received unnecessary antibiotics (44.9% versus 0%, p = 0.03) and, as surgical prophylaxis, the use of antibiotics not recommended by the guidelines (44.2% versus 0%, p = 0.036). Multivariable analysis of the factors associated with prescriptive appropriateness identified ASP units (p = 0.02) and bloodstream or cardiovascular infections (p = 0.03) as independent predictors of better prescriptive appropriateness. The findings of the present study reinforce the importance of adopting an educational ASP to improve the quality of antimicrobial prescription in clinical practice.

Antibiotic resistance in diabetic foot infection: how it changed with COVID-19 pandemic in a tertiary care center.

AIM: To investigate the rate of antibiotic resistance and its main risk factors in a population of patients with diabetic foot infection (DFI) during the COVID-19 pandemic, in comparison with the population of 2019. METHODS: Two hundred and twenty-five patients with DFI were admitted in a tertiary care center from January 2019 to December 2020. Antibiotic resistance was evaluated by microbiological examination of soft tissues' or bone's biopsy. RESULTS: Compared with 2019 group (n = 105), 2020 group (n = 120) had a significantly higher prevalence of antibiotic resistance [2019 vs 2020, 36% vs 63%, P <0.001] and more often was admitted with recent or current antibiotic therapy (18% vs 52%, P <0.001), which was frequently self-administered (5% vs 30%, P = 0.032). The risk of antibiotic resistance was also higher in 2020 group [OR 95% CI, 2.90 (1.68 to 4.99)]. Prior hospitalization, antibiotic self-administration and antibiotic prescription by general practitioners resulted as independent predictors of antibiotic resistance. CONCLUSIONS: In a population of people with DFI admitted in a tertiary care center during the COVID-19 pandemic the prevalence of antibiotic resistance was higher than 2019. Previous hospitalization, antibiotic self-administration /prescription by general practitioners were related to higher risk of antibiotic resistant infections.

Clinical Features of Patients with Home Isolation Sars-Cov-2 Infection: A Multicenter Retrospective Study in Southern Italy.

To describe epidemiological and clinical features of patients confirmed as having SARS-CoV-2 infection and managed in isolation at home. We performed a multicenter retrospective study enrolling all SARS-CoV-2-positive adults evaluated from 28 February to 31 May 2020 at one of nine COVID-19 Units in southern Italy: we included patients receiving care at home and those admitted to hospital. We defined patients with not-severe disease if they were asymptomatic or experienced a mild infection that did not need oxygen (O2) therapy and those with a severe infection if hospitalized and required O2 therapy. We enrolled 415 patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection: 77 were managed in isolation at home, 338 required hospital management. The 77 patients in home isolation were less frequently male than hospitalized patients (55% vs. 64%; <0.01) and were younger (median age 45 years (IQR:19) vs. 62 (IQR 22); p < 0.01), had a lower Charlson comorbidity index (median 0 (IQR2) vs. 6 (IQR 3); p < 0.01), and included fewer subjects with an underlying chronic disease (36% vs. 59%; p < 0.01). According to a binomial logistic regression analysis, a younger age (OR: 0.96 (95% IC: 0.94-0.98), p < 0.01) and a low Charlson comorbidity index (OR: 0.66 (95% IC: 0.54-0.83); p < 0.01) were independent factors associated with at-home management. The identification of subjects with SARS-CoV-2 infection who could be managed in home isolation is useful in clinical practice. A younger age and no comorbidities were identified as factors independently associated with home management.

Clinical Presentation of COVID-19: Case Series and Review of the Literature.

COVID-19 infection has a broad spectrum of severity ranging from an asymptomatic form to a severe acute respiratory syndrome that requires mechanical ventilation. Starting with the description of our case series, we evaluated the clinical presentation and evolution of COVID-19. This article is addressed particularly to physicians caring for patients with COVID-19 in their clinical practice. The intent is to identify the subjects in whom the infection is most likely to evolve and the best methods of management in the early phase of infection to determine which patients should be hospitalized and which could be monitored at home. Asymptomatic patients should be followed to evaluate the appearance of symptoms. Patients with mild symptoms lasting more than a week, and without evidence of pneumonia, can be managed at home. Patients with evidence of pulmonary involvement, especially in patients over 60 years of age, and/or with a comorbidity, and/or with the presence of severe extrapulmonary manifestations, should be admitted to a hospital for careful clinical-laboratory monitoring.