Comparison of first-tier whole-exome sequencing with a multi-step traditional approach for diagnosing paediatric outpatients: An Italian prospective study.

BACKGROUND: The recent guidelines suggest the use of genome-wide analyses, such as whole exome sequencing (WES), at the beginning of the diagnostic approach for cases with suspected genetic conditions. However, in many realities it still provides for the execution of a multi-step pathway, thus requiring several genetic tests to end the so-called 'diagnostic odyssey'. METHODS: We reported the results of GENE Project (Genomic analysis Evaluation NEtwork): a multicentre prospective cohort study on 125 paediatric outpatients with a suspected genetic disease in which we performed first-tier trio-WES, including exome-based copy number variation analysis, in parallel to a 'traditional approach' of two/three sequential genetic tests. RESULTS: First-tier trio-WES detected a conclusive diagnosis in 41.6% of patients, way above what was found with routine genetic testing (25%), with a time-to-result of about 50 days. Notably, the study showed that 44% of WES-reached diagnoses would be missed with the traditional approach. The diagnostic rate (DR) of the two approaches varied in relation to the phenotypic class of referral and to the proportion of cases with a defined diagnostic suspect, proving the major difference for neurodevelopmental disorders. Moreover, trio-WES analysis detected variants in candidate genes of unknown significance (EPHA4, DTNA, SYNCRIP, NCOR1, TFDP1, SPRED3, EDA2R, PHF12, PPP1R12A, WDR91, CDC42BPG, CSNK1D, EIF3H, TMEM63B, RIPPLY3) in 19.4% of undiagnosed cases. CONCLUSION: Our findings represent real-practice evidence of how first-tier genome-wide sequencing tests significantly improve the DR for paediatric outpatients with a suspected underlying genetic aetiology, thereby allowing a time-saving setting of the correct management, follow-up and family planning.

12q21 Interstitial Deletions: Seven New Syndromic Cases Detected by Array-CGH and Review of the Literature.

Interstitial deletions of the long arm of chromosome 12 are rare, with a dozen patients carrying a deletion in 12q21 being reported. Recently a critical region (CR) has been delimited and could be responsible for the more commonly described clinical features, such as developmental delay/intellectual disability, congenital genitourinary and brain malformations. Other, less frequent, clinical signs do not seem to be correlated to the proposed CR. We present seven new patients harboring non-recurrent deletions ranging from 1 to 18.5 Mb differentially scattered across 12q21. Alongside more common clinical signs, some patients have rarer features such as heart defects, hearing loss, hypotonia and dysmorphisms. The correlation of haploinsufficiency of genes outside the CR to specific signs contributes to our knowledge of the effect of the deletion of this gene-poor region of chromosome 12q. This work underlines the still important role of copy number variations in the diagnostic setting of syndromic patients and the positive reflection on management and family genetic counseling.

Prenatal exome sequencing in 65 fetuses with abnormality of the corpus callosum: contribution to further diagnostic delineation.

PURPOSE: Abnormality of the corpus callosum (AbnCC) is etiologically a heterogeneous condition and the prognosis in prenatally diagnosed cases is difficult to predict. The purpose of our research was to establish the diagnostic yield using chromosomal microarray (CMA) and exome sequencing (ES) in cases with prenatally diagnosed isolated (iAbnCC) and nonisolated AbnCC (niAbnCC). METHODS: CMA and prenatal trio ES (pES) were done on 65 fetuses with iAbnCC and niAbnCC. Only pathogenic gene variants known to be associated with AbnCC and/or intellectual disability were considered. RESULTS: pES results were available within a median of 21.5 days (9-53 days). A pathogenic single-nucleotide variant (SNV) was identified in 12 cases (18%) and a pathogenic CNV was identified in 3 cases (4.5%). Thus, the genetic etiology was determined in 23% of cases. In all diagnosed cases, the results provided sufficient information regarding the neurodevelopmental prognosis and helped the parents to make an informed decision regarding the outcome of the pregnancy. CONCLUSION: Our results show the significant diagnostic and prognostic contribution of CMA and pES in cases with prenatally diagnosed AbnCC. Further prospective cohort studies with long-term follow-up of the born children will be needed to provide accurate prenatal counseling after a negative pES result.