Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 58
Filter
1.
Arthroplast Today ; 28: 101464, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39100416

ABSTRACT

Background: Tibiofemoral components rotational congruency affects the total knee arthroplasty (TKA) success. The smart insert sensor (I-S) helps to establish tibial component rotation reciprocally to a fixed femoral rotation. We aimed (1) to validate the use of I-S as a possible tool to reach reproducible reciprocal femorotibial rotation (RftR) in TKA independently from anatomic landmarks, reducing outliers in combined and mismatched femorotibial rotation (CftR and MMftR, respectively) positioning and (2) to validate the "curve-on-curve" method for a specific type of asymmetrical tibial component. Methods: From February 2018, we conducted a prospective case-control study including 106 patients undergoing TKA. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the method used to establish tibial component rotation: with the I-S use (group A, n = 53) and with the standard "curve-on-curve" technique (group B, n = 53). Rotational alignment was calculated using the Berger protocol with postoperative computed tomography scanning. Alignment parameters measured were tibial and femoral component rotations (tR, fR), the CftR, the MMftR, and the RftR. Results: Intraoperative rotation measured by I-S correlated the best with RftR (r = 0.84; P < .001) at the post-operative CT scanning. No significant differences were found between groups A and B regarding all types of rotation (fR: P = .774; tR: P = .467; CftR: P = .847) except for MMftR (P = .036) and RftR (P = .023). There were no outliers in group A but 27 and 12 outliers in group B for MMftR and CftR respectively (P < .001; P = .032). Conclusions: The TKA components' rotation established using a smart I-S intraoperatively is ascribable to the RftR at postoperative computed tomography scan. The I-S helps reduce outliers in the CftR and MMftR. An asymmetrical tibial base plate implanted using the curve-on-curve technique does not create a neutral reciprocal femorotibial rotation significantly increasing the number of cases with mismatched femorotibial internal rotation.

2.
Arthrosc Tech ; 13(6): 102826, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39036402

ABSTRACT

Revision of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) presents many challenges that are not encountered in the primary setting and, therefore, requires thorough preoperative planning. Recently, there has been growing evidence showing that combining the anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction with ACL-R revision reduces the risk of postoperative ACL rupture and meniscal tears, and therefore, the ALL reconstruction becomes essential to a complex ACL revision. The technique that we describe is mainly used in the setting of complex ACL revision with extensive tunnel osteolysis associated with rotational instability of the knee. This article presents a technique for a one-stage complex ACL-R revision combined with ALL reconstruction using an Achilles tendon allograft with a bone plug.

3.
Musculoskelet Surg ; 108(3): 339-345, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38967771

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We created a multicenter survey for Italian orthopedic surgeons on how they approach leg length discrepancy (LLD) when dealing with primary total hip arthroplasty. Aim of the study was to show how surgeons manage LLD and follow the literature recommendations during clinical practice. METHODS: The survey was composed of 25 questions divided into four sections: 1-surgeon's profile, 2-preoperative and 3-intraoperative evaluation, and 4-postoperative management. In this paper, we report results to answer Sects. 1 and 2. Absolute and relative frequencies of answers to Sects. 2 and 3 are reported. We divided the participants in subgroups based on the "surgeon's profile" and evaluated difference in the answers given. RESULTS: Absolute and relative frequencies demonstrate low agreement among participants in all phases of LLD management. We demonstrated a statistically significant difference based on the surgeon's profile regarding these questions: radiographic measure of LLD depending on working experience, p = 0.008; digital planning based on surgeons' age, p < 0.001, and workplace, p = 0.026; intraoperative anatomical landmarks based on numbers of procedures per year, p = 0.020; and use of intraoperative X-rays based on working experience, p = 0.002. CONCLUSIONS: LLD is a debated topic with no definitive recommendations. Many decisions still depend on tradition and surgeons' preference.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Leg Length Inequality , Humans , Leg Length Inequality/etiology , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods , Italy , Preoperative Care , Intraoperative Care , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Orthopedic Surgeons , Female , Surveys and Questionnaires , Male
4.
JBJS Case Connect ; 14(2)2024 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38704648

ABSTRACT

CASE: This report describes a new pattern of meniscal tear in an 18-year-old man after a knee sprain; he had undergone anterior cruciate ligament revision (ACL-R) 3 years earlier. He was diagnosed with an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft rupture, a ramp lesion (Thaunat type 4), and a posterior root avulsion fracture of the medial meniscus (MM) (LaPrade type 5). He was treated successfully with an all-inside repair of the ramp lesion, a transtibial pull-out repair of the root tear, and ACL graft revision and anterolateral stabilization. CONCLUSION: This specific meniscal injury pattern should be recognized and documented, potentially warranting consideration as a new addition to Thaunat and LaPrade classifications as type 6.


Subject(s)
Tibial Meniscus Injuries , Humans , Male , Adolescent , Tibial Meniscus Injuries/surgery , Tibial Meniscus Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Knee Injuries/surgery , Knee Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Menisci, Tibial/surgery , Menisci, Tibial/diagnostic imaging , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/diagnostic imaging
5.
J Knee Surg ; 37(11): 804-811, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38677294

ABSTRACT

Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a challenging surgery occurring in 3 to 24% of primary reconstructions. A meticulous planning to study the precise size and location of both femoral and tibial bone tunnels is mandatory. The aim of the study was to evaluate the intra- and interoperator differences in the decision-making process between experienced surgeons after they were asked to make preoperative planning for ACL revision reconstruction with the use of both the computed tomography (CT) scan and a three-dimensional (3D)-printed model of the knee. Data collected from 23 consecutive patients undergoing revision of ACLR for graft failure at a single institute between September 2018 and February 2020 were prospectively reviewed. The double-blinded collected data were presented to three board-certificate attending surgeons. Surgeons were asked to decide whether to perform one-stage or two-stage revision ACLR based on the evaluation of the CT scan images and the 3D-printed custom-made models at two different rounds, T0 and T1, respectively, 7 days apart one from the other. Interoperator consensus following technical mistake was 52% at T0 and 56% at T1 using the CT scans, meanwhile concordance was 95% at T0 and 94% at T1 using the 3D models. Concordance between surgeons following new knee injury was 66% at T0 and 70% at T1 using CT scans, while concordance was 96% both at T0 and T1 using 3D models. Intraoperative variability using 3D models was extremely low: concordance at T0 and T1 was 98%. McNemar test showed a statistical significance in the use of 3D model for preoperative planning (p < 0.005). 3D-printed model reliability resulted to be higher compared with CT as intraoperator surgery technique selection was not modified throughout time from T0 to T1 (p < 0.005). The use of 3D-printed models had the most impact when evaluating femoral and tibial tunnels, resulting to be a useful instrument during preoperative planning of revision ACLR between attending surgeons with medium-high workflow.


Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , Printing, Three-Dimensional , Reoperation , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Humans , Female , Adult , Patient-Specific Modeling , Male , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Prospective Studies , Surgery, Computer-Assisted , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Middle Aged
6.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 34(1): 479-487, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37624410

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the Löwenstein Lateral view and the True Lateral view for the positioning of the cephalic hip screw, through a cadaveric study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We placed two Kirschner wires in eight femur specimens using an Antero-Posterior view, Löwenstein Lateral view and True Lateral view. The distances between the Kirschner wires and the anterior, posterior, superior and inferior cortex were measured in all projections. The head of the femur was then sectioned, and the same macroscopic distances were measured. Finally, we could calculate the accuracy of the two radiographic lateral projections. RESULTS: When the Kirschner wire was placed in the center of the head using the Antero-Posterior and the True Lateral view, the accuracy of Antero-Posterior view was 0.9705 while the accuracy of True Lateral view and Löwenstein Lateral view was 1.1479 and 1.1584, respectively. When the Kirschner wire was placed superior on the Antero-Posterior and centrally on the True Lateral view, the accuracy of Antero-Posterior view was 0.9930 while the accuracy of True Lateral view and Löwenstein Lateral view was 1.1159 and 0.7224, respectively. CONCLUSION: When the Kirschner wire was positioned proximal in Antero-Posterior view and central in True Lateral view, only the True Lateral view showed high accuracy.


Subject(s)
Femoral Fractures , Humans , Femoral Fractures/surgery , Bone Screws , Femur/surgery , Lower Extremity , Cadaver , Fracture Fixation, Internal
7.
Arthrosc Tech ; 12(11): e2093-e2098, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38094942

ABSTRACT

Posterior cruciate ligament ruptures account for nearly 20% of knee ligament lesions. These may be either isolated or occur as part of multiligament injuries. In most of the cases, conservative treatment is recommended, but when operative treatment is required, this is technically demanding. Several posterior cruciate ligament reconstructive techniques have been described, but some concerns still remain regarding graft choice, tunnels position, visualization of the posterior compartment and graft fixation. We describe an arthroscopic all-inside technique using a single-bundle autologous quadriceps tendon with patellar bone block.

8.
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil ; 14: 21514593231170844, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37162810

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) performed for femoral neck fractures (FNFs) is becoming a more frequent treatment in the active elderly population. Since there is limited research available presenting clinical outcomes after THA using the anterior-based muscle sparing (ABMS) approach, the aim of this study was to compare this surgical approach to the direct lateral (DL) approach in patients treated by THA for FNFs. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data prospectively collected as a part of our "Hip Fracture Unit" and included 163 patients who underwent THA from January 2016 to January 2019 for acute displaced FNFs. Results: A total of 132 patients who completed a minimum 2-years follow up (69 in the ABMS group and 63 in DL group) were included. The ABMS group demonstrated significantly shorter time to reach milestone for hospital discharge (1.5 Days vs 2.1 days, P = .018), while no statistically significant differences were detected in peri-operative complications. At 3 months, the timed up and go test, the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the Oxford ip Score (OHS) were significantly better (P = .024, .032 and .034, respectively) in the ABMS group compared to the DL group. No differences were found in functional outcomes (HHS and OHS) nor in complication rate at 6, 12 and 24 months. Discussion: This is one of the first studies to analyze functional results of THA performed for FNFs through an ABMS approach. Results are in line with those already present in the Literature. Conclusion: ABMS approach allows earlier mobilization and better early functional outcomes, compared to DL approach, in patients undergoing THA for acute displaced FNF. No differences are found after 6 months in functional results and complications rate.

10.
J Exp Orthop ; 10(1): 32, 2023 Mar 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36961581

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Robotic-assisted surgery has been recently introduced to improve biomechanical restoration, and thus better clinical and functional outcomes, after knee joint arthroplasty operations. Robotic-assisted uni-compartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) aims indeed to improve surgical bone resection and alignment accuracy, optimized component positioning and knee balancing, relying on a series of calibration measurements performed during the surgery. These advantages focus therefore on improving the reproducibility of UKA surgeries, reducing (if not eliminating) eventual differences among high- and low-volume surgeons. The purpose of this study is to investigate and quantify the reproducibility of in-vivo measurements performed with a robotic system: the intra- and inter-observer variability of a series of measurements was therefore analyzed and compared among differently experienced operators. METHODS: Five patients were analyzed and underwent robotic-assisted UKA using a semi-active robotic system. Three different observers with different experience levels were involved to independently perform the measurements of two parameters of the preoperative knee (Hip-Knee-Ankle angle [HKAa], Internal-External Rotation) at different degrees of knee flexion. Inter-observer and intra-observer comparisons were performed. RESULTS: The average variability in the measurements obtained from the intra-observer and inter-observer comparisons were always < 0.68° for HKAa and < 2.59° for internal-external rotation, and the ICCs showed excellent agreement (> 0.75) for most cases and good agreement (> 0.60) in the remaining ones. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated high reproducibility of the measurements obtainable in clinical environment with the robotic system. The inter-observer results furthermore showed that the level of confidence with the robotic system is not significantly influencing the measurement.

11.
J Med Case Rep ; 16(1): 457, 2022 Dec 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36494697

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The synovial chondromatosis is an uncommon proliferative metaplastic process of the synovial cells that can develop in any synovial joint. An isolated primary chondromatosis of the posterior compartment of the knee is uncommon and few cases are reported in literature. Our purpose is to describe a rare case of primary chondromatosis of the knee posterior compartment and report the arthroscopic loose bodies excision through a difficult posteromedial portal, avoiding the use of the accessory posterior portal, most commonly reported for approaching this disease. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a rare case of a 35-year-old Caucasian male patient with diagnosis of chondromatosis of the posterior knee compartment. The radiographs showed multiple loose bodies of the posterior compartment. The MRI revealed minimal synovial hypertrophy areas, multiple osteophytes in the intercondylar notch, and loose bodies in the posteromedial compartment. The CT allowed us to assess the bony structures, the morphology of the intercondylar notch, and the presence osteophytes of the medial and lateral femoral condyles. The CT images were crucial to plan how to reach the posterior compartments of the knee through a trans-notch passage. The patient underwent arthroscopic surgery using anteromedial, anterolateral, and posteromedial portals. The tunneling through the intercondylar osteophytes was performed to allow the arthroscope to pass trans-notch. To avoid additional accessory posterior portals, we used a 70° arthroscope to better explore the posterior knee compartment. The cartilage-like bodies were removed and synovectomy of the inflamed areas was performed. The clinical and radiological follow-up was 12 months and the patient showed excellent clinical outcomes, returning to his activities of daily living and sport activity. CONCLUSION: Our case report highlights the importance of the arthroscopic approach to treat synovial chondromatosis, despite the involvement of the posterior compartment of the knee. An optimal preoperative imaging allows to plan for the proper surgical procedure even in patients with severe osteoarthritis. Moreover, the adoption of an intercondylar notch tunneling and a 70° arthroscope can help surgeons to better explore the posterior knee compartment, avoiding an accessory posterior trans-septal portal. Therefore, a synovectomy of the inflamed foci may be useful to prevent recurrence.


Subject(s)
Chondromatosis, Synovial , Joint Loose Bodies , Humans , Male , Adult , Activities of Daily Living , Chondromatosis, Synovial/diagnostic imaging , Chondromatosis, Synovial/surgery , Knee Joint/diagnostic imaging , Knee Joint/surgery , Joint Loose Bodies/diagnostic imaging , Joint Loose Bodies/surgery , Synovectomy , Arthroscopy/methods
12.
J Orthop Traumatol ; 23(1): 32, 2022 Jul 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35840726

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Revision ACL reconstruction is a complex topic with many controversies and not-easy-to-make decisions. The authors' aim is to provide some feasible advice that can be applied in daily clinical practice with the goal of facilitating the decision-making process and improving the outcomes of patients subjected to revision ACL reconstruction. METHODS: A national survey with seven questions about the most controversial topics in revision ACL reconstruction was emailed to members of two societies: SIOT and SIAGASCOT. The participants' answers were collected, the most recent literature was analyzed, and a consensus was created by the authors, according to their long-term surgical experience. CONCLUSIONS: The decision-making process in revision ACL reconstruction starts with a standardized imaging protocol (weight-bearing radiographs, CT scan, and MRI). One-stage surgery is indicated in almost all cases (exceptions are severe tunnel enlargement and infection), while the choice of graft depends on the previously used graft and the dimensions of the tunnels, with better clinical outcomes obtained for autografts. Additional procedures such as lateral extra-articular tenodesis in high-grade pivot-shift knees, biplanar HTO in the case of severe coronal malalignment, and meniscal suture improve the clinical outcome and should be considered case by case. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V (Expert opinion).


Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , Tenodesis , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/methods , Consensus , Humans , Knee Joint/surgery , Reoperation , Tenodesis/methods
13.
J Knee Surg ; 35(14): 1549-1555, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33853154

ABSTRACT

Robotic-assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (mUKA) has been introduced to improve accuracy in implant positioning and limb alignment, overcoming the reported high failure rates of conventional UKA. Indeed, mUKA is a technically challenging procedure strongly related to surgeons' skills and expertise. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the likelihood of robotic-assisted surgery in reducing the variability of coronal and sagittal component positioning between high- and low-volume surgeons. We evaluated a prospective cohort of 161 robotic mUKA implanted between May 2018 and December 2019 at two high-volume robotic centers. Patients were divided into two groups: patients operated by "high-volume" (group A) or "low-volume" (group B) surgeons. We recorded intraoperative lower-limb alignment, component positioning, and surgical timing. Postoperatively, every patient underwent a radiographical protocol to assess coronal and sagittal femoral/tibial component alignment. Range of motion and other clinical outcomes were assessed pre- and 12 months postoperatively by using oxford knee score, forgotten joint score, and visual analog scale. Of 161 recruited knees, 149 (A: 101; B: 48) were available for radiographic analysis at 1 month, and clinical evaluation at 12 months. No clinical difference neither difference in mechanical alignment nor coronal/sagittal component positioning were found (p > 0.05). A significant difference was recorded in surgical timing (A: 57 minutes; B: 86 minutes; p < 0.05). No superficial or deep infections or other major complications have been developed during the follow-up. Robotics surgery in mUKA confirmed its value in improving the reproducibility of such technical procedure, with satisfactory clinical outcomes. Moreover, it almost eliminates any possible differences in component positioning, and lower limb alignment among low-and high- volume knee surgeons.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Knee Prosthesis , Osteoarthritis, Knee , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Surgeons , Humans , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Knee Joint/surgery , Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery
14.
Acta Biomed ; 92(4): e2021338, 2021 09 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34487092

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study is to evaluate how the spread of Sars-Cov-2 has changed the epidemiology of proximal femur fractures in two major trauma centers in Italy, understanding the workload and the best allocation of the resources for the orthopedics department in such an emergency situation. The rate of patients from January 2019 to April 2020 hospitalized with femoral neck fractures (group A) and trochanteric fractures (group B) were recorded. Demographic data, timing of surgical treatment and the length of stay were recorded. Data show that the number of proximal femur fractures has remained unchanged in the COVID and pre-COVID era (ranging from an average of 91.14/month in the pre-COVID era to 76/month in March and 80/month in April). In our trauma centers, the rate of patients operated on within 48 hours has remained stable (78.19% vs 77.92%), while the length of stay has decreased during the COVID period (8.9 days vs 6.5 days in March and 6.8 days in April). Proximal femur fractures, even during the COVID period, are a constant issue and a new challenge for the healthcare system. The main goals of management are to preserve patients from viral infection, to provide early surgical treatment and fast track protocol for discharge.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Disease Outbreaks , Femur , Humans , Trauma Centers
15.
Injury ; 52(7): 1868-1874, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33910684

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The use of proximal femoral replacements (PFR) has been recently described for catastrophic internal fixation failures. PFR is an attractive treatment option because it is technically straightforward and allows for immediate mobilization of the patient. The aim of the study was to determine the survivorship, functional outcome and complications' rate in a group of elderly patients who underwent proximal femoral replacement as a salvage treatment after femur cephalomedullary nails' mechanical failures. METHODS: We evaluated 21 patients who underwent salvage of a failed cephalomedullary nail by using a single design PFR at our institution between 2014-2017. A cemented stem was used in all cases. Radiographs were assessed for fractures, sign of loosening, presence of heterotopic ossification and leg length discrepancy. Functional evaluation was performed through Harris Hip Score (HHS), FIM™ and Time Up and Go test (TUG). Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to determine the overall implants' survival. RESULTS: The average age at the time of surgery was 83years. The mean follow-up was 3.1years. We recorded 3 dislocations of which 2 required a revision. No case of septic or aseptic failure was reported. Two patients died respectively at 11 and 14 months after surgery. At the last follow-up the mean HHS, FIM™, and the TUG improved significantly (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Immediate weight bearing, good functional outcomes, low complications' and one-year mortality rate make the proximal femur replacement with megaprostheses a potential first line treatment of intertrochanteric/subtrochanteric fixations' failures among elderly, osteoporotic, frail patients. Dislocation is the most common complication to bear in mind within the first six months after surgery.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Hip Fractures , Aged , Bone Nails , Femur/surgery , Hip Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Hip Fractures/surgery , Humans , Nails , Postural Balance , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies , Salvage Therapy , Time and Motion Studies , Treatment Outcome
16.
J Knee Surg ; 34(4): 363-371, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31486055

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this article was to analyze clinical and functional results after medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction and to establish if a computer-assisted physical test battery could determine a "safe timing" to return to sport. We hypothesized that "time-based" criteria to declare safe return to sport could not be reliable to predict functional recover. Fifty-eight young athletic patients were selected after isolated reconstruction of MPFL. The minimum follow-up was 8 months. All the patients were evaluated subjectively with Kujala and Short Form 36 (SF-36) scores and objectively through a standardized computer-assisted physical battery of seven tests (Back in Action, Corehab). No patient was lost at the end point of follow-up and no recurrence of patellar dislocation was reported. At 8 months, 31 patients (53.4%) returned to sport at preoperative levels, and 23 (39.6%) participated in sports at lower levels. The subjective evaluation reported an increase of Kujala (60-92.7) and SF-36 score (28.6/25.4-52.2/53.6). At computer-assisted objective assessment, only 23 patients (39.6%) fulfilled the criteria for safe return to sport, while 31 (53.4%) got an insufficient outcome and 4 (6.9%) failed to complete the test. From our data, clinical scores after MPFL reconstruction provide only little insight into return to sport. The introduction of a computer-assisted objective analysis in the decision-making process for proper return to sport is necessary to evaluate functional recovery and dynamic knee stability.


Subject(s)
Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted , Exercise Test/methods , Ligaments, Articular/surgery , Patellofemoral Joint/surgery , Return to Sport , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Patellar Dislocation/surgery , Patellofemoral Joint/diagnostic imaging , Radiography , Young Adult
17.
Phys Sportsmed ; 49(2): 171-175, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32669026

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with cortical fixation adjustable-loop devices are associated with high potential risk of button malpositioning or interposition of the soft tissue between lateral femoral cortex and the button. Surgeons usually use X-rays to check and avoid button malposition and soft tissue interposition. Arthroscopic visualization of button position through the lateral gutter has been described. With this technique, it is possible for identification and correction of femoral button malalignment in the setting of soft tissue interposition and it could avoid the use of post-operative X-ray. METHODS: A total of 193 ACLR were included and patients were randomized into two groups. The first series (Group A) of 112 patients who sustained an ACLR with post-operative X-ray to assess the position of the femoral button and the second series (Group B) of 81 patients who sustained an ACLR with an arthroscopic exploration of the button followed by post-operative X-ray. RESULTS: On the post-operative radiographs, tissue interposition between the button and femoral cortex was found in nine cases of 112 in Group A (8%) and in zero case of 81 in Group B (0%). In six cases (7,4%) in Group B, there was a soft tissue interposition between the button and femoral cortex as visualized by arthroscopic confirmation and before post-operative X-ray; in all these cases, the soft tissue was removed, and the button was in contact with the bone in all X-ray made in the Group B. CONCLUSIONS: This technique allows for identification and correction of femoral button malalignment in the setting of soft tissue interposition and reduces the use of post-operative X-ray.


Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , Knee Joint , Femur/diagnostic imaging , Femur/surgery , Humans , Knee Joint/surgery , Radiography , X-Rays
18.
Hip Int ; 30(2_suppl): 13-19, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33267690

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The Watson-Jones interval plane between tensor fascia lata (TFL) and the gluteus medius (GM) has come back into fashion in the past few years - Röttinger described the anterolateral minimal invasive approach (ALMI) for use in total hip replacement, in which the standard Watson-Jones interval was used, but with a completely intermuscular plane. However, the term anterolateral is often still utilised to describe intramuscular approaches in which the GM was violated, thus creating a potential misunderstanding in the literature. Accordingly, we have designed a study to answer the following questions: (1) are there articles in the recent literature that use the term "anterolateral" to describe different approaches; (2) which would be the correct description of the anterolateral approach? METHODS: We did a systematic review of the literature based on PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, to look for peer reviewed papers of any evidence level focusing on the definition of anterolateral approach; MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched. RESULTS: 73 manuscripts met the criteria of the systematic search. 53 papers (72.6%) reported the term anterolateral approach to describe a complete intermuscular approach between the interval between GM and TFL. Nonetheless, in the remaining 20 papers (27.4%) the term anterolateral was used to describe intramuscular approaches in which the gluteus medius was violated. CONCLUSION: In about 1 out of 4 papers in the recent literature, the term anterolateral was utilised to describe approaches that are completely different both in terms of anatomy and function.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Buttocks , Humans , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures , Muscle, Skeletal/surgery , Thigh
19.
Int J Med Robot ; 16(5): 1-6, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32735039

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Semi-active robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) has two options to measure the leg length discrepancy (LLD) and combined offset (CO), the 'enhanced' femoral workflow and the so-called 'express' simplified workflow. The purpose of this study was to determine the precision and accuracy of intraoperative LLD and CO measurement with express workflow robotic THA. METHODS: Between February 2018 and December 2019, 30 patients underwent an express workflow robot-assisted primary THA for intraoperative LLD and CO measurements. Postoperative radiographs were used for LLD and CO measurement. In order to examine the accuracy of the robotic system assessment, the absolute difference between the robotic assessments and radiographic evaluations was calculated. RESULTS: Intraoperative robotic measurements reported a mean error of 0.2-0.6 mm for each registration, with no significant difference between them (p = 0.311). The average absolute discrepancies between the robotic and radiographic assessments in the LLD and CO measurements were 1.3 ± 1.5 mm (p = 0.17) and 1.1 ± 0.9 mm (p = 0.11), respectively, while the Pearson's correlation coefficients were 0.69 and 0.71. CONCLUSIONS: An external marker without a femoral array inserted into a screw positioned in the greater trochanter would be an easier and faster method to measure LLD and CO. Our study showed that the measured values of LLD and CO obtained by intraoperative express workflow robot-assisted THA system were precise and accurate.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Robotics , Femur/surgery , Humans , Leg , Workflow
20.
J Orthop Traumatol ; 21(1): 5, 2020 Mar 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32222861

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Partial lesions of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) are more common than is generally thought, accounting for about 10-12% of ACL injuries. Selective reconstruction may be considered as an option in isolated bundle rupture. The purpose of this study is to evaluate both subjective and objective clinical results, as well as functional recovery time, after selective arthroscopic single-bundle reconstruction in a consecutive series of patients affected by partial ACL rupture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients undergoing selective reconstruction of a single ACL bundle were retrospectively evaluated from a series of 354 ACL reconstructions performed over a 3-year period. Although the suspicion of partial lesions was present at clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation, final diagnosis was obtained during arthroscopy. All patients were operated using the same technique and type of fixation, and undergoing the same functional recovery protocol. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 64 months (48-84 months). All patients but one achieved good functional recovery and returned to their sports within a mean period of 6.1 months. A single patient complained of postoperative instability 1 year after the index operation and needed further surgery. No complications were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Selective reconstruction of partial ACL injury is a method to bear in mind because it offers quick functional recovery. Specific technical and diagnostic steps should be performed and discussed with patients preoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4, retrospective study.


Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/methods , Anterior Cruciate Ligament/surgery , Arthroscopy/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Anterior Cruciate Ligament/diagnostic imaging , Anterior Cruciate Ligament/physiopathology , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/diagnosis , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Recovery of Function , Retrospective Studies , Rupture , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL