Prevalence of polypharmacy in pregnancy: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: The use of medications among pregnant women has been rising over the past few decades but the reporting of polypharmacy has been sporadic. The objective of this review is to identify literature reporting the prevalence of polypharmacy among pregnant women, the prevalence of multimorbidity in women taking multiple medications in pregnancy and associated effects on maternal and offspring outcomes. DESIGN: MEDLINE and Embase were searched from their inception to 14 September 2021 for interventional trials, observational studies and systematic reviews reporting on the prevalence of polypharmacy or the use of multiple medications in pregnancy were included.Data on prevalence of polypharmacy, prevalence of multimorbidity, combinations of medications and pregnancy and offspring outcomes were extracted. A descriptive analysis was performed. RESULTS: Fourteen studies met the review criteria. The prevalence of women being prescribed two or more medications during pregnancy ranged from 4.9% (4.3%-5.5%) to 62.4% (61.3%-63.5%), with a median of 22.5%. For the first trimester, prevalence ranged from 4.9% (4.7%-5.14%) to 33.7% (32.2%-35.1%). No study reported on the prevalence of multimorbidity, or associated pregnancy outcomes in women exposed to polypharmacy. CONCLUSION: There is a significant burden of polypharmacy among pregnant women. There is a need for evidence on the combinations of medications prescribed in pregnancy, how this specifically affects women with multiple long-term conditions and the associated benefits and harms. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Our systematic review shows significant burden of polypharmacy in pregnancy but outcomes for women and offspring are unknown. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021223966.

The effect of COVID-19 on the presentation of thyroid disease in children.

Introduction: Although studies suggest a potential link between COVID-19 and thyroid dysfunction in adults, there are insufficient data to confirm that association in children, and whether there is any effect on presentation to healthcare services. Aims: To identify whether presentations of thyroid dysfunction in children to a tertiary paediatric hospital changed as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A retrospective case note review was conducted of all children with abnormal thyroid function tests between 1st January 2016 and 31st December 2021 at a tertiary paediatric endocrine centre in the United Kingdom. Results: Overall, 244 children whose first presentation was within the timeframe of interest were included in this study, with a median age (range) of 11.5 (6.1, 16.8) years. Of these, 43 (18%) were hyperthyroid and 201 (82%) were hypothyroid. The greatest number of thyroid presentations occurred in 2021 (n=60, 25% of total over time period) and the fewest in 2020 (n=10, 4% of total over time period). Prior to this, the median (range) number of presentations per year was 34 (28, 39). There were no statistically significant differences in biochemistry, antibody status or other clinical characteristics between those who presented with hyperthyroidism prior to the pandemic or after. In those with hypothyroidism, baseline biochemistry was similar between the 2 groups, but the presence of other autoimmune conditions was greater pre-pandemic (17.2% vs 15.0%, p=0.03). In addition, patients were more likely to have transient thyroid dysfunction, which did not require treatment post-pandemic (70.0% vs 49.6%, p=0.0086). Conclusions: Although overall rates of presentation with thyroid dysfunction have not altered since the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, presentations with transient thyroid dysfunction, not requiring ongoing treatment have increased. Further research regarding the relationship between COVID-19 and thyroid function in children and young people, is needed.