Left atrial appendage thrombus with resulting stroke post-RF ablation for atrial fibrillation in a patient on dabigatran.

Dabigatran etexilate is licensed for use in prevention of deep venous thromboembolism and in prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). It has also been used in patients for other indications as a substitute for warfarin therapy because it requires no monitoring; one group being patients undergoing radiofrequency (RF), ablation for AF, although there have been no consensus guidelines with regards to dosage and timing of dose. We report the case of a patient with documentary evidence of left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus formation and neurological sequelae post-RF ablation despite being on dabigatran. This case highlights the concern that periprocedural dabigatran may not provide adequate protection from development of LAA thrombus and that a standardised protocol will need to be developed and undergo large multicentre trials before dabigatran can be safely used for patients undergoing RF-ablation.

Coronary artery fistula; coronary computed topography--the diagnostic modality of choice.

Coronary artery fistulae (CAF) are rare anomalies. They are vascular communications between the coronary arteries and other cardiac structures, either cardiac chambers or great vessels. There can be considerable variation in the course of a coronary artery fistula. We report a case of a coronary artery fistula between the left circumflex coronary artery and the right and left atria. CAF are often diagnosed by coronary angiogram, however with the advent of new technologies such as Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (Coronary CTA) the course and communications of these fistulae can be delineated non-invasively and with greater accuracy.

Detailed clinical and angiographic analysis of transluminal extraction coronary atherectomy for complex lesions in native coronary arteries.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to describe the results of transluminal extraction coronary atherectomy in native coronary arteries. BACKGROUND: Transluminal extraction coronary atherectomy was approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use in native coronary arteries and vein grafts. METHODS: Between December 1988 and July 1992, transluminal extraction coronary atherectomy was performed in 181 native coronary arteries in 175 patients. A detailed angiographic and clinical assessment was performed. RESULTS: Quantitative angiography (mean +/- SD) revealed an increase in minimal lumen diameter from 1.0 +/- 0.6 mm before to 1.3 +/- 0.7 mm after atherectomy, to 2.1 +/- 0.8 mm after final treatment (p < 0.001), corresponding to a diameter stenosis of 70 +/- 16%, 61 +/- 21% and 36 +/- 21%, respectively (p < 0.001). Final procedural success (final diameter stenosis < 50%, no major complications) was achieved in 84%. Adjunctive angioplasty was used after atherectomy in 152 lesions (84%) to further enlarge lumen dimensions (130 lesions, 72%), salvage technical failures (2 lesions, 1%) and reverse atherectomy-induced abrupt closures (20 lesions, 11%). Clinical complications included death (2.3%), Q wave myocardial infarction (3.4%) and emergency bypass surgery (2.8%). The strongest independent correlate of major clinical complications was development of abrupt closure immediately after atherectomy (p = 0.01). Clinical follow-up of 92% of eligible patients revealed clinical restenosis (repeat intervention, late bypass surgery, myocardial infarction or death) in 28.5%. Angiographic follow-up of 83% of eligible lesions revealed a restenosis rate (diameter stenosis > 50%) of 61%. CONCLUSIONS: Transluminal extraction coronary atherectomy is limited by a modest degree of lumen enlargement, frequent need for adjunctive angioplasty and a high restenosis rate. For complex lesions in native coronary arteries, transluminal extraction coronary atherectomy appears to offer no advantage over conventional balloon angioplasty.

Transluminal extraction catheter for the treatment of diseased saphenous vein grafts: a multicenter experience.

To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and long-term results of atherectomy using the Transluminal Extraction catheter (TEC), patients with diseased saphenous vein grafts were enrolled in a prospective nonrandomized trial. Patients were followed to hospital discharge for acute complications and underwent routine 6-mo reevaluation with repeat cardiac catheterization to assess restenosis. Atherectomy was performed on 650 graft lesions in 538 consecutive patients (male 81%; mean age 66 yr; range 37-81). Mean graft age was 8.3 yr; (range 0.3-20) with 85% of grafts > 3 yr of age. Complex lesion morphology included thrombus (28%), ulceration (13%), and eccentricity (50%). Lesion success was achieved in 606 lesions (93%) with clinical success in 479 patients (89%). Lesion success was achieved in 90% of thrombus containing lesions, 97% of ulcerated lesions, and 97% of grafts > 3 yr. Complications included nonfatal myocardial infarction in 4 (0.7%) of patients, emergency bypass surgery in 2 (0.41%), and in-hospital death in 17 patients (3.2%). Angiographic follow-up at 6 mo was obtained from 268 lesions in 227 patients. The overall lesion angiographic restenosis rate was 60%. TEC atherectomy can be performed in patients with diseased saphenous vein grafts with high primary success and low complication rates. It is suitable for use in aged grafts, particularly in the presence of thrombus and ulcerations, and may be superior to balloon angioplasty alone in this group of patients.

Clinical and angiographic results of transluminal extraction coronary atherectomy in saphenous vein bypass grafts.

BACKGROUND: Transluminal extraction coronary (TEC) atherectomy is a relatively new device that has recently been approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Because of its ability to aspirate clot and atheromatous material, TEC atherectomy may be useful in patients with stenoses in saphenous vein bypass grafts. METHODS AND RESULTS: TEC atherectomy was performed on 158 saphenous vein graft lesions in 146 consecutive patients with a mean age of 65 +/- 8 years (78% men). Clinical indications for atherectomy included stable angina (37%), unstable angina (54%), and postinfarction angina after recent (< 1 month) myocardial infarction (8%). Patients with acute myocardial infarction and target vessels < 2 mm in diameter were excluded. The mean age of the bypass graft was 8.3 +/- 3.0 years, and 17% were diffusely diseased and degenerated. Complex lesion morphology included total occlusion (6%), eccentricity (64%), ulceration (18%), and thrombus (28%). The TEC atherectomy cutter was successfully advanced through 144 lesions (91%), but technical failures occurred in 14 lesions (9%), and these were subsequently managed by successful balloon angioplasty. Quantitative angiography revealed an increase in lumen diameter from 0.9 +/- 0.5 mm, to 1.5 +/- 0.7 mm after TEC atherectomy, to 2.3 +/- 0.8 mm after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) (P < .001), which corresponded to decreases in diameter stenosis from 75 +/- 14%, to 58 +/- 20% after TEC atherectomy, to 36 +/- 22% after PTCA (P < .001). Device success was achieved in 39.2% (post-TEC atherectomy decrease in diameter stenosis > or = 20%), and procedural success was achieved in 84% (final diameter stenosis < 50% in the absence of a major complication). Angiographic complications were evident in 33 lesions (20.7%) immediately after TEC atherectomy and in 8 lesions (5%) after PTCA, including distal embolization (11.9%), no-reflow (8.8%), and abrupt closure (5.0%), but no perforations. Adjunctive PTCA (and other medical therapy) successfully managed 61% of angiographic complications. Serious clinical complications included in-hospital death in 3 patients (2.0%), emergency bypass surgery in 1 patient who died (0.7%), Q wave myocardial infarction in 3 patients (2.0%), non-Q wave myocardial infarction in 4 patients (2.7%), vascular injury requiring surgical repair and/or blood transfusion in 9 patients (6.1%), and hemorrhagic cerebral infarction in 4 patients (2.7%). Using a composite clinical end point defined as in-hospital death, emergency bypass surgery, or myocardial infarction, the strongest independent correlate (P < .001) of a severe clinical complication was the development of one or more serious angiographic complications (no-reflow, distal embolization, or abrupt closure) immediately after TEC atherectomy. Complete clinical follow-up was available in 118 (92%) of 128 eligible patients at an interval of 6.0 +/- 2.5 months after discharge. Late cardiac outcome included recurrent angina treated with medical therapy (18%), repeat percutaneous intervention on the original target lesion (26%), repeat coronary artery bypass surgery (5%), Q wave myocardial infarction (4%), and late cardiac death (7%). Angiographic follow-up in 105 (80%) of 132 eligible lesions revealed a restenosis rate of 69% (defined as a diameter stenosis > 50%), including 30 lesions (29%) with total occlusion of the original lesion. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with stenoses in saphenous vein bypass grafts, TEC atherectomy is limited by the frequent need for adjunctive balloon angioplasty to achieve adequate lumen enlargement and to manage TEC atherectomy-induced complications. Although the incidence of serious clinical complications is similar to that of other percutaneous interventions in vein grafts, there is a high incidence of restenosis and late vessel occlusion. Prospective randomized studies are needed to determine the best revascularization strategy for high-risk patients with old degenerated vein

A prospective, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of intravenous streptokinase and angioplasty versus lone angioplasty therapy of acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: The value of routine administration of intravenous thrombolytic agents during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) therapy of acute myocardial infarction (MI) has not been determined. Therefore, we prospectively randomized 122 patients with evolving MI to PTCA therapy with or without adjunctive intravenous streptokinase therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with ECG ST segment elevation who presented within 4 hours of symptom onset, had no contraindication to thrombolytic therapy, and were not in cardiogenic shock were enrolled. They were treated immediately with intravenous heparin (10,000 units) and oral aspirin (325 mg) and randomized to treatment with placebo or streptokinase (1.5 M units) administered intravenously over 30 minutes. Patients then were taken immediately to the catheterization laboratory, and those with suitable coronary anatomy underwent immediate PTCA. Subsequent clinical course, serial radionuclide ventriculography, and 6-month repeat angiography were analyzed. A total of 106 patients were treated with PTCA. Use of PTCA was similar for placebo (92%) and streptokinase (83%) groups. Angioplasty was successful in 95% of patients, with no difference in placebo (93%) and streptokinase (98%) groups. Serial radionuclide ventriculography demonstrated no difference in 24-hour (52 +/- 12% versus 50 +/- 12%) or 6-week (51 +/- 12% versus 51 +/- 13%) ejection fraction values for placebo and streptokinase groups, respectively. Contrast ventriculography demonstrated improvement in immediate (54 +/- 12%) versus 6-month (60 +/- 15%, p < 0.05) values for the overall group. No differences in 6-month values were present (58 +/- 15% versus 62 +/- 15%, p = NS) for placebo and streptokinase groups, respectively. Coronary angiography was performed in 75% of the 90 patients eligible for restudy. Arterial patency was 87% at 6 months, and coronary restenosis was present in 38% of patients. No differences in chronic patency or restenosis were detected for the two treatment groups. Although adjunctive intravenous streptokinase therapy did not improve outcome, it did complicate the hospital course. Hospitalization was longer (9.3 +/- 5.0 versus 7.7 +/- 4.4 days, p = 0.046) and more costly ($25,191 +/- 15,368 versus $19,643 +/- 7,250, p < 0.02). Transfusion rate was higher (39% versus 8%, p = 0.0001) and need for emergency coronary bypass surgery was greater (10.3% versus 1.6%, p = 0.03) for the streptokinase-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive intravenous streptokinase therapy does not enhance early preservation of ventricular function, improve arterial patency rates, or lower restenosis rates after PTCA therapy of acute MI. Hospital course is longer, more expensive, and more complicated. For these reasons, PTCA therapy of acute MI should not be routinely performed with adjunctive intravenous streptokinase therapy.

Exercise capacity after single and twice-daily doses of nicorandil in chronic stable angina pectoris.

In a double-blind parallel group study, 46 patients with chronic stable angina were randomized, after a 2-week placebo washout period, to 1 of 3 treatment groups for an additional 2 weeks. Groups 1 and 2 received nicorandil (5 mg, n = 5; 10 mg, n = 10) twice daily, respectively, increasing to 10 and 20 mg (n = 20) twice daily after 1 week of treatment; group 3 continued to receive placebo. A symptom-limited Bruce protocol exercise test was performed before and 2 hours after the initial dose and, after 2 weeks of treatment, 2 and 12 hours after administration. The following parameters were measured: resting, peak exercise and recovery blood pressure and heart rate, exercise duration, time to onset of angina and time to 1 mm of ST-segment depression. After initial dosing, there were significant increases in exercise duration (16%--n = 5, n = 10 vs -2% [placebo]) and time to onset of angina (20%, n = 5; 26%, n = 10 vs 5% [placebo]) (p less than 0.05). Time to onset of 1 mm of ST-segment depression increased in the nicorandil-treated groups compared with that in the placebo group (27%, n = 5; 25%, n = 10 vs 8% [placebo]). Calculated total exercise work increased in both nicorandil groups compared with exercise work in the placebo group (30%, n = 5; 19%, n = 10 vs 3% [placebo]). A decrease in resting systolic blood pressure (12%) in the 10-mg group was the only significant alteration in the hemodynamic parameters.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Balloon dilatation of the aortic valve for inoperable aortic stenosis.

The place of balloon dilatation of the aortic valve in the treatment of calcific aortic stenosis is controversial. Thirty two patients (mean age 76) in whom valve replacement was contraindicated were followed up for three to 24 months (mean 8); 25 were in functional class III or IV according to the New York Heart Association's classification. Major complications of the procedure occurred in four patients. Echocardiography and Doppler studies were performed before operation and before discharge in 28 patients, and the area of the valve was measured again six to 50 (mean 23) weeks after operation in 11 patients. The peak to peak aortic pressure gradient fell from a mean of 65 (SD 24) to 46 (20) mm Hg, but the area of the aortic valve, measured by Doppler echocardiography, in 18 patients showed a modest but significant increase, from 0.61 (0.16) to 0.74 (0.23) cm2. One month after dilatation, 29 patients were alive, of whom 17 had improved symptoms. Only two had lasting clinical benefit. Sixteen patients died, 12 of a cardiac cause. The estimated one year survival rate was 49%. Six patients underwent or required valve replacement because of persisting symptoms. In view of its limited long term efficacy balloon dilatation of the aortic valve should be used only for patients with severe symptoms whose life expectancy is limited by other disease or who are considered to be unsuitable for valve replacement. It may have a role in improving the condition of patients who present with cardiogenic shock or pulmonary oedema before valve replacement is undertaken.

Comparative efficacy of lisinopril and nifedipine retard in essential hypertension: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Lisinopril, a long-acting angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, and the calcium channel blocker nifedipine in its retard formulation, were compared as monotherapy in a group of 45 patients with essential hypertension. Lisinopril in single daily doses (range 20-80 mg, median dose 40 mg) and nifedipine retard in twice daily doses (total daily dose range 40-80 mg, median dose 60 mg) were equally effective in controlling hypertension. The lisinopril group (n = 30), at baseline supine blood pressure 178/109 +/- 23/9 mm Hg (mean +/- 1 SD), after 12 weeks' therapy measured 148/88 +/- 27/14 mm Hg; the nifedipine group (n = 15), at baseline 185/110 +/- 23/11 mm Hg, after 12 weeks' therapy measured 151/89 +/- 14/10 mm Hg. The number of patients who experienced clinical adverse effects was significantly greater in the nifedipine group: 8 of 15 (53%) compared to 4 of 30 (13%) in the lisinopril group. The commonest adverse effects of patients on nifedipine were swollen ankles, flushing, and headache. Two patients on nifedipine were withdrawn from the study because of their adverse experiences. Of the patients on lisinopril there were single reports of flushing, ankle swelling, tiredness, and chest pain. No patient withdrew from lisinopril because of an adverse experience. No adverse laboratory experiences were recorded in either group. In conclusion, lisinopril and nifedipine retard were equally effective in controlling essential hypertension. Lisinopril was, however, better tolerated during this study.