Megameatus intact prepuce variant reconstruction: Long-term outcomes and comparison to post-circumcision hypospadias repair.

BACKGROUND: Megameatus intact prepuce (MIP) variant is considered a surgical challenge with associated high complication rates. It is usually diagnosed and corrected only after neonatal circumcision, which is discouraged in non-MIP hypospadias. OBJECTIVE: In order to determine whether the features of the MIP variant or the performance of a secondary reconstruction following circumcision comprise the cause of higher complication rates, we now compared the results of post-circumcision MIP hypospadias repair to the results of children who underwent repair of non-MIP hypospadias following neonatal circumcision. STUDY DESIGN: Reoperation rates of children operated for hypospadias repair following neonatal circumcision between 1999 and 2020 were compared between those with MIP and those with classic non-MIP hypospadias. RESULTS: In total, 139 patients who had undergone neonatal circumcision underwent surgical reconstruction at a mean age of 13 months. Sixty-nine had classic hypospadias and 70 had the MIP variant. The median follow-up was 10 years (interquartile range 6,13). The classic group had a higher rate of meatal location below the corona compared to the MIP variant group (53 % vs. 28 %, respectively, p = 0.002). The reoperation rate was comparable for the two groups (32 % vs. 27 %, p = 0.58, Table). Univariate analysis for the MIP hypospadias group showed no association between reoperation and the initial patient characteristics, while a higher probability of reoperation was demonstrated in the presence of ventral curvature (odds ratio 3.5, p = 0.02), and a higher grade of hypospadias (odds ratio 3.3, p = 0.03 for meatal location lower than the coronal sulcus) in the non-MIP group. DISCUSSION: The limitations of our work include its retrospective design wherein the patients' characteristics, including classification as MIP vs. non-MIP, are derived from medical records. More patients in the non-MIP group were documented to have penile curvature. The non-MIP group was composed of more patients with meatal location under the coronal sulcus, a factor which may increase the rates for reoperation in that group. Still, with the comparison of the largest reported cohort of circumcised MIP with circumcised non-MIP patients together with an extended follow-up period, we believe that we present strong evidence of the possible role of previous circumcision in the surgical challenge of reconstructing MIP hypospadias. CONCLUSIONS: Reoperation rates in MIP hypospadias are high but similar to those of classic hypospadias, both following circumcision, suggesting that circumcision, rather than the unique features of the variant, is the cause for complications.

Mini-HoLEP (MILEP) vs HoLEP: a propensity score-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Minimal invasiveness improves outcome in many surgical fields including urology. We aimed to assess intraoperative performance and clinical outcome of miniaturized holmium laser enucleation of prostate (MiLEP) (22FR). METHODS: We ran a propensity score-matched analysis among all consecutive laser enucleations of prostate performed between 9/2022 and 2/2023. It resulted in two matched comparison groups: MiLEP 22 FR (n = 40) and holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP 26 Fr) (n = 40). Statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: MiLEP was associated with significantly less intraoperative irrigation (20.5 L vs 15 L, p = 0.002E-3), less decrease in body core temperature (0.6°C vs 0.1°C, p = 0.003E-5), and less need for meatal dilation (25% vs 78%, p = 0.01E-3). These parameters were identified as being independent in the multivariate analysis. There was a trend toward less and a shorter period of postoperative stress incontinence (SI) for the MiLEP group compared to the HoLEP group: 15% and 42% (p = 0.01) at 1 month, 8% and 14% (p = 0.07) at 2 months, and 0 and 0.3% (p = 1) at 3 months, respectively. There were no differences in prostatic enucleation effectiveness, operative time, hospital stay, complications, and improvement in the international prostate symptom score and quality of life score. CONCLUSIONS: MiLEP is feasible and provides better maintenance of body core temperature, reduction in amount of fluid irrigation, and decrease in need for meatal dilation without affecting effectiveness in comparison with HoLEP. MiLEP may reduce early postoperative stress incontinence, thereby shortening the recovery period.

Operative techniques and long-term outcomes of hypospadias repair in the absence of preputial skin after neonatal circumcision.

PURPOSE: To present the results of hypospadias repair in the absence of preputial skin following neonatal circumcision, and the analyses of surgical techniques and predictors of procedural success. METHODS: Records of all children who underwent hypospadias repair between 10/1999 and 12/2018 were retrospectively reviewed. All of those who underwent neonatal circumcision prior to surgery were included. Patients with any prior penile reconstruction surgery and those with the megameatus intact prepuce variant were excluded. The primary endpoint was the need for reoperation. RESULTS: A total of 69 patients with a history of neonatal circumcision underwent surgical reconstruction of hypospadias during the study period. Their mean age at surgery was 14 months (interquartile range [IQR] 9,22). Forty-five cases (65%) involved distal hypospadias, and ventral curvature was present in 24 (35%). Dartos flaps were harvested from the dorsal aspect in 37/58 (64%) patients and from the ventral aspect in 21/58 (36%). Twenty-two patients (22/69, 32%) required reoperation after a median follow-up of 9 years (IQR 6,13). Indications for revision surgery included urethral fistula (n = 16, 22%), meatal stenosis (n = 5, 7%), and skin redundancy (n = 1). Ventral curvature (odds ratio [OR] 3.5, p = 0.02) and higher grades of hypospadias. (OR 3.3, p = 0.03) had a higher probability of reoperation (univariate logistic regression). CONCLUSION: Hypospadias repair following neonatal circumcision in the absence of preputial skin is a challenging reconstruction. The reoperation rate in our cohort was 30%, similar to reoperative hypospadias surgery. Parents of newborns diagnosed with hypospadias should be encouraged to refrain from pre surgical neonatal circumcision. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Treatment study, level IV.