Is oligometastatic disease an applicable and useful concept in haematologic malignancies? A narrative review of radiation therapy standards, modern techniques, and innovations.

PURPOSE: Haematologic malignancies are particular in that they can generally be cured, even when distant metastases are present at diagnosis, unlike solid malignancies. Systemic treatments, including chemotherapy, targeted therapies, and immunotherapy, are the standard of care with excellent results. The considerable progress made in the management of these diseases in the last 20years has redefined the role of radiation therapy as minor in many clinical situations. We propose a literature review of data, showing that radiation therapy still has a role in curative, salvage, and palliative therapy situations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A document and literature search was carried out in the following databases: Medline and ClinicalTrial.gov, for the terms "radiotherapy", "haematologic malignancies", "Hodgkin lymphoma", "non-Hodgkin lymphoma", "CAR T cells", "multiple myeloma", "solitary plasmocytoma", "intensity-modulated radiotherapy", "extracranial stereotactic body radiation therapy" and "proton therapy references". RESULTS: Haemopathological malignancies include a wide range of diseases and radiation therapy indications have been assessed over the past 20years. Currently, radiation therapy is indicated for localized disease (solitary plasmocytoma), as an adjuvant (Hodgkin lymphoma), in palliative settings, or after systemic treatment in relapsed patients (chimeric antigen receptor [CAR] T-cells) with a low recurrence burden, which can therefore be considered "oligorecurrence". Radiation therapy, through total body irradiation, has important indications, thanks to its immunomodulatory and/or myeloablative effects. Moreover, recent technological developments have made possible significant improvement in safety, contributing to radiation therapy being positioned in the treatment strategy of several indications. CONCLUSIONS: Given the effectiveness of systemic treatments in hematologic malignancies, the oligometastasis stage is of little importance. A curative intent after local radiation therapy, even advanced stage, is possible, both with residual disease for advanced Hodgkin lymphoma, aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma, or solitary plasmocytoma, and even without evidence of disease after chemotherapy for Hodgkin or non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The role of new treatments, such as CAR T cells, allows us to consider radiation therapy after systemic treatment of relapsed diseases with low volume recurrence, which can be considered oligorecurrence.

Image-guided radiotherapy.

We present the updated recommendations of the French society for oncological radiotherapy on image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). The objective of the IGRT is to take into account the anatomical variations of the target volume occurring between or during the irradiation fractions, such as displacements and/or deformations, so that the delivered dose corresponds to the planned dose. This article presents the different IGRT devices, their use and quality control, and quantify the possible additional dose generated by each of them. The practical implementation of IGRT in various tumour locations is summarised, from the different "RecoRad™" guideline articles. Adaptive radiotherapy is then detailed, due to its complexity and its probable development in the next years. The place of radiation technologist in the practice of IGRT is then specified. Finally, a brief update is proposed on the delicate question of the additional dose linked to the in-room imaging, which must be estimated and documented at a minimum, as long as it is difficult to integrate it into the calculation of the dose distribution.

Performance comparison of modified ComBat for harmonization of radiomic features for multicenter studies.

Multicenter studies are needed to demonstrate the clinical potential value of radiomics as a prognostic tool. However, variability in scanner models, acquisition protocols and reconstruction settings are unavoidable and radiomic features are notoriously sensitive to these factors, which hinders pooling them in a statistical analysis. A statistical harmonization method called ComBat was developed to deal with the "batch effect" in gene expression microarray data and was used in radiomics studies to deal with the "center-effect". Our goal was to evaluate modifications in ComBat allowing for more flexibility in choosing a reference and improving robustness of the estimation. Two modified ComBat versions were evaluated: M-ComBat allows to transform all features distributions to a chosen reference, instead of the overall mean, providing more flexibility. B-ComBat adds bootstrap and Monte Carlo for improved robustness in the estimation. BM-ComBat combines both modifications. The four versions were compared regarding their ability to harmonize features in a multicenter context in two different clinical datasets. The first contains 119 locally advanced cervical cancer patients from 3 centers, with magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography imaging. In that case ComBat was applied with 3 labels corresponding to each center. The second one contains 98 locally advanced laryngeal cancer patients from 5 centers with contrast-enhanced computed tomography. In that specific case, because imaging settings were highly heterogeneous even within each of the five centers, unsupervised clustering was used to determine two labels for applying ComBat. The impact of each harmonization was evaluated through three different machine learning pipelines for the modelling step in predicting the clinical outcomes, across two performance metrics (balanced accuracy and Matthews correlation coefficient). Before harmonization, almost all radiomic features had significantly different distributions between labels. These differences were successfully removed with all ComBat versions. The predictive ability of the radiomic models was always improved with harmonization and the improved ComBat provided the best results. This was observed consistently in both datasets, through all machine learning pipelines and performance metrics. The proposed modifications allow for more flexibility and robustness in the estimation. They also slightly but consistently improve the predictive power of resulting radiomic models.

Pre- and postoperative radiotherapy for extremity soft tissue sarcoma: Evaluation of inter-observer target volume contouring variability among French sarcoma group radiation oncologists.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate, during a national workshop, the inter-observer variability in target volume delineation for primary extremity soft tissue sarcoma radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Six expert sarcoma radiation oncologists (members of French Sarcoma Group) received two extremity soft tissue sarcoma radiation therapy cases 1: one preoperative and one postoperative. They were distributed with instructions for contouring gross tumour volume or reconstructed gross tumour volume, clinical target volume and to propose a planning target volume. The preoperative radiation therapy case was a patient with a grade 1 extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma of the thigh. The postoperative case was a patient with a grade 3 pleomorphic undifferentiated sarcoma of the thigh. Contour agreement analysis was performed using kappa statistics. RESULTS: For the preoperative case, contouring agreement regarding GTV, gross tumour volume GTV, clinical target volume and planning target volume were substantial (kappa between 0.68 and 0.77). In the postoperative case, the agreement was only fair for reconstructed gross tumour volume (kappa: 0.38) but moderate for clinical target volume and planning target volume (kappa: 0.42). During the workshop discussion, consensus was reached on most of the contour divergences especially clinical target volume longitudinal extension. The determination of a limited cutaneous cover was also discussed. CONCLUSION: Accurate delineation of target volume appears to be a crucial element to ensure multicenter clinical trial quality assessment, reproducibility and homogeneity in delivering RT. radiation therapy RT. Quality assessment process should be proposed in this setting. We have shown in our study that preoperative radiation therapy of extremity soft tissue sarcoma has less inter-observer contouring variability.

[Radiotherapy for retroperitoneal sarcomas]. / Place de la radiothérapie dans la prise en charge des sarcomes rétropéritonéaux.

The management of retroperitoneal sarcoma can be very challenging, and the quality of initial treatment strategy appears to be a crucial prognostic factor. En bloc surgery is currently the standard of care for these rare tumours and perioperative treatments such as chemotherapy or radiotherapy have not been validated yet. However, local-regional relapse constitutes the most common disease course. While adjuvant radiotherapy is less and less common due to gastrointestinal toxicities, preoperative radiation therapy offers numerous advantages and is being evaluated as part of a national multicentre phase II study (TOMOREP trial) and is the subject of a European randomized phase III study (STRASS trial). The objective of this article is to present data on preoperative irradiation in terms of dose, volumes and optimal radiotherapy techniques for the treatment of this rare disease.

Combining two biomarkers, IDH1/2 mutations and 1p/19q codeletion, to stratify anaplastic oligodendroglioma in three groups: a single-center experience.

IDH1/2 mutations and 1p/19q codeletion occur frequently in anaplastic gliomas and are prognostic factors. We combined these two biomarkers to stratify patients treated for anaplastic oligodendroglioma (AO). 43 consecutive WHO AO were selected. We combined immunohistochemistry (IHC) with the monoclonal antibody mIDH1R132H and DNA sequencing of IDH1 and IDH2 genes. Fluorescence in situ hybridization was carried out to evaluate 1p/19q codeletion. These biomarkers were correlated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). IDH1/IDH2 mutations occurred in 23/43 (54 %) patients: 20/43 IDH1-R132H mutation in IHC, 2/43 IDH1-R132G mutation and 1/43 IDH2-R172K mutation identified by DNA sequencing. 1p/19q codeletion was detected for 23/43 patients. With median follow-up of 19 months (range 1.4-128), median PFS and OS were 22 and 35 months respectively. IDH1/IDH2 mutations were strongly associated with improved PFS and OS: 5-year PFS was 86 versus 6 % and 5-year OS was 91 versus 9 % for patients with IDH1/IDH2 mutations versus wild-type IDH respectively. In multivariate analyses, IDH1/IDH2 mutations and 1p/19q loss were independent prognostic factors. Three groups with distinct prognostic features were identified: patients with IDH1/2 mutations and 1p/19q loss (median PFS, median OS not reached), patients with IDH1/2 mutations or 1p/19q loss (median PFS: 22 months, median OS: 30 months), and patients without IDH1/2 mutations nor 1p/19q loss with a bad prognosis (median PFS: 8.6 months, median OS: 9.9 months). Combining two biomarkers, IDH1/2 and 1p/19q codeletion, makes it possible to stratify AO in three groups with very distinct prognostic features.

[Evaluation of the dose received by organs at risk]. / Evaluation de la dose reçue par les organes à risque.

The arrival of new technologies and the increase of the possible planned treatments require tools to evaluate and compare the delivered dose to specific organs at risk. Among several options providing the same tumour control, the choice will be made in favour of those that best spare the organs at risk. The evaluation tools have to report acute and late complications, and to be simple to use. The evaluation of the delivered dose to specific organs at risk is currently based on dose-volume histograms, conformal index and the integral dose. However, many questions remain as to reducing the normal tissue toxicity: is it better to deliver a relatively lower dose over a large volume or a relatively higher dose over a smaller volume? The long-term clinical follow-up of patients remains necessary.

[Helical tomotherapy: description and clinical applications]. / Tomothérapie hélicoïdale : aspects techniques et applications cliniques.

Helical tomotherapy is an innovative device combining with the same linac on board-imaging and IMRT facilities. The first national French evaluations, supported by National Institut of Cancer (INCa) are presented. Dosimetric characteristics as quality of homogeneity, cut-off outside target volumes allow IMRT treatments for large and complex volumes and a good organ at risk sparing. First comparative dosimetric studies are discussed.