Masked hypertension and effort-reward imbalance at work among 2369 white-collar workers.

Hypertension is an important risk factor of cardiovascular diseases, the leading cause of death worldwide. Adverse effects of psychosocial factors at work might increase the risk of masked hypertension, but evidences are still scarce. The objective of this study is then to determine whether adverse psychosocial work factors from the effort-reward imbalance (ERI) model are associated with the prevalence of masked hypertension in a population of white-collar workers. White-collar workers were recruited from three public organizations. Blood pressure was measured at the workplace for manually operated measurements (mean of the first three readings taken by a trained assistant) followed by ambulatory measurements (mean of all subsequent readings taken during the working day). Masked hypertension was defined as manually operated BP<140/90 mm Hg and ambulatory BP ⩾135/85 mm Hg. ERI exposure at work was measured using Siegrist's validated questionnaire. Blood pressure readings were obtained from 2369 workers (participation proportion: 85%). ERI exposure (OR: 1.53 (95% CI: 1.16-2.02) and high efforts at work (OR: 1.61 (95% CI: 1.13-1.29) were associated with masked hypertension, after adjusting for sociodemographic and cardiovascular risk factors. Workers exposed to an imbalance between efforts spent at work and reward had a higher prevalence of masked hypertension. High efforts at work might be of particular importance in explaining this association. Future studies should be designed to investigate how clinicians can include questions on psychosocial work factors to screen for masked hypertension and how workplace interventions can decrease adverse psychosocial exposures to lower BP.

Repeated exposure to effort-reward imbalance, increased blood pressure, and hypertension incidence among white-collar workers: effort-reward imbalance and blood pressure.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether men and women with repeated ERI exposure have increased BP means or higher hypertension incidence over a 3-year follow-up. To examine the potential modifying effect of age and overcommitment. METHODS: The study cohort was composed of 1,595 white-collar workers (629 men and 966 women) assessed at baseline and 3-year follow-up. Ambulatory BP measures were taken every 15 min during a working day. ERI at work was self-reported using validated scales. BP means at follow-up and cumulative incidence of hypertension were respectively modeled with analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) and log-binomial regression. RESULTS: Among men, no association was observed between repeated ERI exposure and BP. Among women, age had a modifying effect. Women <45 years old exposed to ERI at both times had significantly higher BP means at follow-up (122.2/78.9 mmHg) than those unexposed (120.4/77.4 mmHg). In women ≥45 years old, the cumulative incidence of hypertension was 2.78 (95% CI: 1.26-6.10) times higher among those exposed to ERI at both times. Men and women in the higher tertile of overcommitment had higher BP means (men: 128.9/82.2 mmHg, women: 121.9/78.0 mmHg) than those in the lower tertile (men: 127.2/81.3 mmHg, women: 120.6/77.0 mmHg). CONCLUSION: This prospective study showed that, among women, repeated ERI exposure led to a significant age-specific increase in BP means and a major age-specific increase in hypertension incidence. These results suggest that primary intervention aimed at reducing ERI may contribute to lower BP and prevent hypertension in women.

Tolerability of antihypertensive drugs in a community-based setting.

BACKGROUND: Outside the experimental environment of clinical trials, the tolerability of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), calcium channel blockers (CCBs), and the angiotensin II antagonist losartan has not been compared. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to estimate, in current clinical practice, the 3-month cumulative incidence of side effects among first-time users of losartan, ACEIs, and CCBs for hypertension. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study through a network of 173 pharmacies across Canada to identify patients with hypertension who were newly prescribed monotherapy with losartan, an ACEI, or a CCB. Individuals were interviewed by telephone 3 times over a 3-month period to determine perceived side effects of the antihypertensive medication prescribed. Data were analyzed using a multivariate logistic regression model. RESULTS: Among the 663 eligible individuals, the 3-month cumulative incidence of perceived side effects was 52.5% (42/80), 60.2% (222/369), and 69.6% (149/214) for those treated with losartan, an ACEI, and a CCB, respectively. After adjustment for sex, age, level of education, number of symptoms perceived the week before entering the study, prior use of antihypertensive drugs, current use of any other drug, drug insurance coverage, and duration of hypertension, the odds of reporting a side effect were significantly higher among patients treated with an ACEI (odds ratio [OR] = 1.78: 95% CI, 1.02-3.12) or a CCB (OR = 2.65; 95% CI, 1.47-4.78) compared with patients treated with losartan. CONCLUSIONS: In a community-based setting, we observed that losartan is better tolerated than ACEIs and CCBs. Given that the occurrence of side effects may contribute to lower adherence to drug treatment, the low incidence of side effects associated with losartan makes it an attractive antihypertensive drug choice.

Effect of family responsibilities and job strain on ambulatory blood pressure among white-collar women.

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to determine whether large family responsibilities and their combination with high job strain were associated with an increase in ambulatory blood pressure (BP) among white-collar women. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a stratified random sample of 199 white-collar women with or without children who were employed full time in jobs involving high or low strain. These women were selected from a population of 3183 women of all ages, employed in eight organizations in Quebec City, Canada. Subjects wore an ambulatory BP monitor for 24 hours during a working day. Mean BPs were calculated. Different measures of family responsibilities were used, based on the number of children and their ages, and domestic work. Job strain was measured using the Job Content Questionnaire recommended by Karasek. RESULTS: Family responsibility measures were significantly related to diurnal BP among women holding a university degree (N=69). Indeed, women having large family responsibilities had increases in systolic and diastolic BPs of 2.7 to 5.7/1.8 to 4.0 mm Hg (p< or =.05). Among women holding a university degree, increases in diurnal systolic and diastolic BPs reached 8.1 to 10.9/5.5 to 7.1 mm Hg (p< or =.01) among women having both large family responsibilities and high job strain. These results were independent of confounders. There was no significant association among women without a university degree (N=130). CONCLUSIONS: Large family responsibilities were associated with significant increases in diurnal systolic and diastolic BPs among white-collar women holding a university degree. In these women, the combined exposure of large family responsibilities and high job strain tended to have a greater effect on BP than the exposure to only one of these factors.

Job strain and ambulatory blood pressure among female white-collar workers.

OBJECTIVES: The association between job strain and ambulatory blood pressure was studied among female white-collar workers. METHODS: This cross-sectional investigation studied 210 women in high- or low-strain jobs randomly selected from 3183 women of all ages, employed as white-collar workers. The women wore an ambulatory blood pressure monitor for 24 hours during a workday. Mean blood pressures were calculated. Psychological demands and decisional latitude were measured twice (14 months before and 7 days before the blood pressure measurement) with 2 scales recommended by Karasek. RESULTS: Significant differences in blood pressure were found according to current job strain among the women holding a university degree. Their mean blood pressures during work were significantly higher [8.0 mm Hg (1.1 kPa) systolic and 6.4 mm Hg (0.8 kPa) diastolic blood pressure] in the high-strain group than in the low-strain group. Statistically significant elevations in blood pressure over the 24-hour period were also found for women with a university degree. Cumulative exposure to high strain over 14 months was also significantly associated with high systolic blood pressure at work, in the evening, and over a 24-hour period irrespective of other factors related to blood pressure. Among the women without a university degree, the blood pressure differences observed between the job strain groups were less than 1 mm Hg (0.1 kPa) and not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide support for the effect of job strain on ambulatory blood pressure only among female white-collar workers holding a university degree.

Prostaglandins and renal function in hypertensive patients with unilateral renal artery stenosis and patients with essential hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to compare the effects of prostaglandin synthesis inhibition on calculated preglomerular and postglomerular resistance in hypertensive patients with unilateral renal artery stenosis (RAS) and in patients with essential hypertension. DESIGN AND METHODS: Sixteen patients with suspected renovascular hypertension underwent renal angiography: eight had unilateral renal artery stenosis > or = 70% and eight had normal angiograms or stenosis < or = 40%. Radionuclide renography and 6 h urinary collection were performed twice for each subject, at baseline and after indomethacin administration. Levels of urinary vasodilatory prostaglandins were measured by specific radioimmunoassays. Visual image analysis was performed to determine the parenchymal transit time (PTT). The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was calculated from the plasma clearance of [99mTc]-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA). The preglomerular and postglomerular resistances were estimated according to Gomez's equations. RESULTS: The prostaglandin excretion decreased significantly after indomethacin administration both in RAS and in essential hypertension patients. The PTT increased from 230 +/- 10 to 340 +/- 40s in the stenotic kidney compared with the contralateral kidney and the kidneys of essential hypertension patients. The GFR was decreased both in stenotic and in contralateral kidneys (48 +/- 4 to 37 +/- 5 and 60 +/- 4 to 52 +/- 5 ml/min, respectively) but did not decline in the kidneys of essential hypertension patients. The preglomerular resistance increased both in stenotic and in contralateral kidneys, whereas it did not rise significantly in the kidneys of essential hypertension patients. The postglomerular resistance in stenotic and contralateral kidneys of RAS patients was not altered. CONCLUSIONS: Prostaglandins limit GFR decreases in RAS by preventing preglomerular constriction without interfering with postglomerular constriction. Thus, the action of vasoactive prostaglandins on preglomerular resistance might maintain renal function in the short term by limiting the fall in GFR in the stenotic kidney and by increasing the GFR in the contralateral kidney.

[Evaluation of the prescription quality: hospital databases]. / Evaluation de la qualité de la prescription: les bases de données hospitalières.

Hospital databases can be used to evaluate drug prescription quality with the help of drug utilization review (DUR). A DUR appraises the appropriateness of prescribing by means of explicit criteria established in accordance with evidence-based data, and then suggests interventions designed to modify prescriber's practice. On the one hand, the capacity of the review to show the variations, and, on the other hand, the assessment of the impact of interventions implemented to correct those variations, depend on the quality of hospital databases. This article has two objectives: to identify the required data, both to carry out a DUR and to evaluate its outcomes, and to define the essential qualities of hospital databases.

The Drug Utilization Review Network of Quebec.

Drug utilization review programs have been recognized as an effective way to control health care spending while maintaining quality services. This article describes the structure, mandate and activities of Quebec's Drug Utilization Review Network. This 112-member network, which represents 45% of health care facilities in the province, was established to promote the optimal utilization of drugs through the provision of support to pharmacology committees, therapeutic committees and pharmacy departments. The network's main role is to coordinate multi-centre drug utilization studies. Future challenges include maintaining member interest and evaluating the clinical and economic impact of the network's efforts.

A physiologic approach to renal scintigraphy. Application to evaluation of hypertension.

The aim of this study was to define the use of the triple radiopharmaceutical renal study (TRRS) for renal scintigraphy as a physiological tool for renal evaluation, and to determine if the sensitivity and/or specificity of a renal study for the diagnosis of renovascular hypertension (RVH) could be improved by the combination of three radiopharmaceuticals (i.e., I-131 OIH, Tc-99m DTPA, and Tc-99m glucoheptonate). One hundred ninety-five patients with suspected RVH underwent TRRS, standard Tc-99m DTPA renal studies, and renal angiography. One hundred eighty-nine patients were hypertensive and ischemic nephropathy was suspected in six. Ninety-one, including three patients with ischemic nephropathy, had a renal artery stenosis of 70% or more (66 unilateral, 25 bilateral). Effective renal plasma flow (ERPF), glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (from plasma clearance of I-131 OIH and Tc-99m DTPA), and geometric renal masses (from Tc-99m glucoheptonate study) were compared to normal values corrected for body surface, to determine the severity of renal dysfunction. For the TRSS, RVH criteria included: 1) differential Tc-99m DTPA function minus differential Tc-99m glucoheptonate function of affected kidney ( < -5% or > 5%) and 2) functional parameters: ERPF = 1.6-2.0 ml/g/minute, GFR = 0.25-0.4 ml/g/minute, and filtration fraction (i.e., GFR/ERPF = 0.15-0.20) on the affected side.

Effect of ketoprofen on blood pressure, endocrine and renal responses to chronic dosing with captopril in patients with essential hypertension.

The effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on the blood pressure and renal function of essential hypertensive patients depend on the specific type of NSAID and antihypertensive drug administered. Twelve patients with essential hypertension, aged 35 to 59 years, stabilized (blood pressure less than 140/90 mmHg) with captopril, received ketoprofen (100 mg bid for 7 days) or matching placebo in a randomized double-blind cross-over fashion. A 3-week wash-out period was included between treatment periods. Blood pressure on the first and last days of the placebo treatment period (137 +/- 7 (SD)/80 +/- 8 and 139 +/- 11/81 +/- 9 mmHg) was similar to respective values during ketoprofen therapy (136 +/- 10/79 +/- 7 and 143 +/- 10/81 +/- 9 mmHg). The mean differences in systolic and diastolic blood pressures, at the end of the treatment periods, between ketoprofen and placebo were 4 (95% confidence intervals -5, +13) and 0 (-8, +8) mmHg, respectively. Ketoprofen had no effect on 24-h urinary sodium excretion (160 +/- 33 and 147 +/- 39 mmol/24 h for ketoprofen and placebo, respectively). Ketoprofen was without effect on glomerular filtration rate, renal plasma flow and filtration fraction. In conclusion, our data suggest that ketoprofen is a safe choice when short-term treatment with a NSAID is indicated in an essential hypertensive patient treated with a converting enzyme inhibitor such as captopril.