A novel anatomical description of the esophagus: the supracarinal mesoesophagus.

BACKGROUND: During thoracoscopic esophageal resection, while performing the supracarinal lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve (LRLN) from the aortic arch to the thoracic apex, we observed a not previously described bilayered fascia-like structure, serving as prolongation of the already known mesoesophagus. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 70 consecutively unedited videos of thoracoscopic interventions on esophageal resections for cancer, in order to determine the validity of this finding and to describe its utility for performing a systematic and more accurate dissection of the LRLN and its adequate lymphadenectomy. RESULTS: After mobilization of the upper esophagus from the trachea and tilting the esophagus by means of two ribbons, a bilayered fascia was observed between the esophagus and the left subclavian artery in 63 of the 70 patients included in this study. By opening the right layer, the left recurrent nerve became visualized and could be dissected free in its whole trajectory. Vessels and branches of the LRLN were divided between miniclips. Mobilizing the esophagus to the right, the base of this fascia could be found at the left subclavian artery. After dissecting and clipping the thoracic duct, complete lymphadenectomy of 2 and 4L stations could be performed. Mobilizing the esophagus in distal direction, the fascia continued at the level of the aortic arch, where it had to be divided in order to mobilize the esophagus from the left bronchus. Here, a lymphadenectomy of the aorta-pulmonary window lymph nodes (station 8) can be performed. It seems that from there the fascia continued without interruption with the previously described mesoesophagus between the thoracic aorta and the esophagus. CONCLUSIONS: Here we described the concept of the supracarinal mesoesophagus on the left side. Applying the description of the mesoesophagus will create a better understanding of the supracarinal anatomy, leading to a more adequate and reproducible surgery.

Short-term postoperative outcomes of gastric adenocarcinoma patients treated with curative intent in low-volume centers.

BACKGROUND: Quality standards in postoperative outcomes have not yet been defined for gastric cancer surgery. Also, the effect of centralization of gastric cancer surgery on the improvement of postoperative outcomes continues to be debated. Short-term postoperative outcomes in gastric carcinoma patients in centers with low-volume of annual gastrectomies were assessed. The effect of age on major postoperative morbidity and mortality was also analyzed. METHODS: Patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction Siewert III type carcinomas who underwent surgical treatment with curative intent between January 2013 and December 2016 were included. Data were obtained from the population-based surgical registry Esophagogastric Carcinoma Registry of the Comunitat Valenciana (RECEG-CV). The RECEG-CV gathers information on demographic characteristics and comorbidity, preoperative study and neoadjuvant treatment, surgical procedure, pathological study, postoperative outcomes, and follow-up. Seventeen hospitals belonging to the public network participated in this registry. RESULTS: Data from 591 patients were analyzed. Postoperative major morbidity occurred in 154 (26.1%) patients. Overall 30-day or in-hospital mortality, and 90-day postoperative mortality rates were 8.6% and 10.1% respectively. Failure-to-rescue was 39% and it was significantly higher in patients aged 75 years or older in comparison with younger patients (55.3% vs 23.1% p < 0.001). In the multivariable analysis, age ≥ 75 years (p = 0.029), laparoscopic approach (p = 0.005), and total gastrectomy (p = 0.005) were associated with major postoperative morbidity. Age ≥ 75 years (p = 0.027), pulmonary complications (p = 0.001), cardiac complications (p = 0.001), leakage (p = 0.003), and hemorrhage (p = 0.013) were associated with postoperative mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Centralization of gastric adenocarcinoma treatment in centers with higher annual caseload should be considered to improve the short-term postoperative outcomes in low-volume centers. Patients aged 75 or older had a significantly increased risk of major postoperative morbidity and mortality, and higher failure-to-rescue.

Esofaguectomía «tubeless»: menos es más / “Tubeless” esophagectomy: Less is more

La cirugía del cáncer de esófago es un procedimiento complejo con tasas de morbimortalidad elevadas, por lo que para obtener resultados adecuados se precisa de centros experimentados, un completo soporte multidisciplinar y vías clínicas adecuadas. Se describe la experiencia inicial y la técnica de la esofaguectomía «tubeless» en la que tras realizar una resección esofágica y linfadenectomía mediastínica extendida, al final del procedimiento no son colocados drenajes ni sondas de ningún tipo, con el fin de disminuir la agresividad del mismo, mejorar el bienestar postoperatorio y acelerar la recuperación funcional del paciente. (AU)

The esophageal cancer surgery is a complex procedure with elevated rates of both morbidity and mortality, which is why, in order to achieve adequate results, it should be performed in high volume centers, where complete multidisciplinary support is available and recent clinical guidelines are applied. We describe the initial experience and the technique of “tubeless” esophagectomy where esophageal resection and mediastinal lymphadenectomy are performed and no drains nor tubes of any kind are placed, with the aim to decrease the level of surgical aggression, enhance the postoperative comfort and accelerate the patient́s recovery. (AU)

"Tubeless" esophagectomy: Less is more.

The esophageal cancer surgery is a complex procedure with elevated rates of both morbidity and mortality, which is why, in order to achieve adequate results, it should be performed in high volume centers, where complete multidisciplinary support is available and recent clinical guidelines are applied. We describe the initial experience and the technique of "tubeless" esophagectomy where esophageal resection and mediastinal lymphadenectomy are performed and no drains nor tubes of any kind are placed, with the aim to decrease the level of surgical aggression, enhance the postoperative comfort and accelerate the patient́s recovery.

Resultados de una encuesta nacional sobre el manejo terapéutico del cáncer de esófago / Results of a National Survey about Therapeutic Management in Esophageal Cancer

En la actualidad existen numerosos puntos de controversia en el manejo perioperatorio y quirúrgico de los pacientes con cáncer de esófago. El objetivo de este trabajo es describir las posibles diferencias en el tratamiento coadyuvante y quirúrgico de estos pacientes entre los hospitales de nuestro país mediante un estudio descriptivo de las encuestas respondidas entre febrero y abril de 2020. Se evaluaron las características de cada centro, el número de procedimientos, el manejo del adenocarcinoma de tercio distal y del carcinoma escamoso de tercio medio, el tipo de anastomosis, el empleo de sonda nasogástrica y drenajes y el seguimiento de una vía clínica. La mediana de esofaguectomías anuales por centro es de 10, realizando solamente el 7,1% más de 20. En el adenocarcinoma distal el 62,5% emplea quimiorradioterapia preoperatoria, un abordaje abdominal y transtorácico (57,1%) y una linfadenectomía infracarinal (51,8%) o extendida (41,1%). En el carcinoma escamoso de tercio medio el 89,3% emplea quimiorradioterapia preoperatoria, una cirugía en 3 campos (73,2%) y una linfadenectomía mediastínica ampliada (52%). La anastomosis intratorácica se realiza de forma mecánica en el 77,8% y la cervical preferentemente de forma manual (71,4%). Los drenajes pleurales y abdominales son colocados habitualmente por el 77,6 y el 48,2%, respectivamente, mientras que la sonda nasogástrica es empleada normalmente por el 57,1%. El 57,1% siguen una vía clínica y el 28,6% un protocolo de recuperación intensificada específico. Por tanto, en el manejo del cáncer de esófago, existen claras diferencias entre los hospitales de nuestro país con relación al tratamiento coadyuvante, abordaje quirúrgico, tipo de linfadenectomía y anastomosis practicadas. (AU)

There are numerous controversial aspects in the perioperative and surgical management of patients with esophageal cancer. The aim of this study is to evaluate the differences between the hospitals of our country in the adjuvant and surgical treatment of these patients. We conducted a descriptive study of 56 surveys answered from February to April 2020, evaluating hospital characteristics, number of procedures, management of distal adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the middle third of the esophagus, type of anastomosis, use of nasogastric tube and drains, and clinical follow-up. The median number of annual esophagectomies per hospital was 10, and only 7.1% performed more than 20. In distal adenocarcinoma, 62.5% use preoperative chemoradiotherapy, an abdominal and transthoracic approach (57.1%), and an infracarinal lymphadenectomy (51.8%) or extended to right paratracheal lymph nodes (41.1%). In squamous cell carcinoma of the middle third of the esophagus, 89.3% use preoperative chemoradiotherapy, surgery in three fields (73.2%) and extended mediastinal lymphadenectomy (52%). Intrathoracic anastomosis is performed mechanically in 77.8% and cervical anastomosis preferably manually (71.4%). Pleural and abdominal drains are usually placed by 77.6% and 48.2%, respectively, while the nasogastric tube is normally used by 57.1%. A clinical pathway is followed by 57.1%, and 28.6% use a specific enhanced recovery after surgery protocol. Thus, in the management of esophageal cancer, there are some clear differences between hospitals in our country regarding adjuvant treatment, surgical approach, type of lymphadenectomy and anastomosis performed. (AU)

Results of a National Survey about Therapeutic Management in Esophageal Cancer. / Resultados de una encuesta nacional sobre el manejo terapéutico del cáncer de esófago.

There are numerous controversial aspects in the perioperative and surgical management of patients with esophageal cancer. The aim of this study is to evaluate the differences between the hospitals of our country in the adjuvant and surgical treatment of these patients. We conducted a descriptive study of 56 surveys answered from February to April 2020, evaluating hospital characteristics, number of procedures, management of distal adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the middle third of the esophagus, type of anastomosis, use of nasogastric tube and drains, and clinical follow-up. The median number of annual esophagectomies per hospital was 10, and only 7.1% performed more than 20. In distal adenocarcinoma, 62.5% use preoperative chemoradiotherapy, an abdominal and transthoracic approach (57.1%), and an infracarinal lymphadenectomy (51.8%) or extended to right paratracheal lymph nodes (41.1%). In squamous cell carcinoma of the middle third of the esophagus, 89.3% use preoperative chemoradiotherapy, surgery in three fields (73.2%) and extended mediastinal lymphadenectomy (52%). Intrathoracic anastomosis is performed mechanically in 77.8% and cervical anastomosis preferably manually (71.4%). Pleural and abdominal drains are usually placed by 77.6% and 48.2%, respectively, while the nasogastric tube is normally used by 57.1%. A clinical pathway is followed by 57.1%, and 28.6% use a specific enhanced recovery after surgery protocol. Thus, in the management of esophageal cancer, there are some clear differences between hospitals in our country regarding adjuvant treatment, surgical approach, type of lymphadenectomy and anastomosis performed.

Resultados iniciales del registro de carcinomas esófago-gástricos de la Comunidad Valenciana / Initial results of the oesophageal and gastric cancer registry from the Comunidad Valenciana

Objetivos: Evaluar los resultados iniciales del registro de tumores esófago-gástricos desarrollado conjuntamente por la Sociedad Valenciana de Cirugía y la Consellería de Sanitat de la Comunidad Valenciana. Métodos: Participaron 14 de los 24 hospitales públicos de la Comunidad Valenciana. Se evaluaron todos los pacientes con diagnóstico de carcinoma de esófago y de estómago operados desde enero 2013 hasta diciembre 2014. Se analizaron variables demográficas, clínicas e histopatológicas. Resultados: Se incluyeron 434 pacientes, 120 con carcinoma de esófago y 314 con carcinoma gástrico. Solo en 2 centros se operaron a más de 10 pacientes con cáncer de esófago/año. La esofaguectomía transtorácica fue el abordaje más frecuente (84,2%) en los tumores de localización esofágica. En el 50,9% de los carcinomas de la unión esófago-gástrica (UEG) se realizó una gastrectomía total. La mortalidad postoperatoria a los 30 y 90 días fue del 8 y 11,6% en el carcinoma de esófago y del 5,9 y 8,6% en el carcinoma gástrico. Antes de la cirugía, los tumores esofágicos del tercio medio fueron tratados mayoritariamente (76,5%) con quimiorradioterapia. Por el contrario, los de tercio inferior y los de la UEG fueron tratados preferentemente solo con quimioterapia (45,5 y 53,4%). El 73,6% de los pacientes con carcinoma gástrico no recibió tratamiento neoadyuvante. La mitad de los pacientes con carcinoma esofágico o gástrico no recibió ningún tratamiento adyuvante. Conclusiones: Este registro muestra que en la Comunidad Valenciana, la mitad de los pacientes con cáncer de esófago son operados en hospitales con una casuística menor de 10 casos/año. Asimismo, ha detectado posibilidades de mejora relevantes en indicadores de resultado de los carcinomas esófago-gástricos (AU)

Aims: To evaluate the initial results of the oesophagogastric cancer registry developed for the Sociedad Valenciana de Cirugía and the Health Department of the Comunidad Valenciana (Spain). Methods: Fourteen of the 24 public hospitals belonging to the Comunidad Valenciana participated. All patients with diagnosis of oesophageal or gastric carcinomas operated from January 2013 to December 2014 were evaluated. Demographic, clinical and pathological data were analysed. Results: Four hundred and thirty-four patients (120 oesophageal carcinomas and 314 gastric carcinomas) were included. Only two hospitals operated more than 10 patients with oesophageal cancer per year. Transthoracic oesophaguectomy was the most frequent approach (84.2%) in tumours localized within the oesophagus. A total gastrectomy was performed in 50.9% patients with gastroesophageal junction (GOJ) carcinomas. Postoperative 30-day and 90-day mortality were 8% and 11.6% in oesophageal carcinoma and 5.9 and 8.6% in gastric carcinoma. Before surgery, middle oesophagus carcinomas were treated mostly (76,5%) with chemoradiotherapy. On the contrary, lower oesophagus and GOJ carcinomas were treated preferably with chemotherapy alone (45.5 and 53.4%). Any neoadjuvant treatment was administered to 73.6% of gastric cancer patients. Half patients with oesophageal carcinoma or gastric carcinoma received no adjuvant treatment. Conclusions: This registry revealed that half patients with oesophageal cancer were operated in hospitals with less than 10 cases per year at the Comunidad Valenciana. Also, it detected capacity improvement for some clinical outcomes of oesophageal and gastric carcinomas (AU)

Initial results of the oesophageal and gastric cancer registry from the Comunidad Valenciana. / Resultados iniciales del registro de carcinomas esófago-gástricos de la Comunidad Valenciana.

AIMS: To evaluate the initial results of the oesophagogastric cancer registry developed for the Sociedad Valenciana de Cirugía and the Health Department of the Comunidad Valenciana (Spain). METHODS: Fourteen of the 24 public hospitals belonging to the Comunidad Valenciana participated. All patients with diagnosis of oesophageal or gastric carcinomas operated from January 2013 to December 2014 were evaluated. Demographic, clinical and pathological data were analysed. RESULTS: Four hundred and thirty-four patients (120 oesophageal carcinomas and 314 gastric carcinomas) were included. Only two hospitals operated more than 10 patients with oesophageal cancer per year. Transthoracic oesophaguectomy was the most frequent approach (84.2%) in tumours localized within the oesophagus. A total gastrectomy was performed in 50.9% patients with gastroesophageal junction (GOJ) carcinomas. Postoperative 30-day and 90-day mortality were 8% and 11.6% in oesophageal carcinoma and 5.9 and 8.6% in gastric carcinoma. Before surgery, middle oesophagus carcinomas were treated mostly (76,5%) with chemoradiotherapy. On the contrary, lower oesophagus and GOJ carcinomas were treated preferably with chemotherapy alone (45.5 and 53.4%). Any neoadjuvant treatment was administered to 73.6% of gastric cancer patients. Half patients with oesophageal carcinoma or gastric carcinoma received no adjuvant treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This registry revealed that half patients with oesophageal cancer were operated in hospitals with less than 10 cases per year at the Comunidad Valenciana. Also, it detected capacity improvement for some clinical outcomes of oesophageal and gastric carcinomas.

Adjuvant chemoradiation in gastric cancer: long-term outcomes and prognostic factors from a single institution.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) improves relapse-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with resected gastric cancer. However, difficulties in standardizing an optimal surgical approach and a perceived higher toxicity compared with the perioperative approach have limited its widespread application in Europe. The aim of our study was to assess toxicity and long-term outcomes of adjuvant CRT at our institution. METHODS: A retrospective review (September 2001-January 2012) was completed of patients with resected gastric cancer who received adjuvant CRT (Macdonald regimen). Adverse events and completion rates, RFS and OS were estimated. Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors for OS were performed. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients were included. Most had diffuse (52%) and locally advanced tumors (stage III-IV; 66.7%). D2 lymphadenectomy was performed in 80.5%. The most frequent grade 3-4 toxicities were gastrointestinal (28%) and stomatitis (20%), with 78.2% completing treatment. With a median follow-up of 115 months, 58.5% had relapsed, most of them distantly. Median RFS and OS were 9 and 24 months, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that performance status, stage and lymph node burden were significant factors for OS. In the multivariate study, only stage and lymph node burden remained as independent OS predictors. CONCLUSIONS: Our implementation of the Macdonald regimen achieved worse outcomes than those reported in the INT-0116 trial. The rate of distant relapse remains unacceptably high. Higher rate of positive lymph nodes and of diffuse tumors could explain some differences. The use of perioperative chemotherapy, especially in patients with a poorer prognosis, might improve these results.

Tumor regression and survival after perioperative MAGIC-style chemotherapy in carcinoma of the stomach and gastroesophageal junction.

BACKGROUND: We assessed the effectiveness of perioperative MAGIC-style chemotherapy in our series focused on the tumor regression grade and survival rate. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 53 patients following a perioperative regimen of epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil or capecitabine (ECF/X). Forty-four (83 %) neoplasias were located in the stomach and 9 (17 %) were located at the esophagogastric junction. Perioperative chemotherapy completion, resection, TNM staging, the tumor regression grade (Becker's classification) and survival were analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-five patients (85 %) completed the 3 preoperative cycles. R0 resection was achieved in 42 (79 %) patients. Thirty-five (66 %) patients completed the 3 postoperative cycles. Nine carcinomas (17 %) were considered major responders after preoperative chemotherapy. With multivariate analysis, only completion of perioperative chemotherapy (HR: 0.25; 95%CI: 0.08 - 0.79; p = 0.019) was identified as an independent prognostic factor for disease-specific survival. However, the protective effect of perioperative therapy was lost in patients with ypT3-4 and more than 4 positive lymph nodes (HR: 1.16; 95%CI: 1.02 - 1.32; p = 0.029). The tumor regression grade (major vs minor responders) was at the limit of significance only with univariate analysis. The 5-year overall and disease-specific survival rates were 18 % and 22 % respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of major responder tumors after preoperative chemotherapy was low. Completion of perioperative ECF/X chemotherapy may benefit patients with gastric carcinomas that do not invade the subserosa with few positive lymph nodes.

Acute cholecystitis caused by hemocholecyst: unusual clinical manifestation of gallbladder cancer.

UNLABELLED: Gallbladder cancer presenting as acute cholecystitis associated with a hemocholecyst is a rare entity. Up to date there are only 2 cases reported in literature. Acute cholecystitis may appear secondary to an obstruction of the cystic duct by the tumour itself or to an obstruction of the cystic duct by blood clots. CASE REPORT: A 74-years-old woman complained of right upper quadrant pain during the last 48 hours, associated to fever of 38 degrees C and vomits. Physical examination revealed a positive Murphy's sign. Laboratory data showed leukocytosis and mild increasement of liver enzymes. Ultrasonography revealed a mobile extense formation located antigravitatorily in fundus and body of the gallbladder. CT scan showed a mass adhered to the fundus and the body of the gallbladder without wall infiltration and contrast enhancement, suggestive of hemocholecyst. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed, observing cholecystitis signs without any other relevant features. Pathology revealed a large amount of clotted blood inside the gallbladder, some of them obstructing the cystic duct; an irregularity was discovered in the gallbladder wall, whose microscopic analysis revealed a gallbladder adenocarcinoma, infiltrating up to the serosa (T3NxMx). The patient underwent a second operation with resection of the gallbladder bed and lymph node dissection of the hepatic hilium, without evidence of neoplastic infiltration.

Adenocarcinoma de yeyuno: una entidad de difícil diagnóstico / Jejunal adenocarcinoma: a difficult diagnostic entity

No disponible