ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To elucidate the treatment and surgery outcomes with or without perioperative therapies in Japanese patients with clinical stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in real-world settings. METHODS: We performed subset analyses of the SOLUTION study, a multicenter, noninterventional, observational study of Japanese patients diagnosed with clinical stage III NSCLC, for those who started first-line treatment (surgery±perioperative therapy) between January 2013 and December 2014 (study registration: UMIN000031385). Follow-up data were obtained using medical records from diagnosis to March 1, 2018. RESULTS: Of 149 eligible patients, 67 underwent surgery alone (median age 71 years) and 82 underwent surgery+perioperative therapy (median age 63 years). Lung resection was performed in 137 patients and the others underwent exploratory thoracotomy or other procedures. Perioperative therapies included adjuvant therapy only (n = 41), neoadjuvant therapy only (n = 24), and neoadjuvant+adjuvant therapy (n = 17). The median overall survival (OS) and 3-year OS rate were 29.3 months and 44.0%, respectively, in patients who underwent surgery alone, and not reached and 61.1%, respectively, in patients who underwent surgery+perioperative therapy. The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 42.4% and 47.1%, respectively, in patients who underwent surgery+perioperative therapy and 28.5% and 28.9%, respectively, in patients who underwent surgery alone. In multivariable Cox regression, perioperative therapy was associated with improved OS (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] 0.49 [0.29-0.81]), PFS (0.62 [0.39-0.96]), and DFS (0.62 [0.39-0.97]) versus surgery alone. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggested that perioperative therapy may be associated with better survival among patients undergoing surgical treatment of clinical stage III NSCLC.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Neoplasm Staging , Humans , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/surgery , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/mortality , Female , Male , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Aged , Middle Aged , Japan , Treatment Outcome , Aged, 80 and over , Pneumonectomy/methods , Cohort Studies , Adult , East Asian PeopleABSTRACT
Patients on dialysis have limited treatment options for advanced lung cancer because some chemotherapeutic agents are unavailable due to renal dysfunction. A man in his 70s on peritoneal dialysis presented with persistent fever refractory to antibiotics for 2 weeks. Subsequent whole-body CT showed a 5 cm diameter mass in the right lower lobe of the lung with right-sided pleural effusion and osteolytic metastasis of the right iliac bone. The patient was diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma (cT3N2M1b, stage IVB) harbouring the p.Gly719Ala point mutation on exon 18 of the epidermal growth factor receptor. The patient developed severe respiratory failure due to malignant lymphangitis after a bronchoscopy. He received 30 mg/day of afatinib, resulting in tumour shrinkage and recovery from respiratory failure. We advocate for aggressive screening of driver oncogenes in patients with lung cancer on dialysis, including those with squamous cell lung cancer.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Lung Neoplasms , Lymphangitis , Respiratory Insufficiency , Male , Humans , Afatinib/therapeutic use , Lymphangitis/drug therapy , Lymphangitis/etiology , Renal Dialysis , Lung Neoplasms/complications , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/complications , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/drug therapy , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy , Respiratory Insufficiency/drug therapy , Lung/pathology , MutationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There have been several reports demonstrating the safety of flexible bronchoscopy (FB) in the elderly, but none have focused specifically on lung cancer, which is a frequent biopsy procedure. METHODS: In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the safety of FB and subsequent treatment in elderly patients with suspected primary lung cancer. Elderly patients were defined as 75 years of age or older. RESULTS: A total of 141 patients, 77 in the elderly group and 64 in the nonelderly group, were reviewed. The median age of the elderly group was 80 years. Transbronchial lung biopsy was performed in more than 80% of all patients. Primary lung cancer was diagnosed in 42 (54.4%) of the elderly group and 35 (54.7%) of the nonelderly group (p = 0.38). Approximately 70% of the elderly patients with a confirmed diagnosis were treated, while more than half of the undiagnosed elderly patients had best supportive care. Complications such as bleeding, pneumothorax, fever, and pneumonia were similar in the elderly and nonelderly groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that flexible bronchoscopy can be performed as safely in the elderly as in the nonelderly. Furthermore, even elderly patients may have a greater chance of receiving treatment when a definitive diagnosis is achieved.
Subject(s)
Bronchoscopy , Lung Neoplasms , Humans , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bronchoscopy/adverse effects , Bronchoscopy/methods , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Lung Neoplasms/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Biopsy/methods , Disease ProgressionABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The substantial heterogeneity of clinical presentations in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pneumonia still requires robust chest computed tomography analysis to identify high-risk patients. While extension of ground-glass opacity and consolidation from peripheral to central lung fields on chest computed tomography (CT) might be associated with severely ill conditions, quantification of the central-peripheral distribution of ground glass opacity and consolidation in assessments of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia remains unestablished. This study aimed to examine whether the central-peripheral distributions of ground glass opacity and consolidation were associated with severe outcomes in patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia independent of the whole-lung extents of these abnormal shadows. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective cohort included hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia between January 2020 and August 2021. An artificial intelligence-based image analysis technology was used to segment abnormal shadows, including ground glass opacity and consolidation. The area ratio of ground glass opacity and consolidation to the whole lung (GGO%, CON%) and the ratio of ground glass opacity and consolidation areas in the central lungs to those in the peripheral lungs (GGO(C/P)) and (CON(C/P)) were automatically calculated. Severe outcome was defined as in-hospital death or requirement for endotracheal intubation. RESULTS: Of 512 enrolled patients, the severe outcome was observed in 77 patients. GGO% and CON% were higher in patients with severe outcomes than in those without. Multivariable logistic models showed that GGO(C/P), but not CON(C/P), was associated with the severe outcome independent of age, sex, comorbidities, GGO%, and CON%. CONCLUSION: In addition to GGO% and CON% in the whole lung, the higher the ratio of ground glass opacity in the central regions to that in the peripheral regions was, the more severe the outcomes in patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia were. The proposed method might be useful to reproducibly quantify the extension of ground glass opacity from peripheral to central lungs and to estimate prognosis.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pneumonia , Humans , Artificial Intelligence , COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , Hospital Mortality , Patient Acuity , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Male , FemaleABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Pneumothorax is a known sequela of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the clinical features of pneumothorax associated with COVID-19 have not been fully elucidated. METHODS: Patients who developed pneumothorax within 6 months of being diagnosed with COVID-19 were retrospectively analysed at two institutions. We investigated the background factors, COVID-19 severity and treatment, timing of pneumothorax onset, treatment modalities, treatment duration, and prognosis of these patients. RESULTS: A total of 21 patients were diagnosed with pneumothorax within 6 months of COVID-19 diagnosis. The combined incidence rate of pneumothorax at two institutions was 0.89 %. The mean age of these patients was 72.5 years, and they were predominantly male (90.5 %), with a history of smoking (76.1 %). The most frequent comorbidity was hypertension, followed by type 2 diabetes mellitus, COPD, and malignancy. Approximately 76 % of the patients had moderate or severe disease requiring oxygenation. Moreover, 90.5 % of these patients were taking antiviral drugs; 52.4 %, immunosuppressant agents (baricitinib/tocilizumab); and 66.7 % were on dexamethasone. The median time to the onset of pneumothorax was 15.0 days, and 86 % of cases occurred within 1 month of COVID-19 diagnosis. Bilateral pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum were noted in one patient each. Chest drainage was performed in 71.4 % of the patients. The mean treatment duration for pneumothorax was 14.1 days, and the 30-day mortality rate was 28.6 %. CONCLUSION: Pneumothorax associated with COVID-19 was more common in patients with moderate or severe disease requiring oxygenation, and occurred within 1 month of COVID-19 diagnosis. Pneumothorax associated with COVID-19 is a serious complication with a high mortality rate and clinicians should pay attention to it.