Improvements in Survival and Clinical Benefit With Gemcitabine as First-Line Therapy for Patients With Advanced Pancreas Cancer: A Randomized Trial.

PURPOSE: Most patients with advanced pancreas cancer experience pain and must limit their daily activities because of tumor-related symptoms. To date, no treatment has had a significant impact on the disease. In early studies with gemcitabine, patients with pancreas cancer experienced an improvement in disease-related symptoms. Based on those findings, a definitive trial was performed to assess the effectiveness of gemcitabine in patients with newly diagnosed advanced pancreas cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty-six patients with advanced symptomatic pancreas cancer completed a lead-in period to characterize and stabilize pain and were randomized to receive either gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 weekly x 7 followed by 1 week of rest, then weekly x 3 every 4 weeks thereafter (63 patients), or to fluorouracil (5-FU) 600 mg/m2 once weekly (63 patients). The primary efficacy measure was clinical benefit response, which was a composite of measurements of pain (analgesic consumption and pain intensity), Karnofsky performance status, and weight. Clinical benefit required a sustained (> or = 4 weeks) improvement in at least one parameter without worsening in any others. Other measures of efficacy included response rate, time to progressive disease, and survival. RESULTS: Clinical benefit response was experienced by 23.8% of gemcitabine-treated patients compared with 4.8% of 5-FU-treated patients (P = .0022). The median survival durations were 5.65 and 4.41 months for gemcitabine-treated and 5-FU-treated patients, respectively (P = .0025). The survival rate at 12 months was 18% for gemcitabine patients and 2% for 5-FU patients. Treatment was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that gemcitabine is more effective than 5-FU in alleviation of some disease-related symptoms in patients with advanced, symptomatic pancreas cancer. Gemcitabine also confers a modest survival advantage over treatment with 5-FU.

A phase II multicentre study of ziv-aflibercept in combination with cisplatin and pemetrexed in patients with previously untreated advanced/metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ziv-aflibercept in combination with cisplatin and pemetrexed in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: This single arm, multicentre phase II trial enrolled patients with previously untreated, locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous NSCLC. Patients received intravenous ziv-aflibercept 6 mg kg(-1), pemetrexed 500 mg m(-2), and cisplatin 75 mg m(-2), every 21 days for up to six cycles. Maintenance administration of ziv-aflibercept was to continue until disease progression, intolerable toxicity or other cause for withdrawal. The co-primary end points were objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Planned sample size was 72 patients. RESULTS: The study was closed prematurely because of three confirmed and two suspected cases of reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome (RPLS). A total of 42 patients were enrolled. Median age was 61.5 years; 55% were male, 86% Caucasian and 50% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS)=0. A median of four cycles of ziv-aflibercept was administered. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of any grade were nausea (69%) and fatigue (67%), with hypertension (36%) as the most common grade 3/4 TEAE. Of the 38 evaluable patients, ORR was 26% and median PFS was 5 months. CONCLUSION: Cases of RPLS had been observed in other studies in the ziv-aflibercept clinical development programme but the rate observed in this study was higher than previously observed. This might be related to declining renal function and/or hypertension. Although ORR and PFS were in accordance with most historical first-line NSCLC studies, this combination of ziv-aflibercept/cisplatin/pemetrexed will not be further explored in NSCLC.

A phase I/II trial of pixantrone (BBR2778), methylprednisolone, cisplatin, and cytosine arabinoside (PSHAP) in relapsed/refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of pixantrone (BBR2778) when substituted for etoposide in the ESHAP regimen in patients with aggressive relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Nineteen patients received protocol therapy, consisting of pixantrone 80 mg/m2 over 1 h on day 1, methylprednisolone 500 mg on days 1 - 5, cisplatin 25 mg/m2 on days 1 - 4, and cytarabine 2000 mg/m2 on day 5. Cycles were repeated every 21 days, in the outpatient setting. Dose limiting toxicity, consisting of bone marrow suppression, occurred at the first dose level (80 mg/m2), which was defined as the recommended dose. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were mainly hematologic. Only one patient had grade 4 febrile neutropenia. No significant decreases in ejection fraction greater than 20% occurred. Overall response rate was 58%, with 37% complete and 21% partial responses. Six of the 11 responders (55%) underwent stem cell transplant. Median time to progression and overall median survival were 5.7 months and 14.5 months, respectively. There is no significant interaction between pixantrone and the combined drugs. The recommended dose of pixantrone in combination with methylprednisolone, cytarabine, and cisplatin (PSHAP) is 80 mg/m2. PSHAP is an active salvage regimen and should be further evaluated as a pretransplant cytoreductive regimen.

A double-blind placebo-controlled randomized phase III trial of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin, plus or minus trimetrexate, in previously untreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Trimetrexate (TMTX) biochemically modulates 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LCV). Two phase II trials demonstrated promising activity for TMTX/5-FU/LCV in patients with untreated advanced colorectal cancer (ACC). This trial was designed to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of TMTX/5-FU/LCV as first-line treatment in ACC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients with ACC were randomized in double-blind fashion to receive placebo or TMTX (110 mg/m2) intravenously (i.v.) followed 24 h later by i.v. LCV 200 mg/m2, and 5-FU 500 mg/m2 plus oral LCV rescue. Both schedules were given weekly for 6 weeks every 8 weeks. Patients were evaluated for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), tumor response, quality of life (QoL) and toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 382 eligible patients were randomized. Significant toxicities were noted more frequently with TMTX/5-FU/LCV. Diarrhea was the most common grade 3 or 4 side-effect (41% and 28% on the TMTX and placebo arms, respectively). QoL scores and response rates did not differ between treatment arms. PFS was 5.3 months and 4.4 months in the TMTX and placebo arms, respectively (P = 0.77; Wilcoxon). OS was 15.8 months and 16.8 months, respectively (P = 0.73; Wilcoxon). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of TMTX to a weekly regimen of 5-FU/LCV worsened grade 3 or 4 diarrhea. The inclusion of TMTX did not yield any significant improvements in response rate, PFS or OS.

ZD0473 treatment in lung cancer: an overview of the clinical trial results.

Three open-label, non-comparative, multicentre Phase II trials have examined the efficacy and tolerability of ZD0473 as first-and second-line therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and second-line therapy in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients. Patients with second-line NSCLC or SCLC were evaluated as either platinum-sensitive or -resistant, based upon their time to relapse/progression after platinum-based therapy. First-line NSCLC patients (n = 18) received a total of 60 treatment cycles (median number per patient 2.5) whilst second-line NSCLC (n = 50) and SCLC (n = 48) patients both received a total of 127 treatment cycles (median number per patient 2.0). Grade 3/4 anaemia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was observed in: 38.8%, 22.2% and 27.7% of first-line NSCLC patients; 12.0%, 24.0% and 50% of second-line NSCLC patients; and 10.4%, 25.0% and 47.9% of second-line SCLC patients, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 non-haematological toxicities in all three trials were lethargy and dyspnoea. No clinically significant oto-, nephro- or neurotoxicity was observed. The first-line treatment of NSCLC produced an overall response rate (OR) of 6.3%. No OR was seen after second-line treatment of NSCLC, while ORs of 15.4% and 8.3% were seen in the platinum-resistant and -sensitive second-line SCLC patients, respectively.

Mitoxantrone and fludarabine in the treatment of patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma failing primary therapy with a doxorubicinor mitoxantrone-containing regimen.

Patients with recurrent lymphoma of any grade were treated with mitoxantrone (12 mg/m2 given intravenously (IV) over 15-30 minutes on day 1) followed by fludarabine at a dose of (25 mg/m 2 given IV over 30 minutes on days 1-3) every 28 days fludarabine at a dose of (25 mg/m2 given IV over 30 minutes on days 1-3) every 28 days. All patients had failed one prior chemotherapy regimen that contained either doxorubicin or mitoxantrone, total dose not exceeding 350 mg/m2 doxorubicin or 80 mg/m2 mitoxantrone. mitoxantrone. Thirty one patients (22 with intermediate- or high-grade and 9 with low-grade NHL) were enrolled. Median age was 63 years (range: 21 to 87). The objective response rate for patients with intermediate/high-grade NHL was 55% (27% with CR) and 89% (56% with CR) for patients with low-grade NHL. Median time to disease progression was 5.1 months for patients with intermediate/high-grade NHL and 10.8 months for patients with low-grade NHL. Median time to death for patients with intermediate/high-grade disease was 11.4 months. Median time to death for patients with low-grade NHL was not calculable as only one death (due to respiratory failure) occurred in this group 6.5 months after study start. The regimen was well tolerated. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was reported in 80% (24 of 30) of patients and Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in 19% (6 of 31) of patients. Nine hospitalizations for adverse events (primarily fever and neutropenia) occurred among eight patients, all with intermediate/high-grade NHL, during a total of 118 cycles of therapy. Further studies of this combination regimen in patients with intermediate/high-grade NHL and studies combined with monoclonal antibodies in low-grade NHL are warranted.

Mitoxantrone and paclitaxel combination chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer.

This study evaluated mitoxantrone and paclitaxel combination chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Thirty-seven patients who had developed progressive disease after prior chemotherapy were treated with mitoxantrone (14 mg/m2) and paclitaxel (150 mg/m2) every 21 days for a maximum of six cycles. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 nonhematological toxicities were fever and nausea. Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 71% of patients. Cardiotoxicity occurred in 2 patients, both of whom had previously received doxorubicin. Objective response was achieved in 35% of patients (5% complete response and 30% partial response) and 41% had stable disease. Median time to disease progression and median survival were 6 and 12 months, respectively. The percent of patients with an objective response was not different for those who had received prior doxorubicin or had chemotherapy in the preceding 6 months. This regimen appears to be effective and well tolerated as salvage therapy and merits further evaluation.

A phase II trial of etoposide, leucovorin, 5-FU, and interferon alpha 2b (ELFI) + G-CSF for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a Southwest Oncology Group study (SWOG 9413).

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapeutic treatments using combinations of etoposide, leucovorin and 5-FU (ELF) have shown activity in the treatment of gastrointestinal malignancies. Interferon alpha 2b is known to have antiproliferative effects on several cell lines and has well documented in vitro evidence of synergism with 5-FU. It was postulated that the combination of ELF and interferon alpha 2b would improve response rates and survival in patients with pancreas cancer. METHODS: Fifty-five eligible patients with locally-advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma received a regimen consisting of: i.v. leucovorin at 300 mg/m2/day on Days 1-3 (of 28-day cycle), i.v. etoposide at 80 mg/m2/day on Days 1-3, i.v. 5-FU at 500 mg/m2/day on Days 1-3, subcutaneous interferon alpha 2b at 3 million units TIW, and subcutaneous G-CSF at 5 microg/kg/day on Days 4-14 (or until WBC exceeds 10,000/microl). Patients with no evidence of disease progression continued on treatment for a total of 6 cycles. RESULTS: Complete response was demonstrated in 1 patient, partial response in 5 patients (11% confirmed response rate). The median survival was 5 months, and the six-month survival rate was 40%. Ten patients completed all 6 cycles of treatment. Toxicity-related dose delays and reductions were necessary for most patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although the combination of ELF and interferon alpha 2b (ELFI) has modest activity in pancreatic cancer, it is a toxic and complex regimen that is not superior to other currently available approaches for the chemotherapeutic management of pancreatic cancer. ELFI cannot be recommended as a standard therapy.

Hepatic chemoembolization combined with systemic infusion of 5-fluorouracil and bolus leucovorin for patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma: A Southwest Oncology Group pilot trial.

BACKGROUND: Rates of response to systemic chemotherapy among patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma rarely exceed 25- 30%, and complete responses are rare. The liver is the most common site of metastasis; however, regional therapies have not improved survival rates. The Southwest Oncology Group designed a clinical trial combining hepatic arterial chemoembolization with systemic infusion of 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy in an attempt to increase the complete response rate and prolong the time to disease progression. METHODS: Patients with documented liver metastasis from colorectal carcinoma were treated with two or three cycles of chemoembolization using a collagen suspension with doxorubicin, mitomycin C, and cisplatin. Subsequently, systemic chemotherapy with continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil and weekly leucovorin was initiated. Patients were assessed for response at 12-week intervals, with treatment continuing until disease progression. RESULTS: Thirty-one eligible, evaluable patients were treated. One complete and 8 partial responses were observed, for an overall response rate of 29%. Fifty-eight percent of patients survived 1 year, and the median survival for the whole cohort was 14 months. The median time to progression was 8 months. Seven patients (23%) experienced Grade 4 toxicity and 21 patients (67%) had Grade 3 toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: The response rate in this trial was comparable to that achieved with systemic chemotherapy consisting of a fluorinated pyrimidine-based regimen for patients with this disease. No improvement in complete response rate or time to progression was observed compared with the Southwest Oncology Group's experience with systemic therapy. The authors are not planning to study this regimen further as a treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

Predictors of cervical cancer screening in Mexican American women of reproductive age.

Several barriers impede cancer prevention in the Mexican American population. This study identified sociocultural factors that could be used to increase screening rates for cervical cancer in women of reproductive age. A survey was conducted in 1991 of 366 Mexican American women ages 18 to 40 in Tucson, Arizona, to assess current compliance with cervical cancer screening guidelines and several psychological, social, and cultural variables. Women who had never been screened (13 percent of the sample) had a knowledge deficit, no gynecological care, and no sexual activity. Women not screened annually (16 percent) lacked preventive care, imperfectly understood the Pap test, had lower self-efficacy expectations for understanding physicians, experienced higher emotional stress about the test, and were older and less acculturated. Women who have never been screened require basic education on cancer and cancer screening and policy changes increasing access to care. For women with less routine screening, preventive care, supportive attitudes, and health care skills must be encouraged.

Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial.

PURPOSE: Most patients with advanced pancreas cancer experience pain and must limit their daily activities because of tumor-related symptoms. To date, no treatment has had a significant impact on the disease. In early studies with gemcitabine, patients with pancreas cancer experienced an improvement in disease-related symptoms. Based on those findings, a definitive trial was performed to assess the effectiveness of gemcitabine in patients with newly diagnosed advanced pancreas cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty-six patients with advanced symptomatic pancreas cancer completed a lead-in period to characterize and stabilize pain and were randomized to receive either gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 weekly x 7 followed by 1 week of rest, then weekly x 3 every 4 weeks thereafter (63 patients), or to fluorouracil (5-FU) 600 mg/m2 once weekly (63 patients). The primary efficacy measure was clinical benefit response, which was a composite of measurements of pain (analgesic consumption and pain intensity), Karnofsky performance status, and weight. Clinical benefit required a sustained (> or = 4 weeks) improvement in at least one parameter without worsening in any others. Other measures of efficacy included response rate, time to progressive disease, and survival. RESULTS: Clinical benefit response was experienced by 23.8% of gemcitabine-treated patients compared with 4.8% of 5-FU-treated patients (P = .0022). The median survival durations were 5.65 and 4.41 months for gemcitabine-treated and 5-FU-treated patients, respectively (P = .0025). The survival rate at 12 months was 18% for gemcitabine patients and 2% for 5-FU patients. Treatment was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that gemcitabine is more effective than 5-FU in alleviation of some disease-related symptoms in patients with advanced, symptomatic pancreas cancer. Gemcitabine also confers a modest survival advantage over treatment with 5-FU.

Randomized, double blind, dose-response trial across four oral doses of dolasetron for the prevention of acute emesis after moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Oral Dolasetron Dose-Response Study Group.

BACKGROUND: This double blind parallel group study assessed the acute antiemetic efficacy of four oral doses of dolasetron mesylate in cancer patients receiving their first course of intravenous chemotherapy with doxorubicin and/or cyclophosphamide. METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive 25, 50, 100, or 200 mg of dolasetron mesylate 30 minutes prior to chemotherapy and were monitored for nausea and emetic episodes for the next 24 hours. RESULTS: Three hundred and nineteen cancer patients at 32 sites completed the study. Most patients were female (81%); of this group, 69% had breast carcinoma. A highly statistically significant linear trend demonstrating improved response with higher doses was detected for complete response (no emetic episodes and no rescue medication) (P < 0.001), for complete plus major response (0-2 emetic episodes and no rescue medication) (P < 0.001), and for patient visual analog scale assessments of nausea (P = 0.001) and general satisfaction with antiemetic therapy (P = 0.001). No serious adverse events were noted. The most frequent adverse event was mild, self-limiting headache, which has been reported with other drugs in this class. CONCLUSIONS: Single oral doses of dolasetron mesylate were found to be effective in preventing acute emesis in cancer patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

Phase II evaluation of topotecan in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. A Southwest Oncology Group trial (SWOG 9241).

The topoisomerase-1 inhibitor, topotecan, was tested in 48 eligible patients with advanced colorectal cancer. The patients had no prior chemotherapy and a Southwest Oncology Group performance status of 0-2. Topotecan was administered intravenously at 1.5 mg/m2/day for five days and repeated every 21 days. The major toxicity was hematologic with 19 out of 48 (40%) patients having grade IV granulocytopenia and 4 out of 48 (8%) patients demonstrating grade IV thrombocytopenia. Two patients (4%) demonstrated partial response. Thirty patients have died and the Kaplan-Meier estimate of median survival is 9 months (95% confidence interval; 7-16 months). Topotecan in this dose and schedule does not appear active in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Antiemetic efficacy of two different single intravenous doses of dolasetron in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin-containing chemotherapy.

This randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter study compared the antiemetic effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of two different intravenous (i.v.) doses of dolasetron mesylate (0.6 and 1.8 mg/kg) in cancer patients receiving their first course of high-dose cisplatin-containing chemotherapy (> or = 75 mg/m2). Efficacy was assessed by recording the timing, number, and severity of emetic episodes in the 24 h following high-dose cisplatin. Safety was evaluated by monitoring adverse events, vital signs, clinical laboratory parameters, and electrocardiograms. Of the 62 patients enrolled in the study, 29 received 0.6 mg/kg of dolasetron mesylate and 33 received 1.8 mg/kg. Patients who received dolasetron mesylate 1.8 mg/kg consistently experienced a greater degree of antiemetic control than those who received 0.6 mg/kg. Complete responses were achieved by 55% of patients who received 1.8 mg/kg compared with 31% for the 0.6-mg/kg group. The 1.8-mg/kg group achieved a significantly (p = 0.039) higher complete/ major response rate than the 0.6-mg/kg group (77% vs 55%, respectively) and a significantly (p = 0.004) longer time to the first emetic episode (> 24 h vs 13.5 h, respectively). More than 80% of patients were either satisfied or very satisfied with dolasetron treatment. The most common adverse events were mild to moderate in intensity, consistent with other studies, and included headache (24.1% of patients) and diarrhea (4.8%). These results demonstrated that a single 1.8-mg/kg i.v. dose of dolasetron mesylate provided effective antiemetic activity in a majority of patients given high-dose cisplatin for the first time and should be evaluated further in clinical trials.

Evaluation of race as a prognostic factor in multiple myeloma. An ancillary of Southwest Oncology Group Study 8229.

PURPOSE: The objective of this investigation was to assess the impact of race (black v white) on the survival of patients with multiple myeloma treated within the context of a large clinical trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cohort of patients randomized to receive one of two treatment regimens and monitored for at least 10 years was studied to assess the impact of race as a prognostic factor, after adjusting for other known factors such as stage of disease. Patients were recruited from the referral network of the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG), a national multiinstitutional consortium that includes both academic and community treatment centers. Patients had a diagnosis of multiple myeloma and had not previously been treated for this disease. They were carefully characterized as to demographic and clinical features, and were randomized to receive one of two treatment regimens, which proved to have virtually identical outcomes. The outcome measure was survival, measured from the date of randomization to the date of last contact. Patients still alive at last contact date were treated as censored observation. RESULTS: Survival for black myeloma patients was similar to that for white patients, both overall and adjusted for prognostic factors such as stage. CONCLUSION: Observed differences in mortality between blacks and whites cannot be attributed to differences in survival after diagnosis, given comparable treatment.

Phase II study of 13-cis-retinoic acid plus interferon-alpha 2a in heavily pretreated squamous carcinoma of the cervix.

The combination of 13-cis-retinoic acid (13-cRA) and interferon (IFN)-alpha 2a has been reported to be highly active in previously untreated squamous carcinoma of the cervix. In this phase II study, 13-cRA was given at a dose of 1 mg/kg/day and IFN-alpha 2a was given subcutaneously at a dose of 3 million units/m2/day. Thirteen of 14 patients enrolled in this study are evaluable for response and toxicity. There were no complete or partial responses. Ten patients had progressive disease and the remaining three had stable disease. Principle toxicities were fatigue, nausea, and vomiting. This regimen appears cross-resistant with radiotherapy and/or platinum-based cytotoxic therapy in heavily pretreated patients with squamous carcinoma of the cervix.

Cancer in Hispanics: issues of concern.

Hispanics are among the fastest growing minorities in the United States, after Asian-Americans and Pacific-Islanders. Hispanics, Latinos, Chicanos, Mexican-Americans, Puerto Ricans, Cuban-Americans, etc. are all designations used to describe this large, heterogeneous population with different cultural, ethnic, geographic, and social backgrounds. There is still no clear definition of the term "Hispanic." The data available regarding the incidence, morbidity, and mortality from cancer in Hispanics are scarce, scattered, outdated, and often incomplete. From the studies looking at the accessibility and availability of medical care for this population, few have examined in detail the variability within the entire Hispanic population. The aggregation of culturally distinct subgroups, which have resided in the United States for different periods of time, into a more inclusive Hispanic category assumes that all persons of Mexican, Cuban, and Puerto Rican extraction have similar needs and experience similar barriers in using health services. There is, however, no clear evidence for this assumption. On the contrary, there is evidence that each group has specific characteristics that make it different and independent from another, despite the fact that they also share some commonalities. Because of the lower overall prevalence of cancer in this population, potential protective factors need to be explored. Hispanics, however, appear to have a less favorable stage of disease at presentation and have overall lower death rates from cancer than non-Hispanic whites, but lower overall survival in certain cancers. Demographic and epidemiologic data collection need to be updated and improved.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Phase I study of adozelesin (U-73,975) in patients with solid tumors.

During a phase I clinical and pharmacologic trial, 26 patients with refractory solid tumors were treated with increasing doses of adozelesin by brief intravenous infusion every 3 weeks. Overall, adozelesin was well tolerated. The dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression, mainly thrombocytopenia and leukopenia. Nonhematologic toxicity was generally mild, with fatigue (36%), local reaction at the infusion site (24%), nausea or vomiting (20%) and hypersensitivity reaction (16%) being the most common adverse effects. There were no objective clinical responses. The maximally tolerated dose on this schedule was 188 micrograms/m2 with the recommended phase II starting dose being 150 micrograms/m2 on an every 3 week schedule. Adozelesin merits broad investigation at the phase II level.

CT findings after hepatic chemoembolization.

Hepatic arterial chemoembolization (CE) with a mixture of particulate collagen and chemotherapeutic agents was evaluated as therapy for hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma. This article describes the characteristics sequential pattern of change seen on liver CT scans following CE. Thirty CT scans were performed on seven patients who had undergone a total of 11 CE procedures. All patients had baseline, immediate postprocedural, and follow-up CT exams at 1 to 2 month intervals following CE. Immediate post-procedural CT scans mapped the area of embolization owing to the density of the contrast mixed with the CE agents. Some lesions seen easily on baseline were more difficult to see as they became isodense with normal liver. Reflux of embolic material into the cystic artery and gallbladder wall was also observed on postprocedural scans in three patients. In all patients, early follow-up scans (1 month after CE) demonstrated changes in lesions seen on baseline scans consistent with tumor necrosis. This was corroborated by a decrease in carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels. In three patients, however, low attenuation regions developed in areas in which there had been no lesion before. The significance of these is uncertain, but the low CEA values and the subsequent evolution in appearance of these sites on CT suggest that they were regions of hepatic ischemia/infarction as opposed to heretofore unidentifiable metastases, now "unmasked." Intermediate follow-up scans (2-3 months) revealed maximal effect on tumor volume, with a decrease of > or = 25% in five of seven patients (71%). Late follow-up scans (> or = 3 months after the last CE) confirmed recurrent disease and new lesions in all cases.