ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There is currently no information on the anatomical risk factors for splenic artery aneurysm rupture, specifically the location or size of the lesion; therefore, reporting this entity to obtain data and ultimately reduce morbidity and mortality is essential. Here we report a case of a male patient with spontaneous rupture of a large splenic artery aneurysm presenting with abdominal pain. CASE PRESENTATION: A 59-year middle-eastern male, with known pemphigus vulgaris presented with a chief complaint of headache and syncope, followed by abdominal pain along with severe metabolic acidosis. A contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan of the abdomen and pelvic showed a splenic artery aneurysm of 33 × 30 mm with a 150 × 90 mm hematoma formation around the aneurysm site. The patient underwent an operation and splenectomy, with confirmation of the diagnosis of ruptured splenic artery aneurysm. CONCLUSION: It is essential to consider splenic aneurysm rupture as a second-line differential diagnosis, especially among patients with comorbid diseases, as this can lead to timely and appropriate lifesaving intervention.
Subject(s)
Aneurysm, Ruptured , Gastrointestinal Diseases , Pemphigus , Splenic Rupture , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Rupture, Spontaneous/pathology , Splenic Artery/diagnostic imaging , Splenic Artery/pathology , Pemphigus/complications , Splenectomy , Aneurysm, Ruptured/complications , Aneurysm, Ruptured/diagnostic imaging , Aneurysm, Ruptured/surgery , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Abdominal Pain/pathologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Bullet embolus is a rare condition following gunshot injuries and represents a clinical challenge regarding both diagnosis and management. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 35-year-old Iranian (Middle-Eastern) male patient with a shotgun injury to both buttocks, which traveled to the heart and the popliteal area through the femoral vein and superficial femoral artery, respectively. Surgical intervention was applied for the popliteal pellet, and the patient was discharged without further complications. CONCLUSION: Although bullet emboli can be a clinical challenge, with the advent of modern procedures, removal has become safer. X-ray, computed tomography, and transthoracic and/or transesophageal echocardiography may be used as adjuncts to help establish the diagnosis.
