Lung donor bronchoalveolar lavage positivity: Incidence, risk factors, and lung transplant recipients' outcome.

BACKGROUND: Inconsistent data exists regarding the risk factors for bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) positivity in lung donors, the incidence of donor-derived infections (DDI), and the effect of BAL positivity on lung transplant (LuTx) recipients' outcome. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on consecutive LuTx at a single center from January 2016 to December 2022. Donors' data, including characteristics, graft function and BAL samples were collected pre-procurement. Recipients underwent BAL before LuTx and about the 3rd, 7th and 14th day after LuTx. A DDI was defined as BAL positivity (bacterial growth ≥104 colony forming units) for identical bacterial species between donor and recipient. Recipients' pre-operative characteristics, intra-operative management, and post-operative outcomes were assessed. Two recipient cohorts were identified based on lung colonization status before undergoing LuTx. RESULTS: Out of 188 LuTx procedures performed, 169 were analyzed. Thirty-six percent of donors' BAL tested positive. Donors' characteristics and graft function at procurement were not associated with BAL positivity. Fourteen DDI were detected accounting for 23% of recipients receiving a graft with a positive BAL. Only among uncolonized recipients, receiving a graft with positive BAL is associated with higher likelihood of requiring invasive ventilation at 72 hours after LuTx on higher positive end-expiratory pressure levels having lower PaO2/FiO2, prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation and longer ICU stay. No difference in hospital length of stay was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Receiving a graft with a positive BAL, which is poorly predicted by donors' characteristics, carries the risk of developing a DDI and is associated to a worse early graft function among uncolonized recipients.

Quantitative Multivolume Proton-Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Lung Transplant Recipients: Comparison With Computed Tomography and Spirometry.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Acute and chronic graft rejection remains the major problem in clinical surveillance of lung-transplanted patients and early detection of complications is of capital importance to allow the optimal therapeutic option. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of quantitative non contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a non-ionizing imaging modality to assess ventilation impairment in patients who have undergone lung transplantation, in comparison with quantitative computed tomography (CT) and spirometry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten lung-transplanted patients (39 ±12 years, forced-expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) = 81 ± 27%, forced vital capacity (FVC) = 87 ± 27%) were acquired in breath-hold at full-expiration and full-inspiration with 1.5T MRI and CT. Maps of expiratory-inspiratory difference in MR signal-intensity and CT-density were computed to estimate regional ventilation. Based on expiratory, inspiratory, and expiratory-inspiratory difference values, each pixel was classified as healthy (H), low ventilation (LV), air trapping (AT), and consolidation (C) and the percent extent of each class was quantified. RESULTS: Overall, expiratory-inspiratory difference in MR signal-intensity correlated to CT-density (r = 0.64, p < 0.0001) and to FEV1 (ρ = 0.71, p = 0.02). The linear correlation between MRI and CT functional maps considering all the four classes is r = 0.93 (p < 0.0001). MRI percent volumes of H, AT, and C correlated to FEV1 %pred, with the highest correlation reported for AT (ρ = -0.82). CONCLUSION: Results demonstrated a good agreement between MRI and CT ventilation imaging and between the corresponding percent volumes of lung damage. Quantitative MRI may represent an accurate non-ionizing imaging technique for longitudinal monitoring of lung transplant recipients.

Bronchoalveolar Lavage-microRNAs Are Potential Novel Biomarkers of Outcome After Lung Transplantation.

Primary graft dysfunction, infections, and acute rejection (AR) worsen lung transplantation (LTx) outcome and patient survival. Despite significant efforts, reliable biomarkers of acute lung allograft dysfunction are lacking. To address this issue, we profiled the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) miRNome in LTx patients. METHODS: BAL-microRNAs (miRNAs) from 16 patients were collected 7 days (T0), 15 days (T1), and 3 months (T2) after bilateral LTx and profiled on low-density array. Unsupervised and supervised analyses were used to identify miRNAs associated with clinical features, pneumonia, or AR. Prognostic markers were identified using the Cox model. Targeted signaling pathways were predicted in silico. A second series of 11 patients were used to validate AR-associated miRNAs. RESULTS: Variation in BAL-miRNAs was associated with acute lung allograft dysfunction. Increased levels of miR-23b-3p at T2 were detected in patients with pneumonia, whereas let-7f-5p, miR-146b-3p, miR-22-5p, miR-29c-5p, miR-362-5p, and miR-452-5p were upregulated at T2 in patients with AR. miR-148b-5p and miR-744-3p distinguished LTx patients with AR in both cohorts. Low miR-148b-5p and high miR-744-3p expression levels were significantly associated with a shorter time to AR either within the first year after LTx or during follow-up. Combination of the 2 miRNAs identified LTx patients with higher AR risk independently of clinical variables. CONCLUSIONS: Our data provide new insights into the roles of BAL-miRNAs in regulating the pulmonary environment after transplantation and suggest that these miRNAs could serve as biomarkers of early- or mid-stage events. If validated, these findings could pave the way to a personalized clinical approach in LTx patients.

Cefditoren versus levofloxacin in patients with exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: serum inflammatory biomarkers, clinical efficacy, and microbiological eradication.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this open-label, randomized, parallel-group pilot study was to evaluate the efficacy of cefditoren pivoxil and levofloxacin in terms of speed of reduction in inflammatory parameters, clinical recovery, and microbiological eradication. METHODS: Forty eligible patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB) were randomized to receive cefditoren 200 mg twice a day for 5 days (n = 20) or levofloxacin 500 mg once daily for 7 days (n = 20). RESULTS: The inflammatory parameters which were significantly reduced at test-of-cure with respect to visit 1 were Krebs von den Lundgen-6 (KL-6) and interleukin-6. KL-6 decreased both in the overall study population (from 19 ± 11 UI/mL to 6 ± 8 UI/mL, P = 0.000) and in the cefditoren (from 19 ± 13 UI/mL to 8 ± 10 UI/mL, P = 0.006) and levofloxacin (from 19 ± 10 UI/mL to 5 ± 5 UI/mL, P = 0.000) arms. Similarly, interleukin-6 decreased both in the overall study population (from 13.35 ± 16.41 pg/mL to 3 ± 4.7 pg/mL, P = 0.000) and in the cefditoren (from 15.90 ± 19.54 pg/mL to 4.13 ± 6.42 pg/mL, P = 0.015) and levofloxacin (from 10.80 ± 12.55 pg/mL to 1.87 ± 1.16 pg/mL, P = 0.003) arms. At the end of treatment (test-of-cure, 6-9 days after drug initiation), the clinical success rate in the overall study population was 78%; the clinical cure rate was 80% in the cefditoren arm and 75% in the levofloxacin arm. Globally, bacteriological eradication at test-of-cure was obtained in 85% of the overall study population. Both treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Cefditoren represents a valid option in the treatment of mild to moderately severe cases of AECB in the outpatient care setting. Moreover, the use of this cephalosporin is associated with a significant reduction of interleukin-6 and KL-6, two key mediators of lung inflammation and epithelial damage.