Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Nucleic Acids Res ; 50(14): 7906-7924, 2022 08 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35819192

ABSTRACT

Chromatin insulators are DNA-protein complexes that can prevent the spread of repressive chromatin and block communication between enhancers and promoters to regulate gene expression. In Drosophila, the gypsy chromatin insulator complex consists of three core proteins: CP190, Su(Hw), and Mod(mdg4)67.2. These factors concentrate at nuclear foci termed insulator bodies, and changes in insulator body localization have been observed in mutants defective for insulator function. Here, we identified NURF301/E(bx), a nucleosome remodeling factor, as a novel regulator of gypsy insulator body localization through a high-throughput RNAi imaging screen. NURF301 promotes gypsy-dependent insulator barrier activity and physically interacts with gypsy insulator proteins. Using ChIP-seq, we found that NURF301 co-localizes with insulator proteins genome-wide, and NURF301 promotes chromatin association of Su(Hw) and CP190 at gypsy insulator binding sites. These effects correlate with NURF301-dependent nucleosome repositioning. At the same time, CP190 and Su(Hw) both facilitate recruitment of NURF301 to chromatin. Finally, Oligopaint FISH combined with immunofluorescence revealed that NURF301 promotes 3D contact between insulator bodies and gypsy insulator DNA binding sites, and NURF301 is required for proper nuclear positioning of gypsy binding sites. Our data provide new insights into how a nucleosome remodeling factor and insulator proteins cooperatively contribute to nuclear organization.


Subject(s)
Chromatin , Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Animals , Chromatin/genetics , Chromatin/metabolism , DNA/metabolism , Drosophila/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Insulator Elements/genetics , Microtubule-Associated Proteins/metabolism , Nuclear Proteins/metabolism , Nucleosomes/genetics , Nucleosomes/metabolism
2.
Cancer Res ; 80(11): 2125-2137, 2020 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32265227

ABSTRACT

Peptidylarginine deiminases (PADI) catalyze posttranslational modification of many target proteins and have been suggested to play a role in carcinogenesis. Citrullination of histones by PADI4 was recently implicated in regulating embryonic stem and hematopoietic progenitor cells. Here, we investigated a possible role for PADI4 in regulating breast cancer stem cells. PADI4 activity limited the number of cancer stem cells (CSC) in multiple breast cancer models in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, PADI4 inhibition resulted in a widespread redistribution of histone H3, with increased accumulation around transcriptional start sites. Interestingly, epigenetic effects of PADI4 on the bulk tumor cell population did not explain the CSC phenotype. However, in sorted tumor cell populations, PADI4 downregulated expression of master transcription factors of stemness, NANOG and OCT4, specifically in the cancer stem cell compartment, by reducing the transcriptionally activating H3R17me2a histone mark at those loci; this effect was not seen in the non-stem cells. A gene signature reflecting tumor cell-autonomous PADI4 inhibition was associated with poor outcome in human breast cancer datasets, consistent with a tumor-suppressive role for PADI4 in estrogen receptor-positive tumors. These results contrast with known tumor-promoting effects of PADI4 on the tumor stroma and suggest that the balance between opposing tumor cell-autonomous and stromal effects may determine net outcome. Our findings reveal a novel role for PADI4 as a tumor suppressor in regulating breast cancer stem cells and provide insight into context-specific effects of PADI4 in epigenetic modulation. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings demonstrate a novel activity of the citrullinating enzyme PADI4 in suppressing breast cancer stem cells through epigenetic repression of stemness master transcription factors NANOG and OCT4.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/enzymology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Neoplastic Stem Cells/enzymology , Neoplastic Stem Cells/pathology , Protein-Arginine Deiminase Type 4/metabolism , Animals , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Cell Line, Tumor , Disease Progression , Female , Gene Knockdown Techniques , Humans , Isoenzymes , MCF-7 Cells , Mice , Nanog Homeobox Protein/genetics , Nanog Homeobox Protein/metabolism , Octamer Transcription Factor-3/genetics , Octamer Transcription Factor-3/metabolism , Protein-Arginine Deiminase Type 4/antagonists & inhibitors , Protein-Arginine Deiminase Type 4/genetics , Transcription Factors/genetics , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Transcriptome
3.
Clin Cancer Res ; 26(3): 643-656, 2020 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31582516

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: TGFßs are overexpressed in many advanced cancers and promote cancer progression through mechanisms that include suppression of immunosurveillance. Multiple strategies to antagonize the TGFß pathway are in early-phase oncology trials. However, TGFßs also have tumor-suppressive activities early in tumorigenesis, and the extent to which these might be retained in advanced disease has not been fully explored. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A panel of 12 immunocompetent mouse allograft models of metastatic breast cancer was tested for the effect of neutralizing anti-TGFß antibodies on lung metastatic burden. Extensive correlative biology analyses were performed to assess potential predictive biomarkers and probe underlying mechanisms. RESULTS: Heterogeneous responses to anti-TGFß treatment were observed, with 5 of 12 models (42%) showing suppression of metastasis, 4 of 12 (33%) showing no response, and 3 of 12 (25%) showing an undesirable stimulation (up to 9-fold) of metastasis. Inhibition of metastasis was immune-dependent, whereas stimulation of metastasis was immune-independent and targeted the tumor cell compartment, potentially affecting the cancer stem cell. Thus, the integrated outcome of TGFß antagonism depends on a complex balance between enhancing effective antitumor immunity and disrupting persistent tumor-suppressive effects of TGFß on the tumor cell. Applying transcriptomic signatures derived from treatment-naïve mouse primary tumors to human breast cancer datasets suggested that patients with breast cancer with high-grade, estrogen receptor-negative disease are most likely to benefit from anti-TGFß therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to dogma, tumor-suppressive responses to TGFß are retained in some advanced metastatic tumors. Safe deployment of TGFß antagonists in the clinic will require good predictive biomarkers.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/pharmacology , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Genes, Tumor Suppressor , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplastic Stem Cells/drug effects , Transforming Growth Factor beta/antagonists & inhibitors , Animals , Breast Neoplasms/immunology , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Cell Line, Tumor , Disease Models, Animal , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/immunology , Lung Neoplasms/metabolism , Lung Neoplasms/secondary , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Neoplastic Stem Cells/metabolism , Signal Transduction , Transforming Growth Factor beta/immunology , Transforming Growth Factor beta/metabolism , Treatment Outcome
4.
Nat Commun ; 10(1): 2071, 2019 05 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31061501

ABSTRACT

Translation and transcription are frequently dysregulated in cancer. These two processes are generally regulated by distinct sets of factors. The CBFB gene, which encodes a transcription factor, has recently emerged as a highly mutated driver in a variety of human cancers including breast cancer. Here we report a noncanonical role of CBFB in translation regulation. RNA immunoprecipitation followed by deep sequencing (RIP-seq) reveals that cytoplasmic CBFB binds to hundreds of transcripts and regulates their translation. CBFB binds to mRNAs via hnRNPK and enhances translation through eIF4B, a general translation initiation factor. Interestingly, the RUNX1 mRNA, which encodes the transcriptional partner of CBFB, is bound and translationally regulated by CBFB. Furthermore, nuclear CBFB/RUNX1 complex transcriptionally represses the oncogenic NOTCH signaling pathway in breast cancer. Thus, our data reveal an unexpected function of CBFB in translation regulation and propose that breast cancer cells evade translation and transcription surveillance simultaneously through downregulating CBFB.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Core Binding Factor Alpha 2 Subunit/genetics , Core Binding Factor beta Subunit/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Heterogeneous-Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein K/metabolism , Animals , Breast/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Cell Line, Tumor , Core Binding Factor Alpha 2 Subunit/metabolism , Down-Regulation , Eukaryotic Initiation Factors/metabolism , Female , HEK293 Cells , Humans , Mice , Mice, Nude , RNA, Messenger/metabolism , Receptors, Notch/metabolism , Signal Transduction/genetics , Tissue Array Analysis , Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays
5.
PLoS Genet ; 8(11): e1003069, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23209434

ABSTRACT

Chromatin insulators organize the genome into distinct transcriptional domains and contribute to cell type-specific chromatin organization. However, factors regulating tissue-specific insulator function have not yet been discovered. Here we identify the RNA recognition motif-containing protein Shep as a direct interactor of two individual components of the gypsy insulator complex in Drosophila. Mutation of shep improves gypsy-dependent enhancer blocking, indicating a role as a negative regulator of insulator activity. Unlike ubiquitously expressed core gypsy insulator proteins, Shep is highly expressed in the central nervous system (CNS) with lower expression in other tissues. We developed a novel, quantitative tissue-specific barrier assay to demonstrate that Shep functions as a negative regulator of insulator activity in the CNS but not in muscle tissue. Additionally, mutation of shep alters insulator complex nuclear localization in the CNS but has no effect in other tissues. Consistent with negative regulatory activity, ChIP-seq analysis of Shep in a CNS-derived cell line indicates substantial genome-wide colocalization with a single gypsy insulator component but limited overlap with intact insulator complexes. Taken together, these data reveal a novel, tissue-specific mode of regulation of a chromatin insulator.


Subject(s)
Chromatin/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster , Insulator Elements/genetics , Organ Specificity , Repressor Proteins/genetics , Animals , Central Nervous System/metabolism , Chromatin/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Genome , Muscles/metabolism , Mutation , Nucleotide Motifs/genetics , Repressor Proteins/metabolism
6.
Genes Dev ; 25(16): 1686-701, 2011 Aug 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21852534

ABSTRACT

A major role of the RNAi pathway in Schizosaccharomyces pombe is to nucleate heterochromatin, but it remains unclear whether this mechanism is conserved. To address this question in Drosophila, we performed genome-wide localization of Argonaute2 (AGO2) by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-seq in two different embryonic cell lines and found that AGO2 localizes to euchromatin but not heterochromatin. This localization pattern is further supported by immunofluorescence staining of polytene chromosomes and cell lines, and these studies also indicate that a substantial fraction of AGO2 resides in the nucleus. Intriguingly, AGO2 colocalizes extensively with CTCF/CP190 chromatin insulators but not with genomic regions corresponding to endogenous siRNA production. Moreover, AGO2, but not its catalytic activity or Dicer-2, is required for CTCF/CP190-dependent Fab-8 insulator function. AGO2 interacts physically with CTCF and CP190, and depletion of either CTCF or CP190 results in genome-wide loss of AGO2 chromatin association. Finally, mutation of CTCF, CP190, or AGO2 leads to reduction of chromosomal looping interactions, thereby altering gene expression. We propose that RNAi-independent recruitment of AGO2 to chromatin by insulator proteins promotes the definition of transcriptional domains throughout the genome.


Subject(s)
Argonaute Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Microtubule-Associated Proteins/metabolism , Nuclear Proteins/metabolism , Repressor Proteins/metabolism , Animals , Animals, Genetically Modified , Argonaute Proteins/genetics , Binding Sites/genetics , Blotting, Western , CCCTC-Binding Factor , Cell Line , Chromatin Immunoprecipitation , Cluster Analysis , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Euchromatin/genetics , Euchromatin/metabolism , Female , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect , Gene Expression Profiling , Genome, Insect/genetics , Homeodomain Proteins/genetics , Homeodomain Proteins/metabolism , Male , Microtubule-Associated Proteins/genetics , Mutation , Nuclear Proteins/genetics , Promoter Regions, Genetic/genetics , Protein Binding , RNA Interference , RNA, Small Interfering/genetics , RNA, Small Interfering/metabolism , Repressor Proteins/genetics , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
7.
PLoS Genet ; 6(3): e1000880, 2010 Mar 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20300658

ABSTRACT

Highly repetitive and transposable element rich regions of the genome must be stabilized by the presence of heterochromatin. A direct role for RNA interference in the establishment of heterochromatin has been demonstrated in fission yeast. In metazoans, which possess multiple RNA-silencing pathways that are both functionally distinct and spatially restricted, whether RNA silencing contributes directly to heterochromatin formation is not clear. Previous studies in Drosophila melanogaster have suggested the involvement of both the AGO2-dependent endogenous small interfering RNA (endo-siRNA) as well as Piwi-interacting RNA (piRNA) silencing pathways. In order to determine if these Argonaute genes are required for heterochromatin formation, we utilized transcriptional reporters and chromatin immunoprecipitation of the critical factor Heterochromatin Protein 1 (HP1) to monitor the heterochromatic state of piRNA clusters, which generate both endo-siRNAs and the bulk of piRNAs. Surprisingly, we find that mutation of AGO2 or piwi increases silencing at piRNA clusters corresponding to an increase of HP1 association. Furthermore, loss of piRNA production from a single piRNA cluster results in genome-wide redistribution of HP1 and reduction of silencing at a distant heterochromatic site, suggesting indirect effects on HP1 recruitment. Taken together, these results indicate that heterochromatin forms independently of endo-siRNA and piRNA pathways.


Subject(s)
Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolism , Eukaryotic Initiation Factors/metabolism , RNA-Induced Silencing Complex/metabolism , Animals , Argonaute Proteins , Chromatin/metabolism , DNA Transposable Elements/genetics , Drosophila melanogaster/cytology , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Female , Gene Expression Regulation , Gene Silencing , Mutagenesis, Insertional/genetics , Mutation/genetics , Ovarian Follicle/cytology , Ovarian Follicle/metabolism , Protein Transport , RNA, Small Interfering/metabolism , Transcription, Genetic
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...