ABSTRACT
In 2016, a new, improved and modern intensive care unit was constructed at Kamuzu Central Hospital in Lilongwe, Malawi. Having been operational for about 4 years, there has not been a systematic audit to gauge its performance. Therefore, this quantitative retrospective cohort study aimed at investigating the performance of the intensive care unit at Kamuzu Central Hospital in Lilongwe, Malawi. We analysed the patterns of admission through 250 clinical cases and their respective outcomes spanning from 1st January 2019 to 31st December 2019 using STATA. Descriptive and inferential statistics were computed. We also had a follow-up discussion with the Head of the unit to better understand the unit's functioning. Out of the 250 admissions, we evaluated 249 case files. About 30.8% of all patients were referred from the main operating theatre, and 20.7% from the casualty (emergency medicine). Head injury (26.7%) and peritonitis (15.7%) were the commonest causes of admission. The overall mortality was 52.2% with more females (57.5%) dying than males (47.9%). Head injury and peritonitis had the highest contribution to the mortality accounting for 25.3% and 16.9% of all deaths respectively. In conclusion, despite the new unit registering an improved performance compared to the old unit's 2012 mortality of 60.9%, the current mortality rate of 52.2% generally reflects a suboptimal performance. The intensive care unit is still grappling with a number of challenges that need immediate attention including few working beds, shortage of critical care specialists and nursing staff and lack of standard admission criteria.
Subject(s)
Hospital Mortality , Intensive Care Units , Humans , Malawi/epidemiology , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Adult , Middle Aged , Clinical Audit , Adolescent , Young Adult , Aged , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Patient Admission/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
Vaccination is one of the greatest public health achievements of the 20th century, with a tremendous impact in the prevention and control of diseases. However, the recent reemergence of vaccine-preventable diseases calls for a need to evaluate current vaccination practices and disparities in vaccination between high-income countries and low-and-middle-income countries. There are massive deficits in vaccine availability and coverage in resource-constrained settings. Therefore, this perspective seeks to highlight the reemergence of vaccine-preventable diseases in Africa within the lens of health equity and offer recommendations on how the continent should be prepared to deal with the myriad of its health systems challenges. Among the notable factors contributing to the reemergence, stand health inequities affecting vaccine availability and the dynamic vaccine hesitancy. Strengthening health systems and addressing health inequities could prove useful in halting the reemergence of vaccine-preventable diseases.
Subject(s)
Health Equity , Vaccination , Vaccine-Preventable Diseases , Humans , Vaccine-Preventable Diseases/prevention & control , Vaccine-Preventable Diseases/epidemiology , Africa/epidemiology , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Vaccines/administration & dosage , Vaccines/supply & distribution , Vaccination Hesitancy/statistics & numerical data , Communicable Diseases, Emerging/prevention & control , Communicable Diseases, Emerging/epidemiologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Antimicrobial drugs form an essential component of medical treatment in human and animal health. Resistance associated with their use has posed a global public health threat. Multiple efforts have been made at the global level directed by the World Health Organization and associated partners to develop policies aimed at combatting antimicrobial resistance. AREAS COVERED: Whilst the Global Action Plan on antimicrobial resistance and people-centered framework aim to guide countries in implementing successful antimicrobial resistance policies, their adoption and success depend on different implementation contexts. Therefore, this paper highlights the challenges and opportunities for implementing the World Health Organization's people-centered approach in sub-Saharan Africa, whilst recognizing antimicrobial resistance as a multifaceted problem rooted in 'complex systems.' EXPERT OPINION: The people-centered approach provides a solid framework for combating antimicrobial resistance. Countries should build sustainable national action plans, adopt the One Health approach, limit over-the-counter antibiotic consumption, and educate communities on rational antibiotic use. They should also promote inter-country collaborations and innovative solutions, strengthen drug regulatory capacities, invest in infection control, water sanitation, hygiene, diagnostics, and surveillance tools, and promote vaccine uptake to prevent drug-resistant infections.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Practice Guidelines as Topic , World Health Organization , Humans , Africa South of the Sahara/epidemiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Health Policy , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Animals , Public Health , One Health , Drug Resistance, MicrobialABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Paediatric HIV data shows a variable and sometimes catastrophic response in the initial stage of ART regimen administration. The burden of disease that affects children in their first year of treatment is not comprehensively available. OBJECTIVE: Objective of our study was to describe patterns of admission in children; before ART initiation, within the first six months, and post-six months of ART between 2001 and 2016. METHODS: Principal caregivers of 260 children (45.7% females 54.2% males, all <15 years) on ART for at least six months were interviewed about admissions of their children. Diagnoses were verified from the health passport books. Data on age, sex, date of ART initiation was obtained from the database of Baylor College of Medicine in Lilongwe. Data were analysed using Excel for descriptive analysis. Chi Square Test was used to test for significance. RESULTS: There were more admissions before starting ART 74% (95%CI 68.67-79.33%) vs. 42% (95%CI 36.00-48.00%), after starting ART (p = <0.001 at 5% significance level); after six months of ART 34% (95%CI 28.24-39.76) vs. 20% (95% CI 15.51-24.86%) (p = <0.001 at 5% significance level). The commonest causes of admission were pneumonia, malaria, tuberculosis, anaemia; no difference in causes of admission within the first and after six months of ART initiation. CONCLUSION: ART significantly reduces admission in children living with HIV. The common causes of admission are HIV non-specific conditions. No difference between causes of admission within and after six months of ART.
Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents , HIV Infections , Male , Female , Humans , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Retrospective Studies , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Malawi/epidemiology , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HospitalsABSTRACT
Vaccination is one of the success stories of public health. The benefit of vaccination goes beyond individual protection to include promoting population well-being, improving cognitive development, and increasing economic productivity. However, the existing inequalities in the access to vaccination undermines its impact. There are significant variations in the coverage of vaccination between and within countries. Despite that urban populations have better access to health services; evidence has shown that the urban poor have the worst health indicators including vaccination uptake. Additionally, there are unique challenges affecting vaccination in urban settings, especially in urban slums. This paper has discussed key challenges some of the proposed interventions that can improve urban vaccination service delivery.
Subject(s)
Developing Countries , Vaccination , Humans , Urban Population , Poverty AreasABSTRACT
Economic consequences of COVID-19 illness and healthcare use for households in low income countries are not well known. We estimated costs associated with COVID-19 care-seeking and treatment from a household perspective and assessed determinants of treatment costs. A cross-sectional household survey was conducted between December 2020 and November 2021 in urban and peri-urban areas of Blantyre district. Adults (age ≥18 years) with confirmed COVID-19 were asked to report the symptoms they experienced or prompted them to seek COVID-19 tests as well as healthcare seeking behaviors preceding and following COVID-19 diagnosis. For individuals who sought healthcare, information on out-of-pocket expenditures incurred while seeking and receiving care including on transport, food etc. by both the patients and their guardians was collected. Finally, data on time use seeking, receiving care and during convalesces was recorded. Multivariate Generalized Linear Models were used to evaluate association between household COVID-19 costs and their determinants. Of 171 individuals who took part in the study, the average age was 40.7 years, standard deviation (SD) 15.0, and 50.8% were females. Most participants (85.3%) were symptomatic. Of these, 67.8% sought care at health facilities and the majority (91.7%) were treated as outpatients. The average total household cost associated with COVID-19 seeking, receiving care and convalescence was $62.81 (SD $126.02). Average costs for outpatient and inpatient cases were $52.96 (SD $54.35) and $172.39 (SD $407.08), respectively. Average out-of-pocket household expenditures were $42.62 (SD $123.10), accounting for 62% of total household costs. Being a male COVID-19 patient and engagement in formal employment were significantly associated with high COVID-19 household costs. Households face high economic burden related to COVID-19 sickness and healthcare use. Social policies that support households cope with both the direct and indirect COVID-19 cost are needed to ensure access to healthcare and protect households from COVID-19 related shocks.