Liberation From Mechanical Ventilation Before Decannulation From Venovenous Extracorporeal Life Support in Severe COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been associated with the significant use of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VVECMO) globally. Identifying strategies to optimize care is essential to improving patient important outcomes. By liberation from mechanical ventilation (MV) before VVECMO to provide awake-ECMO, complications related to MV could be minimized, leading to improved outcomes. Between March 2020 and October 2021, we conducted a prospective observational study at the Kuwait Extracorporeal Life Support Program, of patients admitted for COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), with recording baseline characteristics, respiratory support, and ECMO parameters. Of the 207 patients who underwent VVECMO for COVID-19 ARDS during this period, only 5 patients were successfully liberated from MV before decannulation to provide awake-ECMO. Four were female with a median age of 38. Before VVECMO, all patients received corticosteroids and lung-protective ventilation with four receiving prone positioning. The median duration of MV use was 4 days, whereas the median duration of VVECMO use was 12 days, with early mobility, and all survived until hospital discharge. The safety and feasibility of liberation from MV before ECMO decannulation to provide awake-ECMO were demonstrated, but further studies are warranted to identify factors associated with this success.

Outcomes and predictors of failure of non-invasive ventilation in patients with community acquired pneumonia in the ED.

OBJECTIVE: We set out to describe the use and analyze the predictors of non-invasive ventilation failure in patients with community-acquired pneumonia who receive non-invasive ventilation as first line ventilatory therapy in the emergency department. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted among consecutive patients with community acquired pneumonia requiring ventilator support presenting to two tertiary care university-affiliated emergency departments. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine predictors of non-invasive ventilation failure at initiation of non-invasive ventilation and at two hours of non-invasive ventilation use; RESULT: After excluding patients with a do not resuscitate order status, 163 (74.8%) patients with community acquired pneumonia were initially treated with non-invasive ventilation on initial presentation to the emergency department. Non-invasive ventilation failure occurred in 50% of patients and was found to be associated with the absence of chronic obstructive airway disease, APACHE II score, the need for hemodynamic support and the number of CXR quadrants involved. Two-hour physiological parameters associated with non-invasive ventilation failure included higher respiratory rate, lower serum pH and the ongoing need of hemodynamic support. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the use of non-invasive ventilation to support patients presenting to the emergency department with respiratory failure and community acquired pneumonia is common and is associated with a significant failure rate. Hemodynamic support is a strong predictor of failure. The selection of the appropriate patient and monitoring of physiological parameters while on NIV is crucial to ensure successful treatment.