Guidelines for biomarker testing in colorectal carcinoma (CRC): a national consensus of the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP) and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM).

This consensus statement, conceived as a joint initiative of the Spanish Society of Pathology and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology, makes diagnostic and treatment recommendations for the management of patients with hereditary, localised and advanced CRC based on the current scientific evidence on biomarker use. This consensus statement thus provides an opportunity to improve healthcare efficiency and resource use, which will benefit these patients. Based on the currently available data on this subject, this expert group recommends testing for microsatellite instability (MSI) in patients with localised CRC, as this is a strong predictive factor for deciding on adjuvant treatment. However, although the ColoPrint(®) and Oncotype Dx(®) gene expression signatures have been shown to have prognostic value, no consensus yet exists concerning their use in clinical practice. For advanced CRC, it is essential to test for KRAS mutation status before administering an anti-EGFR treatment, such as cetuximab or panitumumab. However, testing for other biomarkers, such as BRAF, EGFR, PI3K and PTEN mutations, should not be done routinely, because this does not influence treatment planning at the present time. Other important issues addressed include organisational requirements and the quality controls needed for proper testing of these biomarkers as well as the legal implications to be borne in mind when testing some biomarkers.

Tumour and serum MGMT promoter methylation and protein expression in glioblastoma patients.

INTRODUCTION: Methylation of the promoter of the MGMT gene and MGMT protein expression are recognized as predictive markers for response to alkylating chemotherapy in glioblastoma (GB). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We have assessed MGMT methylation with the methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP) in tumor samples from 70 GB patients and in serum samples from 37 of these patients. We have also assessed MGMT protein expression by immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis in tissue samples from 63 of these patients. RESULTS: We found concordance between MGMT methylation status in tissue and serum (Cohen's Kappa = 0.586; p<0.0001). MSP for detection of non-methylated MGMT promoter in serum showed a sensitivity of 95.4% and a specificity of 60%, while the IHC methylation test showed a low specificity (8.9%). Patients whose MGMT promoter was methylated in tissue attained longer progression-free and overall survival. In the multivariate analysis, serum MGMT promoter methylation emerged as an independent factor for longer progression-free and overall survival. CONCLUSION: Serum-based MGMT methylation analysis offers a promising alternative to tumor-based MGMT analysis in cases where tissue samples are unavailable.