Comparative clinical efficacy and safety of biosimilar ABP 959 and eculizumab reference product in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria.

ABP 959 is a biosimilar to the eculizumab reference product (RP), which is approved for the treatment of patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH). This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, two-period crossover study randomized eculizumab RP-treated patients with PNH to one of two treatment sequences (ABP 959/eculizumab RP or eculizumab RP/ABP 959) to evaluate the clinical similarity of ABP 959 when compared with eculizumab RP. This study evaluated the efficacy of ABP 959 when compared with eculizumab RP based on control of intravascular hemolysis as measured by lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and by the time-adjusted area under the effect curve of LDH. Secondary outcomes included safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity. Forty-two patients were randomized (20 in the ABP 959/eculizumab RP group and 22 in the eculizumab RP/ABP 959 group) across 25 centers. Similarity of efficacy was established by a ratio of geometric least squares means of LDH (ABP 959/eculizumab RP) of 1.0628, with a one-sided 97.5% upper CI of 1.1576 at week 27, and a geometric means ratio of time-adjusted area under the effect curve (ABP 959 vs. eculizumab RP) of LDH of 0.981, with a 90% CI of 0.9403-1.0239 from week 13 to 27, week 39 to 53, and week 65 to 79. All secondary efficacy endpoints were comparable between treatment groups. No new safety concerns were identified. The results of this study in patients with PNH, along with previously demonstrated similarity of analytical, nonclinical, and clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in healthy volunteers support a demonstration of no clinically meaningful differences between ABP 959 and eculizumab RP. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03818607.

Corrigendum: Translatability of findings from cynomolgus monkey to human suggests a mechanistic role for IL-21 in promoting immunogenicity to an anti-PD-1/IL-21 mutein fusion protein.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1345473.].

Immune thrombocytopenia: Pathophysiology and impacts of Romiplostim treatment.

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune bleeding disease caused by immune-mediated platelet destruction and decreased platelet production. ITP is characterized by an isolated thrombocytopenia (<100 × 109/L) and increased risk of bleeding. The disease has a complex pathophysiology wherein immune tolerance breakdown leads to platelet and megakaryocyte destruction. Therapeutics such as corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg), rituximab, and thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) aim to increase platelet counts to prevent hemorrhage and increase quality of life. TPO-RAs act via stimulation of TPO receptors on megakaryocytes to directly stimulate platelet production. Romiplostim is a TPO-RA that has become a mainstay in the treatment of ITP. Treatment significantly increases megakaryocyte maturation and growth leading to improved platelet production and it has recently been shown to have additional immunomodulatory effects in treated patients. This review will highlight the complex pathophysiology of ITP and discuss the usage of Romiplostim in ITP and its ability to potentially immunomodulate autoimmunity.

Translatability of findings from cynomolgus monkey to human suggests a mechanistic role for IL-21 in promoting immunogenicity to an anti-PD-1/IL-21 mutein fusion protein.

AMG 256 is a bi-specific, heteroimmunoglobulin molecule with an anti-PD-1 antibody domain and a single IL-21 mutein domain on the C-terminus. Nonclinical studies in cynomolgus monkeys revealed that AMG 256 administration led to the development of immunogenicity-mediated responses and indicated that the IL-21 mutein domain of AMG 256 could enhance the anti-drug antibody response directed toward the monoclonal antibody domain. Anti-AMG 256 IgE were also observed in cynomolgus monkeys. A first-in-human (FIH) study in patients with advanced solid tumors was designed with these risks in mind. AMG 256 elicited ADA in 28 of 33 subjects (84.8%). However, ADA responses were only robust and exposure-impacting at the 2 lowest doses. At mid to high doses, ADA responses remained low magnitude and all subjects maintained exposure, despite most subjects developing ADA. Limited drug-specific IgE were also observed during the FIH study. ADA responses were not associated with any type of adverse event. The AMG 256 program represents a unique case where nonclinical studies informed on the risk of immunogenicity in humans, due to the IL-21-driven nature of the response.

Characterization and root cause analysis of immunogenicity to pasotuxizumab (AMG 212), a prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeting bispecific T-cell engager therapy.

Introduction: In oncology, anti-drug antibody (ADA) development that significantly curtails response durability has not historically risen to a level of concern. The relevance and attention ascribed to ADAs in oncology clinical studies have therefore been limited, and the extant literature on this subject scarce. In recent years, T cell engagers have gained preeminence within the prolific field of cancer immunotherapy. These drugs whose mode of action is expected to potently stimulate anti-tumor immunity, may potentially induce ADAs as an unintended corollary due to an overall augmentation of the immune response. ADA formation is therefore emerging as an important determinant in the successful clinical development of such biologics. Methods: Here we describe the immunogenicity and its impact observed to pasotuxizumab (AMG 212), a prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeting bispecific T cell engager (BiTE®) molecule in NCT01723475, a first-in-human (FIH), multicenter, dose-escalation study in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). To explain the disparity in ADA incidence observed between the SC and CIV arms of the study, we interrogated other patient and product-specific factors that may have explained the difference beyond the route of administration. Results: Treatment-emergent ADAs (TE-ADA) developed in all subjects treated with at least 1 cycle of AMG 212 in the subcutaneous (SC) arm. These ADAs were neutralizing and resulted in profound exposure loss that was associated with contemporaneous reversal of initial Prostate Surface Antigen (PSA) responses, curtailing durability of PSA response in patients. Pivoting from SC to a continuous intravenous (CIV) administration route remarkably yielded no subjects developing ADA to AMG 212. Through a series of stepwise functional assays, our investigation revealed that alongside a more historically immunogenic route of administration, non-tolerant T cell epitopes within the AMG 212 amino acid sequence were likely driving the high-titer, sustained ADA response observed in the SC arm. Discussion: These mechanistic insights into the AMG 212 ADA response underscore the importance of performing preclinical immunogenicity risk evaluation as well as advocate for continuous iteration to better our biologics.

Pharmacokinetic Similarity of ABP 654, an Ustekinumab Biosimilar Candidate: Results from a Randomized, Double-blind Study in Healthy Subjects.

ABP 654 is a proposed biosimilar to ustekinumab reference product (RP) which works through antagonism of interleukin-12 and interleukin-23. Ustekinumab RP is used for the treatment of chronic inflammatory conditions, including some forms of plaque psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, Crohn's disease, and ulcerative colitis. A randomized, double-blinded, single-dose, 3-arm, parallel-group study was conducted to assess the pharmacokinetic (PK) similarity of ABP 654 with ustekinumab RP sourced from the United States (US) and the European Union (EU); the PK similarity of ustekinumab US versus ustekinumab EU; and the comparative safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of all 3 products. A total of 238 healthy subjects were randomized 1:1:1 and stratified by gender and ethnicity (Japanese versus non-Japanese) to receive a single 90 mg subcutaneous injection of ABP 654 or ustekinumab US or ustekinumab EU. PK similarity was established based on 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the primary endpoints of area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf ) and maximum observed serum concentration (Cmax ) being contained within the prespecified margin of 0.8-1.25. No clinically meaningful differences in immunogenicity were found among the 3 products. Adverse events were similar between treatment groups and consistent with the safety profile of ustekinumab RP. Results indicate that ABP 654, ustekinumab US and ustekinumab EU share similar PK and safety profiles.

Immunogenicity assessment of bispecific antibody-based immunotherapy in oncology.

With increasing numbers of bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) and multispecific products entering the clinic, recent data highlight immunogenicity as an emerging challenge in the development of such novel biologics. This review focuses on the immunogenicity risk assessment (IgRA) of BsAb-based immunotherapies for cancer, highlighting several risk factors that need to be considered. These include the novel scaffolds consisting of bioengineered sequences, the potentially synergistic immunomodulating mechanisms of action (MOAs) from different domains of the BsAb, as well as several other product-related and patient-related factors. In addition, the clinical relevance of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) against selected BsAbs developed as anticancer agents is reviewed and the advances in our knowledge of tools and strategies for immunogenicity prediction, monitoring, and mitigation are discussed. It is critical to implement a drug-specific IgRA during the early development stage to guide ADA monitoring and risk management strategies. This IgRA may include a combination of several assessment tools to identify drug-specific risks as well as a proactive risk mitigation approach for candidate or format selection during the preclinical stage. The IgRA is an on-going process throughout clinical development. IgRA during the clinical stage may bridge the gap between preclinical immunogenicity prediction and clinical immunogenicity, and retrospectively guide optimization efforts for next-generation BsAbs. This iterative process throughout development may improve the reliability of the IgRA and enable the implementation of effective risk mitigation strategies, laying the foundation for improved clinical success.

Immunogenicity of erenumab: A pooled analysis of six placebo-controlled trials with long-term extensions.

BACKGROUND: Immunogenicity of erenumab, a human anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor monoclonal antibody developed for migraine prevention, has been evaluated throughout clinical development. METHODS: Integrated post hoc analysis assessing immunogenicity of erenumab across six clinical trials in patients with episodic and chronic migraine (N = 2985). Anti-erenumab antibody incidence and potential impact on pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety were evaluated in short-term (double-blind treatment phase 12-24 weeks) and long-term (double-blind treatment phase plus extensions of up to 5 years) analyses. RESULTS: Anti-erenumab binding antibody incidence was low with few patients developing neutralizing antibodies. Antibody responses were mostly transient with low magnitude. Binding antibodies developed as early as 2-4 weeks after the first dose; the majority developed within the first 6 months and very few after the first year. Serum concentrations of erenumab in antibody-positive patients were generally lower than, but within the range of, antibody-negative patients. There was no impact of anti-erenumab antibodies on erenumab efficacy or safety with no differences between antibody-positive and antibody-negative patients in change in monthly migraine days or adverse event rates. CONCLUSIONS: This pooled analysis showed that immunogenicity had no meaningful clinical impact on efficacy or safety of erenumab in patients with migraine.Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01952574; ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02456740; Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02483585; Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02174861; Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02630459; Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03812224.

Immune Complex Formation Is Associated With Loss of Tolerance and an Antibody Response to Both Drug and Target.

AMG 966 is a bi-specific, heteroimmunoglobulin molecule that binds both tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) and TNF-like ligand 1A (TL1A). In a first-in-human clinical study in healthy volunteers, AMG 966 elicited anti-drug antibodies (ADA) in 53 of 54 subjects (98.1%), despite a paucity of T cell epitopes observed in T cell assays. ADA were neutralizing and bound to all domains of AMG 966. Development of ADA correlated with loss of exposure. In vitro studies demonstrated that at certain drug-to-target ratios, AMG 966 forms large immune complexes with TNFα and TL1A, partially restoring the ability of the aglycosylated Fc domain to bind FcγRIa and FcγRIIa, leading to the formation of ADA. In addition to ADA against AMG 966, antibodies to endogenous TNFα were also detected in the sera of subjects dosed with AMG 966. This suggests that the formation of immune complexes between a therapeutic and target can cause loss of tolerance and elicit an antibody response against the target.

Assessment of romiplostim immunogenicity in pediatric patients in clinical trials and in a global postmarketing registry.

Development of first-generation thrombopoietins (TPOs) was halted due to antibodies that neutralized endogenous TPO, causing protracted thrombocytopenia in some patients. The second-generation TPO receptor agonist romiplostim, having no homology to TPO, was developed to circumvent potential immunogenicity. We examined the development of binding and neutralizing antibodies to romiplostim and TPO among pediatric patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in 5 clinical trials and a global postmarketing registry. In the trials, 25 of 280 (8.9%) patients developed anti-romiplostim binding antibodies. The first positive result was detected 67 weeks (median) after romiplostim treatment was initiated. The median romiplostim dose was 8 µg/kg, and the median platelet count was 87 × 109/L. Most patients who developed anti-romiplostim binding antibodies (18 of 25 [72%]) had ≥90% of platelet assessments showing a response. Anti-romiplostim neutralizing antibodies developed in 8 of 280 (2.9%) patients. The development of anti-romiplostim neutralizing antibodies was unrelated to the romiplostim dose, and most patients who developed the antibodies (7 of 8 [88%]) had platelet response. Nine of 279 (3.2%) patients developed anti-TPO binding antibodies, and 1 (0.4%) developed transient anti-TPO neutralizing antibodies. In 8 patients who developed anti-romiplostim neutralizing antibodies, no TPO cross-reactivity was observed. In the postmarketing registry, 3 of 19 (15.8%) patients developed anti-romiplostim binding antibodies; 1 (5.3%) patient developed anti-romiplostim neutralizing antibodies. These results suggest that immunogenicity to romiplostim occurs infrequently in pediatric patients with ITP and is generally not associated with loss of platelet response or other negative clinical sequelae.

Assessment of romiplostim immunogenicity in adult patients in clinical trials and in a global postmarketing registry.

Antibodies to first-generation recombinant thrombopoietin (TPO) neutralized endogenous TPO and caused thrombocytopenia in some healthy subjects and chemotherapy patients. The second-generation TPO receptor agonist romiplostim, having no sequence homology to TPO, was developed to avoid immunogenicity. This analysis examined development of binding and neutralising antibodies to romiplostim or TPO among adults with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in 13 clinical trials and a global postmarketing registry. 60/961 (6·2%) patients from clinical trials developed anti-romiplostim-binding antibodies post-baseline. The first positive binding antibody was detected 14 weeks (median) after starting romiplostim, at median romiplostim dose of 2 µg/kg and median platelet count of 29.5 × 109 /l; most subjects had ≥98·5% of platelet assessments showing response. Neutralising antibodies to romiplostim developed in 0·4% of patients, but were unrelated to romiplostim dose and did not affect platelet count. Thirty-three patients (3·4%) developed anti-TPO-binding antibodies; none developed anti-TPO-neutralising antibodies. In the global postmarketing registry, 9/184 (4·9%) patients with spontaneously submitted samples had binding antibodies. One patient with loss of response had anti-romiplostim-neutralising antibodies (negative at follow-up). Collectively, anti-romiplostim-binding antibodies developed infrequently. In the few patients who developed neutralising antibodies to romiplostim, there was no cross-reactivity with TPO and no associated loss of platelet response.

Clinical Immunogenicity Risk Assessment for a Fusion Protein.

This document highlights some relevant factors in the assessment of immunogenicity risk of fusion protein therapeutics. Our aim is to highlight specific risks associated with this type of molecule, while also aligning with general risk assessment factors, through a hypothetical case study, where the therapeutic molecule of interest is a Receptor-Fc Fusion protein (RFF) expressed within a typical manufacturing process in Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells (CHO). Given that the components are comprised of endogenous sequences, the risk of developing an ADA response to this molecule is generally considered to be low. However, the consequences of such an immune response may be more severe, specifically, if there is cross reactivity with the endogenous receptor, inducing cell lysis, or if any ADA act as an agonist to trigger receptor signaling. The risk factors described below are not meant to provide a comprehensive list, but rather a framework for factors that should be considered. Immunogenicity risk is difficult to quantify and relies on a comprehensive analysis of both product and patient-related factors. The goal is not necessarily to quantify risk, but rather to demonstrate an understanding of factors that may pose a risk, implement a strategy to minimize risk factors and then align overall risk with a bioanalytical immunogenicity monitoring strategy. The consequences resulting from unexpected outcome will likely depend on severity and impact on patient safety. An immunogenicity risk assessment is an ongoing and continuous process throughout clinical development with the goal of maximizing the safety of patients.

A randomized, double-blind, single-dose, three-arm, parallel group study to determine pharmacokinetic similarity of ABP 959 and eculizumab (Soliris® ) in healthy male subjects.

OBJECTIVES: ABP 959 is a proposed biosimilar to eculizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the human C5 complement protein. The objective of this randomized, double-blind, three-arm, study was to demonstrate pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) similarity of ABP 959 relative to the eculizumab reference product (RP) in healthy adult male subjects. METHODS: Eligible subjects aged 18-45 years were randomized to receive a 300-mg IV infusion of ABP 959, or FDA-licensed eculizumab (eculizumab US), or EU-authorized eculizumab (eculizumab EU). Primary PK endpoint was area under the total serum concentration-time curve from 0 to infinity (AUC0-∞ ); primary PD endpoint was area between the effect curve (ABEC) of CH50-time data. RESULTS: The geometric mean of PK and PD parameters were similar between ABP 959 versus eculizumab US and eculizumab EU; PK and PD similarity was established based on 90% confidence intervals of the geometric mean ratio being within prespecified equivalence margin of 0.8 and 1.25. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar across groups. The incidence of binding anti-drug antibodies was similar across treatments; no subjects developed neutralizing antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated PK and PD similarity of ABP 959 to eculizumab RP; safety and immunogenicity profiles were also similar.

Assay signal as an alternative to titer for assessment of magnitude of an antidrug antibody response.

BACKGROUND: Titer methods are commonly used to characterize the magnitude of an antidrug antibody response. Assay S/N is an appealing alternative, but the circumstances under which use of signal-to-noise (S/N) is appropriate have not been well defined. RESULTS: We validated both titer and S/N-based methods for several therapeutics. S/N correlated strongly with titer both in aggregate and when examined on a per subject basis. Analysis of impact of antibody magnitude on pharmacokinetics yielded the same result using either method. Each assay demonstrated excellent precision, good linearity, and adequate drug tolerance. CONCLUSION: Under these circumstances, assay S/N is a valid alternative to titer for assessment of the magnitude of an antidrug antibody response.

A Proposal to Redefine Clinical Immunogenicity Assessment.

With more than 100 therapeutic proteins (TP) approved since the first EMA guidance on immunogenicity in 2007, a vast amount of clinical experience with a variety of therapeutic proteins has been gained. This has provided data on anti-drug antibodies (ADA) and their observed clinical impact, or lack thereof. It has become evident that not all ADA responses are clinically relevant. The current "standard practice" is to test for ADA in all patients on every study. It is essential that we acknowledge the immunogenicity data gained from marketed TPs and that options for immunogenicity testing reflect this information. Improvements in bioanalytical support throughout the drug development process will eliminate extraneous, non-impactful practices. We propose that low-risk therapeutic proteins could be supported with an event-driven ("collect-and-hold") immunogenicity testing strategy throughout early phases of the clinical program. In the absence of an event, only pivotal studies (where ADA incidence and impact can be decisively assessed) would include default ADA testing. In keeping with the "standard practice," immunogenicity risk assessment must be an on-going and real-time evaluation. This approach has the potential to deliver meaningful, clinically relevant immunogenicity results while maintaining an emphasis on patient safety.

Establishment of the first WHO Erythropoietin antibody reference panel: Report of an international collaborative study.

A panel of 9 fully human monoclonal antibodies against human erythropoietin (EPO) with defined characteristics (non-neutralizing, neutralizing, various isotypes, affinities) representative of those evident in antibody-mediated pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) and non-PRCA patients were formulated and lyophilized. The panel was evaluated in a multi-centre international collaborative study comprising eighteen different laboratories using different assay platforms including those in routine use. These included binding assays, some based on use of novel technologies and neutralization assays predominantly employing EPO responsive cell-lines. Results showed that detection and titre varied depending on antibody characteristics and the method used. Only selective assay platforms were capable of detecting the diverse repertoire of EPO antibodies in the panel indicating that some clinically relevant antibodies are likely to be missed in some assays. Importantly, the clinical samples from PRCA patients were distinguished as antibody-positive and the healthy donor serum as antibody negative across all different platforms tested. For neutralization, data was generally consistent across the assays for the different samples regardless of the cell-line and the assay conditions. The heterogeneity in data from the study clearly indicated the need for reference standards for consistency in detecting and measuring EPO antibodies across different assay platforms for monitoring the safety and efficacy of erythropoiesis stimulating agents. Therefore, the WHO ECBS at its meeting in October'15 established the EPO antibody panel, available from NIBSC, to facilitate decision-making on assay selection for testing antibodies against human EPO, for evaluating assay performance of antibody assays for clinical use, for assay validation and for standardization.

Strategic characterization of anti-drug antibody responses for the assessment of clinical relevance and impact.

All therapeutic proteins have the potential to induce anti-drug antibodies (ADA). Clinically relevant ADA can impact efficacy and/or safety of a biological therapeutic. Immunogenicity assessment strategy evaluates binding and neutralizing ADA, and the need for additional characterization (e.g., epitope, titer and so on) is determined using a risk-based approach. The choice of characterization assays depends on the type, application and immunogenicity of the therapeutic. ADA characterization can impact the interpretation of the risk profile of a given therapeutic, and offers insight into opportunities for risk mitigation and management. This article describes common ADA characterization methods. Strategic assessment and characterization of clinically relevant ADA are discussed, in order to support clinical options for safe and effective patient care and disease management.

The T-cell-dependent antibody response assay in nonclinical studies of pharmaceuticals and chemicals: study design, data analysis, interpretation.

The T-cell-dependent antibody response (TDAR) assay is a measure of immune function that is dependent upon the effectiveness of multiple immune processes, including antigen uptake and presentation, T cell help, B cell activation, and antibody production. It is used for risk and safety assessments, in conjunction with other toxicologic assessments, by the chemical and pharmaceutical industries, and research and regulatory agencies. It is also employed to evaluate investigational drug efficacy in animal pharmacology studies, provide evidence of biological impact in clinical trials, and evaluate immune function in patients with primary or secondary immunodeficiency diseases. Various immunization schemes, analytical methods, approaches to data analysis, and data interpretations are in use. This manuscript summarizes some recommended practices for the conduct and interpretation of the assay in animal studies.

Dose-related differences in the pharmacodynamic and toxicologic response to a novel hyperglycosylated analog of recombinant human erythropoietin in Sprague-Dawley rats with similarly high hematocrit.

We recently reported results that erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA)-related thrombotic toxicities in preclinical species were not solely dependent on a high hematocrit (HCT) but also associated with increased ESA dose level, dose frequency, and dosing duration. In this article, we conclude that sequelae of an increased magnitude of ESA-stimulated erythropoiesis potentially contributed to thrombosis in the highest ESA dose groups. The results were obtained from two investigative studies we conducted in Sprague-Dawley rats administered a low (no thrombotic toxicities) or high (with thrombotic toxicities) dose level of a hyperglycosylated analog of recombinant human erythropoietin (AMG 114), 3 times weekly for up to 9 days or for 1 month. Despite similarly increased HCT at both dose levels, animals in the high-dose group had an increased magnitude of erythropoiesis measured by spleen weights, splenic erythropoiesis, and circulating reticulocytes. Resulting prothrombotic risk factors identified predominantly or uniquely in the high-dose group were higher numbers of immature reticulocytes and nucleated red blood cells in circulation, severe functional iron deficiency, and increased intravascular destruction of iron-deficient reticulocyte/red blood cells. No thrombotic events were detected in rats dosed up to 9 days suggesting a sustained high HCT is a requisite cofactor for development of ESA-related thrombotic toxicities.

Cytokines associated with increased erythropoiesis in Sprague-Dawley rats administered a novel hyperglycosylated analog of recombinant human erythropoietin.

We previously reported an increased incidence of thrombotic toxicities in Sprague-Dawley rats administered the highest dose level of a hyperglycosylated analog of recombinant human erythropoietin (AMG 114) for 1 month as not solely dependent on high hematocrit (HCT). Thereafter, we identified increased erythropoiesis as a prothrombotic risk factor increased in the AMG 114 high-dose group with thrombotic toxicities, compared to a low-dose group with no toxicities but similar HCT. Here, we identified pleiotropic cytokines as prothrombotic factors associated with AMG 114 dose level. Before a high HCT was achieved, rats in the AMG 114 high, but not the low-dose group, had imbalanced hemostasis (increased von Willebrand factor and prothrombin time, decreased antithrombin III) coexistent with cytokines implicated in thrombosis: monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (MCP-1), MCP-3, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1, macrophage inhibitory protein-2, oncostatin M, T-cell-specific protein, stem cell factor, vascular endothelial growth factor, and interleukin-11. While no unique pathway to erythropoiesis stimulating agent-related thrombosis was identified, cytokines associated with increased erythropoiesis contributed to a prothrombotic intravascular environment in the AMG 114 high-dose group, but not in lower dose groups with a similar high HCT.