Evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of sigmoidoscopy in comparison to colonoscopy regarding the detection of intestinal inflammatory activity in the follow-up of patients with ulcerative colitis. / Evaluación de la sensibilidad y especificidad de la sigmoidoscopia en comparación con la colonoscopia en la detección de actividad inflamatoria intestinal en el seguimiento de pacientes con colitis ulcerosa.

INTRODUCTION: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic disease characterized by periods of inflammatory activity and remission, which vary from the rectum to the proximal colon. Currently, mucosal healing is a long-term goal in the management of inflammatory bowel disease, with colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy being the recommended tools for evaluation. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of both examinations in determining the presence of inflammatory activity in the follow-up of patients with UC. METHODS: Retrospective observational study analyzing colonoscopies performed as part of the follow-up of UC patients between January 2021 and July 2023 by gastroenterologists from the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Program at the Clínica Universidad de los Andes. The study compared endoscopic and histological activity observed in the rectosigmoid region with that found in the rest of the colon. Sensitivity and specificity were determined using concordance and correlations tests. RESULTS: A very good concordance and correlation were observed regarding endoscopic findings, with a Kappa index of 0.97 and a Spearman coefficient of 0.97. The Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of sigmoidoscopy for endoscopic activity was 1, and the Negative Predictive Value (NPV) was 0.96. In relation to histological activity, the concordance had a Kappa index of 0.93 and a Spearman coefficient of 0.93, with a PPV of sigmoidoscopy for histological activity being 1 and an NPV of 0.91. CONCLUSION: This cohort suggests that sigmoidoscopy is a cost-effective option for evaluating mucosal healing in UC patients in symptomatic and biomarker remission. However, complete colonoscopy should be considered in cases of discrepancies with the clinical picture or in colorectal cancer surveillance.

[Utilization of Upadacitinib in the treatment of Crohn's disease: a report on two clinical cases]. / Utilización de Upadacitinib en el tratamiento de la enfermedad de Crohn: reporte de dos casos clínicos.

Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic, progressive inflammatory disease with complications that impact the well-being of patients. The therapeutic advances achieved in recent decades, especially through the advent of biological therapy, have allowed for a transformation in the approach and management of CD, thereby modifying the course of this disease. However, a significant number of patients do not experience a satisfactory response to these drugs or lose it during the course of the disease. In this scenario, a viable alternative is to switch medications. Upadacitinib, a novel Janus kinase inhibitor, has emerged as a promising strategy for the management of CD. We presented two cases of patients with CD refractory to conventional therapy and biological therapy, who responded successfully to treatment with upadacitinib.

Eradication rate and adherence with high-dose amoxicillin and proton pump inhibitor as first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection: Experience from University Hospital in Chile.

INTRODUCTION: In Chile, more than 70% of adults are infected by Helicobacter pylori. Clarithromycin should not be used in any regimen if there is >15% resistance to this antibiotic, being greater than 26% in our population. In this scenario, the effectiveness of triple therapy (proton pump inhibitor [PPI], clarithromycin, amoxicillin) was only 63.8%. AIM: To evaluate the eradication rate and safety of dual therapy (esomeprazole and amoxicillin) in high doses, through a prospective, observational, and descriptive study. METHODS: Patients with a positive urease test obtained in an upper digestive endoscopy were included. Any other previous H. pylori eradication regimen were excluded. All patients were treated with esomeprazole 40 mg three times a day and amoxicillin 750 mg four times a day for 14 days. The eradication rate of the dual therapy was evaluated with the H. pylori stool antigen test (the Pylori-Strip® test used) 6 weeks after completing the eradication treatment and with at least 14 days without PPI, being a negative result, confirmation of the effectiveness of this regimen. RESULTS: Of 122 patients, 106 had a negative H. pylori antigen in stool; The intention-to-treat and per protocol analysis, the eradication rates were 91.8% [95% CI: 87%-97%] and 94% [95% CI: 90%-98%], respectively. Four patients discontinued treatment due to adverse effects. Smoking and adherence to treatment were associated with eradication rate. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of patients with H. pylori infection, high-dose dual therapy has a high eradication rate and good adherence, raising the possibility that it could be used as first-line therapy in our country. Studies with a larger number of patients should confirm these results.

Treatment with hyperbaric oxygen in a Crohn`s disease patient.

Despite advances in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease, particularly with biological therapies and new small molecules, a significant gap still exists in achieving persistent remission from a symptomatic, biomarker, and endoscopic perspective. In this context, hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is considered as a therapeutic strategy. This approach has also been suggested for managing ischemic ulcers located at anastomotic sites. In this clinical case, we describe the clinical and endoscopic evolution of a challenging-to-manage Crohn's disease (CD) patient with an ischemic ulcer at the ileo-rectal anastomosis who underwent HBOT.

Personalised therapy in inflammatory bowel disease. / Terapia personalizada en la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal.

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease being their most common presentations, comprise a spectrum of diverse disease phenotypes, exhibiting variable behaviors ranging from an indolent course to aggressive phenotypes that impact quality of life of these patients. The last two decades have been marked by the development of new medications (biological therapy and novel small molecules) with diverse mechanisms of action, which have revolutionized the management of IBD, thereby enhancing the quality of life for these patients. This landscape of multiple therapeutic options underscores the need to define which medication will benefit each patient the most and at what speed it should be started. The objective of this review is to present personalized approaches for patients with IBD, thus contributing to therapeutic management.

Colitis eosinofílica: una entidad aparte / Eosinophilic colitis: a separate entity

Eosinophilic colitis (EoC), a rare immune-mediated disease that is part of the eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases, is characterized by the presence of an eosinophilic infiltrate in the colonic wall in symptomatic patients. Before considering the diagnosis of EoC, other diseases associated with colonic eosinophilia should be ruled out, such as parasitic infections, drugs, chronic immune-mediated diseases, and neoplasms. The symptoms of EoC are variable and non-specific, being abdominal pain and diarrhea the most common. Although systemic corticosteroids and budesonide have demonstrated their efficacy, these drugs have only been evaluated in case series studies and cli- nical case reports. Herein, we discuss the clinical strategy for diagnosis, therapy selection, and follow-up of EoC

La colitis eosinofílica (CEo), una enfermedad inmunomediada que forma parte de las enfermedades gastrointes- tinales eosinofílicas, se caracteriza por la presencia de infiltrado eosinofílico en la pared del colon en pacientes sintomáticos. Antes de plantear el diagnóstico de una CEo, otras enfermedades asociadas a una eosinofilia coló- nica, incluyendo infecciones parasitarias, fármacos, enfermedades crónicas inmunomediadas y neoplasias, deben ser descartadas. Los síntomas de la CEo son variables e inespecíficos, siendo el dolor abdominal y la diarrea los más frecuentes. Aunque los corticoides sistémicos y la budesonida han demostrado su eficacia, estos fármacos han sido evaluados solo en estudios de serie de casos y reportes de casos clínicos. En este artículo, discutimos la estrategia clínica para el diagnóstico, selección del tratamiento y el seguimiento de la CEo.

Corticoides en la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal: ¿siguen siendo una opción terapéutica? / Corticosteroids in inflammatory bowel disease: Are they still a therapeutic option?

A pesar del desarrollo y de la incorporación de nuevas estrategias terapéuticas, como son la terapia biológica y las moléculas pequeñas, los corticoides aún cumplen un papel importante en la inducción de la remisión de la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal (EII). Variables como la indicación en el momento apropiado, la dosis correcta, la duración en intervalos adecuados, la seguridad de estos fármacos y las alternativas farmacológicas disponibles deben ser siempre consideradas por el equipo tratante al momento de su indicación en pacientes con EII. Aunque el uso de corticoides es considerado un marcador de calidad de atención en pacientes con EII, en la actualidad el uso de estos fármacos en la práctica clínica de la EII dista mucho de ser el más correcto. Este artículo de revisión no pretende ser solamente una revisión clásica de las indicaciones de los corticoides, sino que explicamos aquí los escenarios en los que en nuestra opinión no serían una opción adecuada para nuestros pacientes, así como los errores más frecuentes que cometemos en nuestra práctica clínica diaria al utilizarlos. (AU)

Despite the development and incorporation of new therapeutic strategies, such as biologic therapy and small molecules, corticosteroids still play an important role in inducting inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) remission. Variables like indicating the right doses at the right time, in adequate intervals, the security of these drugs and the pharmacological alternatives available must be considered by the providers when they are indicated to patients with IBD. Although the use of corticosteroids is considered as a marker of quality of care in patients with IBD, the use of these drugs in the clinical practice of IBD is far from being the correct one. This review article is not intended to be just a classic review of the indications for corticosteroids. Here we explain the scenarios in which, in our opinion, steroids would not be an appropriate option for our patients, as well as the most frequent mistakes we make in our daily practice when using them. (AU)

Vancomycin in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease: there is a role beyond Clostridioides difficile infection.

The development of new biological agents and small molecules has revolutionized the treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). However, many patients do not respond or gradually lose their response, necessitating the search for other therapeutic strategies (1). In this clinical case, we describe the evolution of a patient with difficult-to-manage Crohn's Disease (CD) who was treated with oral vancomycin.

Actualización en el diagnóstico y manejo de la Infección por Clostridioides difficile / Update in diagnosis and management of Clostridioides difficile

El Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) es una de las principales causas de infección asociada a la atención de salud con una elevada morbimortalidad, sobre todo en adultos mayores hospitalizados. El aumento en el uso de antibióticos ha ido de la mano con el incremento en el número de casos y de una mayor virulencia. Su presentación clínica va desde portadores asintomáticos hasta megacolon tóxico, escenarios que deben ser considerados al momento de realizar el estudio con exámenes de deposiciones (glutamato deshidrogenasa, toxinas A y B y técnicas de amplificación ácidos nucleares). Se han incorporado al arsenal terapéutico, con mayor nivel de evidencia, la fidaxomicina, trasplante microbiota fecal y recientemente nuevas terapias como anticuerpos monoclonales. Sin embargo, la gravedad de la infección, comorbilidad del paciente, presencia factores de recurrencia, el acceso y el costo económico de cada una de las opciones terapéuticas deben ser considerados. El objetivo de esta revisión es actualizar el manejo propuesto por las Sociedades Chilenas de Gastroenterología e Infectología publicadas el 2016 incorporando las últimas recomendaciones con respecto a prevención, diagnóstico y tratamiento de la infección por C. difficile.

Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) is one of the leading causes of infection associated with health care with high morbidity and mortality, especially among hospitalized older adults. The increase in the use of antibiotics has been associated with a higher number of cases and greater virulence. Its clinical presentation ranges from asymptomatic carriers to toxic megacolon. Studies with stool tests (glutamate dehydrogenase, toxins A and B, and nuclear acid amplification techniques) should be considered in these cases. Fidaxomicin, fecal microbiota transplant, and new therapies such as monoclonal antibodies have been incorporated into the therapeutic arsenal, with a higher level of evidence. Nevertheless, the severity, patient comorbidity, recurrence risk factors, and the economic cost of each therapeutic option must be considered. This review aims to update the last guidelines proposed by the Chilean Societies of Gastroenterology and Infectious Diseases published in 2016, providing the latest recommendations regarding prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of C. difficile infection.

Safety of Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.

In recent years, better knowledge of the pathophysiology of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) has led to a relevant expansion of the therapeutic arsenal for these conditions. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are a family of small molecules that block one or more of the intracellular tyrosine kinases, including JAK-1, JAK-2, JAK-3 and TYK-2. Tofacitinib, a non-selective small molecule JAK inhibitor, and upadacitinib and filgotinib, which are selective JAK-1 inhibitors, have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for moderate-to-severe active ulcerative colitis. Compared to biological drugs, JAK inhibitors have a short half-life, rapid onset of action, and no immunogenicity. Both clinical trials and real-world evidence support the use of JAK inhibitors in the treatment of IBD. However, these therapies have been linked with multiple adverse events (AEs) including infection, hypercholesterolemia, venous thromboembolism, major adverse cardiovascular events, and malignancy. While early studies recognized several potential AEs, post-marketing trials have shown that tofacitinib may increase the risk of thromboembolic diseases and major cardiovascular events. The latter are seen in patients aged 50 years or older with cardiovascular risk factors. Hence, the benefits of treatment and risk stratification need to be considered when positioning tofacitinib. Novel JAK inhibitors with a more selective effect on JAK-1 have proven to be effective in both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, offering a potentially safer and efficacious therapeutic option to patients, including those with previous non-response to other therapies such as biologics. Nevertheless, long-term effectiveness and safety data are required.

Corticosteroids in inflammatory bowel disease: Are they still a therapeutic option? / Corticoides en la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal: ¿siguen siendo una opción terapéutica?

Despite the development and incorporation of new therapeutic strategies, such as biologic therapy and small molecules, corticosteroids still play an important role in inducting inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) remission. Variables like indicating the right doses at the right time, in adequate intervals, the security of these drugs and the pharmacological alternatives available must be considered by the providers when they are indicated to patients with IBD. Although the use of corticosteroids is considered as a marker of quality of care in patients with IBD, the use of these drugs in the clinical practice of IBD is far from being the correct one. This review article is not intended to be just a classic review of the indications for corticosteroids. Here we explain the scenarios in which, in our opinion, steroids would not be an appropriate option for our patients, as well as the most frequent mistakes we make in our daily practice when using them.

[Update in diagnosis and management of Clostridioides difficile]. / Actualización en el diagnóstico y manejo de la Infección por Clostridioides difficile.

Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) is one of the leading causes of infection associated with health care with high morbidity and mortality, especially among hospitalized older adults. The increase in the use of antibiotics has been associated with a higher number of cases and greater virulence. Its clinical presentation ranges from asymptomatic carriers to toxic megacolon. Studies with stool tests (glutamate dehydrogenase, toxins A and B, and nuclear acid amplification techniques) should be considered in these cases. Fidaxomicin, fecal microbiota transplant, and new therapies such as monoclonal antibodies have been incorporated into the therapeutic arsenal, with a higher level of evidence. Nevertheless, the severity, patient comorbidity, recurrence risk factors, and the economic cost of each therapeutic option must be considered. This review aims to update the last guidelines proposed by the Chilean Societies of Gastroenterology and Infectious Diseases published in 2016, providing the latest recommendations regarding prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of C. difficile infection.

Trasplante de microbiota fecal por colonoscopía en una mujer embarazada con infección recurrente por Clostridioides difficile / Fecal microbiota transplantation through colonoscopy for Clostridioides difficile recurrent infection in a pregnant woman

El diagnóstico de la infección por Clostridioides dfficile (ICD) ha aumentado en el embarazo y periparto. Cambios fisiológicos e inmunológicos normales durante el embarazo pueden incrementar el riesgo de ICD. Mujeres embarazadas con ICD tienen una mayor frecuencia de fracaso al tratamiento y una significativa morbilidad y mortalidad. El trasplante de microbiota fecal (TMF) se ha convertido en el tratamiento estándar de la ICD recurrente y refractaria. Sin embargo, existen escasos datos sobre sus resultados en mujeres embarazadas. Presentamos el caso de una mujer embarazada que se sometió con éxito a un TMF para el tratamiento de una ICD recurrente.

The diagnosis of Clostridioides dfficile infection (CDI) in pregnant and peripartum women has increased. In this scenario, there are higher rates of treatment failure and a significant maternal morbidity and mortality. Fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) has become the gold standard for the treatment of recurrent and refractory CDI however, there are few data on its results in pregnant patients. This case showed that FMT could be a therapeutic strategy in pregnant women with recurrent CDI.

Trasplante de microbiota fecal por colonoscopía en paciente mayor de 65 años con infección recurrente de Clostridioides difficile: aún una estrategia subutilizada / Fecal microbiota transplantation in an older patient with Clostridioides difficile recurrent infection. Report of one case

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a major public health problem and responsible for significant morbidity and mortality. Eighty percent of CDIs occur in adults older than 65 years of age due to a decreased gastrointestinal microbial diversity, immunosenescence and frailty. Thus, the most reported risk factor for recurrent CDI is older age since nearly 60% of cases occur in individuals aged ≥ 65 years. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a highly cost-effective alternative to antibiotic treatment for patients with recurrent CDI. We report a 75-year-old male with recurrent CDI, who received a FMT after several unsuccessful antimicrobial treatments. He had a satisfactory evolution after the procedure and remained without diarrhea during the ensuing five months.

Anemia en la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal: un objetivo subestimado / Anemia in inflammatory bowel disease

Anemia is the most common extraintestinal manifestation of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Although there are several causes of anemia in IBD, the two most frequent etiologies are iron deficiency anemia and anemia of chronic disease. Despite the high prevalence of anemia in IBD and its significant impact on patient's quality of life, this complication is still underdiagnosed and undertreated by providers. Active screening for anemia, structured assessment, comprehensive management, and multidisciplinary collaboration are needed in IBD patients. The cornerstone of anemia management depends on the underlying etiology along with normalization of inflammatory activity. Although, oral iron is effective for the treatment of mild iron deficiency-related anemia, intravenous iron formulations have a good safety profile and can be used as first-line therapy in patients with active IBD, severe anemia and previous intolerance prior to oral iron. After proper treatment of anemia, careful monitoring is necessary to prevent its recurrence. Herein, we discuss the etiology, screening, diagnosis, therapy selection, and follow-up for anemia in IBD.