A prognostic model based on combining estrogen receptor expression and Ki-67 value after neoadjuvant chemotherapy predicts clinical outcome in locally advanced breast cancer: extension and analysis of a previously reported cohort of patients.

BACKGROUND: Ki-67 expression has gained attention as a breast cancer prognostic factor, however its significance in the remaining malignant cells after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has been rarely examined. This investigation, extension and analysis of a previously reported cohort of patients, evaluates the significance of Ki-67 and estrogen receptor (ER) expression after NAC in LABC (locally advanced breast cancer). PATIENTS AND METHODS: clinical stage, tumor size, clinical and pathological lymph node involvement, Ki-67, ER, progesterone receptor (PgR), HER2 expression, grading and clinical response were evaluated before and after NAC in 110 patients with LABC. Ki-67 expression was assessed both in pre and post-therapy histological samples, using >15% positive cells as cut-off value to distinguish high from low Ki-67 expressing tumors. RESULTS: six patients (5.45%) attained pCR after NAC. A significant relationship between elevated post-CT Ki-67 and ER expression was showed at Cox multivariate analysis of disease free survival (DFS). On univariate analysis high post-chemotherapy Ki-67 and ER status were associated with worse survival; at multivariate model included these results were confirmed. Based on these two parameters, a prognostic model identified two different groups: low risk (low postchemotherapy Ki-67 and ER positive, or either high post-chemotherapy Ki-67 or ER negative), and high risk (high post-chemotherapy Ki-67 and ER negative). The low risk group showed a good prognosis (median OS still not reached), while the high risk group had a worse OS (median 41 months). CONCLUSIONS: Ki-67 value after NAC and ER status could predict a worse prognosis among LABC patients treated with NAC.

Prognostic value of estrogen receptor and Ki-67 index after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer expressing high levels of proliferation at diagnosis.

PURPOSE: Breast cancers expressing high levels of Ki-67, a nuclear marker of cell proliferation, are associated with worse outcome. Recent data from neoadjuvant studies indicate that a single measurement of the nuclear proliferation marker Ki-67 in breast carcinoma during neoadjuvant therapy is strongly predictive of long-term outcome. Secondly, recent literature data indicate that prognostic evaluation with Ki-67 may be better after pre-surgical therapy. A retrospective study from a prospectively maintained clinical database to compare the predictive and prognostic significance of biological markers, assessed before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, in locally advanced breast cancer, was performed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The following parameters were considered before and after chemotherapy for their relationship with treatment response and disease-free survival in 64 patients with locally advanced breast cancer: clinical stage, clinical and pathological lymph node involvement, Ki-67, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (Pgr), Her2, tumor grade, clinical response, type of surgery performed, and number of chemotherapy cycles administered. The expression of Ki-67 was assessed using immunohistochemistry in pre-therapy tru-cut and post-therapy surgical excision specimens after neoadjuvant chemotherapy; only patients with breast tumors expressing high baseline Ki-67 (≥ 15%) were included in the analysis. In addition, the correlation between pre-chemotherapy biological markers and clinical and pathological response was reported. RESULTS: Post-chemotherapy Ki-67 proliferation index decrease, pre-chemotherapy ER expression and post-chemotherapy ER expression were the only significant prognostic factors adversely influencing disease-free survival in univariate analysis. Her2 overexpression was the only factor to impact on the clinical response. CONCLUSIONS: Post-treatment Ki-67 and ER status were predictors of outcome for patients with locally advanced breast cancer and a high pre-chemotherapy proliferation index.

Influence of aging and other cardiovascular risk factors on baroreflex sensitivity.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the influence of known cardiovascular risk factors (cholesterol, blood glucose levels, arterial pressures, heart rate, and aging) on baroreflex sensitivity. DESIGN: An observational epidemiological study. SETTING: Geriatric Division at the Policlinico Umberto Primo, University of Rome La Sapienza. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred three subjects whose ages ranged from 9 to 94 years, apparently healthy and free of detectable clinical evidence of atherosclerosis. MEASUREMENTS: All subjects underwent determination of baroreflex sensitivity by phenylephrine infusion (BSphe), and by a noninvasive method derived from spectral analysis of R-R interval and arterial pressure variabilities (alpha index). RESULTS: The population, subdivided into tertiles for each variable studied, had lower BSphe values and lower alpha indexes as a function of age, plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and systolic blood pressure. The alpha index was significantly lower in both groups with elevated LDL cholesterol levels than in those with lower levels (II and III vs I tertile, P <.001), whereas BSphe differed significantly only in the two groups who had extreme levels of LDL (I vs III tertile, P <.001). Multiple regression analysis identified a negative association of the alpha index with age (P <.001), heart rate (P <.01), area under the glucose-response curve (P <.001), and LDL cholesterol (P <.01), but of BSphe only with age (P <.001) and heart rate (P <.01). CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that some risk factors for coronary heart disease adversely influence baroreflex sensitivity.

Influence of age, the autonomic nervous system and anxiety on QT-interval variability.

As QT variability increases and heart rate variability diminishes, the QT variability index (QTVI) - a non-invasive measure of beat-to-beat fluctuations in QT interval on a single ECG lead - shows a trend towards positive values. Increased QT variability is a risk factor for sudden death. Aging lengthens the QT interval and reduces RR-interval variability. In the present study we investigated the influence of aging and the autonomic nervous system on QT-interval variability in healthy subjects. We studied 143 healthy subjects, and divided them into two age ranges (younger and older than 65 years). For each subject we measured two QTVIs: from the q wave to the end of the T wave (QTeVI) and to the apex of the T wave (QTaVI). Both indexes were calculated at baseline and after sympathetic stress. In 10 non-elderly subjects, both QTVIs were determined after beta-adrenoreceptor blockade induced by intravenous infusion of propranolol or sotalol. The QTVI was higher in elderly than in younger subjects (P<0.001). QTVIs obtained during sympathetic stress remained unchanged in the elderly, but became more negative in the younger group (P<0.05). QTeVI and QTaVI at baseline were correlated positively with age (P<0.01) and anxiety scores (P<0.05), but inversely with the low-frequency spectral power of RR-interval variability (P<0.001). QTVIs were higher in subjects with higher anxiety scores. In younger subjects, sotalol infusion increased both QTVIs significantly, whereas propranolol infusion did not. In conclusion, aging increases QT-interval variability. Whether this change is associated with an increased risk of sudden death remains unclear. The association of abnormal QT-interval variability with anxiety and with reduced low-frequency spectral power of heart rate variability merits specific investigation. In healthy non-elderly subjects, acute sympathetic stress (tilt) decreases the QTVI. beta-Adrenoreceptor blockade inhibits this negative trend, thus showing its sympathetic origin. Because a negative trend in QTVI induced by sympathetic stress increases only in younger subjects, it could represent a protective mechanism that is lost with aging.

Is salvage chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer always effective and well tolerated? A phase II randomized trial of vinorelbine versus 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin versus combination of mitoxantrone, 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin.

Metastatic breast cancer remains an incurable disease and the median overall survival has not significantly improved over the past two decades. Aims of the present randomized phase II trial were to analyse activity and toxicity of chemotherapies with single agent or with combination regimens in previously treated patients with advanced breast cancer. Ninety-nine eligible patients were randomized to receive the following chemotherapies: Arm A - vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 i.v. weekly; Arm B - leucovorin 100 mg/m2 i.v. followed by 5-fluorouracil 370 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 --> 5, q 28 days; Arm C - mitoxantrone 12 mg/m2 i.v. only day 1 + leucovorin 100 mg/m2 i.v. followed by 5-fluorouracil 370 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 --> 3, q 28 days. Patients characteristics are comparable in the three groups. The median number of chemotherapy courses administered was 7, 6 and 5 in arm A, B and C, respectively. Objective responses were 24%, 30% and 21% and the median duration of responses were 2, 2.5 and 5.5 months in the arm A, B and C, respectively. Median overall survivals were 9.5, 9 and 9 months in the three arms. No difference was noted comparing the survivals of responding or non responding patients. General toxicity was not mild, with 27.5% of patients experiencing WHO grade 3-4 toxicities. Our results are similar in the three groups of patients and comparable to those reported by other authors. Chemotherapy applied to patients with second or subsequent recurrence allow objective responses in a small percentage of patients. Moreover responders have a negligible prolongation of survival.

A randomized trial of chemotherapy with or without estrogenic recruitment in locally advanced breast cancer. North-West Oncology Group (GONO) Study, Italy.

The present phase III trial was carried out to verify whether a kinetic recruitment induced by low doses of diethylstilbestrol (DES) could increase the killing efficacy of chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. One-hundred and seventeen untreated patients with locally advanced breast cancer (stage IIIA/IIIB) were randomized to receive 3 courses of primary chemotherapy consisting of cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2 i.v.), doxorubicin (50 mg/m2 i.v.) and fluorouracil (600 mg/m2 i.v.) (CAF) on day 1, or DES-CAF (DES, 1 mg orally days 1-3, CAF on day 4). The courses were repeated every 3 weeks. The patients who achieved an objective response were submitted to mastectomy followed by 3 courses of CAF alternated with 3 courses of CMF (cyclophosphamide, 600 mg/m2 i.v.; methotrexate, 40 mg/m2 i.v.; fluorouracil, 600 mg/m2 i.v.), with or without DES. The two treatment arms were well balanced in terms of clinical and pathologic features. There was no significant difference in response rates to induction chemotherapy between the two treatment arms (objective response rate, 63.3% for CAF and 56.1% for DES-CAF). Median overall survival was 49 and 47 months and median progression-free survival was 24 and 21 months for CAF and DES-CAF patients, respectively. Toxicity was not significantly different in the two groups, with the exception of leukopenia: DES chemotherapy was significantly more myelotoxic than the standard treatment, which resulted in a significant reduction in the actual dose intensity. In spite of the attractive experimental evidence, we conclude that so far there is no clinical advantage in the combination of estrogen and chemotherapy. Further research is needed to investigate different schedules of chemotherapy and hormones, or to test the possibility of combining various mitogens.

Tamoxifen and interferon-beta for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

It has been demonstrated, both in breast cancer cell lines and in metastatic breast cancer patients with cutaneous lesions that could be biopsied, that treatment with interferon beta (IFN-B) can increase expression of both estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptors (PgR). To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of IFN and tamoxifen, 33 metastatic breast cancer patients were treated with the following regimen: IFN-B, 6.0 million units intramuscularly IU 3 times a week for two consecutive weeks followed by IFN-B 6.0 million IU im 3 times a week with concomitant tamoxifen 20 mg orally daily. Patients were pre and postmenopausal with median age of 60 years, median ECOG PS of 0, either ER positive or unknown, and had not received prior hormone therapy for metastatic disease. Overall objective response was observed in 9 (27%) patients. Complete response was observed in 2 cases and partial response in 7 patients. Median duration of response was 7 months (range 2-10). A higher response rate was observed in patients with predominantly soft tissue disease (38%) compared to patients with either dominant bone (18%) or visceral lesions (17%). Toxicity was mild and reversible: low grade fever in 30% of patients and flu-like symptoms in 9% of cases. It appears that IFN-B does not improve the efficacy of tamoxifen in an unselected population of metastatic breast cancer.

Locally advanced non-metastatic breast cancer: analysis of prognostic factors in 125 patients homogeneously treated with a combined modality approach.

125 stage III breast cancer patients, including 51 cases of inflammatory carcinoma, were treated with the following combined modality approach: three courses of primary 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide (FAC) chemotherapy followed by locoregional treatment and subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of three courses of FAC alternating with three courses of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF). Clinical response to primary FAC was 65% (complete 10%). Residual tumour mass in the mastectomy specimen was > 1 and < or = 1 cm in 82 and 18% of cases, respectively. Complete pathological response following primary chemotherapy was achieved in only 3.5% of cases. After primary FAC and local treatment, 97% of patients were disease-free. Overall survival (S) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 5 years were 56 and 34%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that age, receptor status and clinical and pathological response to primary chemotherapy did not appear to influence treatment outcome significantly, whereas stage, presence of inflammatory disease and number of involved nodes had a significant impact on both S and PFS.

Relationship of variations in tumor cell kinetics induced by primary chemotherapy to tumor regression and prognosis in locally advanced breast cancer.

The relationship of changes in 3H-thymidine labelling index (TLI) induced by primary chemotherapy to tumor response and relapse rate in 36 patients with previously untreated locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) was analyzed. All patients received primary chemotherapy (3 cycles FAC), followed by mastectomy and subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy (3 FAC alternated with 3 CMF). Tumor TLI was evaluated immediately prior to primary chemotherapy and at the time of mastectomy. Median pretreatment TLI was used to discriminate between tumors with a high or low proliferative rate. Clinical objective response to primary chemotherapy was 83% in patients with high TLI and 56% for those with low pretreatment TLI (p = 0.06). Primary chemotherapy induced a > or = 50% reduction of the proliferative rate in 83% and 39% of the tumors with high and low pretreatment TLI, respectively (p = 0.006). Patients were classified into 4 groups according to TLI values both before and after primary chemotherapy: patients who remained in the high TLI group after primary FAC had the highest response rate (100%) and the lowest 2-year relapse rate (20%). These data suggest that: a) improved response to aggressive cytotoxic treatment occurs in tumors with high TLI at diagnosis; b) there is a significant correlation between TLI changes induced by primary chemotherapy and pretreatment proliferative activity; c) patients who remain in the high TLI group after primary chemotherapy are more likely to benefit from subsequent adjuvant systemic therapy.

Phase II study of weekly mitoxantrone, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin in metastatic breast cancer.

A phase II study to test the toxicity and the efficacy of a weekly combination of Mitoxantrone, 5-Fluorouracil and L-Leucovorin (MFL) was carried out in 43 patients with metastatic breast cancer. Chemotherapy consisted of mitoxantrone 4 mg/m2, 5-fluorouracil 375 mg/m2, and L-leucovorin 100 mg/m2 on day 1, weekly. Patient characteristics were: median age 53 years (range 36-65); estrogen receptor (ER) status was known in 26 patients and of these 15 (57.7%) patients were ER-positive and 11 (42.3%) ER-negative. Of the 43 patients, 25 (58.1%) and 18 (41.9%) patients had received prior adjuvant chemotherapy and prior adjuvant endocrine treatment, respectively. MFL was administered to 22 (51.1%) patients as first line chemotherapy for advanced disease, while 21 (48.9%) patients had received 1 to 2 cytotoxic regimens for metastatic disease. The dominant sites of metastases were: soft tissue in 11 (25.5%) patients, bone in 8 (18.6%) patients and viscera in 24 (55.9%). All patients were assessable for toxicity: only 8 patients experienced WHO grade 3 leukopenia. Thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, stomatitis, and nausea/vomiting were negligible. Anemia and alopecia were not observed. Thirty-nine patients were assessable for response: overall response rate was 28.2% (complete response 7.7% and partial response 20.5%). Median duration of response was 12 months (range 6-34). Patients with no prior anthracyclines had a 42.1% response rate compared to 15% in patients who had received anthracyclines. Median overall survival of the 43 patients was 6 months (range 1-34). Weekly MFL is a well-tolerated and a moderately effective regimen for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

Lymphoblastoid interferon in advanced breast cancer: a phase II study.

Thirty-two metastatic breast cancer patients entered a phase II study in order to evaluate the toxicity and the clinical activity of lymphoblastoid interferon (IFN). The treatment was divided into two phases, induction and maintenance. During the first, patients were submitted to lymphoblastoid IFN at the dose of 3 MU die intramuscularly for 4-8 weeks; during maintenance treatment IFN was given at the same dosage, intramuscularly, every other day until progression. Five patients with inadequate follow-up were excluded from disease evaluation, thus 27 patients were evaluable for response. No complete response was observed; one patient achieved a partial response and 15 patients disease stabilization. Median time to progression in patients with partial response or stable disease was 11 weeks (range 2-32). Five patients with soft tissue metastases were biopsied before and after 1-2 months of treatment in order to perform Labelling Index and hormonal receptor status determinations. No significant modification was observed.

Serum CEA, CA 15-3, and MCA in breast cancer patients: a clinical evaluation.

With the aim of investigating the clinical usefulness of CEA, CA 15-3, and MCA serum levels, we studied 143 women whose breast cancer was submitted to serial tumor marker determinations: 79 women had stage I-II tumors and were undergoing follow-up after local and adjuvant treatment; 64 women presented metastatic lesions. Among the stage I-II patients, 63 women remained disease-free during the observation period and 16 developed metastases. In 13 out of 16 patients, tumor markers were elevated and in 11 out of 16 patients the increased tumor markers were the first sign of disease progression. Among metastatic patients, 49 presented increased tumor markers and 15 normal value. Moreover, we observed a decrease or normalization of tumor markers in patients responding to treatment and increased values in progressive disease. No correlation was noted between site of disease and tumor markers. We concluded that tumor markers are of clinical value in the detection of metastasis and may be useful in monitoring response to treatment in metastatic patients.

Mitoxantrone and mitomycin C as second-line treatment for advanced breast cancer.

Forty-three evaluable patients with advanced breast cancer were treated with a combination of mitoxantrone 10 mg/sqm and mitomycin C 10 mg/sqm every 3 weeks. Two patients (4%) achieved objective responses lasting 3 and 16 months. The median duration of survival after protocol entry was 6 months (range 1-22) and the median progression-free survival was 3.5 (range 1-20). Only mild toxicities were observed. We concluded that the mitoxantrone and mitomycin C combination has limited toxicity but low activity and only brief disease palliation in advanced breast cancer.

The impact of chemotherapy on the quality of life of breast cancer patients.

One hundred and thirty-seven breast cancer patients, 102 receiving adjuvant chemotherapy and 35 receiving palliative chemotherapy for metastatic disease underwent a 37-item quality-of-life questionnaire to evaluate the impact of disease and treatment on physical, psychological and social well being. Patient groups were designated as follows--Adj CT: patients undergoing the questionnaire during their adjuvant chemotherapy program; Post Adj CT: patients evaluated 3 to 8 months after termination of adjuvant chemotherapy; Mts CT: patients assessed during palliative chemotherapy for metastatic disease, and Post Mts CT: patients 3 to 8 months after termination of palliative chemotherapy. Physical and social activities were reported as unaltered or normal by 64 to 70% and 52 to 67% of patients, respectively. Psychological status was judged normal by 39 to 45% of patients. No significant differences were observed between the patients groups. In 83 to 90% of cases the patient normally took care of herself. In 62 to 87% of cases time dedicated to recreational activities was reported as unaltered. The majority of patients (84%) judged that their relationship with partner and/or family were good. Severe anxiety was reported in 19 to 28% of patients and severe depression was infrequent (3.9%). Information regarding disease and treatment given by health professionals was considered satisfactory by 80 to 100% of patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Tamoxifen and alpha interferon in advanced breast cancer.

Thirteen pretreated advanced breast cancer patients received a combination of alpha interferon 5 million IU every 2 days, subcutaneously, plus tamoxifen 10 mg 3 times daily, until disease progression. The objective response rate was 15.4%: 1 patient achieved a complete response, 1 a partial response and 11 demonstrated stable disease; half of the patients were receptor negative and/or pretreated with hormonotherapy. Durations of response were 16 and 26 months for the CR and PR patients respectively; median progression-free survival was 4 months (range 0-26). Toxicities were registered according to WHO criteria: 4 patients stopped the treatment with interferon because of severe flu-like symptoms, while in the others the combination was generally accepted with good tolerance.