Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
3.
J Tehran Heart Cent ; 12(1): 11-14, 2017 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28469686

ABSTRACT

Background: Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) provides systemic arterial support without directly unloading the left heart, which causes an elevated left ventricular (LV) pressure. The aim of the present study was to investigate the adjunctive application of the Impella device for LV unloading in patients during ECMO. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients who received Impella support in addition to venoarterial ECMO between April 2012 and December 2015. ECMO cannulation was performed peripherally or centrally, while the Impella device was surgically inserted into the femoral artery or the right axillary artery. Results: Among 62 patients, 10 (16.1%) received an Impella device during ECMO support. Following Impella support, right atrial pressure improved from a median of 18 (IQR, 14-24) mmHg to 13 (IQR, 10-15) mmHg and pulmonary wedge pressure improved from 30 (IQR, 26-35) mmHg to 16 (IQR, 12-19) mmHg in all the patients (p value < 0.001). Follow-up transthoracic echocardiograms (n = 6) showed a median decrease of 0.8 cm in LV end-diastolic volume (p value = 0.021). There were 5 (50%) in-hospital deaths due to sustained brain injury (n = 3) and refractory cardiogenic shock (n = 2). The remaining 5 patients were discharged and successfully bridged to more permanent LV assist device (n = 2) or heart transplantation (n = 3). Conclusion: The findings of the present study indicate that the application of the Impella device during ECMO support is effective in LV unloading and confers optimal hemodynamic support.

4.
Heart Lung ; 46(2): 106-109, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28063605

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) has been suggested for cardiopulmonary support in patients with massive pulmonary embolism (PE) refractory to other treatment or as bridging to embolectomy. The survival benefit from ECMO in patients with massive PE remains unclear. METHODS: Here, we describe 5 cases in which ECMO was used as cardiopulmonary support following massive near-fatal pulmonary embolism. RESULTS: The overall mortality in patients with massive PE that received ECMO support was 40%. Death occurred secondary to ECMO-related complication in one case and due to inability to maintain adequate cerebral perfusion despite ECMO support in the second case. CONCLUSIONS: ECMO can be considered as a treatment modality for patients with massive PE.


Subject(s)
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/methods , Pulmonary Embolism/therapy , Adult , Aged , Embolectomy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , New Jersey/epidemiology , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnosis , Pulmonary Embolism/mortality , Severity of Illness Index , Survival Rate/trends , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
5.
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann ; 25(1): 31-34, 2017 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27913738

ABSTRACT

Background Patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement can experience severe perioperative complications leading to hemodynamic instability and death. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation can be used to provide cardiorespiratory support during this time. Methods From 2012 to 2015, of 247 patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement, 6 (2.42%) required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. Their mean age was 82 ± 7.4 years, mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 9.4 ± 6.6, and mean aortic gradient was 28.3 ± 12 mm Hg. Rescue extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was required for hemodynamic instability due to ventricular fibrillation ( n = 1), respiratory failure ( n = 1), left ventricular wall rupture ( n = 2), and aortic annulus rupture ( n = 1). In one patient, prophylactic extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was required due to advanced heart failure. Additional procedures included valve-in-valve implantation ( n = 1), conversion to an open procedure ( n = 3), and intraaortic balloon pump insertion ( n = 1). Results The median hospital stay was 20 days. There were 2 hospital deaths in patients whose hospital course was complicated by left ventricular wall rupture or aortic annulus rupture with resulting tamponade. Among the 4 survivors, one required continuous ventilator support following discharge, and 3 experienced no major complications during the first month after discharge. Conclusions Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation can be considered a viable option for high-risk patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement and those who develop cardiac complications following this procedure and require cardiorespiratory support.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Cardiac Catheterization/adverse effects , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Heart Diseases/therapy , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Heart Valves , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnosis , Aortic Valve Stenosis/mortality , Aortic Valve Stenosis/physiopathology , Cardiac Catheterization/methods , Cardiac Catheterization/mortality , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/adverse effects , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/mortality , Female , Heart Diseases/diagnosis , Heart Diseases/mortality , Heart Diseases/physiopathology , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Heart Valves/physiopathology , Hemodynamics , Humans , Male , Respiratory Insufficiency/diagnosis , Respiratory Insufficiency/mortality , Respiratory Insufficiency/physiopathology , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...