Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Pediatr ; 122(5 Pt 1): 799-802, 1993 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8496765

ABSTRACT

To test the hypothesis that codeine and dextromethorphan are effective in alleviating the symptoms of acute cough, we conducted a randomized, controlled trial. Eligible patients were children 18 months to 12 years of age, seen in private pediatric practices, with significant night cough of less than 14 days' duration. Study patients were randomly selected to receive codeine, dextromethorphan, or placebo at bedtime for 3 consecutive nights. Outcomes were assessed by the use of a parent questionnaire rating the severity of symptoms at the initiation of therapy, and after each night of the study. Every patient had a cough score (range 0 to 4) and composite symptom score (range 0 to 9) computed for each day of the study. One hundred forty-one doses of study medication were evaluated in 49 patients, including 13 children receiving placebo, 19 dextromethorphan, and 17 codeine. Mean cough and composite symptom scores decreased in each of the three treatment groups on each day of the study; there were no significant differences. Regression analysis, with reduction in cough score as the outcome of interest, showed that neither dextromethorphan nor codeine was significantly more effective than placebo (p = 0.41 and 0.70, respectively). Reduction in cough score was positively correlated with the severity of cough at the start of treatment (p = 0.007). Our data suggest that, in the doses used, neither codeine nor dextromethorphan is superior to placebo in treating night cough in children.


Subject(s)
Codeine/therapeutic use , Cough/drug therapy , Dextromethorphan/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Treatment Outcome
2.
J Pediatr ; 120(5): 763-8, 1992 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1578314

ABSTRACT

We studied the sensitivity of testing the newborn infant's hair, meconium, and urine in detecting gestational cocaine exposure. The infants were born to 59 women who were interviewed to determine their use of cocaine during pregnancy and whose hair was analyzed for the presence of cocaine. Regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between cocaine in newborn hair and in maternal hair. Radioimmunoassay of infants' hair and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry of meconium were more sensitive than immunoassay of urine (p less than 0.02), which failed to identify 60% of cocaine-exposed infants. The quantity of benzoylecgonine in the newborn infant's hair correlated best with the proximal-segment maternal hair, representing the last 12 weeks of antepartum hair growth (R = less than R less than 0.83). Approximately half (52%) of the variation in infants' hair was explained by variation in the proximal maternal hair segment. Correlation (R = 0.77) and explained variation (59%) improved slightly when premature infants (n = 9) were excluded. We conclude that analysis of the newborn infant's hair by radioimmunoassay or of meconium by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry is more sensitive than analysis by immunoassay of urine, and can detect fetal cocaine exposure that occurred during the last two trimesters of pregnancy.


Subject(s)
Cocaine/analysis , Hair/chemistry , Infant, Newborn/urine , Meconium/chemistry , Pregnancy Complications/diagnosis , Substance Abuse Detection/methods , Substance-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Adult , Female , Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry , Humans , Pregnancy , Radioimmunoassay , Sensitivity and Specificity
3.
J Pediatr ; 104(6): 814-8, 1984 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6726511

ABSTRACT

We compared pediatric residents' psychosocial attitude, personality, and in-training examination (American Board of Pediatrics) scores with faculty evaluations of the residents' clinical performance (clinical skills, medical knowledge, interpersonal skills and relationship with other staff) in inpatient, outpatient, and intensive care settings. We found no relationship between psychosocial attitudes and the in-training examination scores or among aggregate faculty ratings, attitudes, and examination scores, but faculty ratings grouped by setting yielded more discriminating results. On inpatient rotations, cognitive knowledge (as reflected by in-training examination scores) was positively correlated with faculty ratings. On intensive care and outpatient rotations, knowledge did not correlate with faculty ratings. Residents' attitudes favoring a psychosocial approach to medical practice were associated with positive evaluations on outpatient rotations but with negative evaluations on intensive care rotations. Psychosocial attitudes seemed to be determined by the social orientation of the resident's personality styles. Our results emphasize the importance of clinical setting to faculty rating and suggest that valued resident characteristics vary by setting. These findings have significant implications for both improving the clinical evaluation of residents and creating a better understanding of the interaction of personality, attitude, and cognitive variables in rated clinical performance.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Educational Measurement , Internship and Residency , Pediatrics/education , Clinical Competence , Cognition , Faculty, Medical , Female , Humans , Male , Personality Assessment
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL