ABSTRACT
SUMMARY: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of different training programs based on small-sided games (SSG) and high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on the body composition of female handball players. A total of 45 female handball players (age: 16.13±0.89 years; training experience: 6.18±1.33 years) were assigned to three groups: game group (GG; N = 15), running group (RG; N = 15), and control group (CON; N = 15). The training programs lasted eight weeks, with two training sessions per week. The GG performed three vs. three small-sided games on a 20 m x 20 m court; the RG performed 15 s HIIT running followed by 15 s of active recovery; the CON group maintained regular handball training. Regardless of the group assignment, all participants were measured for each of the following variables: Body height, body mass, fat-free mass, fat mass, muscle mass, intracellular water, and extracellular water. The results demonstrate significant differences (p0.01) in muscle mass. The GG showed significant (p<0.001) greater improvement in these body composition variables than RG and CON. Body composition variables improved with GG, moving from 2.04 % in fat mass to 1.3 % in extracellular water. In the RG, results show significant improvements (p<0.001) only in intra- and extracellular water. The CON shows improvements in fat-free mass, muscle mass, intracellular water, and extracellular water. To conclude, eight weeks of SSG in handball provide better changes in body composition compared to HIIT 15 s - 15 s and handball training alone.
El propósito de este estudio fue comparar los efectos de diferentes programas de entrenamiento basados en juegos reducidos (SSG) y entrenamiento interválico de alta intensidad (HIIT) sobre la composición corporal de jugadoras de balonmano. Un total de 45 jugadoras de balonmano (edad: 16,13 ± 0,89 años; experiencia de entrenamiento: 6,18 ± 1,33 años) fueron asignadas a tres grupos: grupo de juego (GG; N = 15), grupo de carrera (RG; N = 15) y grupo de control (CON; N = 15). Los programas de formación duraron ocho semanas, con dos sesiones de formación por semana. El GG realizó partidos reducidos de tres contra tres en una cancha de 20 x 20 m; el RG realizó 15 s de carrera HIIT seguidos de 15 s de recuperación activa; El grupo CON mantuvo un entrenamiento regular de balonmano. Independientemente de la asignación de grupo, a todos los participantes se les midió cada una de las siguientes variables: altura corporal, masa corporal, masa libre de grasa, masa grasa, masa muscular, agua intracelular y agua extracelular. Los resultados demuestran diferencias significativas (p0,01) en la masa muscular. El GG mostró una mejora significativa (p<0,001) mayor en estas variables de composición corporal que RG y CON. Las variables de composición corporal mejoraron con GG, pasando de un 2,04 % en masa grasa a un 1,3 % en agua extracelular. En el RG, los resultados mostraron mejoras significativas (p<0,001) sólo en el agua intra y extracelular. El CON indicó mejoras en la masa magra, la masa muscular, el agua intracelular y el agua extracelular. En conclusión, ocho semanas de SSG en balonmano proporcionan mejores cambios en la composición corporal en comparación con el HIIT de 15 s - 15 s y el entrenamiento de balonmano solo.
ABSTRACT
Manual dexterity is a key skill in motor development. There are conflicting studies on the influence of sports practice on this skill and on which type of sport trains this ability the most in youth. Manual dexterity is usually assessed with expensive and time-consuming tools not easily available to facilities such as schools or sports clubs. The aim of this study was to assess differences in manual dexterity performance between young basketball players, sportsmen, and non-sportsmen. A further aim was to analyze whether the coin rotation task was a reliable tool for assessing manual dexterity. Based on the characteristics of the sport, we hypothesized that basketball players had better manual dexterity performances. Seventy-eight participants were included in the study and categorized into "basketball", "sports", and "non-sports" groups. Manual dexterity was assessed with the grooved pegboard, the coin rotation task, and the handgrip tests. The basketball group showed better performance in all tests. Significant differences were found between the basketball group and sports group and between the basketball group and non-sport group in the grooved pegboard (p < 0.05) and in the handgrip (p < 0.05) tests. Test-retest reliability of the coin rotation task scores was moderate in the basketball group (ICC2,1 0.63-0.6). Basketball practice could positively influence manual dexterity. The coin rotation task showed an acceptable construct of validity.