Nonreversed great saphenous vein grafts for vascular reconstruction after resection of lower-limb sarcoma.

OBJECTIVE: Reversed great saphenous vein (GSV) graft is widely used for revascularization in limb-sparing surgery for sarcoma invading great vessels. However, a mismatch in caliber between the reverse graft and cut end of the artery can threaten graft patency. Recently, we introduced the use of a venous valvulotome to allow nonreversed GSV graft. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and versatility of this technique. DESIGN: We retrospectively compared long-term patency and limb salvage rates between nonreversed GSV and reversed GSV in patients undergoing limb-sparing surgery for sarcoma. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients were included, with 21 in the nonreversed GSV group and 16 in the reversed GSV group. Patient characteristics, surgical details, and complications were reviewed from the hospital records. The patency of the reconstructed vessels was assessed using contrast-enhanced CT or MRI. Statistical analyses, including Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, were employed for comparisons. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 38 months. Overall graft patency was 90.4% (19 of 21 patients) in the nonreversed GSV group and 81.2% (13 of 16) in the reverse GSV (RGSV) group. In the nonreversed GSV group, there was 1 case of graft occlusion each in the acute and chronic phases, but limb circulation remained intact and all limbs were spared. CONCLUSION: Nonreversed GSV grafting with valvulotome offers a safe and versatile alternative to reversed GSV grafts in limb-sparing sarcoma surgery. It eliminates the need for vein reversal and minimizes diameter mismatch, potentially expanding the indication for autologous revascularization to previously ineligible cases.

The remarkable antitumor efficacy of corticosteroid treatment in patients with refractory thymomas.

BACKGROUND: Some case reports have found that corticosteroid treatments shrunk thymoma lesions remarkably after the failure of chemotherapy or surgery. However, few studies have comprehensibly evaluated the antitumor effects of corticosteroids in patients with invasive thymomas. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 13 consecutively enrolled patients with locally advanced or metastatic thymomas treated via corticosteroid monotherapies from January 2010 to March 2021 in our institute. A Cox's proportional hazard model and the Kaplan-Meier method were used to identify factors associated with survival. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 26 months (range, 13-115 months). The median initial dose of corticosteroid was 0.90 mg/kg/day prednisolone equivalent (range, 0.4-1.1 mg/kg/day). Of the 13 cases, 7 (53.8%, 95% CI: 0.25-0.81) exhibited a partial response and 5 (38.5%, 95% CI: 0.14-0.68) stable disease. The median progression-free survival was 5.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.5-9.6 months]. The median overall survival was 25.3 months (95% CI: 7.1-not attained). The median duration of corticosteroid use was 3 months (range, 1-64 months). Patients with WHO subtype B thymomas exhibited a better overall response rate to corticosteroids than did patients with other disease subtypes (75%, 95% CI: 0.19-0.99). Adverse events of Grade 3 or more were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: Corticosteroids are clinically valuable for patients with thymomas.

Impact of Durvalumab on the Duration and Complexity of Corticosteroid Therapy for Pneumonitis After Chemoradiotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: It is unclear how the duration and tapering pattern of corticosteroid therapy for pneumonitis changed after the introduction of durvalumab consolidation therapy. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the medical records of patients diagnosed with nonsmall cell lung cancer who received chemoradiotherapy between January 2014 and December 2020. RESULTS: Data for 135 patients treated before durvalumab approval and 100 patients treated with durvalumab after its approval were analyzed. In both groups, more than 70% were male, with a median age of 66 y. Approximately 85% were smokers, and the most common tumor histology was adenocarcinoma. Most patients were treated with doses of 60 and 66 Gy (n = 127 [94%] vs. n = 95 [95%]). Among the patients treated with durvalumab, 57%, 38%, and 5% had grade 1, grade 2, and grade 3 pneumonitis; none had grade 4 or 5 pneumonitis. Patients treated with durvalumab exhibited a longer duration of corticosteroid therapy for pneumonitis (17 wk; range: 2-88 wk) than patients not treated with durvalumab (7 wk; range: 0.4-21 wk; P < 0.001). Pneumonitis relapse was more frequent in patients treated with durvalumab (n = 8; 23%) than in patients not treated with durvalumab (n = 2; 7%). Among the 8 patients treated with durvalumab, 2 had recurrent pneumonitis, 1 could not terminate corticosteroids. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that durvalumab prolongs the duration of corticosteroid therapy and increases the complexity of corticosteroid tapering patterns. This study can help manage pneumonitis caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors and other drugs used after chemoradiotherapy in routine practice and clinical trials.

Multicenter Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Study of Pembrolizumab for Non-small-Cell Lung Cancer in Patients Aged 75 Years and Older.

Pembrolizumab is a major treatment for recurrent or advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, data on its use and pharmacokinetics (PK) in older patients are limited. This open-label, multicenter, observational study evaluated real-world data on the safety, efficacy, and PK of pembrolizumab in older patients with NSCLC. In 99 patients aged ≥75 years, PK was determined by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry on pretreatment samples. Performance status (PS), geriatric assessment (GA), overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. The median age was 78 (75-87) years. PS was 2-3 in 14 patients. The median ORR, PFS, and OS were 47.5%, 8.0, and 20.5 months, respectively. Although PK and ORR were not significantly associated, patients with the lowest Cycle 1-trough quartile (Q1) experienced poorer PFS (Q1 vs. Q2-4; 3.4 vs. 11.8 months, P = 0.006) and OS (Q1 vs. Q2-4; 9.9 vs. 21.7 months, P = 0.005) than in other quartiles overall, and even in the PD-L1 ≥50% subset (PFS, Q1 vs. Q2-4; 4.1 vs. 14.7 months, P = 0.005; OS, Q1 vs. Q2-4; 9.4 vs. 22.1 months, P = 0.010). The Q1 subgroup was characterized by poor PS and lower albumin, and more frequent "weight loss ≥ 10%" on the GA. Pembrolizumab therapy had similar PK and efficaciousness in older as well as younger patients. In patients with PS ≥2, low albumin, and vulnerable GA, early increases in PK levels are less likely, potentially diminishing efficacy even when PD-L1 ≥50%.

Mechanism of ERBB2 gene overexpression by the formation of super-enhancer with genomic structural abnormalities in lung adenocarcinoma without clinically actionable genetic alterations.

BACKGROUND: In an extensive genomic analysis of lung adenocarcinomas (LUADs), driver mutations have been recognized as potential targets for molecular therapy. However, there remain cases where target genes are not identified. Super-enhancers and structural variants are frequently identified in several hundred loci per case. Despite this, most cancer research has approached the analysis of these data sets separately, without merging and comparing the data, and there are no examples of integrated analysis in LUAD. METHODS: We performed an integrated analysis of super-enhancers and structural variants in a cohort of 174 LUAD cases that lacked clinically actionable genetic alterations. To achieve this, we conducted both WGS and H3K27Ac ChIP-seq analyses using samples with driver gene mutations and those without, allowing for a comprehensive investigation of the potential roles of super-enhancer in LUAD cases. RESULTS: We demonstrate that most genes situated in these overlapped regions were associated with known and previously unknown driver genes and aberrant expression resulting from the formation of super-enhancers accompanied by genomic structural abnormalities. Hi-C and long-read sequencing data further corroborated this insight. When we employed CRISPR-Cas9 to induce structural abnormalities that mimicked cases with outlier ERBB2 gene expression, we observed an elevation in ERBB2 expression. These abnormalities are associated with a higher risk of recurrence after surgery, irrespective of the presence or absence of driver mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that aberrant gene expression linked to structural polymorphisms can significantly impact personalized cancer treatment by facilitating the identification of driver mutations and prognostic factors, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of LUAD pathogenesis.

Response to dabrafenib plus trametinib on a rare BRAF mutation (V600_W604 deletion-insertion R) in an advanced non-small cell lung cancer patient.

Although dabrafenib plus trametinib has been approved for BRAF V600E mutation positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), data on its efficacy against uncommon BRAF mutations are still limited due to their rare frequency. We report a case of 70-year-old woman with BRAF V600_W604 deletion-insertion R-positive stage IVA lung adenocarcinoma, who was successfully treated with dabrafenib plus trametinib. Herein, we discuss the oncogenic role of uncommon BRAF mutations and highlight the importance of performing comprehensive genomic profiling on patients without any targetable gene alterations in companion diagnostics.

Rapid Response to Lenvatinib and Disease Flare After Discontinuation in a Patient With Thymic Carcinoma Harboring KIT Exon 11 Mutation: A Case Report.

Lenvatinib, a multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor for c-Kit and other kinases, has exhibited promising efficacy in treating advanced or metastatic thymic carcinoma (TC). Here, we present the case of a patient with metastatic TC harboring a KIT exon 11 deletion and amplification. The patient exhibited a remarkable response to lenvatinib but experienced rapid disease progression after discontinuation of lenvatinib, referred to as a "disease flare." This case report indicates that KIT mutations and amplification can predict lenvatinib response in patients with TC. However, in such cases, there might be a risk of disease flares after lenvatinib discontinuation.

Long-term follow-up and exploratory analysis of lenvatinib in patients with metastatic or recurrent thymic carcinoma: Results from the multicenter, phase 2 REMORA trial.

OBJECTIVES: The main objective of this report was to detail the long-term follow-up data from the REMORA study, which investigated the safety and efficacy of lenvatinib in patients with thymic carcinoma. In addition, an exploratory analysis of the association between relative dose intensity (RDI) and the efficacy of lenvatinib is presented. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The single-arm, open-label, phase 2 REMORA study was conducted at eight Japanese institutions. Forty-two patients received oral lenvatinib 24 mg once daily in 4-week cycles until the occurrence of intolerable adverse events or disease progression. The REMORA long-term follow-up data were evaluated, including overall survival (OS). RDI was calculated by dividing the actual dose administered to the patient by the standard recommended dose. This trial is registered on JMACCT (JMA-IIA00285) and on UMIN-CTR (UMIN000026777). RESULTS: The updated median OS was 28.3 months (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 17.1-34.0 months), and the OS rate at 36 months was 35.7 % (95 % CI: 21.7 %-49.9 %). When grouped by RDI of lenvatinib, the median OS was 38.5 months (95 % CI: 31.2-not estimable) in patients with ≥ 75 % RDI and 17.3 months (95 % CI: 13.4-26.2 months) in patients with < 75 % RDI (hazard ratio 0.46 [95 % CI: 0.22-0.98]; P = 0.0406) at 8 weeks. Patients who maintained their lenvatinib dose over 8 weeks had a higher objective response rate than patients whose doses were reduced (75.0 % vs 29.4 %; P = 0.0379). No new safety concerns or treatment-related deaths were reported, and lenvatinib had a tolerable safety profile. CONCLUSION: This follow-up report updated OS in patients with metastatic or recurrent thymic carcinoma. A higher RDI of lenvatinib at 8 weeks could be associated with improved outcomes.

Efficacy and safety of chemoimmunotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with antibiotics-induced dysbiosis: a propensity-matched real-world analysis.

PURPOSE: The gut microbiota is hypothesized as a prognostic biomarker for cancer immunotherapy. Antibiotic-induced dysbiosis negatively affects the clinical outcomes of immunotherapy. However, the effect of dysbiosis on the efficacy and safety of Chemoimmunotherapy (chemo-IOs), the frontline standard of care, in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unknown. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of chemo-IOs in patients exposed to antibiotics before treatment with those of patients who were not exposed. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with advanced NSCLC treated with first-line chemo-IOs between 2018 and 2020 at the National Cancer Center Hospital. The patients were divided into two groups: those exposed to antibiotics within 30 days before induction therapy (ABx group) and those did not antibiotics (Non-ABx group). Propensity score matching was used to control for potential confounding factors. Clinical outcomes including progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were compared. RESULTS: Of 201 eligible patients, 21 were in the ABx group, and 42 were in the non-ABx group after propensity score matching. No differences in PFS or OS emerged between the two groups (ABx group vs. Non-ABx group) (PFS:7.0 months vs. 6.4 months, hazard ratio [HR] 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49-1.63, OS:20.4 months vs. 20.1 months, HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.44-1.71). The frequency of irAEs before propensity score matching was similar across any-grade irAEs (39.4% vs. 42.9%) or grade 3 or higher irAEs (9.1% vs. 11.3%). CONCLUSION: Antibiotic-induced dysbiosis may not affect the efficacy of chemo-IOs in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Clinical significance of inter-assay discrepancy in PD-L1 evaluation for the efficacy of pembrolizumab in advanced NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression.

INTRODUCTION: Programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression is a predictive biomarker for the efficacy of anti-programmed cell death receptor-1/PD-L1 antibodies in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although several assays have been approved for evaluating PD-L1 expression status, inter-assay discordance has been observed between some assays. The clinical significance of these discrepancies is still unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed treatment-naïve NSCLC patients whose PD-L1 expression was evaluated using both 22C3 and SP142 assays. Among those, efficacy analysis was performed for patients with PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥ 50 % (22C3), who had received first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy. Additionally, transcriptome analysis was conducted in the available tumors with TPS ≥ 50 % to investigate the distinct immune profiles that accompany inter-assay discordance. RESULTS: In total, 611 patients were eligible. Among 198 patients with TPS ≥ 50 %, 91 (46 %) had tumor cell score ≤ 1 (SP142, i.e., inter-assay discrepancy). In the 52 patients who received first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy, treatment efficacy was significantly lower in patients with the discrepancy than that in those without (objective response rate: 18 % vs. 83 %, p < 0.001; median progression-free survival [months]: 3.2 vs. 8.3, p < 0.001). Transcriptome analysis revealed significantly more CD274 splice variants with aberrant 3'-terminal sequences in tumors with the inter-assay discrepancy than in those without. CONCLUSION: The inter-assay discrepancy in the PD-L1 status of tumor cells between the 22C3 and SP142 assays, reflecting an imbalance in the CD274 splice variants, could be a biomarker for primary resistance against pembrolizumab monotherapy in high PD-L1-expressing NSCLCs.

Identification of barriers to implementation of precision oncology in patients with rare cancers.

Established treatment options for rare cancers are limited by the small number of patients. The current comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) testing might not fully exploit opportunities for precision oncology in patients with rare cancers. Therefore, we aimed to explore the factors associated with CGP testing utility in rare cancers and identify barriers to implementing precision oncology. Patients who underwent CGP testing at our institution between September 2019 and June 2021 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Based on their results, the patients received molecularly targeted drugs or immune checkpoint inhibitors. Univariate and multivariate analyses evaluated the association between patient characteristics and the proportion of patients receiving molecularly targeted drugs. Overall, 790 patients underwent CGP testing. Among them, 333 patients with rare cancers were identified, of whom 278 (83.5%) had actionable genomic alterations, 127 (38.1%) had druggable genomic alterations, and 25 (7.5%) received genomically matched therapy. The proportion of patients receiving molecularly targeted drugs was significantly higher among those with treatment options with evidence levels A-D (8.7%) than those without treatment options with evidence levels A-D (2.9%). A potential barrier to CGP testing utility in rare cancers is the limited number of molecularly targeted drugs with clinical evidence. We propose that CGP testing be performed in patients with rare cancers who have treatment options with evidence levels A-D to maximize CGP testing utility in real-world practice.

Advances in cancer DNA methylation analysis with methPLIER: use of non-negative matrix factorization and knowledge-based constraints to enhance biological interpretability.

DNA methylation is an epigenetic modification that results in dynamic changes during ontogenesis and cell differentiation. DNA methylation patterns regulate gene expression and have been widely researched. While tools for DNA methylation analysis have been developed, most of them have focused on intergroup comparative analysis within a dataset; therefore, it is difficult to conduct cross-dataset studies, such as rare disease studies or cross-institutional studies. This study describes a novel method for DNA methylation analysis, namely, methPLIER, which enables interdataset comparative analyses. methPLIER combines Pathway Level Information Extractor (PLIER), which is a non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) method, with regularization by a knowledge matrix and transfer learning. methPLIER can be used to perform intersample and interdataset comparative analysis based on latent feature matrices, which are obtained via matrix factorization of large-scale data, and factor-loading matrices, which are obtained through matrix factorization of the data to be analyzed. We used methPLIER to analyze a lung cancer dataset and confirmed that the data decomposition reflected sample characteristics for recurrence-free survival. Moreover, methPLIER can analyze data obtained via different preprocessing methods, thereby reducing distributional bias among datasets due to preprocessing. Furthermore, methPLIER can be employed for comparative analyses of methylation data obtained from different platforms, thereby reducing bias in data distribution due to platform differences. methPLIER is expected to facilitate cross-sectional DNA methylation data analysis and enhance DNA methylation data resources.

Distinct Progression and Efficacy of First-Line Osimertinib Treatment According to Mutation Subtypes in Metastatic NSCLC Harboring EGFR Mutations.

Introduction: Osimertinib (OSI), a third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is the standard treatment for patients with naive EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Nevertheless, information on how the mutation subtype affects disease progression after the failure of OSI treatment is scarce. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC who received OSI as a first-line treatment between April 2015 and December 2021. Results: This study included 229 patients. The objective response rate was 71%, with intracranial and extracranial response rates of 71% and 90%, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 23.3 mo (95% confidence interval [CI]: 19.6-26.7), and the median overall survival was 33.7 mo (95% CI: 31.3-58.6). Multivariate analysis revealed that the EGFR exon 21 L858R point mutation (L858R) (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.04-2.34, p = 0.0328) and liver metastasis (HR = 2.63, 95% CI: 1.53-4.49, p = 0.0004) were significant predictors of progression-free survival in OSI treatment. The concomitant disease progression involving the central nervous system metastasis was significantly more common in patients with L858R (p = 0.048), whereas concomitant disease progression involving primary lesions was significantly more common in patients with exon 19 deletion mutation (p = 0.01). In addition, the probability of disease progression over time was higher for L858R compared with that for exon 19 deletion mutation, in patients with central nervous system metastasis (log-rank test, p = 0.027). Conclusions: The mutation subtype had an impact not only on the clinical outcome of the first-line OSI treatment but also on progression patterns after OSI treatment in patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations.

Adenovirus pneumonia mimicking osimertinib-induced pneumonitis in a patient with advanced NSCLC with EGFR mutation: A case report.

Drug-related pneumonitis (DRP) caused by epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is a fatal adverse event in patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The diagnosis of DRP is based on radiological findings, the temporal association of presentation with the initiation of a systemic therapeutic agent, and the exclusion of other likely causes. Here we report a case in which severe adenoviral pneumonia mimicking DRP occurred during treatment with osimertinib, and osimertinib was successfully resumed after recovery from adenoviral pneumonia.

First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab with or without chemotherapy for Japanese patients with non-small cell lung cancer: LIGHT-NING study.

OBJECTIVE: As first-line treatment for stage IV or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer, combination immunotherapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab, with or without chemotherapy, had demonstrated survival benefits over chemotherapy; however, data on Japanese patients are limited. METHODS: LIGHT-NING was a multicenter, observational study and retrospectively collected data. In this interim analysis, we analyzed patients who received combination immunotherapy between 27 November 2020 and 31 August 2021 for the treatment status, safety objectives (treatment-related adverse events and immune-related adverse events incidences), and effectiveness objectives (objective response rate and progression-free survival) to determine the characteristics and early safety information. RESULTS: We analyzed 353 patients, with a median follow-up of 7.1 (interquartile range, 5.0-9.7) months. Overall, 60.1 and 39.9% received nivolumab plus ipilimumab with and without chemotherapy, respectively. In these cohorts, the median age was 67 and 72 years; 10.8 and 35.5% were aged ≥75 years; 80.2 and 79.4% were male; 5.2 and 13.5% had a performance score ≥ 2; 32.1 and 27.0% developed grade 3-4 immune-related adverse events; treatment-related deaths were observed in 6 (2.8%) and 5 (3.5%) patients, respectively. Grade 3-4 immune-related adverse event incidence was the highest within the first month of treatment in both cohorts, although the immune-related adverse event risk persisted throughout. No new safety signals were observed at this interim analysis. The median progression-free survival was 6.0 (95% confidence interval, 5.2-7.6) and 5.8 (4.3-7.0) months in nivolumab plus ipilimumab with and without chemotherapy cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: LIGHT-NING offers valuable insights into combination immunotherapy for untreated patients with stage IV or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer in Japanese real-world settings.

Nivolumab Plus Chemotherapy in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutated Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer After Disease Progression on Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: Final Results of CheckMate 722.

PURPOSE: The phase III CheckMate 722 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02864251) evaluated nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after disease progression on EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). METHODS: Patients with disease progression after first- or second-generation EGFR TKI therapy (without EGFR T790M mutation) or osimertinib (with/without T790M mutation) were randomly assigned 1:1 to nivolumab (360 mg once every 3 weeks) plus platinum-doublet chemotherapy (once every 3 weeks) or platinum-doublet chemotherapy alone (once every 3 weeks) for four cycles. Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included 9- and 12-month PFS rates, overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and duration of response (DOR). RESULTS: Overall, 294 patients were randomly assigned. At final analysis (median follow-up, 38.1 months), PFS was not significantly improved with nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy (median, 5.6 v 5.4 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.75 [95% CI, 0.56 to 1.00]; P = .0528), with 9- and 12-month PFS rates of 25.9% versus 19.8%, and 21.2% versus 15.9%, respectively. Post hoc PFS subgroup analyses showed a trend favoring nivolumab plus chemotherapy in patients with tumors harboring sensitizing EGFR mutations (HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.54 to 0.97]), one line of previous EGFR TKI (0.72 [95% CI, 0.54 to 0.97]), or both (0.64 [95% CI, 0.47 to 0.88]). Median OS was 19.4 months with nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus 15.9 months with chemotherapy, while ORR was 31.3% versus 26.7%, and median DOR was 6.7 versus 5.6 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 44.7% and 29.4% of patients treated with nivolumab plus chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone, respectively. CONCLUSION: Nivolumab plus chemotherapy did not significantly improve PFS versus chemotherapy in patients with EGFR-mutated metastatic NSCLC previously treated with EGFR TKIs. No new safety signals were identified.

[History of the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology].

The Japanese Society of Medical Oncology(JSMO)was founded in 1993 by the Research Society of Clinical Oncology, the predecessor of the Society. Twenty years have passed since the transition to JSMO in 2003. During this time, JSMO has contributed to the establishment of the academic field of medical oncology in Japan for many years. On the other hand, over the last 20 years, cancer treatment by anti-cancer agents, which forms the basis of medical oncology, has made significant progress, prolonging the survival period of many advanced cancers. In the last 5 years in particular, there have been remarkable advances in the development and clinical introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors, cancer molecular targeted agents based on genetic abnormalities, and cancer genomic medicine. Furthermore, in addition to conventional multidisciplinary treatment with surgery, radiology, and palliative medicine, collaboration with cancer-related interdisciplinary fields has become extremely important in recent years. For this reason, there is an increasing need for medical oncologists who specialize in organ(cancer type)cross-sectional treatment including cancer genomic medicine, and treat advanced cancer as a systemic disease as a specialist in internal medicine. In this article, we review the history of the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology and the history of medical oncology in Japan and look forward to the future of medical oncology.

Biomarkers of immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.

Immunotherapy is revolutionizing the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer by targeting immune checkpoint proteins, including programmed death-1, programmed death ligand 1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4. Several immune checkpoint inhibitors, including programmed death ligand 1 inhibitors, programmed death-1 inhibitors and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 inhibitors, were approved for the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Programmed death ligand 1 expression is currently the only predictive biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitors to guide the treatment strategy in these patients. However, programmed death ligand 1 expression is not a perfect biomarker for predicting the efficacy of immunotherapy. Therefore, various biomarkers such as tumour mutation burden, tumour microenvironment, gut microbiome and T-cell receptor repertoire have been proposed to predict the efficacy of immunotherapy more accurately. Additionally, combining different biomarkers may provide a more accurate prediction of response to immunotherapy. This article reports the review of the latest evidence of the predictive marker of immunotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Reconsidering the Cutoff Value for Sensitive and Refractory Relapses in Extensive-Stage SCLC in the Era of Immunotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Traditionally, relapsed SCLC has been classified as "sensitive" or "refractory" on the basis of cutoff values (60 or 90 d) for the duration between the last chemotherapy and disease progression. Nevertheless, these cutoff values are not derived from rigorous analytical methods, and their applicability to contemporary treatments remains uncertain. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study on patients with extensive-stage SCLC who underwent second-line therapy after platinum-doublet chemotherapy with or without immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) resistance before (pre-ICI cohort) and after (post-ICI cohort) approval of combination immunotherapy. We selected the optimal platinum-free interval cutoff value with the lowest two-sided p value in the multivariable Cox regression model for second-line overall survival. The internal validity of the chosen cutoff value was assessed using twofold cross-validation. RESULTS: There were 235 and 98 patients in the pre-ICI and post-ICI cohorts, respectively. In the pre-ICI cohort, the optimal cutoff was 59 days (p = 0.0001); the hazard ratio calculated using twofold cross-validation was 1.31 (95% confidence interval: 0.95-1.82]). In the post-ICI cohort, although the 60- and 90-day cutoff values could predict prognosis (60 d; p = 0.002, 90 d; p = 0.005), the optimal cutoff value was 75 days (p = 0.0002), which resulted in a median second-line overall survival of 15.9 and 5.0 months for patients with sensitive and refractory relapse, respectively (hazard ratio = 2.77, 95% confidence interval: 1.56-4.93). CONCLUSIONS: We clarified the previously ambiguous cutoff values for classifying relapsed SCLC and revealed that the 75-day cutoff most accurately predicts subsequent prognosis than the traditional cutoffs in the post-ICI era.