Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Med Invest ; 66(3.4): 285-288, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31656290

ABSTRACT

Purpose : Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a serious complication after gastrectomy for gastric cancer. The purpose of this study is to identify the risk factor of POPF and evaluate C-reactive protein on postoperative day 1 (POD1) as the predictor for POPF after laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG). Methods : Between May 2013 and September 2016, 226 patients who underwent LG for gastric cancer were investigated. Patients were divided into 2 groups; POPF group (n = 17) and control group (n = 209). Clinicopathological factors were compared between 2 groups. Results : In POPF group, there are more male patients (p = 0.003) compared with control group. Preoperative factors, such as age, BMI, and prevalence of previous operation and comorbidity showed no significant difference between 2 groups. Regarding tumor factors and perioperative data such as blood loss and operative time, there were also no significant difference between 2 groups. POPF group showed longer postoperative hospital stay, and higher serum CRP level on POD1 (p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that high CRP level on POD1 ( ≥ 3mg/dl) was independent risk factor of POPF. Conclusions : High serum CRP level on POD1 can predict the occurrence of POPF. J. Med. Invest. 66 : 285-288, August, 2019.


Subject(s)
C-Reactive Protein/analysis , Gastrectomy/adverse effects , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Pancreatic Fistula/etiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors
2.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 29(12): 1501-5, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25223626

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic surgery has become the standard for colorectal cancers, but more minimally invasive surgery is continuously pursued. In June 2011, our institution started needlescopic surgery (NS). The aims of this study are to describe this technique and to investigate its feasibility for left-sided colorectal cancer surgery. METHODS: From June 2011 to June 2013, 105 sigmoid colon and upper/middle rectal cancer patients underwent NS in our institution, involving one 5-mm port and three 3-mm ports, with the exception of an umbilical 12-mm port. A 10-mm scope is used through the umbilical 12-mm port, which will be extended to a small skin incision for specimen extraction. After dissection of the left colon, a 5-mm scope is inserted through the right lower 5-mm port and a linear stapler is inserted through the umbilical 12-mm port for rectal transection. The specimen is then extracted through umbilical incision, and the anastomosis is carried out by the double-staple technique. RESULTS: TNM staging is stage 0/I/II/III/IV = 0/31/32/31/11. Fifty-one patients underwent sigmoidectomy and 54 patients underwent anterior resection. There was no conversion to open surgery, but one patient required a change to a 5-mm port from one of the 3-mm ports. Mean operating time was 193 min and mean estimated blood loss was 12 ml. There were ten (9 %) postoperative complications: two anastomotic leaks requiring reoperation, two anastomotic hemorrhages, and one wound infection. There was no mortality. CONCLUSIONS: NS for left-sided colorectal cancer was a technically and oncologically feasible technique for selected patients.


Subject(s)
Laparoscopy/methods , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Sigmoid Neoplasms/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Laparoscopes , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Laparoscopy/instrumentation , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Operative Time , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Sigmoid Neoplasms/pathology
4.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 17(7): 1299-305, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23653376

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The role of laparoscopic surgery for locally advanced colorectal cancer invading or adhering to neighboring organs is controversial. This study evaluated the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic multivisceral resection for colorectal cancer. METHODS: This study included 126 patients who underwent multivisceral resection for primary colorectal cancer invading or adhering to neighboring organs or structures between July 2005 and November 2012 at our institution. Perioperative outcomes were compared between laparoscopic and open resections. RESULTS: Laparoscopic and open multivisceral resections were performed in 60 and 66 patients, respectively. Conversion to open surgery occurred in 6.7 % of patients. The median operative time was significantly longer (271 vs. 227 min), but the median blood loss was significantly less (40 vs. 205 mL), in the laparoscopic compared with the open group. The R0 resection rate of the primary tumor (95 vs. 98.5 %), number of lymph nodes harvested (18 vs. 18), and postoperative complications (28 vs. 24 %) were comparable between the groups. The median length of hospital stay was significantly shorter (13.5 vs. 18 days) in the laparoscopic compared with the open group. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic multivisceral resection for colorectal cancer invading or adhering to neighboring organs is safe and feasible in selected patients.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Laparoscopy , Viscera/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL