Real-world evidence demonstrates an appropriate atrial fibrillation population for hybrid convergent approach versus stand-alone cryoballoon ablation: A long-term safety and efficacy study.

INTRODUCTION: A hybrid convergent approach (endocardial and epicardial ablation) demonstrated superior effectiveness in a recent randomized study for long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (LSPAF). Yet, there is a lack of real-world, long-term evidence as to which patients are best candidates for a hybrid convergent approach compared to standard endocardial cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (CB PVI). METHODS AND RESULTS: This single-center, retrospective analysis spanning from 2010 to 2015 compared two distinctly different atrial fibrillation (AF) cohorts; one treated with stand-alone cryoablation and one treated with a hybrid convergent approach. Baseline characteristics described candidates for each approach. The following criteria were utilized to determine CB PVI candidacy: (1) paroxysmal AF (PAF) (stage 3A) with failed class I/III antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) or (2) persistent/LSPAF (stage 3B/3C/3D) with failed class I/III AAD unwilling to undergo hybrid procedure. Selection criteria for the hybrid procedure included: (1) PAF refractory to both class I/III AAD and prior CB PVI (stage 3D) or (2) persistent/LSPAF (stage 3B/3C/3D) with failed class I/III AAD agreeable to hybrid procedure. Prior sternotomy was excluded. Serial electrocardiograms and continuous monitoring evaluated primary efficacy outcome of time-to-first recurrence of atrial arrhythmia after a 90-day blanking period. Secondary outcomes were procedure-related complications and AAD use (at discharge, 12, and 36 months). Kaplan-Meier methods evaluated arrhythmia recurrence. Of 276 patients, 197 (64.2 ± 10.6 years old; 66.5% male; 74.1% 3A-PAF; 18.3% 3B/3D-persistent AF; 1.0% 3C-LSPAF; 6.6% undetermined) underwent CB PVI and 79 (61.4 ± 8.1 years old; 83.5% male; 41.8% 3D-PAF; 45.5% 3B/3D-persistent AF; 12.7% 3C/3D-LSPAF) underwent hybrid procedure. Arrhythmia freedom through 36 months was 55.2% for CB PVI and 50.4% for hybrid (p = .32). Class I AAD utilization at discharge occurred in 38 (19.3%) patients in the CB PVI group and 5 (6.3%) patients in the hybrid group (p = .01). CB PVI class I AAD utilization at 12 months occurred in 14 (9.0) patients versus 0 patients for hybrid convergent (p = .004). Patients with one or more adverse event were as follows: two (1.0%) in the CB PVI group (both transient phrenic nerve palsy) and three (3.7%) in the hybrid group (two with significant bleeding and one with wound infection) (p = .14). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that patients with more complex forms of AF (3D-PAF or 3B/3C/3D-persistent/LSPAF) could be well managed with a convergent approach. In a real-world evaluation, outcomes match safety and efficacy thresholds achieved for patients with earlier, less complex AF etiologies treated by CB PVI alone.

Rapid effect of benralizumab in fulminant eosinophilic myocarditis in the setting of uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma.

A 51-year-old male with uncontrolled asthma and recent convalescence from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2c pneumonia presented with cough, dyspnea, and chest pain. Evaluation revealed significant peripheral eosinophilia, elevated troponin, and biventricular failure resulting in cardiogenic shock. He was diagnosed with eosinophilic myocarditis and was subsequently started on high-dose steroids. As he was also diagnosed with eosinophilic asthma and continued to clinically decline requiring inotropic support, he received benralizumab, an anti-eosinophilic monoclonal antibody, as rescue therapy. After benralizumab administration he demonstrated improvement in his left ventricular ejection fraction, normalization of his right ventricular function, and improvement in symptoms with resolution of his hypereosinophilia. Currently, benralizumab is approved for add-on maintenance treatment of patients with an eosinophilic phenotype of severe asthma. To date, only few observational studies have been published revealing rapid improvement in symptoms of acute, severe eosinophilic asthma and eosinophilic myocarditis caused by eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis after administration of benralizumab. This clinical case demonstrates that benralizumab can be used safely in conjunction with steroid therapy for eosinophilic myocarditis. This case also emphasizes the need for further clinical research for utilizing benralizumab in the treatment of eosinophilic myocarditis, eosinophilic asthma, and other hypereosinophilic syndromes in the acute setting. Learning objective: Benralizumab has been approved for add-on maintenance treatment of patients with an eosinophilic phenotype of severe asthma. However, few cases have been published demonstrating the drug's use in acute severe exacerbations. This case presents a patient with fulminant eosinophilic myocarditis and asthma with improvement after administration of benralizumab in addition to high-dose steroids. The future role of the drug in acute eosinophilic exacerbation should continue to be explored.

Revisiting propafenone toxicity.

Propafenone is a Vaughan Williams class 1c antiarrhythmic medication widely used for treatment of arrhythmias. Although the long-term safety of propafenone use has not been established, it is commonly used for treatment of atrial fibrillation in patients with no structural heart disease. Propafenone is well known as pill-in-the-pocket treatment for its effect in terminating paroxysmal episodes of atrial fibrillation. Herein, we discuss an unusual adverse reaction to propafenone in a patient who presented with symptomatic bradycardia and hypotension. The aim of this article is to increase physician awareness for propafenone toxicity and its management, with a focused literature review on propafenone pharmacotherapy.