Impacts of antibiotic and anti-inflammatory therapies on serum prostate-specific antigen levels in the presence of prostatic inflammation: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine if antibiotic or anti-inflammatory medications lower serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in the presence or absence of inflammation in the prostatic secretions of patients with PSA levels between 2.5 and 10 ng/ml and normal digital rectal examinations (DRE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with PSA levels between 2.5 and 10 ng/ml and normal DRE were candidates for the study. One hundred and eight patients with positive expressed prostate secretion (EPS) were randomized into antibiotics, anti-inflammatory and control groups (groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively), and 108 patients with negative EPS were randomized into similar groups (groups 4, 5 and 6, respectively). Repeat PSA levels of all patients were obtained 6 weeks after randomization and 10 core prostate biopsies were performed. RESULTS: Median PSA levels in group 1 before and after treatment were 5.2 (4.3-6.4) and 4.0 ng/ml (3.1-4.9), respectively (p < 0.001). The only significant decrease in PSA was observed in group 1. The percent change in PSA levels in group 1 was significantly greater than both in its control group (group 3; p < 0.001) and the EPS- antibiotics group (group 4; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotherapy significantly reduces serum PSA only in EPS+ patients, which justifies limiting the use of prebiopsy antibiotics to EPS+ patients with a normal DRE and PSA level between 2.5 and 10 ng/ml, minimizing the major drawbacks of empirical antibiotics usage.

How do patients with familial benign prostatic hyperplasia differ clinically from those with sporadic benign prostatic hyperplasia?

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare age, prostatic volume, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), maximal flow rate, serum total prostate-specific antigen (PSA), serum free PSA, free/total PSA ratio and PSA density values of familial and sporadic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients suffering moderate or severe lower urinary tract symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between September 1999 and August 2004, 511 patients with moderate or severe lower urinary tract symptoms (IPSS > or =8) due to BPH were included in the study. Patients with at least 2 first-degree relatives who had undergone surgery or received medication for BPH were classified as having the familial form of the disease, while the remaining patients were taken as sporadic cases. Mean age, prostatic volume, symptom score, maximal flow rate, PSA, free PSA, free/total PSA ratio and PSA density values of the familial and sporadic groups were compared using student's t test. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients had a positive family history and formed the familial group, while the remaining 473 made up the sporadic group. No significant difference was observed in the parameters studied, except that mean prostate volume of the familial group was found to be greater and the mean age to be lower than those of sporadic patients in accordance with the literature. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with familial BPH need treatment significantly earlier and have larger prostates than those with sporadic BPH.