Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
Add more filters











Publication year range
2.
Nature ; 412(6845): 405-8, 2001 Jul 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11473307

ABSTRACT

Dinosaurs, like other tetrapods, grew more quickly just after hatching than later in life. However, they did not grow like most other non-avian reptiles, which grow slowly and gradually through life. Rather, microscopic analyses of the long-bone tissues show that dinosaurs grew to their adult size relatively quickly, much as large birds and mammals do today. The first birds reduced their adult body size by shortening the phase of rapid growth common to their larger theropod dinosaur relatives. These changes in timing were primarily related not to physiological differences but to differences in growth strategy.


Subject(s)
Biological Evolution , Birds , Reptiles/growth & development , Animals , Birds/anatomy & histology , Birds/growth & development , Body Constitution , Bone and Bones/anatomy & histology
3.
Science ; 288(5469): 1173, 2000 May 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10841734
4.
Syst Biol ; 48(2): 352-64, 1999 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12066712

ABSTRACT

It has long been argued that Charles Darwin was the founder of the school of "evolutionary taxonomy" of the Modern Synthesis and, accordingly, that he recognized genealogy and similarity as dual, synergistic criteria for classification. This view is based on three questionable interpretations: first, of isolated passages in the 13th chapter of the Origin of Species; second, of one phrase in a letter that Darwin wrote about the work of an author he had partly misunderstood; and third, of his taxonomic practice in the barnacle monographs, which only implicitly embody his philosophy of classification, if at all. These works, seen in fuller context and with the perspective of extensive correspondence, are consistent with the view that Darwin advocated only genealogy as the basis of classification, and that similarity was merely a tool for discovering evolutionary relationships. Darwin was neither a Mayrian taxonomist nor a cladist, and he did not approach systematic issues in the same terms that we do in the late 20th century.


Subject(s)
Biological Evolution , Classification/methods , Genealogy and Heraldry , Animals , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , Models, Biological
6.
Trends Ecol Evol ; 12(2): 84, 1997 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21237984
7.
Trends Ecol Evol ; 12(6): 228-9, 1997 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21238048
8.
Science ; 265(5171): 550-1, 1994 Jul 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17781314
9.
Science ; 252(5008): 1006, 1991 May 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17843257
10.
Science ; 241(4871): 1358-9, 1988 Sep 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17828937
11.
Science ; 211(4481): 475, 1981 Jan 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17816608
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL