Symptom burden among Northern Alberta radiotherapy patients with advanced cancer: mapping needs and gaps.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with advanced cancer often experience symptoms including pain, nausea, anorexia, fatigue, and depression. High symptom burden can be alleviated by multidisciplinary palliative care (PC) teams practicing symptom-directed management. Patients who are unable to access such services may be at higher risk of increased symptoms and poor outcomes. METHODS: A sequential exploratory mixed methods study was performed to explore the burden of symptoms experienced by Northern Alberta patients with advanced cancer. The symptom burden among patients from rural and remote communities was characterized in a retrospective review capturing basic demographic and clinicopathologic information, in addition to patient-reported outcomes. Symptom prevalence was evaluated against the nature and range of supportive care services available. Service accessibility was assessed at community level by surveying health care providers (HCPs) and performing thematic analysis on their responses. RESULTS: From January 1 to December 31, 2017, 607 outpatients were seen in consultation in an integrated palliative radiotherapy clinic in Edmonton, Alberta. A total of 166 (27.3%) patients resided in Alberta communities designated as rural or remote. Patient-reported symptom prevalence and intensity of scores did not differ significantly between rural/remote and urban populations. Unmet practical needs were flagged significantly more often by patients from rural communities (p = 0.05). HCPs from rural community health centers in Northern Alberta were knowledgeable regarding PC services availability and referral processes within their communities. CONCLUSION: Although the symptom burden experienced by patients living with advanced cancer in rural and remote areas of Northern Alberta does not differ significantly from their urban counterparts, and community HCPs are knowledgeable regarding PC services, unmet needs within these communities remain. Continuing support for PC services in rural communities, as well as establishing care pathways for patients from rural populations traveling to urban centers to receive treatment, will help to minimize the unmet needs these patients experience.

Evolution of the Radiation Therapist Role in a Multidisciplinary Palliative Radiation Oncology Clinic.

BACKGROUND: Palliative radiation therapists (PRTs) have been integrated in varying capacities into outpatient palliative radiation therapy (RT) services across Canada for over 2 decades. At our institution, PRTs have developed an essential role over 11 years within a palliative radiation oncology (PRO) clinic that focuses on integrating symptom management with radiation oncology assessment for palliative RT. PRTs have had direct clinical, technical, research, and administrative involvement as the clinic evolved from a pilot in 2007 supporting one half-day per week to the current model of five full clinical days. METHODS: Using collaborative reflection, we explored the PRTs' experience and insight. Twelve PRTs who contributed to the PRO clinic for varying lengths of time from 2007 through to 2016 were invited to participate in the development of a collective expression of the PRT experience. Seven PRTs consented to completing an electronic survey consisting of fifteen open-ended questions regarding individual roles and perspectives relating to our PRO clinic. Survey answers were enhanced by semistructured interviews when needed for clarification. Responses were contextualized within the operational changes to our multidisciplinary clinical model, from pilot to integrated service. RESULTS/DISCUSSION: Five respondents answered all of the questions. From the narratives, PRT roles and responsibilities were outlined and their insights and reflections included to contextualize clinical changes. Four phases of the clinic were identified and elucidated. Beginning in January 2007, three PRTs staffed a multidisciplinary clinical pilot one half-day per week for single-fraction, symptomatic bone metastases. The clinic has now evolved through various iterations to the current model with four PRTs sharing a "navigator" role with two registered nurses five full clinic days per week. The range of PRT experiences, responsibilities, and challenges encountered reflected specific clinical and operational conditions. CONCLUSION: As our clinical service model evolved from short-term pilot to fully integrated departmental service, so did the PRT role. PRTs contributing to RT as part of a multidisciplinary model support and advance nontraditional involvement in the holistic care of patients with advanced cancer.