ABSTRACT
The past decade has seen the increasing influence and relevance of real-world data (RWD) and real-world evidence (RWE) in healthcare decision making. The value added by RWD/RWE has prompted the pharmaceutical industry to develop high performing systems and practices to harness the power of evidence generated at the global level. However, this worldwide transformation provides outstanding opportunities to support capability building within local affiliates and to impact key country-level stakeholders through resulting evidence. Therefore, we present an Evidence Blueprint Initiative, which links the global and local ("glocal") skills, and furthermore addresses the opportunities and gaps in evidence generation capabilities at the local level. Cross-functional experts were recruited at the local, regional, and global level to define best practices. A framework was developed to characterize the foundational expertise needed and to assess markets' existing capabilities. Subsequently, targeted roadmaps were developed and implemented to build capabilities in specific areas within each affiliate. The impact from the Blueprint is encouraging, resulting in improved local evidence plans, established evidence teams, enhanced RWD use and strategic implementation of patient centric science in local affiliates. The success of the Blueprint resides in empowering affiliates to realise their local evidence generation ambitions and to match them to their local context. It strengthens and expands the ties between various parts of the organisation and the external environment while building fit-for-future evidence capabilities from local affiliates.
ABSTRACT
Background and objectives: Demand for assisted reproduction technology (ART) in Germany is high, with 100,844 treatment cycles during 2016. Many ART procedures involve ovarian stimulation with follicle stimulating hormone (FSH). Recently, biosimilar FSH products have become available. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the recombinant FSH Gonal-f® (Originator) in comparison to biosimilar follitropin alfa, Bemfola® (Biosimilar 1) and Ovaleap® (Biosimilar 2), from a German payer perspective in terms of cost per live birth. Methods: A decision tree model was developed, based on one cycle of assisted reproduction, to compare the original product to biosimilars. Clinical inputs, including live birth rates and adverse event rates were obtained from published randomized trials. Cost inputs were obtained from publicly available German sources. Clinical inputs, model structure and methodology were based on previous publications and validated by a clinical expert. Results: Results indicated that the live birth rate is higher for the Originator compared to Biosimilar 1 (40.7% vs 32.1% respectively), and Biosimilar 2 (32.2% vs 26.8%). The average cost per live birth for women treated with the Originator was estimated to be lower than those who were treated with biosimilars: Originator vs Biosimilar 1 (10,510 vs 12,192), Originator vs Biosimilar 2 (12,590 vs 13,606). The analysis also found that the Originator is associated with an incremental cost-effectiveness of 4,168 and 7,540 per additional live birth versus Biosimilar 1 and Biosimilar 2 respectively. Sensitivity analysis indicated probabilities of pregnancy, embryo transfer and live birth, were key drivers of model costs. Scenario analysis confirmed the robustness of the model outcomes. Conclusion: This study suggests that treatment with the Originator could result in a lower cost per live birth in comparison to biosimilars. Further analysis using real-world data, when available, is recommended to validate the results of the present study.