Social egg freezing: Motivations, treatment experiences and the impact of Covid-19 - a single-center experience.

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to assess the motivations and treatment experiences of women undergoing social egg freezing and to understand the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between January 2011 to December 2021, 191 social egg freezing patients were recruited from the Lister Fertility Clinic, London UK. Participants completed a validated questionnaire investigating patients' perspectives of social egg freezing. A response rate of 46.6% was achieved. RESULTS: In all, 93.9% of women expressed concern regarding age-related fertility decline which influenced their decision to undergo social egg freezing. The majority (89.5%) of women were not in a relationship at the time of social egg freezing and considered this a motivating factor. Also, 39.0% of participants had side effects related to treatment which affected work and social life. Participants were significantly more likely to experience side effects if they underwent multiple egg freezing cycles (χ2 , p < 0.01) or if they cryopreserved oocytes during the COVID-19 pandemic (χ2 , p < 0.05). Of the women, 64.0% wished to have cryopreserved oocytes at a younger age, a view significantly more likely if older than 37 years at first social egg freezing cycle (χ2 , p < 0.001). Also, 82.3% of women reported their decision to undergo social egg freezing was not delayed due to concerns regarding COVID-19 exposure during treatment; 44.1% considered the pandemic made them more willing to undergo social egg freezing. CONCLUSIONS: Most participants did not regret their decision to undergo social egg freezing but the majority wished they had cryopreserved oocytes at a younger age. This highlights the importance of early education to optimize outcomes and patient choice. The egg freezing process can be stressful, women may have concerns around social egg freezing and unprecedented situations such as the COVID-19 pandemic may alter treatment experience.

Does egg-sharing negatively impact on the chance of the donor or recipient achieving a live birth?

This study aimed to discover whether egg sharing compromises the chance of donors or recipients achieving a live birth. A descriptive cohort study was performed of 4,545 fertility patients and 5,316 stimulation cycles at a London based fertility clinic between 2010 and 2019. There was no significant difference in clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) or live birth rate (LBR) between egg sharers and standard IVF patients or between egg sharing recipients and non-egg sharing recipients. Both egg sharers and their recipients had fewer oocytes and fewer day 3 embryos available for fresh embryo transfer or cryopreservation than standard IVF patients or non-egg sharing recipients. The cumulative LBR were significantly lower amongst egg sharers than standard IVF patients (p < 0.05), and significantly lower amongst egg sharing recipients than non-egg sharing recipients (p < 0.05). This study demonstrates that egg sharing does not compromise the chances of donors or their recipients achieving a live birth. However, participants may occasionally require additional ovarian stimulation cycles to conceive. With government funding for IVF treatment falling, egg sharing provides a practical option to allow more women access to IVF. Egg sharing is currently the most efficient way of maximising the use of the precious resource of human oocytes.

Exploring women's attitudes, knowledge, and intentions to use oocyte freezing for non-medical reasons: A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Women are postponing childbearing and preventing age-related fertility decline with oocyte freezing for non-medical reasons (OFNMR). The objective of this systematic evaluation was to gain an understanding of women's attitudes and knowledge of, and intentions to use OFNMR among users of OFNMR and the general public. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PyschINFO databases was undertaken, for studies that examined the psychosocial attitudes among women toward OFNMR. The search was limited to English language and no time restriction was set for publications. Extracted data were analyzed using thematic analysis and the study was performed according to PRISMA guidelines with prospective PROSPERO registration (CRD4201912578). RESULTS: Overall, 35 studies met the inclusion criteria. Studies were broadly categorized into studies investigating users or potential users of OFNMR, and studies examining the views of members of the general public. Users of OFNMR have good knowledge of age-related fertility decline and awareness of the OFNMR procedure. Lack of partner was identified as the most common motivating factor to undertake OFNMR, with cost as a predominant concern. Knowledge among the general public of OFNMR is highly variable. Underestimation of age-related fertility decline is common among the general public. Intentions of women to use OFNMR also varied drastically between studies. CONCLUSIONS: Women are predominantly motivated to freeze eggs by the lack of a suitable partner, but cost is a significant barrier. Increasing the number of women pursuing OFNMR at an earlier stage may positively impact upon the risk of future involuntary childlessness. Better information should be made available to both women and men about their fertility and options to inform their reproductive decision-making.

Analysis of patient and nurse preferences for self-administered FSH injection devices in select European markets.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess product-specific features for a variety of self-administered injection devices and identify key factors that patients and nurses in select European markets find most important when selecting injection devices for self-administration of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone and urinary human follicle-stimulating hormone for fertility/reproductive therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (N=402) in France, Italy, Spain, Germany, the UK, the Netherlands, and Belgium, as well as reproductive/fertility nurses (N=40) in Germany, Italy, France, Spain, and the Czech Republic were surveyed. All patients were previously prescribed a follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) treatment for either in vitro fertilization or ovulation induction. Patient and nurse preferences for attributes across all injection devices in the market were obtained via an online questionnaire and evaluated using the maximum differential scaling (MaxDiff) and conjoint analyses, which captured the relative importance of the selected FSH injection device attributes to determine specific qualities in overall product preference. RESULTS: Both the MaxDiff and conjoint analyses indicated that, for patients and nurses, the ideal FSH injection device would be a highly accurate, multi-use reusable pen injector with a dial-back function that would be easy for both use and education/instruction. Patients and nurses each selected attributes pertinent to their own experiences with the FSH injection device. Categorically, patients valued factors that resulted in minimal impact on daily life, including reduced injection volume to minimize injection-site pain, as well as a reusable device that would be easy to use; nurses placed greater value on a device that would be easy to teach in order to instruct the greatest number of patients while minimizing risk. CONCLUSION: Patient and nurse preferences were aligned on certain selected attributes of the FSH products. Although this study was an unbranded examination of attributes across all injection devices currently in the market, results demonstrated that the preferred product attributes were all characteristics of the Ovaleap® Pen.